e19031 Background: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ABMT) is a standard treatment approach for patients with relapsed Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL). We wish to report long term (>10 year) outcomes for ...patient’s with HL treated with ABMT at our institution. Methods: We treated 35 patients over a 30 year time period (1992-2022). Of these 35 patients, there were 19 males and 16 females with a median age of 41 years (range 21-70 years) and a median performance status of 1 (0-1). The preparative regimen was carmustine, etoposide, and melphalam (CEM, 1992-2005) and BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (BEAM, 2006 to present). Bretuximab was added to BEAM in 2018 as post-transplant consolidation therapy in 13 patients. All patients underwent mobilized peripheral blood stem collections with high dose filgrastim, and starting in 2008 were mobilized with both filgrastim and plexiform. The required stem cell product was at a minimum of 2 million CD34+ cells per kilogram of body weight. Results: Fifteen patients received CEEM and 9/15 (60%) achieved a complete response (CR). Twenty patients received BEAM and 16/20 (80%) achieved a CR, p=0.27 (Fisher’s exact test). The median time to hematological recovery was 12 days (range 8-21). Treatment related complications included: S. epidermis sepsis (3 patients), E. coli sepsis (3 patients), and esophageal perforation that lead to death in 1 patient. With a median follow up 13 years (range 1-23 years), the actual 10 year disease free survival (DFS) is 52% and overall survival (OS) is 64%. The actuarial DFS and OS at 15 years are 52% and 64% respectively. Six patients are in continuous CR for greater than 20 years. Long term complications at greater than 15 years include: cardiomyopathy (5 patients), breast cancer (1 patient), and liposarcoma (1 patient). Conclusions: Patients with relapsed HL can achieve long term curative outcomes when treated with ABMT with most frequent long term complication being cardiomyopathy.
Plasma cell neoplasms include various conditions ranging from indolent conditions such as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to more aggressive forms such as multiple myeloma ...(MM). The World Health Organization classifies plasmacytomas into two types: solitary osseous plasmacytoma (SOP) and extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP). Most primary EMPs occur in the upper gastrointestinal tract, head and neck, upper respiratory system, central nervous system, lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys. However, the occurrence of EMP involving the testis site is quite rare. Given the rarity of testicular plasmacytoma, there is no consensus on the standard of treatment for this diagnosis. Most EMP is radiosensitive, with few localized types responding to surgical intervention. Tumor recurrence and disseminated infiltration are treated with adjuvant chemotherapy after radiation or surgery. Our patient has a unique presentation of an individual who developed recurrent myeloma of the testis 12 years after his initial diagnosis of myeloma.
CONCLUSION Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ABMT) is a standard treatment approach for patients with relapsed Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL). We wish to report long term (>10 year) outcomes for ...patient's with HL treated with ABMT at our institution. We treated 35 patients over a 30 year time period (1992-2022) Of these 35 patients, there were 19 males and 16 females with a median age of 41 years (range 21-70 years) and a median performance status of 1 (0-1). The preparative regimen was carmustine, etoposide, and melphalan (CEM,1992-2005) and BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM, 2006 to present). Brentuximab was added was added to BEAM in 2018 as post-transplant consolidation therapy in 13 patients. All patients underwent mobilized peripheral blood stem cell collections with high dose filgrastim and since 2008 filgrastim and plexiform. The required stem cell product was at a minimum 2 million CD34+ cells per kilogram of body weight. Fifteen patients received CEM and 9/15 (60%) achieved a complete response (CR). Twenty patients received BEAM and 16/20 (80%) achieved a CR, p=0.27 (Fisher's exact test). The median time to hematologic recovery was 12 days (range 8-21). Treatment related complications included: S. Epidermis sepsis (3 patients), E. coli sepsis (3 patients) and esophageal perforation that lead to death (1 patient). With a median follow up of 13 years (range 1-23 years).The actual 10 year disease free survival (DFS) is 52% and overall survival (OS) is 64%. The actuarial DFS and OS at 15 years are 52% and 64% respectively. Six patients are in continuous CR for greater than 20 years. Long term complications at greater than 15 years include: cardiomyopathy (5 patients), breast cancer (1 patient), liposarcoma (1patient). Patients with relapsed HL can achieve long term curative outcomes when treated with ABMT. The most frequent long term complication is cardiomyopathy.
