Periprosthetic femur fracture (PFF) is a complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). These occur intraoperatively or postoperatively, and documented risk factors of PFFs include women, age greater ...than 65 years, cementless stems, and inflammatory arthropathies. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the relationship of years of surgical experience and surgeon annual THA volume on intraoperative and postoperative PFFs.
Data were collected from a database query, and PFFs were identified as either intraoperative or postoperative. Intraoperative and postoperative PFFs were both compared to a control group of non-PFF patients. Years of surgical experience at the time of surgery and annual THA volume for the primary surgeon were calculated for all cases. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios for each of the surgeon variables when adjusted for patient demographics.
Thirty-seven intraoperative and 108 postoperative PFFs were identified and compared to 7,629 controls. From regression analyses, high-volume surgeons (≥50 THA/year) had lower odds of intraoperative PFF (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.40, P = .020) but not postoperative PFF (aOR = 1.02, P = .921). Surgeon experience (≥15 years since board certification at the time of surgery), was not significantly related to either PFF outcomes. For patient factors, age ≥65 years (aOR = 2.30, P < .001) and women (aOR = 2.69, P < .001) were both significant predictors of postoperative PFFs only.
Surgeons who performed 50 or more THAs per year had significantly fewer intraoperative PFFs than surgeons who did less than 50 THAs per year. Surgeon experience was not significantly related to PFFs.
Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (R-THA) affords precision yet uncertain clinical benefits. This study compares dislocation rates and related revisions between R-THA and manual total hip ...arthroplasty (M-THA). Secondarily we evaluated cup position, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and postoperative complications.
A three-surgeon cohort study was conducted on 2247 consecutive patients (1724 M-THA and 523 R-THA) who received a primary THA between January 2014 and June 2020 at a single hospital. Demographics, PROMs, emergency department visits, readmissions, and 90-day complications were collected via the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative. Chart review yielded instability occurrence with an average follow-up of 4 years. Multivariate regression analysis was performed, and a sample of 368 radiographs, including all dislocations, were assessed.
There were significantly lower rates of dislocation in R-THA (0.6%) vs M-THA (2.5%; Multivariate odds ratio 3.74, P < .046). All cases of unstable R-THA were successfully treated conservatively, whereas 46% of unstable M-THA were revised for recurrent instability. Cup anteversion (25.6° ± 5.4° R-THA vs 20.6° ± 7.6° M-THA) was greater, and cup inclination (42.5° ± 5.3° R-THA vs 47.0° ± 6.7° M-THA) was lower in the R-THA group (P < .05). No significant differences were noted for demographics, PROMs, or other complications (P > .05).
R-THA resulted in less than one-fourth the dislocation rate compared to M-THA and no revision for instability. It was associated with no difference in PROMs or other early complications. The influence of R-THA on stability goes beyond simply cup positioning and deserves further study.
We sought to understand the mortality rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip undergoing 2-stage revision for infection.
Database search, yielding 23 relevant studies, totaled 19,169 ...patients who underwent revision for total hip PJI.
One-year weighted mortality rate was 4.22% after total hip PJI. Five-year mortality was 21.12%. Average age was 65 years. When comparing the national age-adjusted risk of mortality and the reported 1-year mortality risk in this systematic review, the risk of death after total hip PJI is significantly increased (odds ratio 3.58, P < .001).
The mortality rate during total hip revision for infection is high. When counseling a patient regarding complications of this disease, death should be discussed.
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide the patient’s perspective following total hip arthroplasty (THA), although differences between primary THA (pTHA) and revision THA (rTHA) remain ...unclear. Thus, we compared the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Improvement (MCID-I) and Worsening (MCID-W) in pTHA and rTHA patients.
Data from 2,159 patients (1,995 pTHAs/164 rTHAs) who had completed Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (HOOS-PS), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 10a (PF10a), PROMIS Global-Mental, or PROMIS Global-Physical questionnaires were analyzed. The PROMs and MCID-I/MCID-W rates were compared using statistical tests and multivariate logistic regressions.
