Objectives/Hypothesis
To report the preliminary outcomes of patients with single‐sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss undergoing cochlear implantation at two centers.
Study Design
Retrospective ...review and prospective data collection.
Methods
Patients with single‐sided deafness who underwent cochlear implantation at two centers were included. Pre‐ and postoperative measures included monosyllabic word and sentence recognition in quiet for the ear implanted, and sentence recognition in noise in the best‐aided bilateral condition.
Results
Average monosyllabic word recognition scores in quiet improved significantly from 11.3% (standard deviation SD 15.6%) preoperatively to 48.7% (SD 24.2%) at the 3‐month postactivation interval, although they did not increase significantly between the 3‐month and 6‐month intervals. Sentence recognition scores in quiet increased significantly from 18.4% (SD 28.5%) preoperatively to 65.9% (SD 17.9%) at the 3‐month postactivation interval, but not between the 3‐month and 6‐month intervals. Sentence recognition in noise in the best‐aided bilateral condition increased from 59% (SD 16.3%) preoperatively to 72% (SD 16.0%) at 6‐months postactivation, though the difference was not statistically significant. Thirteen of the participants reported tinnitus prior to surgery. Of those, 12 reported that tinnitus was improved after implantation, and one reported that tinnitus was unchanged.
Conclusion
Preliminary results suggest that speech recognition in a singly deafened ear is significantly improved after cochlear implantation, although speech recognition in noise measured in the bilateral condition remains the same at 6‐months postactivation.
Level of Evidence
4. Laryngoscope, 127:223–228, 2017
The management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) remains controversial. One commonly cited advantage of microsurgery over other treatment modalities is that tumor removal provides the greatest chance of ...long-term cure. However, there are very few publications with long-term follow-up to support this assertion. The purpose of the current study is to report the very long-term risk of recurrence among a large historical cohort of patients who underwent microsurgical resection.
The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had undergone primary microsurgical resection of unilateral VS via a retrosigmoid approach performed by a single neurosurgeon-neurotologist team between January 1980 and December 1999. Complete tumor removal was designated gross-total resection (GTR), and anything less than complete removal was designated subtotal resection (STR). The primary end point was radiological recurrence-free survival. Time-to-event analyses were performed to identify factors associated with recurrence.
Four hundred fourteen patients met the study inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Overall, 67 patients experienced recurrence at a median of 6.9 years following resection (IQR 3.9-12.1, range 1.2-22.5 years). Estimated recurrence-free survival rates at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years following resection were 93% (95% CI 91-96, 248 patients still at risk), 78% (72-85, 88), 68% (60-77, 47), and 51% (41-64, 22), respectively. The strongest predictor of recurrence was extent of resection, with patients who underwent STR having a nearly 11-fold greater risk of recurrence than the patients treated with GTR (HR 10.55, p < 0.001). Among the 18 patients treated with STR, 15 experienced recurrence at a median of 2.7 years following resection (IQR 1.9-8.9, range 1.2-18.7). Estimated recurrence-free survival rates at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years following GTR were 96% (95% CI 93-98, 241 patients still at risk), 82% (77-89, 86), 73% (65-81, 46), and 56% (45-70, 22), respectively. Estimated recurrence-free survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years following STR were 47% (95% CI 28-78, 7 patients still at risk), 17% (5-55, 2), and 8% (1-52, 1), respectively.
Long-term surveillance is required following microsurgical resection of VS even after GTR. Subtotal resection alone should not be considered a definitive long-term cure. These data emphasize the importance of long-term follow-up when reporting tumor control outcomes for VS.
To assess the impact of differential hearing loss on QOL in sporadic unilateral vestibular schwannoma.
Cross-sectional observational multicenter study including 422 patients with vestibular ...schwannoma and formal audiometry within 1 year of survey administration, analyzed using multivariable regression.
Among 422 patients included, the median age was 57 (range, 18-81) years; 223 (53%) were women. Among 390 patients with complete audiometric data, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery class was A in 134 (34%), B in 69 (18%), C in 26 (7%), and D in 161 (41%). A total of 335 of 390 (86%) reported subjective ipsilateral hearing loss (median severity, 6/10 1 = normal, 10 = deaf), 166 (43%) reported ipsilateral inability to use the telephone, 155 (37%) reported that hearing loss had affected personal relationships, and 213 (51%) reported difficulty with conversations. After adjusting for age and sex, the odds ratio (OR) for hearing loss adversely affecting relationships was 4.4 for class B hearing vs class A (95% CI, 2.1-9.4; P<.0001). The OR for difficulty with conversations was 2.7 for class B vs class A (95% CI, 1.4-5.3; P=.003). The OR for lost ipsilateral telephone use was 6.3 for class B vs class A (95% CI, 3.2-13.0; P<.0001). Differences between class B and class C were not significant. WRS outperformed PTA as a predictor of hearing-related QOL. The optimal threshold for predicting a significant adverse impact on QOL was WRS less than 72% to 76%.
Hearing loss adversely affects QOL after only modest audiometric disability. The WRS alone appears to be a much more reliable predictor of hearing-related QOL than PTA or American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery class.
