Background: The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a useful tool for diagnosing paroxysmal conditions potentially related to arrhythmias. Most investigations have focused on selected clinical studies ...or high-volume centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications and outcomes of the ILR in real clinical practice. Methods and Results: This was a prospective, multicenter registry of patients undergoing ILR implantation for clinical indications (April 2006–December 2008). Clinical characteristics (symptoms, arrhythmias, treatments) were recorded in a database. Follow-up data at 1 year or after the occurrence of the first episode were also recorded. Total enrollment: 743 patients (male, 413, 55.6%; 64.9±16 years); 228 (30.7%) had structural heart disease (SHD), and 183 (24.6%), bundle branch block (BBB). Recurrent syncope (76.4%) was the most common indication for implantation. Complete follow-up was obtained for 680 patients (91.5%). Three hundred and twenty-five patients (48%) presented 414 events, with a final diagnosis in 230 patients (70.8% of patients with events; 33.1% of patients with follow-up). Syncope secondary to bradyarrhythmia was the most frequent diagnosis. Similar rates of final diagnoses were noted in subgroups of SHD, BBB and normal heart. Regarding the cause of implantation, higher event rates were registered among patients with recurrent syncope. Conclusions: One-third of patients obtained a final diagnosis with the ILR, independent of the baseline characteristics. Only the cause of implantation provided different rates of final diagnosis. (Circ J 2013; 77: 2535–2541)
The multiparametric implantable cardioverter-defibrillator HeartLogic index has proven to be a sensitive and timely predictor of impending heart failure (HF) decompensation. We evaluated the impact ...of a standardized follow-up protocol implemented by nursing staff and based on remote management of alerts.
The algorithm was activated in HF patients at 19 Spanish centers. Transmitted data were analyzed remotely, and patients were contacted by telephone if alerts were issued. Clinical actions were implemented remotely or through outpatient visits. The primary endpoint consisted of HF hospitalizations or death. Secondary endpoints were HF outpatient visits. We compared the 12-month periods before and after the adoption of the protocol.
We analyzed 392 patients (aged 69±10 years, 76% male, 50% ischemic cardiomyopathy) with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (20%) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (80%). The primary endpoint occurred 151 times in 86 (22%) patients during the 12 months before the adoption of the protocol, and 69 times in 45 (11%) patients (P<.001) during the 12 months after its adoption. The mean number of hospitalizations per patient was 0.39±0.89 pre- and 0.18±0.57 postadoption (P<.001). There were 185 outpatient visits for HF in 96 (24%) patients before adoption and 64 in 48 (12%) patients after adoption (P<.001). The mean number of visits per patient was 0.47±1.11 pre- and 0.16±0.51 postadoption (P<.001).
A standardized follow-up protocol based on remote management of HeartLogic alerts enabled effective remote management of HF patients. After its adoption, we observed a significant reduction in HF hospitalizations and outpatient visits.
HeartLogic is a multiparametric algorithm incorporated into implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). The associated alerts predict impending heart failure (HF) decompensations. Our objective ...was to analyze the association between alerts and clinical events and to describe the implementation of a protocol for remote management in a multicenter registry.
We evaluated study phase 1 (the investigators were blinded to the alert state) and phases 2 and 3 (after HeartLogic activation, managed as per local practice and with a standardized protocol, respectively).
We included 288 patients from 15 centers. In phase 1, the median observation period was 10 months and there were 73 alerts (0.72 alerts/patient-y), with 8 hospitalizations and 2 emergency room admissions for HF (0.10 events/patient-y). There were no HF hospitalizations outside the alert period. In the active phases, the median follow-up was 16 (95%CI, 15-22) months and there were 277 alerts (0.89 alerts/patient-y); 33 were associated with HF hospitalizations or HF death (n=6), 46 with minor decompensations, and 78 with other events. The unexplained alert rate was 0.39 alerts/patient-y. Outside the alert state, there was only 1 HF hospitalization and 1 minor HF decompensation. Most alerts (82% in phase 2 and 81% in phase 3; P=.861) were remotely managed. The median NT-proBNP value was higher within than outside the alert state (7378 vs 1210 pg/mL; P <.001).
The HeartLogic index was frequently associated with HF-related events and other clinically relevant situations, with a low rate of unexplained events. A standardized protocol allowed alerts to be safely and remotely detected and appropriate action to be taken on them.
HeartLogic es un algoritmo multiparamétrico incorporado a desfibriladores automáticos implantables (DAI). La alerta asociada predice descompensaciones de insuficiencia cardiaca (IC). Nuestro objetivo es analizar la asociación entre alertas y eventos clínicos bajo un protocolo de seguimiento común en un registro multicéntrico.
Se evaluaron la fase 1 (investigadores ciegos al estado de la alerta) y las fases 2 y 3 (tras la activación de HeartLogic, según práctica local y un protocolo común respectivamente).
