A multicenter study on the affects of lanthanum carbonate (Fosrenol™) and calcium carbonate on renal bone disease in dialysis patients.
Lanthanum carbonate (LC) (Fosrenol™) is a novel new treatment ...for hyperphosphatemia. In this phase III, open-label study, we compared the effects of LC and calcium carbonate (CC) on the evolution of renal osteodystrophy (ROD) in dialysis patients.
Ninety-eight patients were randomized to LC (N = 49) or CC (N = 49). Bone biopsies were taken at baseline and after one year of treatment. Acceptable paired biopsies were available for static and dynamic histomorphometry studies in 33 LC and 30CC patients. Blood samples were taken at regular intervals for biochemical analysis and adverse events were monitored.
LC was well tolerated and serum phosphate levels were well controlled in both treatment groups. The incidence of hypercalcemia was lower in the LC group (6% vs. 49% for CC). At baseline, subtypes of ROD were similarly distributed in both groups, with mixed ROD being most common. At one-year follow-up in the LC group, 5 of 7 patients with baseline low bone turnover (either adynamic bone or osteomalacia), and 4 of 5 patients with baseline hyperparathyroidism, had evolved toward a normalization of their bone turnover. Only one lanthanum-treated patient evolved toward adynamic bone compared with 6 patients in the CC group. In the LC group, the number of patients having either adynamic bone, osteomalacia, or hyperpara decreased overall from 12 (36%) at baseline to 6 (18%), while in the calcium group, the number of patients with these types of ROD increased from 13 (43%) to 16 (53%).
LC is a poorly absorbed, well-tolerated, and efficient phosphate binder. LC-treated dialysis patients show almost no evolution toward low bone turnover over one year (unlike CC-treated patients), nor do they experience any aluminum-like effects on bone.
Background. During the last few years the spectrum of renal osteodystrophy (ROD) in dialysis patients has been studied thoroughly and the prevalence of the various types of ROD has changed ...considerably. Whereas until a decade ago most patients presented with secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPTH), adynamic bone (ABD) has become the most common lesion within the dialysis population over the last few years. Much less is known about the spectrum of ROD in end‐stage renal failure (ESRF) patients not yet on dialysis. Methods. Transiliac bone biopsies were taken in an unselected group of 84 ESRF patients (44 male, age 54±12 years) before enrolment in a dialysis programme. All patients were recruited within a time period of 10 months from various centres (n=18) in Macedonia. Calcium carbonate was the only prescribed medication in patients followed up by the outpatient clinic. Results. HPTH was found in only 9% of the patients, whilst ABD appeared to be the most frequent renal bone disease as it was observed in 23% of the cases next to normal bone (38%). A relatively high number of patients (n=10; 12%) fulfilled the criteria of osteomalacia (OM). Mixed osteodystrophy (MX) was diagnosed in 18% of the subjects. There was no significant difference between groups in age, creatinine, or serum and bone strontium and aluminium levels. Patient characteristics associated with ABD included male gender and diabetes, whilst OM was associated with older age (>58 years). Conclusions. In an unselected population of ESRF patients already, 62% of them have an abnormal bone histology. ABD is the most prevalent type of ROD in this population. In the absence of aluminium or strontium accumulation the relatively high prevalence of a low bone turnover as expressed by either normal bone or ABD and OM is striking.
PDF
