Despite advances in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), a subgroup of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are still managed medically by a conservative approach. We sought to characterize a ...contemporary, large-scale, real-world cohort of ACS patients treated conservatively via pharmacological management, without PCI. Data was gathered from the ACS Israeli Survey (ACSIS) between 2000 and 2016, encompassing all consecutive patients admitted to cardiology wards with an ACS diagnosis. Included were 3,543 conservatively managed patients with non-ST elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). Patients with ST elevation MI or those who underwent any coronary revascularization (PCI or bypass surgery) were excluded. Primary endpoints were 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and 1-year mortality. The study cohort was divided to 4 time-periods. Over 2 decades, medically managed NSTE-ACS patients remained of similar age (67 ± 13 years, p = 0.78), but had more atherosclerotic risk-factors and comorbidities. During time, patients were more often referred to diagnostic angiography and treated with statins, ACE-I/ARBs, and P2Y12 inhibitors (p < 0.001 for each). Over time, there were less in-hospital complications such as kidney injury and heart failure. The rate of 30-day MACE decreased (from 20.7% to 10.3%, earliest to latest period, p < 0.001). Compared with the earliest period, the latest period was associated with a reduction in 1-year mortality (14.7% to 11.6%; adjusted HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.90). In conclusion, Over 2 decades, in medically managed NSTE-ACS patients, short term prognosis has significantly improved while 1-year mortality demonstrated improvement only recently, likely due to incremental benefits of medical management.
Background Cardiac rehabilitation improves prognosis and symptoms in cardiac patients. In 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, cardiac rehabilitation services were temporarily suspended between April ...and August. We aimed to investigate the effect of cardiac rehabilitation suspension during the COVID-19 pandemic on patients’ exercise capacity and metabolic parameters. Methods Included were patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation following hospital admission for ACS. Exercise capacity, weight and body fat percentage were compared between baseline, pre- and post-lockdown visits. Results A total of 281 patients participated in the cardiac rehabilitation program prior to its suspension. Of them, only 198 (70%) patients returned to the program on its renewal and were included in the analysis. Exercise capacity improved significantly in the pre-lockdown stress test compared to baseline. However, there was a significant decrease in exercise capacity in the post compared to pre-lockdown test (8.1±6.3 and 7.1±2.1 METs in pre- and post-lockdown measurements, respectively, p<0.001). Of the 99 (50%) of patients that demonstrated at least 10% improvement in exercise capacity in the pre-lockdown test, 48(48.5%) patients returned to their baseline values in the post-lockdown test. Post-lockdown assessment demonstrated a significant weight gain (80.3 and 81.1kg, in pre- and post-lockdown measurements, respectively, p<0.001) as well as an increase in visceral fat level and body fat percentage. Conclusions Cardiac rehabilitation suspension for 4 months during COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant reduction in exercise capacity and increased weight and body fat percent. These findings highlight the importance of remote cardiac rehabilitation services that can continue uninterrupted in times of pandemic.
