This chapter assesses the problems of history writing/writing historical fiction. It discusses ongoing debates about the value of Holocaust narratives. Taking its cue from Linda Hutcheon's notion of ...historiographical metafiction, and discussing Laurent Binet's novel HHhH, the chapter discusses the idea of historiographical metafiction, fictionalized narratives of historical facts.
Reinhard Heydrich is widely recognized as one of the great iconic villains of the twentieth century, an appalling figure even within the context of the Nazi leadership. Chief of the Nazi Criminal ...Police, the SS Security Service, and the Gestapo, ruthless overlord of Nazi-occupied Bohemia and Moravia, and leading planner of the "Final Solution," Heydrich played a central role in Hitler's Germany. He shouldered a major share of responsibility for some of the worst Nazi atrocities, and up to his assassination in Prague in 1942, he was widely seen as one of the most dangerous men in Nazi Germany. Yet Heydrich has received remarkably modest attention in the extensive literature of the Third Reich.
Robert Gerwarth weaves together little-known stories of Heydrich's private life with his deeds as head of the Nazi Reich Security Main Office. Fully exploring Heydrich's progression from a privileged middle-class youth to a rapacious mass murderer, Gerwarth sheds new light on the complexity of Heydrich's adult character, his motivations, the incremental steps that led to unimaginable atrocities, and the consequences of his murderous efforts toward re-creating the entire ethnic makeup of Europe.
The scale and scope of the 'final solution' of the 'Jewish question' were extreme even in the horrific annals of genocide. Bloxham attempts to shed light on the pattern of mass murder in its ...expansion and contraction by viewing the Holocaust in a set of temporally and culturally specific contexts. It places the Holocaust into a broader European framework of violent ethnopolitics and geopolitics from the late nineteenth century through the mid-twentieth century. The Holocaust is depicted as an only partially discrete part of a continental process of traumatic flux, and a part, furthermore, that can itself be partially disaggregated into national and regional components. Bloxham moves from a general consideration of patterns of ethnic violence in the period to a closer causal explanation that shows the different valences of Nazi policy towards Jews in the lands directly ruled by Germany and those of Germany's allies respectively. He shows that the peculiarly extensive ambitions of the 'final solution' at its most expansive can only be explained when wider geopolitical and strategic contextual terms are factored in along with consideration of Nazi ideology and the internal dynamics of some of the key institutions of the perpetrator state.
This is a re-examination of a number of well-known documents from the Nazi era, most of them used during the Nuremberg Trial. When put into the context of recent historiography, it is argued that ...they provide answers to the central questions asked by histonans regarding the development of Nazi policy towards the decision to annihilate the Jewish people. The hierarchy of decision-making led from Hitler to Göring, and from Göring to Himmler and Heydrich. This can be seen clearly from late 1938 onwards. Hitler was personally and directly involved at all stages. The authorization letter of Göring to Heydrich, 31 July 1941, to make the necessary preparations for effectuating the ‘Final Solution’, is in fact a derivative form of Hitler's oral order to murder all the Jews.
PDF
