Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with a poor prognosis and low survival rates, providing a strong rationale for the development of new treatment options. The discovery of ALK gene ...rearrangements in a subset of NSCLC specimens and the identification and development of the first-in-class ALK inhibitor crizotinib provided a personalised treatment option for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Crizotinib demonstrated rapid and durable responses in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients in phase I and II studies, leading to accelerated FDA approval. Subsequent evaluation in phase III studies showed that crizotinib improved progression-free survival compared with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in previously untreated patients and compared with pemetrexed or docetaxel in previously treated patients. Crizotinib was shown to have an acceptable safety profile and also to improve quality of life and symptom scores. Overall, crizotinib has been shown to provide a valuable first- and second-line treatment option and is now the first-line standard of care for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.
Agents targeting programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) are showing promising results in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is unknown whether PD-1/PD-L1 are differently ...expressed in oncogene-addicted NSCLC.
We analysed a cohort of 125 NSCLC patients, including 56 EGFR mutated, 29 KRAS mutated, 10 ALK translocated and 30 EGFR/KRAS/ALK wild type. PD-L1 and PD-1 expression were assessed by immunohistochemistry. All cases with moderate or strong staining (2+/3+) in >5% of tumour cells were considered as positive.
PD-1 positive (+) was significantly associated with current smoking status (P=0.02) and with the presence of KRAS mutations (P=0.006), whereas PD-L1+ was significantly associated to adenocarcinoma histology (P=0.005) and with presence of EGFR mutations (P=0.001). In patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (N=95), sensitivity to gefitinib or erlotinib was higher in PD-L1+ vs PD-L1 negative in terms of the response rate (RR: P=0.01) time to progression (TTP: P<0.0001) and survival (OS: P=0.09), with no difference in PD1+ vs PD-1 negative. In the subset of 54 EGFR mutated patients, TTP was significantly longer in PD-L1+ than in PD-L1 negative (P=0.01).
PD-1 and PD-L1 are differentially expressed in oncogene-addicted NSCLC supporting further investigation of specific checkpoint inhibitors in combination with targeted therapies.
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER2 are cell surface receptor tyrosine kinases (TKs) that transduce growth signals through dimerization with HER family receptors. The heterodimerization ...of EGFR with HER2 induces a more potent activation of EGFR TK than does EGFR homodimerization. When tumor cells overexpress both EGFR and HER2, they exhibit aggressive tumor cell growth, owing to the increased potential for EGFR/HER2 heterodimerization and signaling. Gefitinib and erlotinib are EGFR TK inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) and have antitumor activity in 8-18% of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Certain patient subsets are particularly responsive to EGFR TKIs. Analyses of biomarkers from patients in clinical studies of EGFR TKIs show correlations between objective tumor response and EGFR overexpression, as detected by immunohistochemistry and increased gene copy number measured by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Furthermore, NSCLC tumors that overexpress both EGFR and HER2 are more sensitive to EGFR TKIs than are tumors that overexpress EGFR but are HER2 negative. Therefore, the measurement of EGFR and HER2 protein expression and the gene copy number in NSCLC tumors may have a prognostic value in NSCLC and a predictive value for identifying patients likely to benefit from an EGFR TKI. These considerations suggest that the simultaneous inhibition of EGFR and HER2 may warrant further study in patients with NSCLC.
Background: MET amplification has been detected in ∼20% of non-small-cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations progressing after an initial response to ...tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Patients and methods: We analyzed MET gene copy number using FISH in two related NSCLC cell lines, one sensitive (HCC827) and one resistant (HCC827 GR6) to gefitinib therapy and in two different NSCLC patient populations: 24 never smokers or EGFR FISH-positive patients treated with gefitinib (ONCOBELL cohort) and 182 surgically resected NSCLC not exposed to anti-EGFR agents. Results: HCC827 GR6-resistant cell line displayed MET amplification, with a mean MET copy number >12, while sensitive HCC827 cell line had a mean MET copy number of 4. In the ONCOBELL cohort, no patient had gene amplification and MET gene copy number was not associated with outcome to gefitinib therapy. Among the surgically resected patients, MET was amplified in 12 cases (7.3%) and only four (2.4%) had a higher MET copy number than the resistant HCC827 GR6 cell line. Conclusions: MET gene amplification is a rare event in patients with advanced NSCLC. The development of anti-MET therapeutic strategies should be focused on patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance.