Se incluyó a 288 pacientes en 15 centros. En fase 1, tras una media de observación de 10 meses, hubo 73 alertas (0,72 alertas/paciente-año), con 8 hospitalizaciones y 2 visitas a urgencias por IC (0,10 eventos/año-paciente). No hubo hospitalizaciones fuera del periodo de alerta. Las fases activas tuvieron una media de seguimiento de 16 (IC95%, 15-22) meses, con 277 alertas (0,89 alertas/año-paciente); 33 se asociaron con hospitalizaciones o muerte por IC, 46 con descompensaciones menores y 78 con otros eventos. La tasa de alertas inexplicables fue 0,39/año-paciente. Fuera del estado de alerta solo hubo una hospitalización y una descompensación menor. La mayoría de las alertas (el 82% en fase 2 y el 81% en fase 3; p=0,861) se gestionaron a distancia. La mediana de NT-proBNP fue superior en estado de alerta que fuera de él (7.378 frente a 1.210 pg/ml; p <0,001).
El índice HeartLogic se asoció con descompensaciones de IC y otros eventos relevantes, con baja tasa de alertas inexplicables. Un protocolo estandarizado permitió detectar y actuar a distancia con seguridad sobre las alertas.
HeartLogic es un algoritmo multiparamétrico incorporado a desfibriladores automáticos implantables (DAI). La alerta asociada predice descompensaciones de insuficiencia cardiaca (IC). Nuestro objetivo ...es analizar la asociación entre alertas y eventos clínicos bajo un protocolo de seguimiento común en un registro multicéntrico.
Se evaluaron la fase 1 (investigadores ciegos al estado de la alerta) y las fases 2 y 3 (tras la activación de HeartLogic, según práctica local y un protocolo común respectivamente).
Se incluyó a 288 pacientes en 15 centros. En fase 1, tras una media de observación de 10 meses, hubo 73 alertas (0,72 alertas/paciente-año), con 8 hospitalizaciones y 2 visitas a urgencias por IC (0,10 eventos/año-paciente). No hubo hospitalizaciones fuera del periodo de alerta. Las fases activas tuvieron una media de seguimiento de 16 (IC95%, 15-22) meses, con 277 alertas (0,89 alertas/año-paciente); 33 se asociaron con hospitalizaciones o muerte por IC, 46 con descompensaciones menores y 78 con otros eventos. La tasa de alertas inexplicables fue 0,39/año-paciente. Fuera del estado de alerta solo hubo una hospitalización y una descompensación menor. La mayoría de las alertas (el 82% en fase 2 y el 81% en fase 3; p=0,861) se gestionaron a distancia. La mediana de NT-proBNP fue superior en estado de alerta que fuera de él (7.378 frente a 1.210 pg/ml; p <0,001).
El índice HeartLogic se asoció con descompensaciones de IC y otros eventos relevantes, con baja tasa de alertas inexplicables. Un protocolo estandarizado permitió detectar y actuar a distancia con seguridad sobre las alertas.
HeartLogic is a multiparametric algorithm incorporated into implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). The associated alerts predict impending heart failure (HF) decompensations. Our objective was to analyze the association between alerts and clinical events and to describe the implementation of a protocol for remote management in a multicenter registry.
We evaluated study phase 1 (the investigators were blinded to the alert state) and phases 2 and 3 (after HeartLogic activation, managed as per local practice and with a standardized protocol, respectively).
We included 288 patients from 15 centers. In phase 1, the median observation period was 10 months and there were 73 alerts (0.72 alerts/patient-y), with 8 hospitalizations and 2 emergency room admissions for HF (0.10 events/patient-y). There were no HF hospitalizations outside the alert period. In the active phases, the median follow-up was 16 (95%CI, 15-22) months and there were 277 alerts (0.89 alerts/patient-y); 33 were associated with HF hospitalizations or HF death (n=6), 46 with minor decompensations, and 78 with other events. The unexplained alert rate was 0.39 alerts/patient-y. Outside the alert state, there was only 1 HF hospitalization and 1 minor HF decompensation. Most alerts (82% in phase 2 and 81% in phase 3; P=.861) were remotely managed. The median NT-proBNP value was higher within than outside the alert state (7378 vs 1210 pg/mL; P <.001).
The HeartLogic index was frequently associated with HF-related events and other clinically relevant situations, with a low rate of unexplained events. A standardized protocol allowed alerts to be safely and remotely detected and appropriate action to be taken on them.
Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en
OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to evaluate the cerebral amyloid distribution in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), assessed by carbon-11-Pittsburgh compound B (C-PIB) PET/CT, after 5 ...years of follow-up.