Compared to the pTHA group, the rTHA group had lower rates of improvement and higher rates of worsening for almost all PROMs, including HOOS-PS (MCID-I: 54 versus 84%, P < .001; MCID-W: 24 versus 4.4%, P < .001), PF10a (MCID-I: 44 versus 73%, P < .001; MCID-W: 22 versus 5.9%, P < .001), PROMIS Global-Mental (MCID-W: 42 versus 28%, P < .001), and PROMIS Global-Physical (MCID-I: 41 versus 68%, P < .001; MCID-W: 26 versus 11%, P < .001). Odds ratios supported rates of worsening following revision for the HOOS-PS (Odds Ratio (OR): 8.25, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 5.62 to 12.4, P < .001), PF10a (OR: 8.34, 95% CI: 5.63 to 12.6, P < .001), PROMIS Global-Mental (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.41 to 3.34, P < .001), and PROMIS Global-Physical (OR: 3.69, 95% CI: 2.46 to 5.62, P < .001).
Patients reported higher rates of worsening and lower rates of improvement following rTHA than pTHA, with significantly less score improvement and lower postoperative scores for all PROMs after revision. Most patients reported improvements following pTHA, with few worsening postoperatively.
Level III, retrospective comparative study.
The ideal timing for bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. This study compared 90-day outcomes after simultaneous bilateral THA and contralateral surgery in staged bilateral ...THA to a matched cohort of unilateral procedures.
Patients undergoing primary, elective THA during 2015 to 2020 were reviewed in a national database. Of the 273,281 patients identified, 39,905 (14.6%) were bilateral. Patients were divided into cohorts of unilateral THA, simultaneous bilateral THA, and staged bilateral THA at 1 to 14 days, 15 to 42 days, 43 to 90 days, and 91 to 365 days. Bilateral THA cohorts were matched with unilateral THA patients based on demographics and comorbidities. Ninety-day outcomes after the second THA were compared between matched groups.
Simultaneous bilateral THA resulted in higher rates of transfusion (odds ratio OR 4.43, 95% confidence interval 2.31-2.63, P < .001), readmission (OR 2.60, 2.01-3.39, P < .001), and any complication (OR 1.86, 1.55-2.24, P < .001) compared to unilateral THA. Contralateral THA staged at 1 to 14 days increased the risk of readmission (OR 1.83, 1.49-2.24, P < .001) and any complication (OR 1.45, 1.26-1.66, P < .001) relative to unilateral THA. Contralateral THA staged at 15 to 42 days increased the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (OR 3.15, 1.98-5.19, P < .001), readmission (OR 1.92, 1.55-2.39, P < .001), and any complication (OR 1.70, 1.46-1.97, P < .001). Contralateral THA staged beyond 42 days resulted in similar or decreased rates of adverse events relative to unilateral THA.
Bilateral THA should be staged a minimum of 6 weeks apart in appropriately selected patients to avoid an increased risk of adverse events after the second THA compared to unilateral THA.
In patients considered high-risk for infection, extended oral antibiotic (EOA) prophylaxis has been demonstrated to reduce rates of prosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty (THA). ...Although national guidelines regarding their use have not yet been created, the increase in literature surrounding EOA prophylaxis suggests a potential change in practice patterns. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trends in utilization of EOA prophylaxis following THA from 2010 to 2022 and identify prescription patterns.
A total of 646,059 primary THA and 51,879 aseptic revision THA patients were included in this study. Patients who underwent primary or aseptic revision THA between 2010 and 2022 were identified in a national administrative claims database. Rates and duration of EOA prescriptions were calculated. A secondary analysis examined rates of utilization across demographics, including patients considered high risk for infection.
From 2010 to 2022, utilization of EOA increased by 366% and 298% following primary and revision THA, respectively. Of patients prescribed postoperative antibiotics, 30% and 59% were prescribed antibiotics for more than 7 days following primary and revision THA, respectively. Rates of utilization were similar between high-risk individuals and the general population.
Rates of utilization of EOA prophylaxis after THA have increased significantly since 2010. As current trends demonstrate a wide variation in prescription patterns, including in length of antibiotic duration and in patient population prescribed, guidelines surrounding the use of EOA prophylaxis after THA are necessary to promote antibiotic stewardship while preventing rates of periprosthetic joint infection.