HER2 mutations have been identified as oncogenic drivers in lung cancers and are found in 1–2% of lung adenocarcinomas. There is, to date, no standard of care for these patients. We thus aim to study ...the therapeutic outcomes of patients harboring HER2 mutations and establish the efficacy of various drug regimens.
This retrospective cohort study in European centers assessed patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a known HER2 exon-20 insertion, treated with chemotherapy and/or HER2-targeted drugs.
We identified 101 eligible patients from 38 centers: median age 61 years (range: 30–87), 62.4% women, 60.4% never-smokers. All tumors were adenocarcinomas. Concomitant EGFR mutations, ALK translocations, and ROS translocations were observed in 5, 1, and 1 patients, respectively. The median number of treatment lines was 3 (range: 1–11). The median overall survival was 24 months. Overall response rate (ORR) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) with conventional chemotherapy (excluding targeted therapies) were 43.5% and 6 months in first-line (n = 93), and 10% and 4.3 months in second-line (n = 52) therapies. Sixty-five patients received HER2-targeted therapies: trastuzumab = 57, neratinib = 14, afatinib = 9, lapatinib = 5, T-DM1 = 1. ORR was 50.9% and PFS was 4.8 months with trastuzumab or T-DM1.
This series shows the chemosensitivity of HER2-driven NSCLC, and the potential interest of HER2-targeted agents. Our results should help to define the best therapeutic strategy for these patients and to orient future clinical trials.
Background: Standardized conditions to distinguish subpopulations of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients more and less sensitive to cetuximab therapy remain undefined. Materials and methods: We ...retrospectively analyzed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) copy number by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in paraffin-embedded tumor blocks from 85 chemorefractory CRC patients treated with cetuximab. Results were analyzed according to different score systems previously reported in colorectal and lung cancers. The primary end point of the study was identification of the EGFR FISH score that best associates with response rate (RR). Results: Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the cut-off that best discriminated responders versus nonresponders to cetuximab was a mean of 2.92 EGFR gene copies per cell. This model showed sensitivity of 58.6% 95% confidence interval (CI) = 47.1–70.1) and specificity of 93.3% (95% CI = 80.6–100). EGFR FISH-positive patients (N = 43, 50.6%) had significantly higher RR (P = 0.0001) and significantly longer time to disease progression (P = 0.02) than EGFR FISH negative (N = 42, 49.4%). Other scoring systems resulted less accurate in discriminating patients with the highest likelihood of response to cetuximab therapy. Conclusions: CRC patients with high EGFR gene copy number have an increased likelihood to respond to cetuximab therapy. Prospective clinical trials with a careful standardization of assay conditions and pattern interpretation are urgently needed.
Amivantamab plus carboplatin–pemetrexed (chemotherapy) with and without lazertinib demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with refractory epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced ...non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in phase I studies. These combinations were evaluated in a global phase III trial.
A total of 657 patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletions or L858R) locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after disease progression on osimertinib were randomized 2 : 2 : 1 to receive amivantamab–lazertinib–chemotherapy, chemotherapy, or amivantamab–chemotherapy. The dual primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) of amivantamab–chemotherapy and amivantamab–lazertinib–chemotherapy versus chemotherapy. During the study, hematologic toxicities observed in the amivantamab–lazertinib–chemotherapy arm necessitated a regimen change to start lazertinib after carboplatin completion.
All baseline characteristics were well balanced across the three arms, including by history of brain metastases and prior brain radiation. PFS was significantly longer for amivantamab–chemotherapy and amivantamab–lazertinib–chemotherapy versus chemotherapy hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression or death 0.48 and 0.44, respectively; P < 0.001 for both; median of 6.3 and 8.3 versus 4.2 months, respectively. Consistent PFS results were seen by investigator assessment (HR 0.41 and 0.38 for amivantamab–chemotherapy and amivantamab–lazertinib–chemotherapy, respectively; P < 0.001 for both; median of 8.2 and 8.3 versus 4.2 months, respectively). Objective response rate was significantly higher for amivantamab–chemotherapy and amivantamab–lazertinib–chemotherapy versus chemotherapy (64% and 63% versus 36%, respectively; P < 0.001 for both). Median intracranial PFS was 12.5 and 12.8 versus 8.3 months for amivantamab–chemotherapy and amivantamab–lazertinib–chemotherapy versus chemotherapy (HR for intracranial disease progression or death 0.55 and 0.58, respectively). Predominant adverse events (AEs) in the amivantamab-containing regimens were hematologic, EGFR-, and MET-related toxicities. Amivantamab–chemotherapy had lower rates of hematologic AEs than amivantamab–lazertinib–chemotherapy.
