Abstract This is the first case report of an iatrogenic anterior hip dislocation after arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement with over 1 year of follow-up. This case report describes ...the clinical course of a patient with symptomatic cam-pincer femoroacetabular impingement. She underwent arthroscopic rim trimming, labral debridement after a failed attempt at labral refixation from suture cut-through, and femoral head-neck resection osteoplasty. The procedure involved supranormal hip distraction for extraction of an iatrogenic loose body (detached metallic radiofrequency probe tip). The patient had an anterior hip dislocation in the recovery room. Immediate closed reduction under general anesthesia and bracing were performed but failed despite the ability to obtain a concentric but grossly unstable reduction. After 3 failed attempts, a mini-open capsulorrhaphy was performed that successfully restored stability. Her postoperative management and outcome are presented. All of the major static stabilizers of the hip (osseous, labral, and capsuloligamentous) were surgically altered, and a multifactorial causation is proposed. Lessons learned are discussed in hopes of minimizing the occurrence of this rare but dramatic complication.
The perfect femoroplasty varies with the individual patient’s pathoanatomy and is a prime example of the art and science of surgery. Radiographs are two-dimensional representations of a ...three-dimensional reality and can miss detection of cam impingement. Cam impingement may occur without cam morphology as femoral retrotorsion and/or supraphysiological range of motion (e.g., dancers and martial artists) may cause cam impingement with normal α-angles and anterior offset. Acetabuloplasty or acetabular reorientation osteotomy may change the dynamic interaction between the proximal femur and acetabular rim and may alter the location and extent of cam decompression. Although much is discussed about the α-angle, restoration of anterior offset is also important. Incremental femoroplasty assessed in real time by arthroscopic dynamic examination is key, as the surgeon sculpts a nonimpinging proximal femur using a burr rather than a chisel in creating a customized surgical masterpiece.
Pubalgia means pubic pain. This is different from core muscle injury (implying muscular pathology) or inguinal disruption (different anatomic region). Athletic pubalgia includes a myriad of ...pathologic conditions involving the pubic symphysis, adductors, rectus abdominis, posterior inguinal wall, and/or related nerves. Moreover, growing evidence supports a link between femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and pubalgic conditions. Constrained hip range of motion in flexion causing obligatory transitory, even ballistic, posterior tilting of the hemipelvis may produce pathologic transfer stress to not only the pubic symphysis but the sacroiliac joint, lumbar spine, and proximal hamstrings, manifesting in diverse, often-painful, conditions. In select cases of pubalgia, patients may have clinical improvement with concurrent or even isolated treatment addressing FAI. Unlike atypical posterior hip pain from FAI, which may be referred pain that might respond favorably, albeit temporarily, to an intra-articular injection, secondary pubic pain from a transfer stress pathomechanism might not be expected to benefit from such. And, it’s not always FAI. Some patients who do not respond to nonoperative management may not require arthroscopic surgery and might benefit from open or laparoscopic mesh hernia repair, adductor tenotomy, primary tissue (hernia) repair, rectus abdominis repair, or even endoscopic surgery for osteitis pubis and/or pubalgia. And, finally, these may be combined with FAI surgical treatment. Refinement of definitions, pathologic conditions, technical advances, and collaboration with general surgeons will best help us treat our patients.
Orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship experience in hip arthroscopy is increasing rapidly (2.6-fold from 2011 to 2016), although the case numbers vary quite widely (64-fold) depending on the ...program. Orthopaedic providers are now able to refine diagnoses and refer or render indicated less-invasive hip treatment options, many of which yield outcomes equaling or surpassing those of open equivalents. Patients benefit. Our profession benefits. However, advanced hip arthroscopy procedures are technically challenging, and complications can be significant in inexperienced hands. For those who choose to perform hip arthroscopy after fellowship training, continuing hip arthroscopy education and skill development is essential.
Abstract Arthroscopic hip capsular repair is an area of intense interest. Basic science studies suggest that adverse changes in capsular stability/restraint may occur with capsulotomy and ...capsulectomy, that repair may ameliorate these changes, and, most recently, that the repaired capsule usually heals. Clinical studies suggest that in some conditions, most notably mild dysplasia, capsular repair or plication may improve short-term outcomes, but in general, the role of capsular closure is less clear. At present, perhaps a selective approach is merited, with capsular closure performed in patients with dysplasia, focal or generalized hyperlaxity, and/or increased femoral anteversion. The comparative outcomes from smaller, more vertically oriented capsulotomies with less violation of the iliofemoral ligament deserve investigation.
Abstract Recent reports of poor clinical outcomes after arthroscopic surgery in hips with marked dysplasia have emerged. Arthroscopic resection of the hypertrophic labrum in cases of dysplasia, ...especially in the absence of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), has been implicated. Some patients will refuse PAO because it is a major open procedure, opting for a less invasive arthroscopic procedure. We present the cases of 2 young adults with marked dysplasia who had rapidly progressive osteoarthrosis despite arthroscopic labral repair. Though perhaps beneficial as an isolated procedure in borderline or mild dysplasia cases, arthroscopic hip surgery, even labral repair, may best be performed with PAO in cases with more severe dysplasia. Albeit attractive as a less invasive labral-preserving surgery, arthroscopic labral repair not only may fail to provide symptomatic improvement but may compromise or preclude a later PAO if rapidly progressive osteoarthrosis ensues. Hip arthroscopy may best be performed concurrently with or after PAO but not proceeding PAO in patients requiring both procedures.