Although the direct anterior (DA) approach has increased in popularity for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is limited evidence regarding its use for revision THA. It is unknown whether ...the dislocation benefit seen in the primary setting translates to revision cases.
This retrospective review compared the dislocation rates of revision THA performed through DA versus postero-lateral (PL) approaches at a single institution (2011 to 2021). Exclusion criteria included revision for instability, ≥ 2 prior revisions, approaches other than DA or PL, and placement of dual-mobility or constrained liners. There were 182 hips in 173 patients that met the inclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 6.5 years (range, 2 to 8 years).
There was a trend toward more both-component revisions being performed through the PL approach. There were no differences in dislocation rates between the DA revision and PL revision cohorts, which were 8.1% (5 of 72) and 7.5% (9 of 120), respectively (P = .999). Dislocation trended lower when the revision approach was discordant from the primary approach compared to cases where primary and revision had a concordant approach (4.9 versus 8.5%), but this was not statistically significant (P = .740). No significant differences were found in return to operating room, 90-day emergency department visits, or 90-day readmissions. However, the length of stay was significantly shorter in patients who had DA revisions after a primary PL procedure (P = .021).
Dislocation rates following revision THA did not differ between the DA and PL approaches irrespective of the primary approach. Surgeons should choose their revision approach based on their experience and the specific needs of the patient.
Adjunctive screw fixation has been shown to be reliable in achieving acetabular component stability in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of ...inferior screw placement on acetabular component failure following revision THA. We hypothesized that inferior screw fixation would decrease acetabular failure rates.
We reviewed 250 patients who had Paprosky Type II or III defects who underwent acetabular revision between 2001 and 2021 across three institutions. Demographic factors, the number of screws, location of screw placement (superior versus inferior), use of augments and/or cup-cage constructs, Paprosky classification, and presence of discontinuity were documented. Multivariate regression was performed to identify the independent effect of inferior screw fixation on the primary outcome of aseptic re-revision of the acetabular component.
At a mean follow-up of 53.4 months (range, 12 to 261), 16 patients (6.4%) required re-revision for acetabular loosening. There were 140 patients (56.0%) who had inferior screw fixation, all of whom did not have neurovascular complications during screw placement. Patients who had inferior screws had a lower rate of acetabular re-revision than those who only had superior screw fixation (2.1 versus 11.8%, P = 0.0030). Multivariate regression demonstrates that inferior screw fixation decreased the likelihood of re-revision for acetabular loosening when compared to superior screw fixation alone (OR odds ratio: 0.1, CI confidence interval: 0.03 to 0.5; P = 0.0071). No other risk factors were identified.
Inferior screw fixation is a safe and reliable technique to reduce acetabular component failure following revision THA in cases of severe acetabular bone loss.
With the removal of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the inpatient-only (IPO) lists, the orthopedic landscape across the United States has changed rapidly. Thus, this study aimed to: 1) characterize ...the change in THA volume for outpatient and inpatient surgeries; 2) elucidate demographical differences before and after removal from the IPO list; and 3) analyze 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations.
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for primary THAs between January 2010 and December 2021. The primary outcome was the annual volume of outpatient and inpatient THAs. Secondary outcomes involved 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations. The variables between cohorts were analyzed using goodness-of-fit Chi-square tests with summary statistics.
Of the 332,423 THAs between 2010 and 2021, 88% were inpatient THAs (n = 292,974) and 12% were outpatient THAs (n = 39,449). From 2019 to 2021, the volume of inpatient THA decreased by 55% (42,779 to 19,075), while outpatient THA increased by 751% (2,518 to 21,424). Patients who had a THA after 2019 were older (P < .001), more commonly women (P < .001), white (P < .001), and more likely American Society of Anesthesiologists Class III (P < .001). The outpatient cohort had fewer 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations. The length of stay for both cohorts decreased until 2019, before increasing in 2020 and 2021 for inpatient THAs, while home discharge and operative time increased for both.
The volume of outpatient THA increased almost eightfold after its removal from the IPO lists in 2020. Despite expanding eligibility with older patients and more comorbidities, 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations remain low. These findings support the safe transition to outpatient THA with appropriate patient selection and optimization.
