E-resources
-
Barišić, Pavo
Filozofska istraživanja, 08/2019, Volume: 39, Issue: 2Journal Article, Web Resource
Članak ocrtava povijesni razvoj pitanja o višeznačnoj i zagonetnoj ljudskoj naravi, s posebnim osvrtom na razloge i uvjete zasnivanja moderne filozofijske antropologije. Na toj podlozi daje pregled idejnih začetaka i pravaca antropologijskih istraživanja u Hrvatskoj. U žarištu su pitanja: kada se pojavljuju istraživanja u polju filozofijske antropologije, u kojem se misaonom okružju oblikuju te kakve znanstvene dosege ostvaruju? Prikaz na vidjelo iznosi spoznaju kako filozofijska antropologija u Hrvatskoj dobiva prve konture i vrijedne prinose u sam osvit suvremene obnove te discipline, neposredno nakon njezinih fenomenologijskih i znanstvenih oživljavanja u pothvatima Schelera i Plessnera. Razvoj istraživačke grane raščlanjen je, prema modelu Hansa Lenka, u četiri glavne idejne orijentacije. U okviru antropologije odozgo prikazani su stvaralački prinosi Stjepana Zimmermanna, Vilima Keilbacha, Rajmunda Kuparea, Miljenka Belića, Ante Kusića, Josipa Ćurića, Hrvoja Lasića i Ivana Kopreka. Antropologija odozdo prispodobljena je osvrtom na istraživanja Vere Ehrlich-Stein, Rudija Supeka, Instituta za antropologiju, Pavla Rudana i Darka Polšeka. Za antropologiju iz kulture izložena su misaona postignuća Pavla Vuk-Pavlovića, Vladimira Filipovića, Vjekoslava Mikecina, Esada Ćimića, Nikole Skledara, Branke Brujić, Milana Galovića i Mihaele Girardi-Karšulin. Pod antropologijom iz povijesti ocrtana su djela Predraga Vranickoga, Milana Kangrge, Vanje Sutlića, Gaje Petrovića, Hotimira Burgera, Mislava Kukoča i Raula Raunića. Zaključak sažimlje četiri uvida 1. Filozofijska antropologija nedovoljno je istraženo i malo vrednovano polje, koje predstavlja jedan od najplodnijih misaonih pravaca u 20. stoljeću; 2. Stvaralački prinosi zastupljeni su u sve četiri glavne orijentacije; 3. U okviru istraživanja o čovjeku ostvaren je živ dijalog i plodotvoran susret različitih nazora na svijet; 4. Početke razvoja discipline treba pomaknuti ranije u povijest nego što se prethodno smatralo (Hotimir Burger), s pedesetih i šezdesetih na početak tridesetih godina 20. stoljeća. Posljednji uvid ukazuje na potrebu daljnjega istraživanja uočena, a dosad uglavnom zanemarena, kontinuiteta antropologijskih tema i bliskih idejnih stajališta u povijesti novije filozofije u Hrvatskoj. The paper outlines the historical development of question about ambiguous and mysterious human nature, in particular considering the reasons and conditions for the founding of modern philosophical anthropology. Subsequently, it brings an overview of the conceptual beginnings and directions of anthropological research in Croatia. The focus is on the following questions: When did the investigations begin in the field of philosophical anthropology, in what kind of thinking environments were they shaped and what scientific achievements were reached? The presentation brings to light the cognition that philosophical anthropology in Croatia got its first contours and valuable contributions to the very beginning of the contemporary renewal of this discipline, shortly after its phenomenological and scientific revivals in the ventures of Scheler and Plessner. The development of this research branch is, according to Hans Lankʼs model, divided into four main conceptual orientations. The anthropology from above shows the creative contributions of Stjepan Zimmermann, Vilim Keilbach, Rajmund Kupareo, Miljenko Belić, Ante Kusić, Josip Ćurić, Hrvoje Lasić and Ivan Koprek. The anthropology from below is illustrated by the reference to the research by Vera Ehrlich-Stein, Rudi Supek, the Institute of Anthropology, Pavao Rudan and Darko Polšek. For the anthropology from culture, the philosophical achievements of Pavao Vuk-Pavlović, Vladimir Filipović, Vjekoslav Mikecin, Esad Ćimić, Nikola Skledar, Branka Brujić, Milan Galović and Mihaela Girardi-Karšulin were delineated. Under the anthropology from history, the works of Predrag Vranicki, Milan Kangrga, Vanja Sutlić, Gaja Petrović, Hotimir Burger, Mislava Kukoč and Raul Raunić are outlined. The conclusion summarises four insights. 1. Philosophical anthropology is an under-researched and not enough appreciated field, which represents one of the most fertile currents of thought in the 20th century. 2. Creative contributions are presented in all four major orientations. 3. In the context of anthropological research, lively dialogue and a fruitful meeting of different worldviews were realised. 4. The beginnings of the development of the discipline should be moved earlier in history than previously considered (Hotimir Burger), from the 1950s and 1960s to the early 1930s. The last insight points to the need for further exploration of the perceived, and so far largely neglected, continuity of anthropological themes and related ideas in the history of recent philosophy in Croatia.
Author
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Shelf entry
Permalink
- URL:
Impact factor
Access to the JCR database is permitted only to users from Slovenia. Your current IP address is not on the list of IP addresses with access permission, and authentication with the relevant AAI accout is required.
Year | Impact factor | Edition | Category | Classification | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Select the library membership card:
If the library membership card is not in the list,
add a new one.
DRS, in which the journal is indexed
Database name | Field | Year |
---|
Links to authors' personal bibliographies | Links to information on researchers in the SICRIS system |
---|
Source: Personal bibliographies
and: SICRIS
The material is available in full text. If you wish to order the material anyway, click the Continue button.