DIKUL - logo
E-resources
Peer reviewed Open access
  • Supplemental Vitamins and M...
    Jenkins, David J.A.; Spence, J. David; Giovannucci, Edward L.; Kim, Young-in; Josse, Robert; Vieth, Reinhold; Blanco Mejia, Sonia; Viguiliouk, Effie; Nishi, Stephanie; Sahye-Pudaruth, Sandhya; Paquette, Melanie; Patel, Darshna; Mitchell, Sandy; Kavanagh, Meaghan; Tsirakis, Tom; Bachiri, Lina; Maran, Atherai; Umatheva, Narmada; McKay, Taylor; Trinidad, Gelaine; Bernstein, Daniel; Chowdhury, Awad; Correa-Betanzo, Julieta; Del Principe, Gabriella; Hajizadeh, Anisa; Jayaraman, Rohit; Jenkins, Amy; Jenkins, Wendy; Kalaichandran, Ruben; Kirupaharan, Geithayini; Manisekaran, Preveena; Qutta, Tina; Shahid, Ramsha; Silver, Alexis; Villegas, Cleo; White, Jessica; Kendall, Cyril W.C.; Pichika, Sathish C.; Sievenpiper, John L.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 06/2018, Volume: 71, Issue: 22
    Journal Article

    The authors identified individual randomized controlled trials from previous meta-analyses and additional searches, and then performed meta-analyses on cardiovascular disease outcomes and all-cause mortality. The authors assessed publications from 2012, both before and including the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force review. Their systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed generally moderate- or low-quality evidence for preventive benefits (folic acid for total cardiovascular disease, folic acid and B-vitamins for stroke), no effect (multivitamins, vitamins C, D, β-carotene, calcium, and selenium), or increased risk (antioxidant mixtures and niacin with a statin for all-cause mortality). Conclusive evidence for the benefit of any supplement across all dietary backgrounds (including deficiency and sufficiency) was not demonstrated; therefore, any benefits seen must be balanced against possible risks. Display omitted