E-viri
Recenzirano
-
Wang, Jiaan; Xiong, Wei; Small, Mitchell J.; Gardiner, James B.; Stewart, Brian W.; Thomas, R. Burt; Hakala, J. Alexandra; Lopano, Christina L.
International journal of greenhouse gas control, February 2024, 2024-02-00, Letnik: 132Journal Article
•Presented the workflow for the application of a geochemically informed leak detection (GILD) model to an idealized carbon storage site on the Gulf Coast.•Illustrated a method for characterizing measurement variability from background data.•Constructed and fitted Bayesian belief network (BBN) models to predict the probability of CO2 leak detection as a function of the size of the leak and the magnitude of measurement variability.•Quantified the effect of measurement variability on leak detection capabilities of monitoring parameters. The Gulf Coast region possesses great potential for CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and CO2 storage. A geochemically informed leak detection (GILD) model has been applied to CO2 injection sites on the Gulf Coast with considerations of measurement variability. The Jasper aquifer in Montgomery County, Texas, was chosen to demonstrate the method. Based on background data from wells in the area, combinations of mineral and fluid compositions were used to create 23 scenarios for the geochemical model. The output from the geochemical model was used to identify sensitive monitoring species, and response functions were generated for these as a function of the CO2 leakage concentration. The sources of measurement variability for background conditions were characterized from the Jasper aquifer background data, and then normalized using the coefficient of variation of each species across the monitoring wells. Bayesian belief network (BBN) models were constructed, and measurement variability of different levels were added to compare leak detection probabilities. Increasing measurement variability decreased the power to detect a leak of a given size. For a moderately high CO2 concentration of 0.2 mol/kg, the probability of detecting this leakage effect using pH as the monitoring variable in an aquifer with calcite decreases from 98% (no measurement variability) to 61% (medium variability) to 33% (high variability). The loss in power of the sampling protocol with increasing measurement variability is similar in magnitude when Ca2+ or HCO3− is used as the monitoring parameter, but only for aquifers with calcite.
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Vnos na polico
Trajna povezava
- URL:
Faktor vpliva
Dostop do baze podatkov JCR je dovoljen samo uporabnikom iz Slovenije. Vaš trenutni IP-naslov ni na seznamu dovoljenih za dostop, zato je potrebna avtentikacija z ustreznim računom AAI.
Leto | Faktor vpliva | Izdaja | Kategorija | Razvrstitev | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Baze podatkov, v katerih je revija indeksirana
Ime baze podatkov | Področje | Leto |
---|
Povezave do osebnih bibliografij avtorjev | Povezave do podatkov o raziskovalcih v sistemu SICRIS |
---|
Vir: Osebne bibliografije
in: SICRIS
To gradivo vam je dostopno v celotnem besedilu. Če kljub temu želite naročiti gradivo, kliknite gumb Nadaljuj.