Rosa Uribe is an Assistant Professor of BioSciences at Rice University. Having established her lab in 2017, her research focusses on identifying the genetic, cellular and signalling-level mechanisms ...of neural crest stem cell proliferation, migration and differentiation during embryogenesis. We caught up with Rosa to find out more about her career, her opinions about mentorship and a series of virtual seminars that she co-organises.
Meiosis produces gametes through a specialized, two-step cell division, which is highly error prone in humans. Reductional meiosis I, where maternal and paternal chromosomes (homologs) segregate, is ...followed by equational meiosis II, where sister chromatids separate. Uniquely during meiosis I, sister kinetochores are monooriented and pericentromeric cohesin is protected. Here, we demonstrate that these key adaptations for reductional chromosome segregation are achieved through separable control of multiple kinases by the meiosis-I-specific budding yeast Spo13 protein. Recruitment of Polo kinase to kinetochores directs monoorientation, while independently, cohesin protection is achieved by containing the effects of cohesin kinases. Therefore, reductional chromosome segregation, the defining feature of meiosis, is established by multifaceted kinase control by a master regulator. The recent identification of Spo13 orthologs, fission yeast Moa1 and mouse MEIKIN, suggests that kinase coordination by a meiosis I regulator may be a general feature in the establishment of reductional chromosome segregation.
Display omitted
•Spo13 recruits Polo kinase to kinetochores to direct sister chromatid co-segregation•Kinetochore-associated Polo drives co-segregation independently of monopolin•Spo13 counteracts cohesin kinases to prevent premature loss of centromeric cohesion•Spo13 restricts CK1δ to allow shugoshin reaccumulation after meiosis I
Segregation of homologs—rather than sister chromatids—is unique to meiosis I. Galander et al. show that the meiosis-I-specific Spo13 protein prevents sister chromatid segregation by controlling the effects of multiple kinases to both enforce sister kinetochore co-orientation and prevent premature loss of cohesion.
During mitosis and meiosis, sister chromatid cohesion resists the pulling forces of microtubules, enabling the generation of tension at kinetochores upon chromosome biorientation. How tension is read ...to signal the bioriented state remains unclear. Shugoshins form a pericentromeric platform that integrates multiple functions to ensure proper chromosome biorientation. Here we show that budding yeast shugoshin Sgo1 dissociates from the pericentromere reversibly in response to tension. The antagonistic activities of the kinetochore-associated Bub1 kinase and the Sgo1-bound phosphatase protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A)-Rts1 underlie a tension-dependent circuitry that enables Sgo1 removal upon sister kinetochore biorientation. Sgo1 dissociation from the pericentromere triggers dissociation of condensin and Aurora B from the centromere, thereby stabilizing the bioriented state. Conversely, forcing sister kinetochores to be under tension during meiosis I leads to premature Sgo1 removal and precocious loss of pericentromeric cohesion. Overall, we show that the pivotal role of shugoshin is to build a platform at the pericentromere that attracts activities that respond to the absence of tension between sister kinetochores. Disassembly of this platform in response to intersister kinetochore tension signals the bioriented state. Therefore, tension sensing by shugoshin is a central mechanism by which the bioriented state is read.
Mansi Srivastava is a John L. Loeb Associate Professor of the Natural Sciences at Harvard University. This year, she was awarded the Elizabeth D. Hay New Investigator Award by the Society of ...Developmental Biology, which recognizes new group leaders who have performed outstanding research in developmental biology during the early stages of their independent career. Mansi's research focusses on investigating wound response and stem cell biology during regeneration in an evolutionary context. We talked to Mansi to discover how she feels about receiving this award, and about her career and her activities outside of the lab.
Meiosis produces gametes through two successive nuclear divisions, meiosis I and meiosis II. In contrast to mitosis and meiosis II, where sister chromatids are segregated, during meiosis I, ...homologous chromosomes are segregated. This requires the monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores and the loss of cohesion from chromosome arms, but not centromeres, during meiosis I. The establishment of both sister kinetochore mono-orientation and cohesin protection rely on the budding yeast meiosis I-specific Spo13 protein, the functional homolog of fission yeast Moa1 and mouse MEIKIN.
