Most real-world search and optimization problems naturally involve multiple criteria as objectives. Generally, symmetry, asymmetry, and anti-symmetry are basic characteristics of binary relationships ...used when modeling optimization problems. Moreover, the notion of symmetry has appeared in many articles about uncertainty theories that are employed in multi-criteria problems. Different solutions may produce trade-offs (conflicting scenarios) among different objectives. A better solution with respect to one objective may compromise other objectives. There are various factors that need to be considered to address the problems in multidisciplinary research, which is critical for the overall sustainability of human development and activity. In this regard, in recent decades, decision-making theory has been the subject of intense research activities due to its wide applications in different areas. The decision-making theory approach has become an important means to provide real-time solutions to uncertainty problems. Theories such as probability theory, fuzzy set theory, type-2 fuzzy set theory, rough set, and uncertainty theory, available in the existing literature, deal with such uncertainties. Nevertheless, the uncertain multi-criteria characteristics in such problems have not yet been explored in depth, and there is much left to be achieved in this direction. Hence, different mathematical models of real-life multi-criteria optimization problems can be developed in various uncertain frameworks with special emphasis on optimization problems.
All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the ...professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Conference submission management system: https://hervicon.sumdu.edu.ua/en/ • Number of submissions received: 70 • Number of submissions sent for review: 58 • Number of submissions accepted: 51 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 73% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 28 Any additional info on review process: Short description of review criteria: 1. Technical criteria (accuracy and correctness, readability and discussion of concepts, suitable references). 2. Quality criteria (novelty, scientific and practical interest of the results). 3. Presentation criteria (title - appropriate for the content; abstract - essential information; diagrams, figures, tables and captions-essential and clear; text and mathematics-brief and clear; conclusion - key points stand out). Contact person for queries: Andriy Zahorulko, Sumy State University, a.zagorulko@omdm.sumdu.edu.ua
In this paper, a criterion of stabili/ability of plants without coprime factorization for 2x2 plants is given. This is expressed by two factorizations. We parametrize stabilizing controllers based on ...the criterion and also present their applications.
All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering has been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by experts ...referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.: • Type of peer review: Double-blind (Conference reviewers and iThenticate system) • Conference submission management system: Conference Management Toolkit (CMT) • Number of submissions received: 12 full papers and 12 abstracts • Number of submissions sent for review: 12 full papers • Number of submissions accepted: 7 full papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 58% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 58 • Any additional info on review process: The papers were evaluated based on the technical criteria, quality criteria and presentation criteria. The referees argued detailed their reviews and provided an overall evaluation (strong accept, accept, weak accept, weak reject, reject, strong reject), specifying their confidence (expert, high, medium, low, none) regarding qualifications to review the allocated paper. • Contact person for queries: Ms. Alice Liu; alice@isaeri.org
All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert ...referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: Easychair.org • Number of submissions received: 58 • Number of submissions sent for review: 58 • Number of submissions accepted: 26 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 45% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 47 • Any additional info on review process: The papers were evaluated based on the technical criteria, quality criteria and presentation criteria. The referees argued detailed their reviews and provided an overall evaluation (strong accept, accept, weak accept, borderline paper, weak reject, reject, strong reject), specifying their confidence (expert, high, medium, low, none) regarding qualifications to review the allocated paper. For each paper, the similarity index was determined by the organisers using Turnitin software at Universiti Malaysia Pahang. • Contact person for queries: Associate Prof. Dr Devarajan Ramasamy; deva@ump.edu.my
•ELECTRE Tri methods help solving multiple criteria sorting problems.•We extend the ELECTRE Tri methods to take into account a hierarchical structure of the set of criteria.•The Multiple Criteria ...Hierarchy Process is applied in conjunction with the ELECTRE Tri methods.•An extension of the Simos–Roy–Figueira (SRF) method is proposed to compute the weights of criteria.•A didactic example shows the applicability of the proposed methodology to real world decision problems.
Sorting methods, in particular ELECTRE Tri methods, are widely used in Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding to deal with ordinal classification problems. Problems of this kind encountered in practice involve the evaluation of different alternatives (actions) on several evaluation criteria that are structured in a hierarchical way. In order to deal with a hierarchical structure of criteria in decision problems, Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process (MCHP) has been recently proposed. In this paper, we apply the MCHP to the ELECTRE-Tri methods. In particular, we extend ELECTRE Tri-B, ELECTRE Tri-C and ELECTRE Tri-nC methods. We also adapt the MCHP concept to the case where interaction among evaluation criteria has either strengthening, or weakening, or antagonistic effect. Finally, we present an extension of the SRF method to determine the weights of criteria in case they are hierarchically structured.
