DIKUL - logo
E-resources
Full text
Peer reviewed Open access
  • Effect of Use of a Bougie v...
    Driver, Brian E; Semler, Matthew W; Self, Wesley H; Ginde, Adit A; Trent, Stacy A; Gandotra, Sheetal; Smith, Lane M; Page, David B; Vonderhaar, Derek J; West, Jason R; Joffe, Aaron M; Mitchell, Steven H; Doerschug, Kevin C; Hughes, Christopher G; High, Kevin; Landsperger, Janna S; Jackson, Karen E; Howell, Michelle P; Robison, Sarah W; Gaillard, John P; Whitson, Micah R; Barnes, Christopher M; Latimer, Andrew J; Koppurapu, Vikas S; Alvis, Bret D; Russell, Derek W; Gibbs, Kevin W; Wang, Li; Lindsell, Christopher J; Janz, David R; Rice, Todd W; Prekker, Matthew E; Casey, Jonathan D

    JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 12/2021, Volume: 326, Issue: 24
    Journal Article

    IMPORTANCE: For critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation, failure to intubate the trachea on the first attempt occurs in up to 20% of cases and is associated with severe hypoxemia and cardiac arrest. Whether using a tracheal tube introducer (“bougie”) increases the likelihood of successful intubation compared with using an endotracheal tube with stylet remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of use of a bougie vs an endotracheal tube with stylet on successful intubation on the first attempt. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Bougie or Stylet in Patients Undergoing Intubation Emergently (BOUGIE) trial was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial among 1102 critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation in 7 emergency departments and 8 intensive care units in the US between April 29, 2019, and February 14, 2021; the date of final follow-up was March 14, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to use of a bougie (n = 556) or use of an endotracheal tube with stylet (n = 546). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt. The secondary outcome was the incidence of severe hypoxemia, defined as a peripheral oxygen saturation less than 80%. RESULTS: Among 1106 patients randomized, 1102 (99.6%) completed the trial and were included in the primary analysis (median age, 58 years; 41.0% women). Successful intubation on the first attempt occurred in 447 patients (80.4%) in the bougie group and 453 patients (83.0%) in the stylet group (absolute risk difference, −2.6 percentage points 95% CI, −7.3 to 2.2; P = .27). A total of 58 patients (11.0%) in the bougie group experienced severe hypoxemia, compared with 46 patients (8.8%) in the stylet group (absolute risk difference, 2.2 percentage points 95% CI, −1.6 to 6.0). Esophageal intubation occurred in 4 patients (0.7%) in the bougie group and 5 patients (0.9%) in the stylet group, pneumothorax was present after intubation in 14 patients (2.5%) in the bougie group and 15 patients (2.7%) in the stylet group, and injury to oral, glottic, or thoracic structures occurred in 0 patients in the bougie group and 3 patients (0.5%) in the stylet group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation, use of a bougie did not significantly increase the incidence of successful intubation on the first attempt compared with use of an endotracheal tube with stylet. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03928925