Here we investigate the effects of loss of
on cohesion during meiosis I using a live-cell imaging approach.
Unlike wild type, cells lacking
fail to maintain the meiosis-specific cohesin subunit, Rec8, at centromeres and segregate sister chromatids to opposite poles during anaphase I. We show that the cohesin-destabilizing factor, Wpl1, is not primarily responsible for the loss of cohesion during meiosis I. Instead, premature loss of centromeric cohesin during anaphase I in
cells relies on separase-dependent cohesin cleavage. Further, cohesin loss in
anaphase I cells is blocked by forcibly tethering the regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 2A, Rts1, to Rec8.
Our findings indicate that separase-dependent cleavage of phosphorylated Rec8 causes premature cohesin loss in
cells.
Background:
Meiosis produces gametes through two successive nuclear divisions, meiosis I and meiosis II. In contrast to mitosis and meiosis II, where sister chromatids are segregated, during meiosis ...I, homologous chromosomes are segregated. This requires the monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores and the loss of cohesion from chromosome arms, but not centromeres, during meiosis I. The establishment of both sister kinetochore mono-orientation and cohesion protection rely on the budding yeast meiosis I-specific Spo13 protein, the functional homolog of fission yeast Moa1 and mouse MEIKIN.
Methods:
Here we investigate the effects of loss of
SPO13
on cohesion during meiosis I using a live-cell imaging approach.
Results:
Unlike wild type, cells lacking
SPO13
fail to maintain the meiosis-specific cohesin subunit, Rec8, at centromeres and segregate sister chromatids to opposite poles during anaphase I. We show that the cohesin-destabilizing factor, Wpl1, is not primarily responsible for the loss of cohesion during meiosis I. Instead, premature loss of centromeric cohesin during anaphase I in
spo13
Δ
cells relies on separase-dependent cohesin cleavage. Further, cohesin loss in
spo13
Δ
anaphase I cells is blocked by forcibly tethering the regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 2A, Rts1, to Rec8.
Conclusions:
Our findings indicate that separase-dependent cleavage of phosphorylated Rec8 causes premature cohesin loss in
spo13
Δ
cells.
Research over the last two decades has identified a group of meiosis‐specific proteins, consisting of budding yeast Spo13, fission yeast Moa1, mouse MEIKIN, and Drosophila Mtrm, with essential ...functions in meiotic chromosome segregation. These proteins, which we call meiosis I kinase regulators (MOKIRs), mediate two major adaptations to the meiotic cell cycle to allow the generation of haploid gametes from diploid mother cells. Firstly, they promote the segregation of homologous chromosomes in meiosis I (reductional division) by ensuring that sister kinetochores face towards the same pole (mono‐orientation). Secondly, they safeguard the timely separation of sister chromatids in meiosis II (equational division) by counteracting the premature removal of pericentromeric cohesin, and thus prevent the formation of aneuploid gametes. Although MOKIRs bear no obvious sequence similarity, they appear to play functionally conserved roles in regulating meiotic kinases. Here, the known functions of MOKIRs are reviewed and their possible mechanisms of action are discussed. Also see the video here https://youtu.be/tLE9KL89bwk.
MOKIRs (Meiosis One KInase Regulators) are meiosis‐specific proteins that orchestrate the segregation of homologous chromosomes. MOKIRs establish key features of meiosis I, including sister kinetochore mono‐orientation and protection of pericentromeric cohesin. This review focuses on how MOKIRs might control a number of kinases, notably Polo, to elicit these effects.
Cohesin is a conserved ring-shaped multiprotein complex that participates in chromosome segregation, DNA repair, and transcriptional regulation 1, 2. Cohesin loading onto chromosomes universally ...requires the Scc2/4 “loader” complex (also called NippedBL/Mau2), mutations in which cause the developmental disorder Cornelia de Lange syndrome in humans 1–9. Cohesin is most concentrated in the pericentromere, the region surrounding the centromere 10–15. Enriched pericentromeric cohesin requires the Ctf19 kinetochore subcomplex in budding yeast 16–18. Here, we uncover the spatial and temporal determinants for Scc2/4 centromere association. We demonstrate that the critical role of the Ctf19 complex is to enable Scc2/4 association with centromeres, through which cohesin loads and spreads onto the adjacent pericentromere. We show that, unexpectedly, Scc2 association with centromeres depends on cohesin itself. The absence of the Scc1/Mcd1/Rad21 cohesin subunit precludes Scc2 association with centromeres from anaphase until late G1. Expression of SCC1 is both necessary and sufficient for the binding of cohesin to its loader, the association of Scc2 with centromeres, and cohesin loading. We propose that cohesin triggers its own loading by enabling Scc2/4 to connect with chromosomal landmarks, which at centromeres are specified by the Ctf19 complex. Overall, our findings provide a paradigm for the spatial and temporal control of cohesin loading.
