Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents roughly 85% of lung cancers, with an incidence that increases yearly across the world. The introduction in clinical practice of several new and more ...effective molecules has led to a consistent improvement in survival and quality of life in locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC. In particular, oncogenic drivers have indeed transformed the therapeutic algorithm for NSCLC. Nearly 25% of patients are diagnosed in an early stage when NSCLC is still amenable to radical surgery. In spite of this, five-year survival rates for fully resected early stage remains rather disappointing. Adjuvant chemotherapy has shown a modest survival benefit depending on the stage, but more than half of patients relapse. Given this need for improvement, over the last years different targeted therapies have been evaluated in early-stage NSCLC with no survival benefit in unselected patients. However, the identification of reliable predictive biomarkers to these agents in the metastatic setting, the design of molecularly-oriented studies, and the availability of novel potent and less toxic agents opened the way for a novel era in early stage NSCLC treatment. In this review, we will discuss the current landscape of targeted therapeutic options in early NSCLC.
Upfront tumour genotyping is now considered an essential step in guiding treatment decision-making in the management of patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in light of the ...ever-expanding toolbox of targeted therapies and immune-checkpoint inhibitors. However, genotyping of tumour biopsy samples is not feasible for all patients and, therefore, genomic analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a compelling non-invasive option. Current guidelines universally recommend genotyping and support the use of ctDNA testing in certain settings, although they often omit the detail necessary for integrating these tests into clinical care on an individual basis. In this Perspective, we describe the rationale, promise and challenges associated with ctDNA-based NSCLC genotyping and suggest a framework for the implementation of these assays into routine clinical practice. We also offer considerations for the interpretation of ctDNA genotyping results, which, particularly when using next-generation sequencing panels, can be nuanced. Through the addition of this new approach to clinical practice, we propose that oncologists might finally be able to utilize effective genotyping in nearly all patients with advanced-stage NSCLC.
•Biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) in cancer are crucial in improving patient selection, predicting response and toxicity.•Currently available biomarkers are driven from patients’ ...serum, tumor tissue, circulating tumor cells/DNA, and gut microbiome.•No single biomarker can provide accurate response or toxicity prediction, however, combining multiple biomarkers might be a promising model.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPis) are emerging as the new corner stone of cancer treatment due to their ability to produce durable responses in patients with various cancers. But, objective responses to ICPis vary among each type of cancer. Further, treatment with ICPis is often associated with risk of developing immune-related adverse event, which are potentially life-threatening if untreated, indicating a need for patient selection. However, given the complexity of the tumor microenvironment and the dynamic interaction between tumor and immune cells, development of robust biomarkers to predict patients who are likely to respond to treatment with ICPis remains a challenge. In this review we present an overview of the immune monitoring strategies that are currently in use to enable appropriate patient selection.
Lung neoplasms are the leading cause of death by cancer worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes more than 80% of all lung malignancies and the majority of patients present advanced ...disease at onset. However, in the last decade, multiple oncogenic driver alterations have been discovered and each of them represents a potential therapeutic target. Although KRAS mutations are the most frequently oncogene aberrations in lung adenocarcinoma patients, effective therapies targeting KRAS have yet to be developed. Moreover, the role of KRAS oncogene in NSCLC remains unclear and its predictive and prognostic impact remains controversial. The study of the underlying biology of KRAS in NSCLC patients could help to determine potential candidates to evaluate novel targeted agents and combinations that may allow a tailored treatment for these patients. The aim of this review is to update the current knowledge about KRAS-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, including a historical overview, the biology of the molecular pathways involved, the clinical relevance of KRAS mutations as a prognostic and predictive marker and the potential therapeutic approaches for a personalized treatment of KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients.
Background The Nuclear Factor kappaB (NF-kB) family consists of transcription factors that play a complex and essential role in the regulation of immune responses and inflammation. NF-kB has recently ...generated considerable interest as it has been implicated in human cancer initiation, progression and resistance to treatment. In the present comprehensive review the different aspects of NF-kB signaling in the carcinogenesis of cancer of the uterine cervix are discussed. NF-kB functions as part of a network, which determines the pattern of its effects on the expression of several other genes (such as crosstalks with reactive oxygen species, p53, STAT3 and miRNAS) and thus its function. Activation of NF-kB triggered by a HPV infection is playing an important role in the innate and adaptive immune response of the host. The virus induces down regulation of NF-kB to liquidate the inhibitory activity for its replication triggered by the immune system leading a status of persistant HPV infection. During the progression to high grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer NF-KB becomes constitutionally activated again. Mutations in NF-kB genes are rare in solid tumors but mutations of upstream signaling molecules such as RAS, EGFR, PGF, HER2 have been implicated in elevated NF-kB signaling. NF-kB can stimulate transcription of proliferation regulating genes (eg. cyclin D1 and c-myc), genes involved in metastasis, VEGF dependent angiogenesis and cell immortality by telomerase. NF-kB activation can also induce the expression of activation-induced cytodine deaminase (AID) and the APOBEC proteins, providing a mechanistic link between the NF-kB pathway and mutagenic characteristic of cervical cancer. Inhibition of NF-kB has the potential to be used to reverse resistance to radiotherapy and systemic anti-cancer medication, but currently no clinicaly active NF-kB targeting strategies are available.
