DIKUL - logo
E-resources
Peer reviewed Open access
  • Veliparib in Combination wi...
    Byers, Lauren Averett; Bentsion, Dmitry; Gans, Steven; Penkov, Konstantin; Son, ChoonHee; Sibille, Anne; Owonikoko, Taofeek K; Groen, Harry J M; Gay, Carl M; Fujimoto, Junya; de Groot, Patricia; Dunbar, Martin; Kang, Kingston; He, Lei; Sehgal, Vasudha; Glasgow, Jaimee; Bach, Bruce Allen; Ellis, Peter M

    Clinical cancer research, 07/2021, Volume: 27, Issue: 14
    Journal Article

    This study investigated the efficacy and safety of oral PARP inhibitor veliparib, plus carboplatin and etoposide in patients with treatment-naïve, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to veliparib 240 mg twice daily (BID) for 14 days plus chemotherapy followed by veliparib maintenance (400 mg BID; veliparib throughout), veliparib plus chemotherapy followed by placebo (veliparib combination only), or placebo plus chemotherapy followed by placebo (control). Patients received 4-6 cycles of combination therapy, then maintenance until unacceptable toxicity/progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) with veliparib throughout versus control. Overall ( = 181), PFS was improved with veliparib throughout versus control hazard ratio (HR), 0.67; 80% confidence interval (CI), 0.50-0.88; = 0.059; median PFS was 5.8 and 5.6 months, respectively. There was a trend toward improved PFS with veliparib throughout versus control in SLFN11-positive patients (HR, 0.6; 80% CI, 0.36-0.97). Median overall survival (OS) was 10.1 versus 12.4 months in the veliparib throughout and control arms, respectively (HR, 1.43; 80% CI, 1.09-1.88). Grade 3/4 adverse events were experienced by 82%, 88%, and 68% of patients in the veliparib throughout, veliparib combination-only and control arms, most commonly hematologic. Veliparib plus platinum chemotherapy followed by veliparib maintenance demonstrated improved PFS as first-line treatment for ED-SCLC with an acceptable safety profile, but there was no corresponding benefit in OS. Further investigation is warranted to define the role of biomarkers in this setting.