To evaluate clinical outcomes, pathologic subtypes, metastatic disease rate, and clinical features associated with malignancy in Bosniak category IIF and III cystic renal lesions.
This retrospective ...study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. Informed consent was waived. Radiology and hospital information systems were searched for Bosniak IIF and Bosniak III lesions in computed tomographic (CT) reports from January 1, 1994 to August 31, 2009. Patients 18 years and older with unenhanced and contrast material-enhanced CT results and with lesions either surgically resected or with 1 year or more of surveillance were included. Data recorded were history of renal cell carcinoma, number of renal lesions, presence of a coexistent solid renal mass, surgical pathologic findings, and presence of metastatic disease from a renal malignancy. Sixty-two patients with 69 Bosniak IIF lesions and 131 patients with 144 Bosniak III lesions were identified. Proportions from independent groups were compared by using the Fisher exact test; continuous variables were compared by using a two-tailed two-sample t test or a Wilcoxon two-sample test.
The malignancy rate of resected Bosniak IIF lesions was 25% (four of 16) and that for Bosniak III lesions was 54% (58 of 107) (P = .03). Thirteen percent (nine of 69) of Bosniak IIF lesions progressed at follow-up, and 50% (four of eight) of these resected cysts were malignant. History of primary renal malignancy, coexisting Bosniak category IV lesion and/or solid renal mass, and multiplicity of Bosniak III lesions were each associated with an increased malignancy rate in Bosniak III lesions. No patients developed locally advanced or metastatic disease from a Bosniak IIF or III lesion.
Although the malignancy rate in surgically excised Bosniak IIF and Bosniak III cystic renal lesions was 25% and 54%, respectively, in our study, the malignancy rate was higher in patients with a history of primary renal malignancy or coexisting Bosniak IV lesion and/or solid renal neoplasm.
The purpose of this article is to evaluate the effect of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) on contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) compared with filtered back projection (FBP) and to ...determine whether SAFIRE improves low-contrast object detection or conspicuity in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver on full- and low-dose examinations.
A low-contrast object phantom was scanned at 100%, 70%, 50%, and 30% dose using a single-source made of a dual-source MDCT scanner, with the raw data reconstructed with SAFIRE and FBP. Unenhanced liver CT scans in 22 patients were performed using a dual-source MDCT. The raw data from both tubes (100% dose) were reconstructed using FBP, and data from one tube (50% dose) were reconstructed using both FBP and SAFIRE. CNR was measured in the phantom and in the liver. Noise, contrast, and CNR were compared using paired Student t tests. Six readers assessed sphere detection and conspicuity in the phantom and liver-inferior vena cava conspicuity in the patient data. The phantom and patient data were assessed using multiple-variable logistic regression.
The phantom at 70% and 50% doses with SAFIRE had decreased noise and increased CNR compared with the 100% dose with FBP. In the liver, the mean CNR improvement at 50% dose with SAFIRE compared with FBP was 31.4% and 88% at 100% and 50% doses, respectively (p < 0.001). Sphere object detection and conspicuity improved with SAFIRE (p < 0.001). However, smaller spheres were obscured on both FBP and SAFIRE images at lower doses. Liver-vessel conspicuity improved with SAFIRE over 50%-dose FBP in 67.4% of cases (p < 0.001), and versus 100%-dose FBP, improved in 38.6% of cases (p = 0.085). As a predictor for detection, CNR alone had a discriminatory ability (c-index, 0.970) similar to that of the model that analyzed dose, lesion size, attenuation difference, and reconstruction technique (c-index, 0.978).
Lower dose scans reconstructed with SAFIRE have a higher CNR. The ability of SAFIRE to improve low-contrast object detection and conspicuity depends on the radiation dose level. At low radiation doses, low-contrast objects are invisible, regardless of reconstruction technique.
