A 3-year prospective study examined 76 frontal (F) and 45 lateral (L) motor vehicle crash (MVC) patients with regard to seatbelt restraint use and occupant compartment contact and intrusion injuries. ...These 121 MVC victims with multiple injuries (39 belted B and 82 non-belted NB), admitted to a level I trauma center, were studied by accident reconstruction and medical data analysis. They had a MVC mean impact velocity (delta V) of 30 +/- 11 mph and an injury Severity Score of 29 +/- 12. Proper restraint use reduced brain injury in F MVCs (30% FB vs. 47% FNB) but had no effect in L MVCs (63% LB vs. 30% FB p < 0.06). Belt use did not protect against lung, liver, spleen, pelvis, or lower extremity (LE) injury. These appeared to be more a function of crash direction, with LE injuries higher in F crashes (p < 0.04) and pelvis injuries (p < 0.001) higher in L crashes. In FB crashes, however, properly used safety restraints were the primary cause of bowel or colon injuries (p < 0.006). Belts did not prevent thoracic or abdominal solid organ injuries in L crashes. Contact-intrusions (CI) of the car occupant compartment in F crashes were the main cause of brain (A-pillar), lung and liver (steering wheel and instrument panel), and LE (toepan) injuries; but in L crashes, side-door CI caused lung, aorta, liver, and pelvic injuries. In contrast, contact-only (CO) injuries of the steering assembly were mainly responsible for injuries to the lung, heart, and liver in F crashes, and side-door CO for lung, liver, and spleen injuries in L crashes. Deaths and complications after injury were higher among F MVC occupants, or when delta V was > or = 30 mph. Hospital and professional costs reflect the complex care needed for victims of multiple injuries: FB, $99,000; FNB, $95,000; LB, $75,000; LNB, $79,000; total, $10.7 million. Present vehicle safety standards are not adequate, and structural design changes are needed to improve restraints and protect occupants from intrusion-related injuries.
We present an application which can rapidly determine the binding patterns of monoclonal antibodies on mixed populations of cells simultaneously in a single rapid analysis. It is an application of ...the tube identifier parameter (TIP) system which can provide fully correlated listmode data of the entire patient phenotype in a single file. Using the phenogram analytical display, we are able to determine the cross‐reacting antibodies for an entire antibody panel for each cell type. This information can be displayed in a single plot. Using light scatter gating to select different populations of lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils, phenograms can be simultaneously generated. This provides a directly comparable means of displaying the positive and negative binding characteristics of each antibody on each cell population. Any marker combination that is abnormal will be identifiable in the phenogram. Additionally, by plotting the fluorescence distributions of each marker beside one another (termed overview), quantifiable differences in intensity can be determined. There are 3 major benefits of the proposed analysis. By using the TIP concept, several sets of antibodies can be compared simultaneously. Any light scatter gate can be used and this gate can be changed on one histogram or plot, yet apply to the total analysis. Data analysis is particularly rapid since the entire phenotype of a patient can be evaluated by performing a single rapid analysis.
We propose a method which significantly shortens the time required for both the collection and analysis of data derived from multiple sample, flow cytometric kinetic assays. We have defined the term ...Time Interval Gating (TIG) to describe this method. TIG effectively allows one flow cytometer to concurrently monitor several samples over the course of a kinetic assay. Data for all samples are stored in a single FCS 2.0 compatible listmode data file which we refer to as the TIG data file. TIG is adaptable to most commerical flow cytometers. Standard listmode analysis software can be used to analyze the TIG data files and correlate any combination of tubes and/or time intervals from the assay. Results for the entire assay can be displayed on a single two parameter plot. This paper describes how TIG is applied to neutrophil oxidative burst measurement using a standard EPICS Elite flow cytometer. In this assay, 11 samples were each monitored for 30 min to identify the extent to which volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) inhibited the oxidation of DCFH in stimulated neutrophils. TIG makes the oxidative burst assay practical for high volume screening by reducing the overall flow cytometer and analysis time required by a factor of ten. In addition, TIG provides an organized approach to managing data acquisition on instruments equipped with automated sampling systems.
Murine cauda epididymal sperm contain sites on the plasma membrane over the apical portion of the acrosome that recognize proteinase inhibitors and the homologous zona pellucida. Ten times more of ...the component can be extracted from cauda and ductus sperm than from equal numbers of caput and corpus sperm. Likewise, few sperm from the upper epididymal regions are able to bind seminal inhibitor, while the majority of sperm from the cauda and ductus do bind. Cauda epididymal and ductus sperm lose little of their ability to bind inhibitor after a 4-hour in vitro incubation in either a capacitating or a noncapacitating medium. The percentage of naturally inseminated sperm with the seminal inhibitor bound to their surface decreases to about 10 after 4 hours in utero. Approximately 80% of these sperm show positive fluorescence when given the opportunity to rebind the the inhibitor, and these sperm do have an intact plasma membrane over the apical portion of the acrosome. Furthermore, after 4 hours in utero, the inhibitor bound in the same region of the sperm head as it did on freshly ejaculated sperm. The seminal inhibitor inhibits the binding of sperm to the zona if added during the first 15 minutes of incubation but has no effect on attachment. The data indicate that sperm gain the ability to bind the seminal inhibitor during the epididymal sojourn. Furthermore, this binding capacity is not lost during in vitro or in utero incubation. The site is not involved in sperm-zona attachment but does participate in the binding of sperm to the zona.