Abstract only
e12529
Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women. Cardiovascular diseases (CVD), alternatively, is the leading cause of mortality in women worldwide. ...Adjuvant endocrine therapy including AI and SERM is offered to almost 75% of patients with estrogen receptor–positive (ER
+
) disease and potentially raises concerns for negative effects in cardiovascular health. Our study aims to evaluate cardiac events including acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and heart failure requiring hospitalization (HF) in post-menopausal patients treated with AI and SERM. Methods: An institutional database of 478 patients with histologically confirmed hormone receptor positive breast cancer diagnosed between 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2017 was reviewed after IRB approval. Development of ACS and heart failure requiring hospitalization upon initiating AI or SERM was considered an adverse cardiac event. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS v9.4. software. Chi Square (or Fisher’s Exact test) was used to test associations between various medication and cardiac events. Student’s T-test (or non-parametric equivalent when violations occurred) was used to assess if there was a difference in delta between those on and those not on medication categories. All significance was assumed at the p < 0.05 level. Results: Of 478 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 336 (70%) patients were postmenopausal. Of the 336 patients, 55% (n = 185) and 22% (n = 77) were offered therapy with AI and SERM, respectively. 6.49 % (n = 12) developed cardiac event with AI compared to 7.10 % (n = 13) who were not on AI therapy, (p = 0.814). Similarly, 6.49 % (n = 5) developed cardiac event with SERM compared to 6.87 % (n = 20) who were not on SERM therapy, (p = 0.9064). Moreover, an interesting finding in patients treated with SERM therapy compared to those not on SERM therapy was the delta of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Median LVEF of 3.5% (0 to 21%) was noted in patients treated with SERM compared to a median LVEF of 5% (0 to 55%) in patients who were not treated with SERM, p = 0.048. Conclusions: Our findings revealed AI and SERM therapy did not increase adverse cardiac events in our patient cohort. Cardiac safety of the patients is less likely to be compromised with AI and SERM therapy and therefore, should be initiated early in the course of treatment for better patient outcome. Furthermore, since SERM therapy can possibly have an effect in the LVEF of patients, a frequent evaluation LVEF is warranted to prevent any unwarranted complications.
Abstract only
e13624
Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in females. Early detection and advances in treatment modalities have resulted in decreasing rates of breast cancer ...related death. While breast cancer survival has improved, risks of death from cardiovascular comorbidities have increased. Our study aims to evaluate survival among breast cancer patients with cardiac comorbidities. Methods: This study was conducted using a retrospective cohort design with use of de-identified hospital electronic patient records. ICD diagnoses codes were used to identify breast cancer patients. Our initial search criteria revealed 1618 patients. Our eligibility criteria included adult patients 18 years and older with newly diagnosed breast cancer from January 1
st
, 2014 – January 31
st
, 2017 which yielded 478 patients. All data was collected through retrospective chart review. Analysis was performed with SAS v9.4 software. Qualitative variables were analyzed using Chi-Square Test. Survival curves are estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and analyzed with a log rank test. Predictors of survival are assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. All significance was assumed at the p < 0.05 level and reported as hazard ratios (HR). Results: Of our 478 patients, the following comorbidities were noted: diabetes n = 98 (21.17%), myocardial infarction (MI) n = 14 (2.98%), heart failure (HF) n = 36 (8.38%), coronary artery disease (CAD) n = 26 (5.75%), hypertension (HTN) n = 261 (55.77%), peripheral vascular disease (PVD) n = 9 (1.95%), hyperlipidemia (HLD) n = 230 (49.15%). Survival analysis was completed on patients with CAD (p = 0.49), HLD (p = 0.40), HTN (p = 0.15), MI (p = 0.52), and HF HR = 6.35 (95% CI 2.40-16.7, p = 0.0002). Pre-existing HF had a higher risk of mortality, which was statistically significant; however, all other single comorbidities were not. Overall survival (OS) in patients with more than one comorbidity HR = 1.36 (1.08-1.69, p = 0.006), was statistically significant. Conclusions: Patients with only one comorbidity be it MI, CAD, HTN, HLD did not have statistically significant results in OS. However, breast cancer patients with pre-existing HF are at 6.35-fold higher risk of mortality than those without HF. Patients with more than one comorbidity listed above were at 1.36-fold higher risk of mortality. Our results indicate that risk factor reduction may help improve survival in patients with breast cancer. Prospective validation of these findings is warranted.
