Objective The purpose of this study was to determine contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy rates in adolescents who are offered immediate postpartum etonogestrel implant (IPI) insertion. ...Study Design Participants in an adolescent prenatal-postnatal program were enrolled in a prospective observational study of IPI insertion (IPI group, 171) vs other methods (control group, 225). Contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancies were determined. Results Implant continuation at 6 months was 96.9% (156/161 participants); at 12 months, the continuation rate was 86.3% (132/153 participants). At 6 months, 9.9% of the control participants were pregnant (21/213); there were no IPI pregnancies. By 12 months, 18.6% of control participants (38/204) experienced pregnancy vs 2.6% of IPI recipients (4/153; relative risk, 5.0; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.9–12.7). Repeat pregnancy at 12 months was predicted by not receiving IPI insertion (odds ratio, 8.0; 95% CI, 2.8–23.0) and having >1 child (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1–4.3; P = .03). Conclusion IPI placement in adolescents has excellent continuation 1 year after delivery; rapid repeat pregnancy is significantly decreased compared with control participants.
Pediatric Group Care: A Systematic Review Gaskin, Emily; Yorga, Kim Weber; Berman, Rebecca ...
Maternal and child health journal,
10/2021, Volume:
25, Issue:
10
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
Objective
To describe characteristics and outcomes of Group Well-Child Care programs and provide recommendations for future research.
Methods
Informed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic ...Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, an electronic references database, manual search of bibliographies and peer-reviewed journals, and general Internet search were conducted including research published up to July 2019. English language, peer-reviewed research, with provision of medical care were included. Studies without published outcomes, not specific to well-child care, or included only one visit were excluded. Nineteen articles met review criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Downs and Black tool for rigor.
Results
Programs typically included an individual medical examination, check-in, and group discussion. Demographics varied by race, ethnicity, age, income level, education and parity, though many were used specifically with underserved populations. Group size ranged from 3 to 10 and lasted an average of 1.5 h over a period of 6–24 months. Evidence suggests group well-child care is as effective as individual care with improvement noted for health-care utilization, weight outcomes, and more content covered. Design elements such as patient-led discussion, self-check-in, inclusion of other family members, and use of a variety of health care professionals and para-professionals may influence these outcomes.
Conclusions
Group well-child care is useful in providing efficient and patient-centered care and shows promise for use in underserved populations. Future research should utilize more rigorous study design and include evaluations of program components and group processes to address implementation challenges and determine effectiveness.
To evaluate how recent opioid, marijuana, and cannabidiol use affects pre-procedure pain-related anxiety for patients seeking abortion.
We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional anonymous survey of ...patients seeking abortion assessing recent substance use and anxiety about pain during and after abortion. We compared substance users' and non-users' anxiety scores.
Among 217 participants, recent opioid users (5.3%) had higher median anxiety scores for pain during (7.0 vs 6.0; p=0.33) and after (8.0 vs 6.0; p=0.01) abortion than non-opioid users. Anxiety scores were similar for marijuana and cannabidiol users.
Assessing recent opioid use may help guide counseling for anxiety about abortion.
Over half of adolescents are sexually active by age 18 years and represent half of sexually transmitted infections (STI). These individuals often do not obtain routine medical care, so discussing ...contraception at each visit becomes imperative. Our study objectives were to determine the frequency of visits before contraception was discussed/initiated, and to assess factors affecting primary care contraception provision.
A retrospective chart review (January 2009-June 2019) was conducted for preventive, follow-up, and sick visits; Title X confidential visits were excluded. Questions were asked about method at start and end of the visit. Nonparametric median tests for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables assessed for differences for patient age, race, gender, insurance type, visit type, and provider gender. The institutional review board approved the study as exempt.
Patients (n = 12,619; median = 15 years; 58% female) were seen in primary care clinic. Providers asked about contraception for 82% of visits, and averaged 3 visits before contraception was discussed. For patients asked about contraception, 60% were using a contraceptive method, 15% left the visit on a new method (24.9% long-acting reversible contraception LARC). For patients not using contraception, 39.9% left the visit on a method. Patients asked about contraception were female, older, Hispanic, had public insurance, and were seen by female providers (P < .001). Follow-up/sick visits represented <20% of patients asked about contraception.
Multiple visits occur before contraception is discussed in adolescent primary care, and factors including age, race, and gender affect these discussions. Strategies to increase contraception discussions at all visits is essential, as adolescents do not always present for yearly visits.
Introduction
The birth of a second child to an adolescent woman worsens the adverse medical, socioeconomic, educational, and parenting outcomes for the woman and her children. Despite the known high ...efficacy of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), many postpartum adolescents use less effective or no contraception. Interconception care (ICC) focuses on modifying maternal risks between pregnancies and promoting healthy birth spacing to improve outcomes for women and children. Research shows that women regularly attend their child’s health care visits even if they do not seek care for themselves between pregnancies. These visits present a potential opportunity for providers to educate women on available LARC options.
Methods
In an adolescent mother–child clinic, demographic and ICC screening data were collected on women presenting for well child visits of children age 0–24 months. These data were analyzed using logistic regression models to identify independent predictors of LARC initiation and repeat pregnancy.
Results
Mother–child dyads were screened an average of two times in the study period. Participants with only one visit were less likely to initiate LARC. Of the participants, 5.5% became pregnant again, with patients having only one ICC visit being slightly, but not significantly more likely. Hispanic ethnicity and having ≥ 2 visits were significant independent predictors of LARC initiation. The only independent predictor of repeat pregnancy was not initiating LARC.
