DIKUL - logo
E-resources
Full text
Peer reviewed Open access
  • The development of sensorim...
    Fung, Madison H.; Heinrichs-Graham, Elizabeth; Taylor, Brittany K.; Frenzel, Michaela R.; Eastman, Jacob A.; Wang, Yu-Ping; Calhoun, Vince D.; Stephen, Julia M.; Wilson, Tony W.

    NeuroImage, 12/2022, Volume: 264
    Journal Article

    •Neural oscillatory activity serving motor control develops throughout adolescence.•Pubertal hormones like testosterone are a useful proxy for development.•Spontaneous beta power during the baseline predicted beta ERD strength in youth.•Testosterone predicted spontaneous baseline power and beta ERD strength.•Pubertal hormones uniquely influence the development of motor cortical oscillations. Puberty is a period of substantial hormonal fluctuations, and pubertal hormones can modulate structural and functional changes in the developing brain. Many previous studies have characterized the neural oscillatory responses serving movement, which include a beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) preceding movement onset, gamma and theta responses coinciding with movement execution, and a post-movement beta-rebound (PMBR) response following movement offset. While a few studies have investigated the developmental trajectories of these neural oscillations serving motor control, the impact of pubertal hormone levels on the maturation of these dynamics has not yet been examined. Since the timing and tempo of puberty varies greatly between individuals, pubertal hormones may uniquely impact the maturation of motor cortical oscillations distinct from other developmental metrics, such as age. In the current study we quantified these oscillations using magnetoencephalography (MEG) and utilized chronological age and measures of endogenous testosterone as indices of development during the transition from childhood to adolescence in 69 youths. Mediation analyses revealed complex maturation patterns for the beta ERD, in which testosterone predicted both spontaneous baseline and ERD power through direct and indirect effects. Age, but not pubertal hormones, predicted motor-related theta, and no relationships between oscillatory responses and developmental metrics were found for gamma or PMBR responses. These findings provide novel insight into how pubertal hormones affect motor-related oscillations, and highlight the continued development of motor cortical dynamics throughout the pubertal period.