Based on previous research, the author attempts to identify the key points for the research of Croatian-Czech-Slovak literary and cultural relations in the period of neo-absolutism (1852-1859). ...Citing relevant examples, he refers above all to the abundant correspondence of Croatian, Czech and Slovak intellectuals from that period, and to literary periodicals, which he regards as indicators of the mutual reception of the literary production of these three nations.
The article is a contribution to the research of Slovak-Croatian literary and cultural relations. It focuses at the reception of Andrej Sládkovič (1820 – 1872) in the Croatian context. The second ...half of the 19th century is investigated through the analysis of contributions to Croatian literary magazines and newspapers such as Danica, Dragoljub, Vienac, Slavonac and Nada. The analysis of the 20th century and contemporary reception looks at texts published in various magazines, books and anthologies which contain translations by Luko Paljetak, Dubravka Dorotić Sesar and others. Since Sládkovič did not have any personal contacts with Croatian intellectuals of the time, the presence of his work in the 19th century Croatian cultural space was scarce. Wider recognition of his oeuvre came much later and in the late 20th century, it was intensified by the establishment of a Slovak studies programme at the University of Zagreb (as part of Czech studies in 1994 and as a separate programme in 1997). While in the 19th century, period magazines and newspapers – albeit sporadically – do mention Sládkovič, but do not contain any translations of his work, nowadays, translations are available, but are usually only known in the narrow academic circles of (mainly) Slavic studies experts.
Príspevok z oblasti slovensko-chorvátskych literárnych a kultúrnych vzťahov približuje recepciu diela slovenského básnika Andreja Sládkoviča (1820 – 1872) v chorvátskom prostredí, a to najprv v ...chorvátskych literárnych časopisoch a novinách druhej polovice 19. storočia (Danica, Dragoljub, Vienac, Slavonac, Nada) a následne od 20. storočia až do súčasnosti v časopisoch, knižných edíciách a antológiách (vďaka aktivite súčasných prekladateľov ako Luko Paljetak a Dubravka Dorotić Sesar). Keďže sám A. Sládkovič nemal konkrétnejšie kontakty s chorvátskymi intelektuálmi 19. storočia, aj prezentácia jeho diela bola počas jeho života v chorvátskom prostredí minimálna. K väčšej odozve prichádza až neskôr, pričom impulzom pre zintenzívnenie záujmu bolo okrem iného zahájenie univerzitného štúdia slovakistiky na Filozofickej fakulte v Záhrebe (od roku 1994 v rámci štúdia bohemistiky, od roku 1997 samostatne). Zatiaľ čo v 19. storočí dobová chorvátska tlač sporadicky informovala o Sládkovičovi, hoci preklady jeho poézie boli minimálne, v súčasnosti vznikajúce preklady rezonujú predovšetkým v pomerne úzkych akademických kruhoch, najmä medzi slavistami.
Svetozár Hurban Vajanský (1847 – 1916) had some contact with the Croatian environmentand reflected on Croatian issues in his newspaper articles and literary texts severaltimes. However, the book of ...his substantial correspondence only seldom features thecontact with Croatian partners. The fact that Vajanský´s works were well-received inCroatia at that time can be proved by e.g. translations and reviews in the Information-overview section Listak of the magazine Vienac (1869 – 1903), which was Croatia´smost significant literary magazine in the 19th century. The subject of the paper is thecontribution of the magazine Vienac to Vajanský´s reception by Croatian readers. Themagazine mainly deserves credit for reassessment of his literary work, especially theprosaic part, which later resulted in publishing many translations of his proses in otherCroatian literary magazines. Vajanský´s opus primarily earned praise for its aestheticcriteria and principles, which in contrast to young Croatian intellectuals was adheredto by the older, more conservative generation of Croatian writers, who in the late 19thcentury turned the magazine Vienac into their platform.
Svetozár Hurban Vajanský (1847 – 1916) mal s chorvátskym prostredím viaceré kontakty a vo svojich novinových a aj literárnych textoch chorvátske témy tiež viac ráz tematizoval. V jeho rozsiahlej, ...knižne vydanej korešpondencii sú však styky s chorvátskymi korešpondentmi zastúpené iba ojedinele. To, že Vajanského dielo bolo v Chorvátsku aktuálne prijímané, dokladajú napr. preklady a recenzie v informačno-prehľadovej rubrike Listak časopisu Vienac (1869 – 1903), čo bol najvýznamnejší chorvátsky literárny časopis v 19. storočí. Predmetom štúdie je prínos časopisu Vienac k recepcii Vajanského u chorvátskych čitateľov. Hlavná zásluha časopisu na chorvátskej recepcii Vajanského spočíva vo valorizácii jeho literárneho, a predovšetkým prozaického diela, čo malo neskôr za výsledok uverejnenie mnohých prekladov jeho próz v iných chorvátskych literárnych časopisoch. Pochvalné hodnotenie Vajanského opusu vzišlo primárne z estetických kritérií a princípov, ku ktorým sa, na rozdiel od mladších chorvátskych intelektuálov a literátov, hlásila staršia a konzervatívnejšia generácia chorvátskych spisovateľov, ktorá si koncom 19. storočia urobila z časopisu Vienac svoju platformu.