Display omitted
► Cohesin is required for the association of its loader, Scc2/4, with centromeres ► The Ctf19 kinetochore subcomplex targets the loader to centromeres ► Centromere-loaded cohesin ensures pericentromeric cohesion establishment ► Cohesin ring formation triggers cohesin loading via Scc2/4
Meiosis is a specialized form of cell division where homologous chromosomes are segregated in meiosis I before sister chromatids are segregated in meiosis II. To establish this pattern, a number of ...changes to the mitotic chromosome segregation machinery are put in place. Firstly, sister kinetochores orient towards the same pole in meiosis I (mono-orientation). Secondly, homologue recombination creates chiasmata, which link homologues together. And thirdly, cohesin, the molecule that holds sister chromatids together, is cleaved in a step-wise manner. This is achieved because the Shugoshin (Sgo1) protein recruits protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) to centromeres to counteract cohesin phosphorylation, which is required for its cleavage. The work presented here has investigated two critical aspects of cohesin protection: firstly, how cohesin protection is deactivated in meiosis II and, secondly, how a meiosis-specific protein called Spo13 helps to set up cohesin protection in meiosis I. Previously, our lab had shown that Sgo1 is removed from chromosomes when sister chromatids come under tension during mitosis. I therefore sought to investigate whether sister kinetochore mono-orientation allows Sgo1 to stay on centromeres during meiosis I and carry out its protective function. To this end, I modified meiosis I chromosomes to lack both chiasmata and mono-oriented kinetochores. Under these conditions, where sister chromatids are forced to be under tension in metaphase I, Sgo1 is undetectable on chromosomes. As a consequence, centromeric cohesin is largely lost in anaphase I leading to the premature separation of sister chromatids in a fraction of cells. Since mono-orientation of sister kinetochores is exclusive to meiosis I, these findings suggest that Sgo1 localisation is influenced by sister kinetochore tension in both mitosis and meiosis. Therefore, our findings suggest a mechanism that could contribute to the deprotection of cohesin in meiosis II. However, loss of cohesin protection upon bi-orientation is not complete, suggesting that other factors are involved in the efficient protection and deprotection of cohesin. One such factor is the meiosis-specific protein Spo13, which had previously been shown to be required for cohesin protection as well as kinetochore monoorientation. Although it had been suggested that Spo13 regulates Sgo1 recruitment to centromeres, I could not find any evidence to support a loss of Sgo1, or PP2A, in spo13Δ cells. Additionally, even when Sgo1 is stabilised and clearly visible in anaphase I of spo13Δ mutants, pericentromeric cohesion is still defective. Therefore, I investigated the effect that polo kinase Cdc5, an interactor of Spo13, has on Sgo1. While cellular Sgo1 levels are increased in response to Cdc5 loss, this effect seems to be independent of Spo13. However, Spo13 is required for proper levels of Cdc5 at centromeres and the centromeric recruitment of Cdc5 by Spo13 is likely to be functionally important because tethering of Cdc5 to kinetochores rescued the mono-orientation phenotype of spo13Δ cells. In contrast, I found no evidence that the Spo13-Cdc5 interaction is required for cohesin protection. Meiotic overexpression of SPO13 enhances cohesin protection in meiosis I, apparently independent of its robust interaction with Cdc5, and causes increased Sgo1 enrichment at centromeres. This suggested that Spo13 might recruit Sgo1 to cohesin itself to facilitate its protection. Although I could not detect a loss of Sgo1-cohesin interaction in spo13Δ cells, tethering of Sgo1 to cohesin restores pericentromeric Rec8 to spo13Δ mutants in anaphase I. Surprisingly, sister chromatids still segregate in this case, suggesting that pericentromeric cohesion is defective, despite maintenance of Rec8. Furthermore, inhibition of either one of the cohesin kinases, DDK and Hrr25, restores sister chromatid cohesion to spo13Δ cells. Therefore, the findings in this study suggest that Spo13 is at the centre of a complex regulatory network that coordinates cohesin protection and sister chromatid cohesion in meiosis I.
