General anaesthetics generate spatially defined brain oscillations in the EEG that relate fundamentally to neural-circuit architecture. Few studies detailing the neural-circuit activity of general ...anaesthesia in children have been described. The study aim was to identify age-related changes in EEG characteristics that mirror different stages of early human brain development during sevoflurane anaesthesia.
Multichannel EEG recordings were performed in 91 children aged 0–3 yr undergoing elective surgery. We mapped spatial power and coherence over the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital cortices during maintenance anaesthesia.
During sevoflurane exposure: (i) slow–delta (0.1–4 Hz) oscillations were present in all ages, (ii) theta (4–8 Hz) and alpha (8–12 Hz) oscillations emerge by ∼4 months, (iii) alpha oscillations increased in power from 4 to 10 months, (iv) frontal alpha-oscillation predominance emerged at ∼6 months, (v) frontal slow oscillations were coherent from birth until 6 months, and (vi) frontal alpha oscillations became coherent ∼10 months and persisted in older ages.
Key developmental milestones in the maturation of the thalamo-cortical circuitry likely generate changes in EEG patterns in infants undergoing sevoflurane general anaesthesia. Characterisation of anaesthesia-induced EEG oscillations in children demonstrates the importance of developing age-dependent strategies to monitor properly the brain states of children receiving general anaesthesia. These data have the potential to guide future studies investigating neurodevelopmental pathologies involving altered excitatory–inhibitory balance, such as epilepsy or Rett syndrome.
Neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia can reach 1 to 2 standard deviations below healthy controls. The comparative effect of typical and atypical antipsychotic medications on neurocognition is ...controversial, and based primarily on studies with small samples and large doses of typical comparator medications. The present study assessed neurocognitive efficacy. It was hypothesized that olanzapine treatment would improve neurocognitive deficits to a greater degree than either risperidone or haloperidol treatment. This was a double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel study with neurocognition assessed at baseline, and 8, 24, and 52 weeks. Per protocol, the haloperidol arm was discontinued. Four hundred and fourteen inpatients or outpatients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder were treated with oral olanzapine (
n
=
159), risperidone (
n
=
158), or haloperidol (
n
=
97). Individual domains (executive function, learning and memory, processing speed, attention/vigilance, verbal working memory, verbal fluency, motor function, and visuospatial ability) were transformed into composite scores and compared between treatment groups. At the 52-week endpoint, neurocognition significantly improved in each group (
p
<
0.01 for olanzapine and risperidone,
p
=
0.04 for haloperidol), with no significant differences between groups. Olanzapine- and risperidone-treated patients significantly (
p
<
0.05) improved on domains of executive function, learning/memory, processing speed, attention/vigilance, verbal working memory, and motor functions. Additionally, risperidone-treated patients improved on domains of visuospatial memory. Haloperidol-treated patients improved only on domains of learning/memory. However, patients able to remain in treatment for the entire 52 weeks benefited more from olanzapine or risperidone treatment than haloperidol treatment.
The syndrome of schizophrenia often includes negative symptoms and severe cognitive deficits that are resistant to change with conventional pharmacotherapy. The efficacy of clozapine in the reduction ...of the negative syndrome has prompted a series of studies implicating circumscribed cognitive improvements. Restrictions on the use of clozapine have encouraged the development and introduction of novel compounds with a clinical efficacy profile similar to clozapine that are hoped also to have beneficial cognitive effects. The present review summarizes studies of the cognitive efficacy of novel antipsychotic medications, particularly in regard to issues in experiment design and study implementation that might facilitate additional research. Although preliminary support exists for relatively circumscribed improvement of cognitive status with the use of clozapine and risperidone—and more general improvement with the use of olanzapine—specific inferences relating cognitive change to particular treatments will remain speculative until more sophisticated investigations are completed. The present review emphasises the most relevant design limitations in past studies to provide practical suggestions for the implementation of subsequent investigations. Previous results have established the possibility of a medication-based change in cognitive status in schizophrenia. Future research will determine the validity of these changes, the cerebral mechanism involved, and their significance to improved prognosis.
Cognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia and a major impediment to social and vocational rehabilitation. A number of studies have claimed cognitive benefits from treatment with various ...atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs). The currently available evidence supporting cognitive improvement with atypical APDs was evaluated in two meta-analyses. Studies that (1) prospectively examined cognitive change to the atypical APDs clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone, (2) included a commonly used neuropsychological test, and (3) provided data from which relevant effect sizes could be calculated, were included. Forty-one studies met these criteria. Neuropsychological test data from each study were combined into a Global Cognitive Index and nine cognitive domain scores. Two meta-analyses were carried out. The first included 14 controlled, random assignment trials that assigned subjects to an atypical APD and a typical APD control arm. The second analysis included all prospective investigations of atypical treatment and the within-group change score divided by its standard deviation served as an estimate of effect size (ES). The first analysis revealed that atypicals are superior to typicals at improving overall cognitive function (ES=0.24). Specific improvements were observed in the learning and processing speed domains. The second analysis extended the improvements to a broader range of cognitive domains (ES range=0.17–0.46) and identified significant differences between treatments in attention and verbal fluency. Moderator variables such as study blind and random assignment influence results of cognitive change to atypical APDs. Atypical antipsychotics produce a mild remediation of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, and specific atypicals have differential effects within certain cognitive domains.
To assess the efficacy of quetiapine, a recently introduced second generation antipsychotic medication, in reducing cognitive impairment in patients with schizophrenia.
Prospective, randomized, ...double-blind clinical trial.
25 patients who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, (DSM-IV) criteria for schizophrenia were recruited from 3 Canadian hospitals.
After a 48-hour washout period, 25 patients with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with quetiapine or haloperidol for 6 months and evaluated with rating scales for psychotic symptoms, mood and extrapyramidal side effects, as well as standardized neuropsychological measures sensitive to 6 cognitive domains: fine motor skill, attention span, verbal reasoning and fluency, visuospatial construction and fluency, executive skills and visuomotor tracking, and immediate recall of verbal and nonverbal materials. The measures were repeated 8 weeks and 6 months after treatment was initiated.
Quetiapine improved psychosis and mood without inducing extrapyramidal symptoms. Quetiapine also had beneficial effects on cognitive skills, particularly verbal reasoning and fluency skills and immediate recall, with additional improvements on executive skills and visuomotor tracking and on the average of the 6 cognitive domains with sustained treatment. Patients taking haloperidol showed improvements in general clinical status, but no specific improvements on the positive syndrome, the negative syndrome, depression ratings or cognitive skills.
These preliminary results support the potential value of quetiapine for improving cognitive impairment in patients with schizophrenia and emphasize the importance of further research with this promising atypical antipsychotic.
Uni-rhinal olfactory acuity in schizophrenia was investigated in two experiments. The first assessed the presence of a predicted atypical asymmetry of nostril laterality and the second assessed the ...effect of antipsychotic treatment on the asymmetry. Although olfactory identification impairment has been well documented in schizophrenia, olfactory acuity has been neglected. This may be an oversight as cerebral structures of the mesial temporal lobe important to olfactory perception have often been implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and it is thus reasonable to postulate a primary impairment of olfactory acuity in schizophrenia. In addition, unmedicated patients with schizophrenia have exhibited asymmetrical laterality favouring the right over the left hemisphere in studies of visual, haptic, and auditory perception, and the few published prospective treatment studies have suggested a reversal of this asymmetry with first generation neuroleptic treatments. In experiment 1 a generalization of the perceptual asymmetry to olfactory acuity was examined by measurement of n-butanol olfactory thresholds with the Connecticut Chemosensory Perception Exam (CCPE) in an unmedicated sample of 17 patients with schizophrenia and 17 age, gender, and handedness matched normal controls. The patient sample showed an asymmetrical impairment of the left nostril that was not apparent in the normal control sample. In experiment 2, the CCPE was administered to a new sample of 10 patients with schizophrenia before and after neuroleptic treatment. The asymmetry observed in experiment 1 was replicated, and the relative advantage of the right nostril shifted to a relative advantage of the left nostril over the course of 8
weeks of treatment. Results are discussed in relation to cerebral aspects of schizophrenia and potential implications to cognitive change from treatment.