A subset of patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) has been shown to be seropositive for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-IgG).
To describe the ...epidemiological, clinical, radiological, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and electrophysiological features of a large cohort of MOG-IgG-positive patients with optic neuritis (ON) and/or myelitis (n = 50) as well as attack and long-term treatment outcomes.
Retrospective multicenter study.
The sex ratio was 1:2.8 (m:f). Median age at onset was 31 years (range 6-70). The disease followed a multiphasic course in 80 % (median time-to-first-relapse 5 months; annualized relapse rate 0.92) and resulted in significant disability in 40 % (mean follow-up 75 ± 46.5 months), with severe visual impairment or functional blindness (36 %) and markedly impaired ambulation due to paresis or ataxia (25 %) as the most common long-term sequelae. Functional blindess in one or both eyes was noted during at least one ON attack in around 70 %. Perioptic enhancement was present in several patients. Besides acute tetra-/paraparesis, dysesthesia and pain were common in acute myelitis (70 %). Longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions were frequent, but short lesions occurred at least once in 44 %. Fourty-one percent had a history of simultaneous ON and myelitis. Clinical or radiological involvement of the brain, brainstem, or cerebellum was present in 50 %; extra-opticospinal symptoms included intractable nausea and vomiting and respiratory insufficiency (fatal in one). CSF pleocytosis (partly neutrophilic) was present in 70 %, oligoclonal bands in only 13 %, and blood-CSF-barrier dysfunction in 32 %. Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) and long-term immunosuppression were often effective; however, treatment failure leading to rapid accumulation of disability was noted in many patients as well as flare-ups after steroid withdrawal. Full recovery was achieved by plasma exchange in some cases, including after IVMP failure. Breakthrough attacks under azathioprine were linked to the drug-specific latency period and a lack of cotreatment with oral steroids. Methotrexate was effective in 5/6 patients. Interferon-beta was associated with ongoing or increasing disease activity. Rituximab and ofatumumab were effective in some patients. However, treatment with rituximab was followed by early relapses in several cases; end-of-dose relapses occurred 9-12 months after the first infusion. Coexisting autoimmunity was rare (9 %). Wingerchuk's 2006 and 2015 criteria for NMO(SD) and Barkhof and McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) were met by 28 %, 32 %, 15 %, 33 %, respectively; MS had been suspected in 36 %. Disease onset or relapses were preceded by infection, vaccination, or pregnancy/delivery in several cases.
Our findings from a predominantly Caucasian cohort strongly argue against the concept of MOG-IgG denoting a mild and usually monophasic variant of NMOSD. The predominantly relapsing and often severe disease course and the short median time to second attack support the use of prophylactic long-term treatments in patients with MOG-IgG-positive ON and/or myelitis.
This paper presents new subjective model for determining weight coefficients in multi-criteria decision-making models. The new Level Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) model enables the involvement of ...experts from different fields with the purpose of defining the relations between criteria and providing rational decision making. The method can be applied in practical cases in specialized decision-making support systems, as well as in alternative dispute resolutions in virtual environment. The LBWA model has several key advantages over other subjective models based on mutual comparison of criteria, which include the following: (1) the LBWA model allows the calculation of weight coefficients with small number of criteria comparisons, only comparison; (2) The algorithm of the LBWA model does not become more complex with the increase of the number of criteria, which makes it suitable for use in complex multi-criteria (MCDM) models with a large number of criteria; (3) By applying the LBWA model, optimal values of weight coefficients are obtained with simple mathematical apparatus that eliminates inconsistencies in expert preferences, which are tolerated in certain subjective models (Best Worst Method - BWM and Analytic Hierarchy Process - AHP); (4) The elasticity coefficient of the LBWA model enables, after comparing the criteria, additional corrections of the values of the weight coefficients depending on the preferences of the decision makers. This feature of the LBWA model enables sensitivity analysis of the MCDM model by analyzing the effects of variations in the values of the weights of criteria on final decision.