Svetozár Hurban Vajanský (1847 – 1916) had some contact with the Croatian environment and reflected on Croatian issues in his newspaper articles and literary texts several times. However, the book of ...his substantial correspondence only seldom features the contact with Croatian partners. The fact that Vajanský´s works were well-received in Croatia at that time can be proved by e.g. translations and reviews in the Information- overview section Listak of the magazine Vienac (1869 – 1903), which was Croatia´s most significant literary magazine in the 19th century. The subject of the paper is the contribution of the magazine Vienac to Vajanský´s reception by Croatian readers. The magazine mainly deserves credit for reassessment of his literary work, especially the prosaic part, which later resulted in publishing many translations of his proses in other Croatian literary magazines. Vajanský´s opus primarily earned praise for its aesthetic criteria and principles, which in contrast to young Croatian intellectuals was adhered to by the older, more conservative generation of Croatian writers, who in the late 19th century turned the magazine Vienac into their platform.
Festival povijesti Kliofest godišnja je manifestacija posvećena popularizaciji povijesti i srodnih joj humanističkih i društvenih disciplina, koju od 2014. organiziraju Hrvatski nacionalni odbor za ...povijesne znanosti, Društvo za hrvatsku povjesnicu, Nacionalna i sveučilišna knjižnica u Zagrebu i Hrvatski državni arhiv. Ovogodišnji, peti po redu Kliofest trajao je od 8. do 11. svibnja 2018., i tom je prigodom u Zagrebu održana serija predavanja, promocija publikacija i okruglih stolova, a središnji je dan bio u petak (11. svibnja), kada je u sklopu istoga festivala širom Hrvatske na različite načine obilježen Dan povijesti. Toga su dana u Nacionalnoj i sveučilišnoj knjižnici u Zagrebu dodijeljene i godišnje nagrade ponajboljim hrvatskim povjesničarima i studentima povijesti. Nagradu Ivan Lučić, za životno djelo, dobio je akademik Nikša Stančić, nagradu Vjekoslav Klaić, za popularizaciju znanosti, dobili su Hrvoje Gračanin i Vesna Turtula, nagradom Jaroslav Šidak, za stranog povjesničara, nagrađena je Rumjana Božilova iz Sofije, a nagradom Ferdo Šišić, za najbolje diplomske radove, nagrađeni su Filip Hren i Veronika Novoselec.
Autor na temelju priložene komentirane korespondencije između češkog slavista Jiříja Polívke i Milivoja Šrepela, te između Polívke i Dragutina Boranića, izlaže kako je 1903. došlo do Polívkine ...suradnje u Zborniku za narodni život Južnih Slavena i iznosi okolnosti u kojima je ona nastavljena do 1908. Kroz ovu suradnju prati i etnološke i folklorističke interese Dragutina Boranića koji su, iako je pola stoljeća uređivao Zbornik, do sada ostali u sjeni njegovog jezikoslovnog rada. Osim što je praktičnim savjetima i prikupljanjem literature pomagao Polívki u znanstvenom radu, Boranić je preveo i sva tri njegova priloga u Zborniku, poticao ga je na suradnju sa Zbornikom u svrhu podizanja razine znanstvenog pisanja među hrvatskim etnolozima i folkloristima, te ga je pridobio da komentarima poprati prilog “Narodne pripovijetke iz Bukovice u Dalmaciji”, spojivši tako Polívkine akademske kompetencije s terenskim zapisima Vladimira Ardalića.
U
prilogu se s deset novih pisama koje je Matija Mesić u razdoblju od 1854. do
1878. poslao Václavu Vladivoju Tomeku, Hermenegildu Jirečeku i Konstantinu
Jirečeku, a pohranjena su u arhivima u Češkoj ...i Bugarskoj, nadopunjuje dosad
objavljena korespondencija Matije Mesića s češkim suvremenicima. U uvodu su
objašnjene okolnosti nastanka objelodanjenih pisama te su istaknuti novi
momenti koje ona donose u kontekstu dosad poznate Mesićeve korespondencije.
This
contribution reveals ten new letters that Matija Mesić wrote to Vàclav Vladivoj
Tomek, Hermengild Jireček, and Konstantin Jireček. Today these letters are kept
in the archives in Czech Republic and Bulgaria, and they complement up to now
published Mesić’s correspondence with his Czech contemporaries. The authors explain the circumstances in which these ten letters were written and emphasize some new
moments that help to better understand the context of the previously published
Mesić correspondence. This new correspondence reveals that Mesić contacted and
collaborated with Tomek frequently, and especially interesting is their
discussion and Mesić’s dilemmas regarding his editorial work on Krčelić’s
Annuae. Moreover, this new correspondence reveals that Mesić was in contact
with several members of Jireček family: he was writing not only to Josef Jireček
and his father-in-law Pavel Josef Šafařik, but also to Josef’s brother
Hermenegild and son Konstantin. All of them helped Mesić in his scholarly work
in various ways. For example, he asked them to help and consult regarding the organization of the newly opened Zagreb university, and at the same time, he
collaborated with each of them on their projects. The last of these ten letters
were written to Konstantin Jireček on July 18, 1878, which is less than five
months before Mesić has passed away (December 8, 1878). This letter witness
that Mesić, almost to his very end, remained an active affiliate of the Prague
historiographic academic circle.
PDF