Abstract only
e13631
Background: Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy. In 2019, it is estimated that there were 268,000 new cases of female breast cancer. The most common subtype was ...HR+/HER2 based on 2012-2016 cases, a much higher rate than triple negative breast cancer. Best survival rates are found among women with HR+/HER2- subtype followed by HR+/HER2+ and HR-/HER+ subtypes. Triple negative subtype comparatively had a poorer survival.Our objective was to determine breast cancer rate and survival by molecular subtype in the central Illinois population. Methods: A cohort of 478 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2014 and December 2017 was identified by using ICD codes. Eligibility criteria included pathology confirmed breast cancer.Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies and percentages. Predictors of survival were assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.All significance was assumed at the p < 0.05 level. Results: Luminal A breast cancer was the most common type in our population. In the cohort of 478 patients, 208 patients (74%) were found to have Luminal A. whereas, 37 patients (13.21%) had Basal subtype, 20 patients (7.14%) had Luminal B and 13 patients (5.36%) had Her2 enriched subtype. However, there was no statistical difference in survival between the subtypes. Conclusions: Although the frequency of cancer subtypes in our population is comparable to the national epidemiology data,we observed that there is no statistical difference in survival as compared to NCI SEERS data. This could be due to optimum care and patient’s adherence to chemo-radiation or due to small sample size. This could be an important area of future research to investigate if we can increase survival of poor prognosis subtypes (as triple negative) by following the same measures. Long term follow up for the patients in the study might also be necessary.
Abstract only
e12540
Background: Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of deaths in breast cancer patients. Pre-existing cardiac conditions and cardiovascular risks associated with ...chemotherapy affect the overall mortality of these patients. Cardio protective medications like beta-blocker, ACEIs, ARBs, statin, and potassium-sparing diuretics have shown to increase the survival odds. In our study, we investigated the survival of breast cancer patients who were on cardio protective medications. Methods: Our retrospective cohort study included breast cancer patients from Simmons Cancer Institute, Springfield, Illinois from January 1
st
, 2014 to December 31
st
, 2017. The first step comprised of screening patients using ICD code of breast cancer. Next, a retrospective chart review led to selecting eligible patients with biopsy proven breast cancer diagnosis within the aforementioned dates. We excluded patients who were diagnosed outside the give time frame. Data on age, gender, medical comorbidities, medications, and survival status were also collected. Comparisons between categorical variables were compared with the Chi-Squared test. Survival curves were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and analyzed with a log rank test. Predictors of survival are assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Results: Screening using ICD codes resulted in 1618 patients. Of those, 478 had biopsy proven diagnosis within the dates mentioned. 301 out of 478 patients were on some kind of cardio protective medication (88 on beta-blockers, 73 on ACEIs, 41 on ARBs, 87 on statins, and 12 on potassium sparing diuretics). We looked into survival analysis in patients on different cardioprotective medications. ARBs and potassium sparing diuretics showed increased likelihood of survival as the hazard ratio (HR) was found to be 0.512 (95% Cl: 0.068-3.832, p-value:0.0919) and HR 0.390 (95% CI: 0.130-1.66, p-value:0.514) respectively. In contrast, other cardio protective medications showed decreased trends for survival. The HR of beta blocker was 1.734 (95% CI: 0.508-5.919, p-value: 0.379) and of ACEIs was 1.350 (95% CI: 0.395-4.613, p-value: 0.632). Similarly, statins had a hazard ratio of 1.534 (95% CI: 0.512- 4.594, p-value:0. 444). Conclusions: We found that the cardio protective medications showed no statistically significant difference in survival in breast cancer patients. Given the smaller sample size and single center study, further multi-center clinical trial is warranted to establish a stronger association.
Abstract only
e12548
Background: Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity has been associated with certain breast cancer therapy regimens, such as anthracyclines. With the development of newer therapies, ...just as the anti HER2 agents,another association with cardiotoxicity has been recognized in these drug groups. We report the cardiac safety of anti-HER2 agents and anthracyclines. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients diagnosed with breast cancer between January 1st 2014 and December 31st 2017, treated with chemotherapy were identified from a large cancer center database. Heart failure, ACS, and other comorbidities were identified using billing codes. Primary outcome was cardiac event,defined by New York Heart Association class II, III or IV heart failure, ACS and heart failure hospitalization. Fisher's exact test was used to test associations between medication categories and cardiac events. Results: A total of 478 patients were included in our study.Our results indicated a significant association of anti HER2 agents with new heart failure with 12.24% (6/49) of patients, compared to 4.04% (12/297) in the control group (p = 0.0288). For the compound of all cardiac events, patients on the anti HER2 arm did not have a significant association, representing 12.50%(6/48) (p = 0.117).Regarding anthracyclines, results demonstrated a significant association of cardiac events, with an incidence of 17.46%(11/63) compared to 4.59%(14/305) in the control group (p = 0.001). We also found that specifically for new onset heart failure, the anthracycline group had a proportion of 13.64%(9/66), in comparison to the control group which had an incidence of 3.21%(9/280) (p = 0.0023). Conclusions: These findings are comparable to rates reported in studies evaluating cardiac safety of anthracyclines and anti-HER2 agents,calling attention to the importance of novel techniques and treatments for the management of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity.