In a randomized trial, alirocumab (a monoclonal antibody that inhibits PCSK9), as compared with placebo, reduced LDL cholesterol levels by an additional 62 percentage points. In a post hoc analysis, ...the incidence of cardiovascular events was reduced with alirocumab.
Monoclonal antibodies to proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 (PCSK9) have been shown to reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in patients who are being treated with statins. In phase 2 studies lasting 8 to 12 weeks, the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab lowered LDL cholesterol levels by 40 to 70% when added to background statin therapy.
1
–
3
However, this new treatment needs to be evaluated in larger populations for longer periods of follow-up to establish its safety and efficacy.
4
–
7
We conducted a 78-week trial comparing alirocumab (150 mg every 2 weeks) with placebo in 2341 patients at high risk for cardiovascular . . .
Background The ODYSSEY COMBO I study ( http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01644175 ) evaluated efficacy and safety of alirocumab as add-on therapy to stable maximally tolerated daily statin with or ...without other lipid-lowering therapy in high cardiovascular risk patients with suboptimally controlled hypercholesterolemia. Methods This multicenter, phase 3, randomized (2:1 alirocumab vs placebo), double-blind, 52-week trial enrolled 316 patients with established coronary heart disease or coronary heart disease risk equivalents and hypercholesterolemia. Alirocumab (75 mg every 2 weeks Q2W) or placebo Q2W was self-administered subcutaneously via 1 mL prefilled pen. The alirocumab dose was increased to 150 mg Q2W (also 1 mL) at week 12 if week 8 low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was ≥70 mg/dL. The primary efficacy end point was percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 (intention-to-treat analysis). Results At week 24, estimated mean (95% CI) changes in LDL-C from baseline were −48.2% (−52.0% to −44.4%) and −2.3% (−7.6% to 3.1%) for alirocumab and placebo, respectively, an estimated mean (95% CI) difference of −45.9% (−52.5% to −39.3%) ( P < .0001). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dL was achieved by 75% alirocumab versus 9% placebo patients at week 24. At week 12, 83.2% of evaluable alirocumab-treated patients remained on 75-mg Q2W. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups. Conclusions Alirocumab treatment achieved a significantly greater reduction in LDL-C and allowed a greater proportion of patients to achieve LDL-C goals, versus placebo after 24 weeks in high cardiovascular risk patients with suboptimally controlled hypercholesterolemia at baseline despite receiving maximally tolerated statin with or without other lipid-lowering therapy. The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events and study medication discontinuations were generally comparable between treatment groups.
Previous individual trials of alirocumab (a PCSK9 monoclonal antibody) showed significant low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reductions with overall treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates ...comparable with controls. This analysis evaluated safety data from 14 trials (4 phase 2 and 10 phase 3, 8 to 104 weeks; n = 5,234), in 2 pools according to control (placebo/ezetimibe). Overall, 3,340 patients received alirocumab (4,029 patient-years' exposure), 1,276 received placebo, and 618 received ezetimibe. Incidence of deaths, serious TEAEs, discontinuations because of TEAEs, and overall TEAEs were similar between alirocumab and control groups. Alirocumab was associated with a higher incidence of local injection site reactions (7.4% vs 5.3% with placebo; 3.1% vs 2.3% with ezetimibe), pruritus (1.3% vs 0.4% placebo; 0.9% vs 0.5% ezetimibe), and upper respiratory tract infection signs and symptoms (2.1% vs 1.1% placebo; 1.3% vs 0.8% ezetimibe). Incidence of musculoskeletal, neurologic, neurocognitive, ophthalmologic, hepatic events, and TEAEs related to diabetes/diabetes complications was similar between alirocumab and control groups. In a prespecified analysis of phase 3 studies, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events (coronary heart disease death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and unstable angina requiring hospitalization) occurred in 1.8% alirocumab versus 2.6% placebo patients (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 1.11) and 2.8% alirocumab versus 1.5% ezetimibe patients (hazard ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 3.02). In conclusion, pooled safety data from 14 trials demonstrate that alirocumab is generally well tolerated with a favorable safety profile.
To compare the efficacy low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering and safety of alirocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9, compared with ...ezetimibe, as add-on therapy to maximally tolerated statin therapy in high cardiovascular risk patients with inadequately controlled hypercholesterolaemia.
COMBO II is a double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group, 104-week study of alirocumab vs. ezetimibe. Patients (n = 720) with high cardiovascular risk and elevated LDL-C despite maximal doses of statins were enrolled (August 2012-May 2013). This pre-specified analysis was conducted after the last patient completed 52 weeks. Patients were randomized to subcutaneous alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (plus oral placebo) or oral ezetimibe 10 mg daily (plus subcutaneous placebo) on a background of statin therapy. At Week 24, mean ± SE reductions in LDL-C from baseline were 50.6 ± 1.4% for alirocumab vs. 20.7 ± 1.9% for ezetimibe (difference 29.8 ± 2.3%; P < 0.0001); 77.0% of alirocumab and 45.6% of ezetimibe patients achieved LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L (P < 0.0001). Mean achieved LDL-C at Week 24 was 1.3 ± 0.04 mmol/L with alirocumab and 2.1 ± 0.05 mmol/L with ezetimibe, and were maintained to Week 52. Alirocumab was generally well tolerated, with no evidence of an excess of treatment-emergent adverse events.
In patients at high cardiovascular risk with inadequately controlled LDL-C, alirocumab achieved significantly greater reductions in LDL-C compared with ezetimibe, with a similar safety profile.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01644188.
The Project Optimus initiative by the FDA's Oncology Center of Excellence is widely viewed as a groundbreaking effort to change the status quo of conventional dose-finding strategies in oncology. ...Unlike in other therapeutic areas where multiple doses are evaluated thoroughly in dose ranging studies, early-phase oncology dose-finding studies are characterized by the practice of identifying a single dose, such as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Following the spirit of Project Optimus, we propose an Multi-Arm Two-Stage (MATS) design for proof-of-concept (PoC) and dose optimization that allows the evaluation of two selected doses from a dose-escalation trial. The design assesses the higher dose first across multiple indications in the first stage, and adaptively enters the second stage for an indication if the higher dose exhibits promising anti-tumor activities. In the second stage, a randomized comparison between the higher and lower doses is conducted to achieve PoC and dose optimization. A Bayesian hierarchical model governs the statistical inference and decision making by borrowing information across doses, indications, and stages. Our simulation studies show that the proposed MATS design yield desirable performance. An R Shiny application has been developed and made available at https://matsdesign.shinyapps.io/mats/.
To assess long-term (78 weeks) alirocumab treatment in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH) and inadequate LDL-C control on maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy ...(LLT).
In two randomized, double-blind studies (ODYSSEY FH I, n = 486; FH II, n = 249), patients were randomized 2 : 1 to alirocumab 75 mg or placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W). Alirocumab dose was increased at Week 12 to 150 mg Q2W if Week 8 LDL-C was ≥1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). Primary endpoint (both studies) was percentage change in calculated LDL-C from baseline to Week 24. Mean LDL-C levels decreased from 3.7 mmol/L (144.7 mg/dL) at baseline to 1.8 mmol/L (71.3 mg/dL; -57.9% vs. placebo) at Week 24 in patients randomized to alirocumab in FH I and from 3.5 mmol/L (134.6 mg/dL) to 1.8 mmol/L (67.7 mg/dL; -51.4% vs. placebo) in FH II (P < 0.0001). These reductions were maintained through Week 78. LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L (regardless of cardiovascular risk) was achieved at Week 24 by 59.8 and 68.2% of alirocumab-treated patients in FH I and FH II, respectively. Adverse events resulted in discontinuation in 3.4% of alirocumab-treated patients in FH I (vs. 6.1% placebo) and 3.6% (vs. 1.2%) in FH II. Rate of injection site reactions in alirocumab-treated patients was 12.4% in FH I and 11.4% in FH II (vs. 11.0 and 7.4% with placebo).