BACKGROUND: A complete total mesorectal excision is the criterion standard in curative rectal cancer surgery. Ensuring quality is challenging in a narrow pelvis, and obesity amplifies technical ...difficulties. Pelvimetry is the measurement of pelvic dimensions, but its role in gauging preoperatively the difficulty of proctectomy is largely unexplored. OBJECTIVE: To determine pelvic structural factors associated with incomplete total mesorectal excision after curative proctectomy and build a predictive model for total mesorectal excision quality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A quaternary referral center database of patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma (2009–2017). PATIENTS: Curative-intent proctectomy for rectal adenocarcinoma. INTERVENTIONS: All radiological measurements were obtained from preoperative CT images using validated imaging processing software tools. Completeness of total mesorectal excision was obtained from histology reports. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ability of radiological pelvimetry and obesity measurements to predict total mesorectal excision quality. RESULTS: Of the 410 cases meeting inclusion criteria, 362 underwent a complete total mesorectal excision (88%). Multivariable regression identified a deeper sacral curve (per 100 mm 2 OR: 1.14; 95% CI, 1.06–1.23; p < 0.001) and a greater transverse distance of the pelvic outlet (per 10 mm OR:1.41, 95% CI, 1.08–1.84; p = 0.012) to be independently associated with incomplete total mesorectal excision. An increased area of the pelvic inlet (per 10 cm 2 OR: 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75–0.97; p = 0.02) was associated with a higher rate of complete mesorectal excision. No difference in visceral obesity ratio and visceral obesity (ratio >0.4 vs <0.4) between BMI (<30 vs ≥30) and sex was identified. A model was built to predict mesorectal quality using the following variables: depth of sacral curve, area of pelvic inlet, and transverse distance of the pelvic outlet. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective analysis is not controlled for the choice of surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvimetry predicts total mesorectal excision quality in rectal cancer surgery and can alert surgeons preoperatively to cases of unusual difficulty. This predictive model may contribute to treatment strategy and aid in the comparison of outcomes between traditional and novel techniques of total mesorectal excision. See Video Abstract . USO DE MEDICIONES DE PELVIMETRÍA Y OBESIDAD VISCERAL BASADAS EN TC PARA PREDECIR LA CALIDAD DE TME EN PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A CIRUGÍA DE CÁNCER DE RECTO ANTECEDENTES: Una escisión mesorrectal total y completa es el estándar de oro en la cirugía curativa del cáncer de recto. Garantizar la calidad es un desafío en una pelvis estrecha y la obesidad amplifica las dificultades técnicas. La pelvimetría es la medición de las dimensiones pélvicas, pero su papel para medir la dificultad preoperatoria de la proctectomía está en gran medida inexplorado. OBJETIVO: Determinar los factores estructurales pélvicos asociados con la escisión mesorrectal total incompleta después de una proctectomía curativa y construir un modelo predictivo para la calidad de la escisión mesorrectal total. DISEÑO: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo. ÁMBITO: Base de datos de un centro de referencia cuaternario de pacientes diagnosticados con adenocarcinoma de recto (2009-2017). PACIENTES: Proctectomía con intención curativa para adenocarcinoma de recto. INTERVENCIONES: Todas las mediciones radiológicas se obtuvieron a partir de imágenes de TC preoperatorias utilizando herramientas de software de procesamiento de imágenes validadas. La integridad de la escisión mesorrectal total se obtuvo a partir de informes histológicos. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN: Capacidad de la pelvimetría radiológica y las mediciones de obesidad para predecir la calidad total de la escisión mesorrectal. RESULTADOS: De los 410 casos que cumplieron los criterios de inclusión, 362 tuvieron una escisión mesorrectal total completa (88%). Una regresión multivariable identificó una curva sacra más profunda (por 100 mm2); OR:1,14,IC95%:1,06-1,23,p<0,001, y mayor distancia transversal de salida pélvica (por 10mm); OR:1,41, IC 95%:1,08-1,84,p=0,012 como asociación independiente con escisión mesorrectal total incompleta. Un área aumentada de entrada pélvica (por 10 cm2); OR:0,85, IC95%:0,75-0,97,p=0,02 se asoció con una mayor tasa de escisión mesorrectal completa. No se identificaron diferencias en la proporción de obesidad visceral y la obesidad visceral (proporción>0,4 vs.<0,4) entre el índice de masa corporal (<30 vs.>=30) o el sexo. Se construyó un modelo para predecir la calidad mesorrectal utilizando variables: profundidad de la curva sacra, área de la entrada pélvica y distancia transversal de la salida pélvica. LIMITACIONES: Análisis retrospectivo no controlado por la elección del abordaje quirúrgico. CONCLUSIONES: La pelvimetría predice la calidad de la escisión mesorrectal total en la cirugía del cáncer de recto y puede alertar a los cirujanos preoperatoriamente sobre casos de dificultad inusual. Este modelo predictivo puede contribuir a la estrategia de tratamiento y ayudar en la comparación de resultados entre técnicas tradicionales y novedosas de escisión mesorrectal total. (Traducción— Dr. Ingrid Melo)
Renal Mass Biopsy—A Renaissance? Lane, Brian R; Samplaski, Mary K; Herts, Brian R ...
The Journal of urology,
2008, 2008-Jan, 2008-01-00, 20080101, Volume:
179, Issue:
1
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
Purpose Advances in our understanding of the natural history and limited aggressive potential of many small renal masses, expanding treatment options and the integration of molecular factors into ...prognostic and therapeutic algorithms have stimulated renewed interest in percutaneous renal mass biopsy. Materials and Methods A comprehensive literature review was performed using MEDLINE®/PubMed® to evaluate the indications, techniques, complications and efficacy of renal mass biopsy. Results Reported techniques of renal mass biopsy vary widely with different modes of radiographic guidance, needle size, number of cores and pathological analyses. Percutaneous renal mass biopsy with 2 or 3 cores using 18 gauge needles may improve diagnostic accuracy without increasing morbidity. Serious complications of percutaneous biopsy are rare and the minor complication rate in recent series has been less than 5%. The reported rate of technical failure of renal mass biopsy due to insufficient material was about 9% before 2001 and 5% in more recent studies. The likelihood of indeterminate or inaccurate pathological findings has decreased from 10% to 4% when comparing clinical studies before and since 2001. Currently a total success rate of greater than 90% is attainable using renal mass biopsy with standard histopathological analysis. Recent studies demonstrated that combining immunohistochemical and molecular analyses may further improve renal mass biopsy accuracy. Conclusions Research on expanded analysis of percutaneous renal mass biopsy specimens should remain a top priority. Enhanced renal mass biopsy should not change treatment in most patients with small renal masses, who should be treated with surgical excision. However, future clinical algorithms will likely incorporate enhanced biopsy in situations in which decision making is more challenging.