Conclusions
This study suggests that optimal ICC may rely on consistent and frequent touch points with providers and not solely on the medical management during the interconception period, making it adaptable to a traditional pediatric medical home. Tying the worlds of pediatric and maternal healthcare is pivotal for successful ICC.
Sugammadex is a steroid binder and can potentially bind the estrogens and progestins contained within hormonal contraception. Therefore, the FDA label for sugammadex contains a drug–drug interaction ...warning between this medication and hormonal contraception, advising that women taking hormonal contraception use a backup contraceptive method or abstinence for seven days after exposure to sugammadex. However, given concerns that this warning may not be appropriately provided to at-risk patients, we conducted a retrospective chart review to identify women administered sugammadex while using hormonal contraception to identify documented counseling on this drug–drug interaction prior to implementation of a formalized counseling process. We reviewed 1000 randomly selected charts from the University of Colorado Hospital between January 2016 and December 2017. We identified 134 women using hormonal contraception at the time of sugammadex exposure; only one patient (0.7%, 95% CI 0.0, 4.1) had documented counseling. One patient had an unintended pregnancy within the same cycle as her exposure to sugammadex. Improved counseling processes are needed to avoid unnecessary risk for unintended pregnancies.
Introduction and hypothesis
We evaluated family medicine obstetric providers’ identification and categorization of vaginal delivery lacerations in the USA. We hypothesized that there would be ...inaccuracy in family medicine physicians’ identification of vaginal delivery injuries, similar to our previous studies of midwives and obstetricians (OBs).
Methods
We included clinically active physicians who attended deliveries within 2 years and evaluated their identification and categorization of delivery lacerations using descriptive text and visual images. We asked about their education on this topic and how they document lacerations in the labor and delivery record.
Results
We analyzed 250 completed responses (70% of opened surveys). Fifty-five percent of respondents characterized their obstetric laceration training as “good” or “excellent” and half previously had education on obstetric lacerations. The median accuracy overall for the classification and identification of perineal lacerations was 78% (IQR 56–91%). Respondents frequently mischaracterized nonperineal lacerations. Few respondents (36%) reported using the third-degree injury subclassification system. In adjusted analysis, the highest scoring respondents were board certified in family medicine, with fewer years in practice, and a higher obstetric volume.
Conclusions
Obstetric laceration diagnoses may be inaccurate, which could influence perinatal quality and patient outcomes. We found gaps in knowledge similar to previous reports on midwives and obstetricians in the USA. These data suggest a need for increased education and training on obstetric injuries, perhaps especially for physicians with less obstetric activity. Improved categorization and identification of vaginal delivery trauma can impact management and improve women’s postpartum care and long-term pelvic floor outcomes.
Group prenatal care (GPNC) is an alternative model to traditional individual care and may improve public health outcomes. Prior studies suggest that interest in GPNC varies widely and few studies ...have examined characteristics predictive of interest in this model. The purpose of this study was to inform GPNC recruitment efforts by examining likelihood of participation delineated by characteristics and GPNC perceptions. Pregnant participants received information about GPNC then completed a survey measuring demographic, psychosocial, and reproductive characteristics, likelihood to participate in GPNC, and factors influencing selections. Respondents expressed varied levels of likelihood to participate in GPNC; 16.2% low likelihood, 44.9% moderate likelihood, and 38.9% high likelihood. Characteristics were similar between groups, and thus their use is not recommended when targeting recruitment efforts. Benefits outweighed barriers and threats for the high likelihood category, barriers and threats outweighed benefits for the low likelihood category, and benefits, barriers, and threats were balanced for the moderate likelihood category. Accurately assessing likelihood of participating in GPNC efficiently identifies individuals who are clearly either going to decline or participate, as well as promotes targeted recruitment efforts directed at those who are ambivalent. Understanding and addressing perceived benefits, barriers, and threats supports effective GPNC recruitment.
Introduction and hypothesis
Clinical quality improvement relies on accurate understanding of current practice. We performed a cross-sectional national survey of certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) ...assessing classification and identification of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and other delivery lacerations. We hypothesized laceration diagnoses are frequently inaccurate, and delivery records for obstetric lacerations may be of questionable quality.
Methods
We emailed 6909 American College of Nurse Midwives members an internet-based survey link. Of respondents, we included clinically active CNMs who perform at least one delivery per month. We evaluated laceration knowledge and application using standard descriptive text and images and asked about processes for recording lacerations in the delivery record.
Results
We received 1070 (15.5%) completed surveys and 832 (77.8%) met inclusion criteria. Over 50% characterized their OASI training and ability to identify OASI as good/excellent. Most (79%) had never attended education review on OASI. The overall accuracy for classification and identification of perineal lacerations ranged from 49 to 99%. Non-perineal lacerations were frequently categorized using the perineal/OASI system. Half of respondents (51%) document their deliveries in an electronic medical record but a quarter (28%) are not personally responsible for approving delivery data. Younger participants without a doctoral degree, with self-assessed good/excellent laceration training, and caring for < 50% publicly insured patients had higher accuracy for laceration identification and diagnosis.
Conclusions
We found high rates of inaccurate laceration diagnosis and inappropriate application of the perineal OASI degree system, suggesting education and training are needed. Clinical studies that rely on delivery diagnosis of OASI may not be reliable.
PDF