This “How I Do It” report describes modifications made to the OSIA bone conduction hearing implant surgery in order to reduce wound complications.
Laryngoscope, 132:1850–1854, 2022
OBJECTIVE Over the last 30 years, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an established noninvasive treatment alternative for small- to medium-sized vestibular schwannoma (VS). This study aims to ...further define long-term SRS tumor control in patients with documented pretreatment tumor growth for whom conservative observation failed. METHODS A prospective clinical database was queried, and patients with sporadic VS who elected initial observation and subsequently underwent SRS after documented tumor growth between 2004 and 2014 were identified. Posttreatment tumor growth or shrinkage was determined by a ≥ 2-mm increase or decrease in maximum linear dimension, respectively. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients met study inclusion criteria. The median pre- and posttreatment observation periods were 16 and 43.5 months, respectively. The median dose to the tumor margin was 13 Gy (range 12-14 Gy), and the median maximum dose was 26 Gy (range 24-28 Gy). At the time of treatment, 59 tumors exhibited extracanalicular (EC) extension, and 9 were intracanalicular (IC). Of the 59 EC VSs, 50 (85%) remained stable or decreased in size following treatment, and 9 (15%) enlarged by > 2 mm. Among EC tumors, the median pretreatment tumor growth rate was 2.08 mm/year for tumors that decreased or were stable, compared with 3.26 mm/year for tumors that grew following SRS (p = 0.009). Patients who demonstrated a pretreatment growth rate of < 2.5 mm/year exhibited a 97% tumor control rate, compared with 69% for those demonstrating ≥ 2.5 mm/year of growth prior to SRS (p = 0.007). No other analyzed variables were found to predict tumor growth following SRS. CONCLUSIONS Overall, SRS administered using a marginal dose between 12-14 Gy is highly effective in treating VSs in which initial observation fails. Tumor control is achieved in 97% of VSs that exhibit slow (< 2.5 mm/year) pretreatment growth; however, SRS is less successful in treating tumors exhibiting rapid growth (≥ 2.5 mm/year).
A variety of neurosensory symptoms including tinnitus have been associated with COVID-19 infection. While most cases of tinnitus are associated with hearing loss, here we report a case of severe ...tinnitus following COVID-19 infection with normal thresholds through 8000 Hz.
A 49-year-old male presented with new onset severe tinnitus following COVID-19 infection. Tinnitus was bilateral, constant and nonpulsatile. Audiometric evaluation revealed normal threshold through 8000 Hz, with mild hearing loss at 16,000 Hz. Conservative measures including masking strategies failed to mitigate symptoms. A trial of gabapentin 300 mg twice per day improved tinnitus with no notable side effects.
This patient may represent a subpopulation of patients who suffer from severe tinnitus following COVID-19 infection in the setting of largely normal hearing. The pathophysiology may be distinct from the more common hearing loss associated tinnitus and perhaps neuromodulators may play a larger role in mitigating tinnitus in this patient subset.
Intracranial facial nerve schwannomas (FNS) requiring treatment are frequently recommended for surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The objective of this study was to compare facial nerve ...function outcomes between these two interventions for FNS via a systematic review and meta-analysis.
A search of the Ovid EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases from inception to July 2019 was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened against prespecified criteria. Facial nerve outcomes were classified as improved, stabilized, or worsened by last follow-up. Incidence was pooled by random-effects meta-analysis of proportions.
Thirty-three articles with a pooled cohort of 519 patients with FNS satisfied all criteria. Twenty-five articles described operative outcomes in 407 (78%) patients; 10 articles reported SRS outcomes in 112 (22%). In the surgical cohort, facial nerve function improved in 23% (95% CI 15%-32%), stabilized in 41% (95% CI 32%-50%), and worsened in 30% (95% CI 21%-40%). In the SRS cohort, facial nerve function was improved in 20% (95% CI 9%-34%), stable in 66% (95% CI 54%-78%), and worsened in 9% (95% CI 3%-16%). Compared with SRS, microsurgery was associated with a significantly lower incidence of stable facial nerve function (p < 0.01) and a significantly higher incidence of worsened facial nerve function (p < 0.01). Tumor progression and complication rates were comparable. Outcome certainty assessments were very low to moderate for all parameters.
Unfavorable facial nerve function outcomes are associated with surgical treatment of intracranial FNS, whereas stable facial nerve function outcomes are associated with SRS. Therefore, SRS should be recommended to patients with FNS who require treatment, and surgery should be reserved for patients with another indication, such as decompression of the brainstem. Further study is required to definitively optimize and validate management strategies for these rare skull base tumors.
The best management for patients with small- to medium-sized vestibular schwannomas (VS) is controversial.
: A prospective cohort study of 82 patients with unilateral, unoperated VS less than 3 cm ...undergoing surgical resection (n = 36) or radiosurgery (n = 46). Patients undergoing resection were younger (48.2 yr versus 53.9 yr, P = 0.03). The groups were similar with regard to hearing loss, associated symptoms, and tumor size. The mean follow-up period was 42 months (range, 12-62 mo).
