Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana (NUK)
Naročanje gradiva za izposojo na dom
Naročanje gradiva za izposojo v čitalnice
Naročanje kopij člankov
Urnik dostave gradiva z oznako DS v signaturi
  • Primerjava hitrih perimetričnih strategij s programom G2 na perimetru Octopus 101 = Comparison of fast perimetric strategies using G2 program on Octopus 101 perimeter
    Pajek, Jernej ; Hawlina, Marko
    Background. The duration of the perimetric examination was significantly shortened by development of fast perimetric strategies. By analyzing the results of normal dynamicand TOP strategy we studied ... the differences in determination of MD, LV, in determination of number of all points with a deficit and number of points with a significant deficit of p < 0.5%. Methods. 22 normal visual fields of 17 subjects (mean age 33 +- 15 years) and 22 visualfields with defects of 17 patients (47 +- 16 years) having different types and degrees of visual lesions were examined. All visual fields were examined once with each strategy in alternating order using Octopus 101 perimeter with the G2 program. Results. No statistically significant differences were measured in MD values. In abnormal visual fields group, TOP strategy showed 11 +- 14 dB2 lower LV values compared to dynamic strategy (p <0.01) and 9.8 +- 16 dB2 Iower LV values compared to normal strategy (p = 0.02). In the abnormal visual fields group the dynamic strategy measured in average 3 points with the deficit less compared to the other two strategies (p< 0.05). There were no significant differences between strategies in the number of points with a deficit of p < 0.59%. Conclusions. With the exception of lower LV values measured with TOP strategy, the differences between TOP, dynamic strategy results are small and the time sparing benefits are substantial Therefore the usage of fast perimetric strategies is clinically justified.
    Vrsta gradiva - prispevek na konferenci
    Leto - 2002
    Jezik - slovenski
    COBISS.SI-ID - 14715097