Amivantamab–chemotherapy and amivantamab–lazertinib–chemotherapy improved PFS and intracranial PFS versus chemotherapy in a population with limited options after disease progression on osimertinib. Longer follow-up is needed for the modified amivantamab–lazertinib–chemotherapy regimen.
Display omitted
•Amivantamab–chemotherapy improved PFS and intracranial PFS versus chemotherapy.•Amivantamab–lazertinib–chemotherapy improved PFS and intracranial PFS versus chemotherapy.•Predominant AEs in the amivantamab-containing arms were hematologic, EGFR, and MET related.•MARIPOSA-2 is the first study to demonstrate improved PFS versus chemotherapy after disease progression on osimertinib.
In the phase I KEYNOTE-001 study, pembrolizumab demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to characterize the relationship ...between pembrolizumab dose, exposure, and response to define an effective dose for these patients.
Patients received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W) (n = 55), 10 mg/kg Q3W (n = 238), or 10 mg/kg Q2W (n = 156). Response (RECIST v1.1) was assessed every 9 weeks. The relationship between the estimated pembrolizumab area under the concentration–time curve at steady state over 6 weeks (AUCss–6weeks) and the longitudinal change in tumor size (sum of longest diameters) was analyzed by regression and non-linear mixed effects modeling. This model was simultaneously fit to all tumor size data, then used to simulate response rates, normalizing the trial data across dose for prognostic covariates (tumor PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutation status). The exposure–safety relationship was assessed by logistic regression of pembrolizumab AUCss–6weeks versus occurrence of adverse events (AEs) of interest based on their immune etiology.
Overall response rates were 15% 95% confidence interval (CI) 7%–28% at 2 mg/kg Q3W, 25% (18%–33%) at 10 mg/kg Q3W, and 21% (95% CI 14%–30%) at 10 mg/kg Q2W. Regression analyses of percentage change from baseline in tumor size versus AUCss–6weeks indicated a flat relationship (regression slope P > 0.05). Simulations showed the exposure–response relationship to be similarly flat, thus indicating that the lowest evaluated dose of 2 mg/kg Q3W to likely be at or near the efficacy plateau. Exposure–safety analysis showed the AE incidence to be similar among the clinically tested doses.
No significant exposure dependency on efficacy or safety was identified for pembrolizumab across doses of 2–10 mg/kg. These results support the use of a 2 mg/kg Q3W dosage in patients with previously treated, advanced NSCLC.
NCT01295827.
In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), KRAS is the only validated biomarker used to select patients for administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapies. To identify ...additional predictive markers, we investigated the importance of HER2, the primary EGFR dimerisation partner, in this particular disease.
We evaluated the HER2 gene status by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in 170 KRAS wild-type mCRC patients treated with cetuximab or panitumumab.
Depending on HER2 gene copy number status, patients showed three distinct cytogenetic profiles: 4% of patients had HER2 gene amplification (R:HER2/CEP17 ≥ 2) in all neoplastic cells (HER2-all-A), 61% of patients had HER2 gain due to polysomy or to gene amplification in minor clones (HER2-FISH+*), and 35% of patients had no or slight HER2 gain (HER2-FISH-). These subgroups were significantly correlated with different clinical behaviours, in terms of response rate (RR; P=0.0006), progression-free survival (PFS; P<0.0001) and overall survival (OS; P<0.0001). Patients with HER2-all-A profile experienced the worst outcome, patients with HER2-FISH- profile showed an intermediate behaviour and patients with HER2-FISH+* profile were related to the highest survival probability (median PFS in months: 2.5 vs 3.9 vs 7.6, respectively; median OS in months: 4.2 vs 9.7 vs 13, respectively).
HER2 gene copy number status may influence the clinical response to anti-EGFR-targeted therapy in mCRC patients.
PDF