Normal facial movement and preservation of serviceable hearing was more frequent in the radiosurgical group at 3 months (P < 0.001), 1 year (P < 0.001), and at the last follow-up examination (P < 0.01) compared with the surgical resection group. Patients undergoing surgical resection had a significant decline in the following subscales of the Health Status Questionnaire 3 months after surgery: physical functioning (P = 0.006), role-physical (P < 0.001), energy/fatigue (P = 0.02), and overall physical component (P = 0.004). Patients in the surgical resection group continued to have a significant decline in the physical functioning (P = 0.04) and bodily pain (P = 0.04) subscales at 1 year and in bodily pain (P = 0.02) at the last follow-up examination. The radiosurgical group had no decline on any component of the Health Status Questionnaire after the procedure. The radiosurgical group had lower mean Dizziness Handicap Inventory scores (16.5 versus 8.4, P = 0.02) at the last follow-up examination. There was no difference in tumor control (100 versus 96%, P = 0.50).
Early outcomes were better for VS patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery compared with surgical resection (Level 2 evidence). Unless long-term follow-up evaluation shows frequent tumor progression at currently used radiation doses, radiosurgery should be considered the best management strategy for the majority of VS patients.
The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of having preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear for speech recognition in complex listening environments.
The present study included a ...within-subjects, repeated-measures design including 21 English-speaking and 17 Polish-speaking cochlear implant (CI) recipients with preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear. The patients were implanted with electrodes that varied in insertion depth from 10 to 31 mm. Mean preoperative low-frequency thresholds (average of 125, 250, and 500 Hz) in the implanted ear were 39.3 and 23.4 dB HL for the English- and Polish-speaking participants, respectively. In one condition, speech perception was assessed in an eight-loudspeaker environment in which the speech signals were presented from one loudspeaker and restaurant noise was presented from all loudspeakers. In another condition, the signals were presented in a simulation of a reverberant environment with a reverberation time of 0.6 sec. The response measures included speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and percent correct sentence understanding for two test conditions: CI plus low-frequency hearing in the contralateral ear (bimodal condition) and CI plus low-frequency hearing in both ears (best-aided condition). A subset of six English-speaking listeners were also assessed on measures of interaural time difference thresholds for a 250-Hz signal.
Small, but significant, improvements in performance (1.7-2.1 dB and 6-10 percentage points) were found for the best-aided condition versus the bimodal condition. Postoperative thresholds in the implanted ear were correlated with the degree of electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS) benefit for speech recognition in diffuse noise. There was no reliable relationship among measures of audiometric threshold in the implanted ear nor elevation in threshold after surgery and improvement in speech understanding in reverberation. There was a significant correlation between interaural time difference threshold at 250 Hz and EAS-related benefit for the adaptive speech reception threshold.
The findings of this study suggest that (1) preserved low-frequency hearing improves speech understanding for CI recipients, (2) testing in complex listening environments, in which binaural timing cues differ for signal and noise, may best demonstrate the value of having two ears with low-frequency acoustic hearing, and (3) preservation of binaural timing cues, although poorer than observed for individuals with normal hearing, is possible after unilateral cochlear implantation with hearing preservation and is associated with EAS benefit. The results of this study demonstrate significant communicative benefit for hearing preservation in the implanted ear and provide support for the expansion of CI criteria to include individuals with low-frequency thresholds in even the normal to near-normal range.
Background
Vestibular schwannomas (VS) present at variable size with heterogeneous symptomatology. Modern treatment paradigms for large VS include gross total resection, subtotal resection (STR) in ...combination with observation, and/or radiation to achieve optimal function preservation, whereas treatment is felt to be both easier and safer for small VS. The objective is to better characterize the presentation and surgical outcomes of large and small VS.
Methods
We collected data of patients who had surgically treated VS with a posterior fossa diameter of 4.0 cm or larger (large tumor group, LTG) and smaller than 1.0 cm in cisternal diameter (small tumor group, STG). Statistical significance was defined as
p
< 0.05.
Results
LTG included 48 patients (average tumor size: 44.9 mm) and STG 38 (7.9 mm). Patients in STG presented more frequently with tinnitus and sudden hearing loss. Patients in LTG underwent more STR than STG (50.0% vs. 2.6%,
p
< 0.0001). LTG had more complications (31.3% vs. 13.2%,
p
= 0.049). Postoperative facial nerve function in STG was significantly better than LTG. STG had better hearing preoperatively (
p
< 0.0001) and postoperatively than LTG (
p
= 0.0002). Postoperative headache was more common in STG (13.2% vs. 2.1%,
p
= 0.045). The rate of recurrence/progression needing treatment was not statistically different between the groups (12.5% in LTG vs. 7.9% in STG,
p
= 0.49). Those patients who required periprocedural cerebrospinal fluid diversion had higher risk of infection (20.8% vs 4.8%,
p
= 0.022).
Conclusion
Large and small VS present differently. LTG showed more unsatisfactory outcomes in facial nerve function and postoperative hearing despite maximal efforts undertaken toward function-preservation strategy; however, similar tumor control was achieved.
PDF