Background:
Borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH) is frequently diagnosed concurrently with cam impingement. While hip arthroscopy has advanced the treatment of hip joint pathology, ...including femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), arthroscopic treatment for FAI in the setting of BDDH remains a challenge amid a subset of patients. The risk factors of poor clinical results after hip arthroscopic labral preservation and FAI corrections in the setting of BDDH patients have not been well established.
Hypothesis:
Pre- and intraoperative findings can predict the poor clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI in the setting of BDDH.
Study Design:
Case control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
Of patients with BDDH (defined as lateral center edge LCE angle between 20° and 25°) who underwent arthroscopic procedures for FAI between 2009 and 2014, 45 met inclusion criteria (45 hips: 15 males and 30 females). Their mean age was 31.4 years (range, 12-65 years), and the mean LCE angle was 23.2°. Clinical and radiographic follow-up evaluations up to a minimum of 2 years after surgery were performed for all patients. Failure of the procedure was defined as conversion to subsequent surgery or having a Tönnis osteoarthritis grade of 2, and success was defined as patients who did not need subsequent surgery. Univariate analysis and Cox hazard proportional analysis were performed for both cohorts.
Results:
Of 45 patients, 11 (24%) had revision surgery (endoscopic shelf acetabuloplasty for 5 patients, total hip arthroplasty for 2, and revision hip arthroscopy for 2) or advanced to Tönnis grade ≥2 osteoarthritis and thus constituted the failure group. In the success group, modified Harris Hip Score (median, pre- vs postoperative: 72.1 vs 100, P< .001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and nonarthritic hip score (58.8 vs 98.8, P< .001) were significantly improved at the minimum 2-year follow-up. The median age of the failure group was significantly higher than that of the success group (47.0 vs 20.0, P< .001, Mann-Whitney Utest). Risk factors of poor clinical outcomes were identified as follows: age ≥42 years (hazard ratio HR, 11.6; 95% CI, 2.5-53.9; P= .002, Cox hazard model), broken Shenton line (HR, 6.4; 95% CI, 1.9-22.3; P= .003), Tönnis angle ≥15° (HR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.2-12.9; P= .03), vertical center anterior (VCA) angle ≤17° (HR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.5-17.1; P= .01), Tönnis grade 1 at preoperative radiograph (HR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-11.7; P= .04), severe cartilage delamination at acetabulum (HR, 11.8; 95% CI, 3.0-46.1; P< .001), and mild cartilage damage at femoral head (HR, 8.1; 95% CI, 2.1-30.8; P= .002).
Conclusion:
Preoperative predictors of poorer outcomes from hip arthroscopic labral preservation, capsular plication, and cam osteoplasty in the setting of BDDH are age ≥42 years old, broken Shenton line, osteoarthritis, Tönnis angle ≥15°, and VCA angle ≤17° on preoperative radiographs. Intraoperative predictors of poorer outcomes are severe acetabular chondral damage and even mild femoral chondral damage. Although the patients in the setting of BDDH may have good outcomes from isolated hip arthroscopy, caution is suggested for those with the aforementioned risk factors.
Abstract Protrusio acetabuli has been considered a contraindication for hip arthroscopy. We present the case of a 33-year-old man with bilateral symptomatic protrusio acetabuli—the most extreme form ...of global pincer femoroacetabular impingement—and cam femoroacetabular impingement. We demonstrate the feasibility of the arthroscopic correction of severe deformities and describe key surgical steps permitting central compartment access, subtotal acetabuloplasty, labral reconstruction, and femoroplasty of the right hip, followed by later subtotal acetabuloplasty, labral refixation, and femoroplasty of the left hip, with improved outcomes at 2 and 1 years, respectively, as measured by the nonarthritic hip score. Though challenging, global pincer impingement, even acetabular protrusion, may be successfully treated with dual-portal outpatient hip arthroscopy. The modified midanterior portal enables central compartment access and extended posterior “reach” in the arthroscopic treatment of major global pincer femoroacetabular impingement, potentially making this contraindication a historical one while respectfully challenging the “global” recommendation for open surgery in this setting.
In the experience of a high-volume hip arthroscopic surgeon with a referral practice, a bimodal age distribution could be common. Younger patients presenting with symptomatic hip pathology ...recalcitrant to nonoperative management may seek or be referred to high-volume surgeons, and older patients absent significant osteoarthritis may also be surgical candidates. Lower-volume hip surgeons could have higher complication rates, and it is incumbent on higher-volume surgeons to train upcoming colleagues as hip arthroscopy continues to grow.
The incidence of hip arthroscopy is increasing over time, as is the rate of labral repairs performed by American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery candidates in general and by sports medicine ...fellowship-trained candidates in particular. However, both arthroscopic labral debridement and repair yield excellent minimum 10-year outcomes in well-selected femoroacetabular impingement patients. In my practice, most hip arthroscopy patients undergo labral repair, and labral reconstruction is performed in about 4%, so I view the rising use of labral repair as a step forward. But concerns remain. How many of these American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery candidates will be able to hone their arthroscopic skills (and clinical judgment) in anywhere near the number of cases needed to achieve demonstrably low reoperation rates? In addition, will these fledgling surgeons be able to perform labral reconstructions or augmentations when indicated, bearing in mind that only half of such cases could be predicted preoperatively? The definition of adequate hip arthroscopy training remains up for grabs.
PDF
