This book (‘The development of protected areas in Slovenia’) discusses the development of protected areas in Slovenia. Due to Slovenia’s natural and cultural diversity, these areas are extensive, and ...therefore their special features should also be taken into account in efforts to stimulate regional development. Because of the vulnerable relationships that exist within them, protected areas require integrated planning, which should focus not only on protecting biodiversity and natural heritage, but first and foremost on sustainable development and conservation of established relationships between people and the environment, which are reflected in unique cultural landscapes. The authors analyze various aspects of managing protected areas: defining them, legal frameworks, their role in prevention against natural disasters, their special features in terms of management, and so on. Descriptions of individual cases often highlight the importance of including all stakeholders because only in this way is a protected area acknowledged and accepted as a development opportunity and not an obstacle.Volume seeks to identify patterns for development coordination, negotiations, and stimulation that rely on areas’ potentials and their conservation, while also making possible their sustainable growth and development.
Povezave med zavarovanimi območji, turizmom in razvojem podeželja smo preučevali na primerih Triglavskega narodnega parka in Kozjanskega parka. Na vsakem območju je bilo anketiranih 200 lokalnih ...prebivalcev. Glede na dobljene rezultate lahko zaključimo, da preučevani zavarovani območji omogočata razvoj podeželskega turizma. Da je razvoj turizma v zavarovanih območjih uspešnejši od razvoja turizma izven zavarovanih območij, ne moremo trditi. Anketirani prebivalci Triglavskega narodnega parka med vsemi gospodarskimi panogami najbolj podpirajo razvoj turizma na območju (86,5 %), kar pa ne velja za anketirane prebivalce Kozjanskega parka, ki se najbolj strinjajo z usmeritvijo območja v kmetijstvo ter razvoj malega podjetništva in obrti. Vseeno ni zanemarljivo dejstvo, da se kljub temu visok delež anketiranih prebivalcev Kozjanskega parka strinja, da bi se moralo območje osredotočiti na razvoj turizma (74,5 %). Da je priložnost zavarovanega območja v boljših možnostih za poslovanje v turizmu, se strinja skoraj polovica anketiranih prebivalcev Triglavskega narodnega parka (47 %) in le 15 % anketiranih prebivalcev Kozjanskega parka. Iz tega lahko sklepamo, da Triglavski narodni park nudi več priložnosti oziroma dodatnih možnosti za poslovanje v turizmu kot pa Kozjanski park. Na zavarovanem območju, kjer je turizem bolj razvit (Triglavski narodni park), anketirani prebivalci menijo, da so strategije varstva narave manj uspešne, in občutijo več negativnih obremenitev turizma (promet in gneča, višje cene). Nasprotno pa v primeru, kjer je turizem na zavarovanem območju manj razvit (Kozjanski park), anketirani prebivalci opažajo, da so strategije ohranjanja narave uspešnejše in da jih turizem manj obremenjuje.
Zavarovana območja so znana po številnih posebnostih, bodisi naravnih, bodisi kulturnih, vendar zavarovanje prinaša določene omejitve, zaradi katerih se tudi kmetijstvo vse bolj usmerja v ekološko ...kmetovanje. Prispevek je povezan z raziskavo o ekološkem kmetovanju, njegovo uspešnostjo in njegovi pomembni vlogi v zavarovanih območjih. Kot primer so izbrana tri zavarovana območja v Sloveniji: Triglavski narodni park (TNP), Kozjanski regijski park (KRP) in Krajinski park Goričko (KPG). Rezultati so bili pridobljeni z intervjuji odgovornih za razvoj tamkajšnjega kmetijstva.
Further regional and spatial development of the Republic of Slovenia is based on a wide share of protected areas that pose significant demands for spatial planers. As an example of links between ...spatial planning and management of protected areas, in this paper we deal with the Triglav National Park (TNP) in NW Slovenia, particularly with the proposa I for its 2014-2023 management plan and to which extent this plan takes into account specific conditions that arise from risk areas due to natural hazards as a significant water management expert foundation for planning the use of space. The paper explicitly demonstrates that the determination of hazard and risk areas in Slovenia is truly necessary, and that only a detailed determination of hazard and risk areas in scales 1.1000 to 1:5000 makes possible detailed spatial planning and thus also the management of protected areas. From the discussion, it also follows that the proposed TNP management plan should be upgraded in the field of research by establishing a Scientific (research) council at the TNP Administration, and by establishing a specific targeted research program focused on research in TNP.
Zavarovana območja nudijo obiskovalcem naravne in druge kakovosti, hkrati pa turizem in rekreacija ta območja vse bolj sooblikujeta. Na primeru Triglavskega narodnega parka, natančneje Zgornjesavske ...doline, smo poskušali ugotoviti, v kolikšni meri sta skladni varstvena in turistična funkcija zavarovanih območij. Pri tem smo se osredotočili na mnenja, poglede in stališča obiskovalcev. Zanimalo nas je, ali so razlogi, zaradi katerih prihajajo turisti, in njihove želje oz. predlogi v zvezi z nadaljnjim razvojem turizma v TNP v skladu z varstveno funkcijo našega edinega narodnega parka.
The plan of spatial arrangement, which was given to us by the real estate developer to asses (environmental report and the estimation of the susceptibility of impacts on protected areas), deals with ...80 hectars of the north-western part of Lipica Stud Farm, which covers the area of the existing golf course as well as the area of its foreseen expansion. We tried to establish, describe and evaluate all the important aspects of plan realization, taking into consideration all of the environmental goals and area characteristics based on the different segments of the environment. A major impact would be seen only in the potentially special protected area of Kras, more precisely on the group of beetles, among which we stress “Morimus funereus” as the qualification bird species of Natura 2000. We suggested the exclusion of 17 hectars of the area from further operations and the establishment of the new distribution of some individual golf-fields. The improved suggestion incorporates the exclusion of a stripe of the western part of the area in question, where there is a habitat of Morimus funereus. This change would also mean the preservation of fossile sites and of maple forests.
PDF