•Uncommon mutations account for 10% of all EGFR mutations.•No specific studies have prospectively evaluated uncommon sensitizing mutations.•NGS gene panels have improved EGFR mutations detection ...accuracy.•Molecular Tumor Board is mandatory to optimize the treatment strategy for NSCLC.
Uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations collectively account for 10% of EGFR mutations, harboring heterogeneous molecular alterations within exons 18–21 with clinically variable responses to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients. In addition, with the introduction of different NGS gene approach an improvement of EGFR mutations detection was reported. Today, no specific studies have prospectively evaluated uncommon sensitizing mutations in detail and no firm standard of care has been established in the first-line setting. The aim of this comprehensive review is to critically consider the clinical role of uncommon EGFR mutations highlighting the results of several in vitro and in vivo studies, which singly evaluated the sensitivity of uncommon mutations to currently European of Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved EGFR TKIs in cell lines, xenograft models and humans, in order to obtain a practical guide for refining the clinical decision-making process.
...the use of this biomarker has been hampered by technical and biological limitations, due to difficulties of intercepting very low quantities of tumor-derived DNA, which can be in some cases, ...especially early-stage tumors, at a tumor fraction far below the limits of detection of currently available technologies for cfDNA analysis.2 Two different approaches have been used to date for studying cfDNA analysis as potential biomarker for early cancer detection, depending on the need of knowing in advance the tumor mutation profile through whole exome sequencing of tissue (tumor-informed approach) or not (tumor-uninformed approach) (figure 1).3 In order to avoid the risk of false positive detection, due to the identification of non-tumor-derived mutations, such as those associated with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), different technical expedients have been used for filtering CHIP mutations, as for example concurrent leukocyte DNA analysis. A machine learning model called ‘DNA evaluation of fragments for early interception’ (DELFI) was developed to detect a large number of abnormalities in cfDNA examined by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to determine genome-wide copy number profiles, sequence motifs, and fragmentation profiles between patients with cancer and healthy individuals.4 The initial results on 236 cancer and 245 healthy individuals showed that the DELFI model was associated with sensitivities of detection ranging from 57% to more than 99% among the seven cancer types included in the study at 98% specificity, potentially identifying the cancer tissue of origin (TOO) in 75% of the cases. Combining carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, age, smoking history, and presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in a multimodal model (DELFImulti) followed by low-dose CT (LDCT) was associated with a sensitivity of 94% (stage I=87%, stage II=100%, stage III=97%, and stage IV=96%) and 52% reduction of unnecessary procedures with LDCT alone.6 Two large prospective case–control studies are currently ongoing (DELFI-L201/NCT05306288 and DELFI-L101/NCT04825834) for early lung cancer detection. ...coupled approaches between liquid biopsy approaches and conventional radiological imaging, such as CT/PET,10 should be further explored, as it can significantly increase the chances of detecting cancers at a potentially curable stage.
Recurrent gene fusions, such as ROS1 fusions, are oncogenic drivers of various cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Up to 36% of patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC have brain ...metastases at the diagnosis of advanced disease. Entrectinib is a ROS1 inhibitor that has been designed to effectively penetrate and remain in the CNS. We explored the use of entrectinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC.
We did an integrated analysis of three ongoing phase 1 or 2 trials of entrectinib (ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2). The efficacy-evaluable population included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC who received entrectinib at a dose of at least 600 mg orally once per day, with at least 12 months' follow-up. All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, and previous cancer treatment (except for ROS1 inhibitors) was allowed. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with an objective response (complete or partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) and duration of response, and were evaluated by blinded independent central review. The safety-evaluable population for the safety analysis included all patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC in the three trials who received at least one dose of entrectinib (irrespective of dose or duration of follow-up). These ongoing studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02097810 (STARTRK-1) and NCT02568267 (STARTRK-2), and EudraCT, 2012–000148–88 (ALKA-372-001).