Despite substantial advances in the imaging-based diagnosis of renal masses, the increased detection of incidental renal masses with cross-sectional imaging poses problems to the radiologist and ...referring physician. Most incidental renal masses can be diagnosed with confidence and either ignored or treated without further testing. However, some renal masses, particularly small ones, remain indeterminate and require a management strategy that is both medically appropriate and practical. In this article, the literature will be reviewed and an approach to the diagnosis and management of the incidental renal mass will be suggested. Management recommendations, derived from data regarding the probability of malignancy in cystic and solid renal masses, are provided for two types of patients, those in the general population and those with limited life expectancy or co-morbidity. The Bosniak classification is used to guide the management of cystic masses, with observation reserved for selected patients, and the presumption of benignity recommended for simple-appearing cystic masses smaller than 1 cm. Among solid renal masses, a more aggressive overall approach is taken. However, additional imaging, and in selected patients, percutaneous biopsy, is recommended to diagnose benign neoplasms. Although additional studies are needed to establish risks and benefits, observation of solid masses may be considered in selected patients. Minimally invasive treatments of renal cancer (including percutaneous ablation) show promise but at the same time challenge the radiologist to review the approach to the incidental renal mass.
The ACR Incidental Findings Committee (IFC) presents recommendations for renal masses that are incidentally detected on CT. These recommendations represent an update from the renal component of the ...JACR 2010 white paper on managing incidental findings in the adrenal glands, kidneys, liver, and pancreas. The Renal Subcommittee, consisting of six abdominal radiologists and one urologist, developed this algorithm. The recommendations draw from published evidence and expert opinion and were finalized by informal iterative consensus. Each flowchart within the algorithm describes imaging features that identify when there is a need for additional imaging, surveillance, or referral for management. Our goal is to improve quality of care by providing guidance for managing incidentally detected renal masses.
As multidetector CT has come to play a more central role in medical care and as CT image quality has improved, there has been an increase in the frequency of detecting "incidental findings," defined ...as findings that are unrelated to the clinical indication for the imaging examination performed. These "incidentalomas," as they are also called, often confound physicians and patients with how to manage them. Although it is known that most incidental findings are likely benign and often have little or no clinical significance, the inclination to evaluate them is often driven by physician and patient unwillingness to accept uncertainty, even given the rare possibility of an important diagnosis. The evaluation and surveillance of incidental findings have also been cited as among the causes for the increased utilization of cross-sectional imaging. Indeed, incidental findings may be serious, and hence, when and how to evaluate them are unclear. The workup of incidentalomas has varied widely by physician and region, and some standardization is desirable in light of the current need to limit costs and reduce risk to patients. Subjecting a patient with an incidentaloma to unnecessary testing and treatment can result in a potentially injurious and expensive cascade of tests and procedures. With the participation of other radiologic organizations listed herein, the ACR formed the Incidental Findings Committee to derive a practical and medically appropriate approach to managing incidental findings on CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis. The committee has used a consensus method based on repeated reviews and revisions of this document and a collective review and interpretation of relevant literature. This white paper provides guidance developed by this committee for addressing incidental findings in the kidneys, liver, adrenal glands, and pancreas.
The objective of this study was to measure the accuracy and interobserver agreement of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, version 2 (PI-RADSv2), for the characterization of prostate ...lesions on multiparametric MRI.
This retrospective study included 170 men examined at a single institution between August 2014 and February 2015 on a 3-T MRI scanner. Study patients were found to have lesions concerning for prostate cancer that were targeted for MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy. Two experienced readers independently assigned a PI-RADSv2 assessment category to the dominant lesion in each patient. The AUC was calculated to determine reader accuracy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4). The Cohen kappa statistic was used to quantify interobserver agreement.
The prevalence of clinically significant prostate cancer was 0.36 (61/170 patients). The AUCs for readers 1 and 2 were 0.871 and 0.882, respectively. The AUCs were greater for peripheral zone lesions than for transition zone lesions. When a PI-RADSv2 assessment category ≥ 3 was considered positive, the agreement between readers was good overall (κ = 0.63) and was fair for transition zone lesions (κ = 0.53). When a PI-RADSv2 assessment category ≥ 4 was considered positive, the agreement was excellent overall (κ = 0.91) and was excellent for both peripheral zone lesions (κ = 0.91) and transition zone lesions (κ = 0.87).
Two experienced readers were able to accurately identify patients with clinically significant prostate cancer using PI-RADSv2 with good interobserver agreement overall.
PDF