Meiosis is a specialized form of cell division where homologous chromosomes are segregated in meiosis I before sister chromatids are segregated in meiosis II. To establish this pattern, a number of ...changes to the mitotic chromosome segregation machinery are put in place. Firstly, sister kinetochores orient towards the same pole in meiosis I (mono-orientation). Secondly, homologue recombination creates chiasmata, which link homologues together. And thirdly, cohesin, the molecule that holds sister chromatids together, is cleaved in a step-wise manner. This is achieved because the Shugoshin (Sgo1) protein recruits protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) to centromeres to counteract cohesin phosphorylation, which is required for its cleavage. The work presented here has investigated two critical aspects of cohesin protection: firstly, how cohesin protection is deactivated in meiosis II and, secondly, how a meiosis-specific protein called Spo13 helps to set up cohesin protection in meiosis I. Previously, our lab had shown that Sgo1 is removed from chromosomes when sister chromatids come under tension during mitosis. I therefore sought to investigate whether sister kinetochore mono-orientation allows Sgo1 to stay on centromeres during meiosis I and carry out its protective function. To this end, I modified meiosis I chromosomes to lack both chiasmata and mono-oriented kinetochores. Under these conditions, where sister chromatids are forced to be under tension in metaphase I, Sgo1 is undetectable on chromosomes. As a consequence, centromeric cohesin is largely lost in anaphase I leading to the premature separation of sister chromatids in a fraction of cells. Since mono-orientation of sister kinetochores is exclusive to meiosis I, these findings suggest that Sgo1 localisation is influenced by sister kinetochore tension in both mitosis and meiosis. Therefore, our findings suggest a mechanism that could contribute to the deprotection of cohesin in meiosis II. However, loss of cohesin protection upon bi-orientation is not complete, suggesting that other factors are involved in the efficient protection and deprotection of cohesin. One such factor is the meiosis-specific protein Spo13, which had previously been shown to be required for cohesin protection as well as kinetochore monoorientation. Although it had been suggested that Spo13 regulates Sgo1 recruitment to centromeres, I could not find any evidence to support a loss of Sgo1, or PP2A, in spo13Δ cells. Additionally, even when Sgo1 is stabilised and clearly visible in anaphase I of spo13Δ mutants, pericentromeric cohesion is still defective. Therefore, I investigated the effect that polo kinase Cdc5, an interactor of Spo13, has on Sgo1. While cellular Sgo1 levels are increased in response to Cdc5 loss, this effect seems to be independent of Spo13. However, Spo13 is required for proper levels of Cdc5 at centromeres and the centromeric recruitment of Cdc5 by Spo13 is likely to be functionally important because tethering of Cdc5 to kinetochores rescued the mono-orientation phenotype of spo13Δ cells. In contrast, I found no evidence that the Spo13-Cdc5 interaction is required for cohesin protection. Meiotic overexpression of SPO13 enhances cohesin protection in meiosis I, apparently independent of its robust interaction with Cdc5, and causes increased Sgo1 enrichment at centromeres. This suggested that Spo13 might recruit Sgo1 to cohesin itself to facilitate its protection. Although I could not detect a loss of Sgo1-cohesin interaction in spo13Δ cells, tethering of Sgo1 to cohesin restores pericentromeric Rec8 to spo13Δ mutants in anaphase I. Surprisingly, sister chromatids still segregate in this case, suggesting that pericentromeric cohesion is defective, despite maintenance of Rec8. Furthermore, inhibition of either one of the cohesin kinases, DDK and Hrr25, restores sister chromatid cohesion to spo13Δ cells. Therefore, the findings in this study suggest that Spo13 is at the centre of a complex regulatory network that coordinates cohesin protection and sister chromatid cohesion in meiosis I.
PDF