Patients were enrolled in ALKA-372-001 from Oct 26, 2012, to March 27, 2018; in STARTRK-1 from Aug 7, 2014, to May 10, 2018; and in STARTRK-2 from Nov 19, 2015 (enrolment is ongoing). At the data cutoff date for this analysis (May 31, 2018), 41 (77%; 95% CI 64–88) of 53 patients in the efficacy-evaluable population had an objective response. Median follow-up was 15·5 monhts (IQR 13·4–20·2). Median duration of response was 24·6 months (95% CI 11·4–34·8). In the safety-evaluable population, 79 (59%) of 134 patients had grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse events. 46 (34%) of 134 patients had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events, with the most common being weight increase (ten 8%) and neutropenia (five 4%). 15 (11%) patients had serious treatment-related adverse events, the most common of which were nervous system disorders (four 3%) and cardiac disorders (three 2%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.
Entrectinib is active with durable disease control in patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC, and is well tolerated with a manageable safety profile, making it amenable to long-term dosing in these patients. These data highlight the need to routinely test for ROS1 fusions to broaden therapeutic options for patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC.
Ignyta/F Hoffmann-La Roche.
SummaryBackgroundTrastuzumab duocarmazine is a novel HER2-targeting antibody–drug conjugate comprised of trastuzumab covalently bound to a linker drug containing duocarmycin. Preclinical studies ...showed promising antitumour activity in various models. In this first-in-human study, we assessed the safety and activity of trastuzumab duocarmazine in patients with advanced solid tumours. MethodsWe did a phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study. The dose-escalation cohort comprised patients aged 18 years or older enrolled from three academic hospitals in Belgium, the Netherlands, and the UK with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours with variable HER2 status who were refractory to standard cancer treatment. A separate cohort of patients were enrolled to the dose-expansion phase from 15 hospitals in Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, and the UK. Dose-expansion cohorts included patients aged 18 years or older with breast, gastric, urothelial, or endometrial cancer with at least HER2 immunohistochemistry 1+ expression and measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Trastuzumab duocarmazine was administered intravenously on day 1 of each 3-week cycle. In the dose-escalation phase, trastuzumab duocarmazine was given at doses of 0·3 mg/kg to 2·4 mg/kg (3 + 3 design) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint of the dose-escalation phase was to assess safety and ascertain the recommended phase 2 dose, which would be the dose used in the dose-expansion phase. The primary endpoint of the dose-expansion phase was the proportion of patients achieving an objective response (complete response or partial response), as assessed by the investigator using RECIST version 1.1. This ongoing study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02277717, and is fully recruited. FindingsBetween Oct 30, 2014, and April 2, 2018, 39 patients were enrolled and treated in the dose-escalation phase and 146 patients were enrolled and treated in the dose-expansion phase. One dose-limiting toxic effect (death from pneumonitis) occurred at the highest administered dose (2·4 mg/kg) in the dose-escalation phase. One further death occurred in the dose-escalation phase (1·5 mg/kg cohort) due to disease progression, which was attributed to general physical health decline. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events reported more than once in the dose-escalation phase were keratitis (n=3) and fatigue (n=2). Based on all available data, the recommended phase 2 dose was set at 1·2 mg/kg. In the dose-expansion phase, treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 16 (11%) of 146 patients, most commonly infusion-related reactions (two 1%) and dyspnoea (two 1%). The most common treatment-related adverse events (grades 1–4) were fatigue (48 33% of 146 patients), conjunctivitis (45 31%), and dry eye (45 31%). Most patients (104 71% of 146) had at least one ocular adverse event, with grade 3 events reported in ten (7%) of 146 patients. No patients died from treatment-related adverse events and four patients died due to disease progression, which were attributed to hepatic failure (n=1), upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (n=1), neurological decompensation (n=1), and renal failure (n=1). In the breast cancer dose-expansion cohorts, 16 (33%, 95% CI 20·4–48·4) of 48 assessable patients with HER2-positive breast cancer achieved an objective response (all partial responses) according to RECIST. Nine (28%, 95% CI 13·8–46·8) of 32 patients with HER2-low, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and six (40%, 16·3–67·6) of 15 patients with HER2-low, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer achieved an objective response (all partial responses). Partial responses were also observed in one (6%, 95% CI 0·2–30·2) of 16 patients with gastric cancer, four (25%, 7·3–52·4) of 16 patients with urothelial cancer, and five (39%, 13·9–68·4) of 13 patients with endometrial cancer. InterpretationTrastuzumab duocarmazine shows notable clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-expressing metastatic cancer, including HER2-positive trastuzumab emtansine-resistant and HER2-low breast cancer, with a manageable safety profile. Further investigation of trastuzumab duocarmazine for HER2-positive breast cancer is ongoing and trials for HER2-low breast cancer and other HER2-expressing cancers are in preparation. FundingSynthon Biopharmaceuticals.
PDF