Neuropsychological change after 6
weeks of clozapine treatment was examined in 18 treatment-refractory patients to test anticipated domain-specific cognitive improvements. The first aim of this study ...was to test the assumption that increased homogeneity of sample and treatment would yield an experimental design with sufficient sensitivity to detect general intellectual changes with clozapine that were not apparent in one previous investigation. The second aim was to test predictions derived from a domain-specific review of all other investigations with clozapine suggesting salient gains on tests sensitive to motor and mental speed, visual spatial manipulation, and new learning of verbal material. The results showed that the comprehensive neuropsychological test battery was sensitive to general cognitive changes with clozapine, and supported the hypothesized domain-specific gains on tests of motor and mental speed, visual spatial manipulation and new verbal learning. Novel gains were also apparent on tests of new learning with nonverbal material. The results are discussed in relation to aspects of experimental design necessary for the evaluation of prospective medication-induced changes in cognitive skill, particularly in future investigations designed to differentiate between second-generation antipsychotic medications.
Gender specific discrepancies on psychometric examination are often interpreted to reflect static differences in cerebral hemisphere specialization, but dynamic alterations relating to circulating ...gonadal hormones may also be relevant after puberty. The often cited inference of a right hemisphere advantage in males and left hemisphere advantage in females derived from small but reliable differences on spatial tasks and verbal tasks, for example, may to some extent relate to gender-specific differences in circulating gonadal hormones. Performance fluctuations on other higher order cognitive tasks through the menstrual cycle tend to support a temporal association between alterations in cerebral laterality and hormone fluctuations. A potential left hemisphere advantage after menstruation when estrogen and progesterone levels are high in contrast to a right hemisphere advantage at menstruation when estrogen and progesterone levels are low has also received support from shifts in visual field perception. The present investigation continues this line of work by measurement of prospective changes in unirhinal olfactory acuity in the menstrual, ovulatory, and midluteal phases of the menstrual cycle in 11 healthy women who agreed to blood assays of estradiol and progesterone prior to completing a modified version of the Connecticut Chemosensory Perception Exam (CCPE). The CCPE detection of n-butanol showed a clear pattern of changes over the menstrual cycle marked by an asymmetry favoring the right nostril during menstruation when estradiol and progesterone levels were low, an asymmetry favoring the left nostril during ovulation when estradiol levels were high and progresterone levels were low, and an absence of asymmetry during the midluteal phase when estradiol levels decreased and progesterone levels increased. Preliminary correlation analyses revealed a potential competitive influence of estradiol and progesterone on this apparent shift in cerebral laterality. There is thus sufficient evidence to conclude that dynamic changes in relative cerebral hemisphere advantages have a temporal relation to fluctuations in circulating gonadal hormones and to suggest the value of additional investigation of more specific causal relations.
To test the discriminant validity of a model predicting a dissociation between measures of right and left frontal lobe function in people with schizophrenia.
Twenty-one clinically stable outpatients ...with schizophrenia.
Patients were administered the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), the Stroop Color-Word Test (Stroop), and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).
Scores on these tests and relation among scores.
There was a convergence of UPSII and Stroop interference scores consistent with a common cerebral basis for limitations in olfactory identification and inhibition of distraction. There was also a divergence of UPSIT and Stroop reading scores suggesting that the olfactory identification limitation is distinct from a general limitation of attention or a dysfunction of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Most notable was the 81% classification convergence between the UPSIT and Stroop incongruous colour naming scores compared with the near-random 57% classification convergence of the UPSIT and Stroop reading scores.
These data are consistent with a right orbitofrontal dysfunction in a subgroup of patients with schizophrenia, although the involvement of mesial temporal structures in both tasks must be ruled out with further study. A multifactorial model depicting contributions from diverse cerebral structures is required to describe the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Valid behavioural methods for classifying suspected subgroups of patients with particular cerebral dysfunction would be of value in the construction of this model.
PDF