PATIENTS AND METHODSTen amnestic MCI (A-MCI) and four nonamnestic (NA-MCI) patients were studied by C-PIB PET/CT and re-evaluated 5 years later by a new C-PIB PET/CT. PET/CT scans were acquired 60–90 min after the administration of 555 MBq C-PIB and analyzed visually, to obtain a score of the cerebral cortical C-PIB retention in the frontal, basal ganglia (BG), temporoparietal (TP), occipital, posterior cingulate, and cerebellum areas. Initial and 5-year follow-up C-PIB retentions were compared.
RESULTSInitially, 9/10 A-MCI patients were C-PIB positive and one was C-PIB negative. All four NA-MCI patients were C-PIB negative. Of the C-PIB-positive A-MCI patients, seven progressed to Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD-D), one to mixed dementia and one remained as A-MCI. The C-PIB-negative A-MCI patient remained as A-MCI. Of the four C-PIB-negative NA-MCI, one progressed to semantic dementia. All changes in C-PIB retention were of low intensity. The A-MCI patients who progressed to AD-D (n=7) showed an increase in C-PIB retention in the frontal (5/7), BG (3/7), TP (3/7), occipital (1/7), and posterior cingulate (1/7) regions. The A-MCI patient who progressed to mix dementia showed an increase in C-PIB retention in the frontal region. The C-PIB-positive A-MCI patient who remained as A-MCI showed an increase in C-PIB retention in the frontal, BG, and TP areas. The amyloid deposition in the anterior part of the brain (frontal, TP, and BG) increased more than that in the posterior part (occipital and precuneus) (7/9 vs. 2/9; P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONPIB retention increased predominantly in the frontal, BG, and TP areas. C-PIB-positive A-MCI patients mostly progressed to AD-D, showing similar topographic changes in their cerebral C-PIB pattern than the patient who remained as A-MCI.
PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to evaluate amyloid imaging with C-PIB PET/CT in the study of cognitive impairment in a clinical setting.
PATIENTS AND METHODSThe study included 64 patients, with a ...mean age of 65 years, classified as subjective memory complaints (SMCs; n = 8), nonamnestic mild cognitive impairment (NA-MCI; n = 10), amnestic MCI (A-MCI; n = 19), prodromal Alzheimer disease (AD; n = 12), suspicion of frontotemporal dementia (n = 8), Lewy bodies dementia (DLB; n = 2), and cortical degeneration (CD; n = 5). Ten healthy controls (HCs), with a mean age of 59 years, were also included. C-PIB was acquired 60 minutes after IV injection of 555 MBq C-PIB. A visual and semiquantitative analysis was performed.
RESULTSIn HC, C-PIB was negative in 9 and positive in 1. Of the 64 patients, C-PIB was negative in 27 (42%) and positive in 37 (58%). C-PIB was positive in 3 of 8 SMC, in none of 10 NA-MCI, in 14 of 19 A-MCI, in 10 of 12 prodromal AD, in 3 of 8 frontotemporal dementia, and in the 2 and 5 DLB and CD patients. The semiquantitative results in terms of mean global SUV ratio were 1.13 for HC, 1.36 for SMC, 1.07 for NA-MCI, 2.01 for A-MCI, 2.37 for prodromal AD, 2.75 for DLB, and 2.44 for CD.
CONCLUSIONSIn a clinical setting, C-PIB scan had a relevant contribution on patients with cognitive impairment, excluding AD in a high proportion of MCI patients and differentiating AD from other dementias. In A-MCI, C-PIB revealed β-amyloid deposit in 74%, whereas it was negative in all NA-MCI patients.
Amyloid imaging clinically is usually reported as positive or negative, and the role of amyloid topography has not been studied before. To evaluate in a clinical setting the regional distribution ...patterns of C-Pittsburgh compound B (C-PIB) and the fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) uptake in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), we designed this study.
We studied 81 consecutive MCI patients, 64 amnestic (A-MCI) and 17 nonamnestic (NA-MCI) by C-PIB and F-FDG PET/computed tomography, by visual analysis. PIB retention was classified according to the regional distribution into the following patterns: A (frontal, lateral temporal, basal ganglia and anterior cingulate) and B (global retention). F-FDG images were considered positive only if temporoparietal hypometabolism consistent with Alzheimer's disease was observed.
In 42 of the 64 A-MCI, C-PIB was positive. Twelve of the 42 positive A-MCI showed an A-pattern, all F-FDG negative, and 30 a B-pattern, 10 F-FDG positive and 20 F-FDG negative. Of the 17 NA-MCI, C-PIB was positive in three and F-FDG was positive in one. The different proportion of C-PIB positivity in A-MCI and NA-MCI was highly significant (P<0.001).
Two different C-PIB patterns were observed in MCI patients and for the A-pattern, glucose hypometabolism consistent with Alzheimer's disease is highly unlikely. These findings may contribute towards a better selection of patients for future potential treatments and also to optimize the use of F-FDG-PET/CT.