In patients with HeFH and inadequate LDL-C control at baseline despite maximally tolerated statin ± other LLT, alirocumab treatment resulted in significant LDL-C lowering and greater achievement of LDL-C target levels and was well tolerated.
Cinicaltrials.gov (identifiers: NCT01623115; NCT01709500).
Purpose
Even with statins and other lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), many patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH) continue to have elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ...(LDL-C) levels. ODYSSEY HIGH FH (NCT01617655) assessed the efficacy and safety of alirocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibody, versus placebo in patients with heFH and LDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dl despite maximally tolerated statin ± other LLT.
Methods
Patients were randomized to subcutaneous alirocumab 150 mg or placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 78 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24.
Results
Mean baseline LDL-C levels were 196.3 mg/dl in the alirocumab (
n
= 71) and 201.0 mg/dl in the placebo groups (
n
= 35). Significant mean (standard error SE) reductions in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 were observed with alirocumab (−45.7 3.5 %) versus placebo (−6.6 4.9 %), a difference of −39.1 (6.0) % (
P
< 0.0001). Absolute mean (SE) LDL-C levels were reduced from baseline by 90.8 (6.7) mg/dl with alirocumab at week 24, with reductions maintained to week 78. Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally comparable between groups. Injection-site reactions were more frequent in the alirocumab group (8.3 %) versus placebo (5.7 %); most were mild in severity and did not result in study medication discontinuation.
Conclusions
In patients with heFH and very high LDL-C baseline levels despite maximally tolerated statin ± other LLT, alirocumab 150 mg Q2W demonstrated significant reductions in LDL-C levels with 41 % of patients achieving predefined LDL-C goals. Alirocumab was generally well tolerated.
With recent accelerated approvals of histology-agnostic novel agents, conducting basket trials that evaluate an investigational therapy on different histologies is gaining momentum, thanks to the ...underlying common biological anti-cancer mechanism of action. Statistical models are proposed to boost statistical efficiency by leveraging information across cohorts to harvest the shared response signal. However, limited research exists about establishing a quantitative decision-making framework for basket trials. Robustness of a dichotomized "Go/No-Go" decision may be suboptimal when an "inconclusive" decision is more appropriate. Accordingly, the three-outcome decision-making (3ODM) framework with an additional "Consider" zone has gained popularity, and we propose to incorporate 3ODM into basket trials for the benefit of robustness and flexibility, and for formal incorporation of between-cohort shared signal into 3ODM to improve its performance in basket trials. Our simulation study is the first to compare modeling of log odds ratio (on top of benchmark response rates, RRs) with modeling of RRs in most current basket trial designs, considering the potential drastic differences for reference and target RRs across cohorts. We used the exchangeability-nonexchangeability (EXNEX) model to evaluate operating characteristics of the EXNEX + 3ODM framework (with/without an interim analysis), although the proposed enhancement could be readily extended to different basket trial designs.
Most phase I trials in oncology aim to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on the occurrence of dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Evaluating the schedule of administration in addition to the ...dose may improve drug tolerance. Moreover, for some molecules, a bivariate toxicity endpoint may be more appropriate than a single endpoint. However, standard dose‐finding designs do not account for multiple dose regimens and bivariate toxicity endpoint within the same design. In this context, following a phase I motivating trial, we proposed modeling the first type of DLT, cytokine release syndrome, with the entire dose regimen using pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), whereas the other DLT (DLTo) was modeled with the cumulative dose. We developed three approaches to model the joint distribution of DLT, defining it as a bivariate binary outcome from the two toxicity types, under various assumptions about the correlation between toxicities: an independent model, a copula model and a conditional model. Our Bayesian approaches were developed to be applied at the end of the dose‐allocation stage of the trial, once all data, including PK/PD measurements, were available. The approaches were evaluated through an extensive simulation study that showed that they can improve the performance of selecting the true MTD‐regimen compared to the recommendation of the dose‐allocation method implemented. Our joint approaches can also predict the DLT probabilities of new dose regimens that were not tested in the study and could be investigated in further stages of the trial.
PDF
