Anticoagulant therapy has undergone a significant change since direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) introduction. Their obvious advantages including the fixed dose, the few interactions and less ...frequent controls, have made them the first choice anticoagulant therapy. More and more patients have therefore switched from therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to DOACs. Aim of our study was to assess the satisfaction, quality of life (QoL) and therapy adherence of patients who switched from VKA to DOACs therapy. This single center study evaluated satisfaction and QoL of 107 patients who switched from VKA to DOACs therapy through Anti-Clot Treatment Scale and SF-36 respectively. The questionnaires were administered before therapy change, after 3 months of DOACs therapy and then annually. We also evaluated DOACs therapy adherence with a questionnaire administered each visit and through the measures of DOACs plasma levels. Patients’ satisfaction and QoL were high during VKA therapy, but with DOACs we observed an improvement after the first 3 months and then maintained over the time of DOACs therapy. DOACs adherence was excellent, also confirmed by DOACs plasma levels.
Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) determined an improvement of responses and overall survival (OS) in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients, some patients still fail the ...achievement of important milestones.
In this review, we focus on the need of appropriate molecular and mutational monitoring during TKI treatment with new laboratory tools and on new compounds developed to counteract the unmet clinical need in CP-CML.
The appropriate identification of BCR::ABL1 dependent and independent mechanisms of resistance with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) can allow to improve the therapeutic strategies and prevent the onset of a failure to treatment. New compounds have been recently approved or are still in investigational trials to improve the response in some critical forms of resistance and/or intolerance to available TKIs.
Introduction. Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare clonal B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorder. Current treatments for HCL include purine analogs (PA), which are used successfully as front-line ...therapy in young and fit patients. The therapeutic armamentarium has been recently extended by the introduction of rituximab, BRAF oral inhibitors and other novel agents. Interferon alpha (IFNα) has been the first agent capable of inducing a response in HCL patients and of changing the natural course of the disease. It has been extensively used up to the introduction of PA. Nowadays, IFNα front-line is limited to pregnant women (or desiring a pregnancy), to patients with severe neutropenia or frail, or to relapsed/refractory patients. We hereby report the experience of 74 patients treated continuously with IFNα at our Center in Rome.
Methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with HCL or with variant HCL treated between 1990 and 2020 with IFNα until progression or toxicity. The initial dosage was 3 MUI subcutaneously three times weekly (3d/week). In responding patients, after 12 months the dose was progressively tapered to reach a very low maintenance dose, ranging from 0.1 MUI 3d/week to 0.9 3d/week. After 12 months of treatment, the degree of response was based on peripheral blood count evaluation, bone marrow biopsy and IFNα front-line; C) patients resistant to PAs who received IFNα as second or further line of treatment.
Results. After 12 months of treatment, 70 patients (95%) achieved either a PR or a CR in 52 (70%) and 18 (24%) cases, respectively. Four (5.4%) patients were considered as non-responders. After a median follow-up of 92 months (range 7-236), 55 patients (75%) still maintained their response while receiving maintenance IFNα. The estimated 5-year and 10-year PFS were 89% and 77%, respectively (Fig. 1). The median PFS for these patients has not been reached at 10 years. Patients in CR at 12 months of treatment showed a significantly superior PFS rate (p 0.001). The 10-year PFS was 94% for patients in CR compared to 73% for patients who obtained a PR during abdominal ultrasound. The mutational status of BRAF V600E by PCR analysis was assessed in a subset of patients during treatment. Three groups of patients were identified: A) patients >65 years who received IFNα front-line; B) patients <65 years with comorbidities or women desiring a pregnancy who received IFNα therapy. Univariate analysis showed a different PFS for groups A, B and C, the 5-year PFS being 95%, 68% and 96%, respectively (p 0.005) (Fig. 1). In group A, a CR was achieved by 28% of cases and a PR by 62%, in group B the rates were 16% and 80%, and in group C 28% and 68%, respectively. Group C received a median number of 2 prior lines of treatment; 89% received PAs. Patients with previous PA-based treatment obtained a PR in 55% of cases and a CR in 32%. No significant differences were observed in terms of PFS in the 10 patients with a variant HCL (p 0.5); 1/10 achieved a CR. The impact of Hb, WBC count, spleen size and platelet count were assessed in univariate analysis. A significant difference in the entire case series was observed in patients with a WBC >3500/mmc at the start of treatment: the estimated median PFS was 236 vs 108 months (p 0.004). Twenty-two patients in response during IFNα maintenance were tested for MRD basing on BRAF status: 32% were negative during treatment (7 out of 22). All patients with negative MRD were in CR. G1-2 extra-hematologic toxicity, occurred as flu-like syndrome and fatigue, was observed in 25 patients (76% in group A), 13/25 patients discontinued IFNα for toxicity; 1 case of alopecia was reported. No patient required discontinuation due to G3-4 hematologic toxicity. Four deaths occurred, 2 due to secondary neoplasms and 2 in very elderly patients.
Conclusions. IFNα still retains a role in selected HCL patients. In young patients with comorbidities front-line IFNα remains a possible option, although not as effective as PAs. In elderly patients, the continuous administration allows remarkable results with acceptable toxicity. Also in patients resistant to PAs, INFα is capable of inducing durable responses in a considerable part of patients. The data on MRD demonstrate the possibility of achieving a molecular response. Although the role of IFNα is further limited by the advent of new agents, when administered in a continuous schedule it still represents a valid therapeutic option in specific subsets of HCL patients.
Display omitted
Martelli:sandoz: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Foà:Abbvie: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tiacci:Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Travel and meeting expenses. Pulsoni:Pfizer: Consultancy; Merk: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy; roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau.
Introduction. Early-stage follicular lymphoma (FL) is usually managed with involved field radiotherapy (IFRT), allowing a complete and long-lasting eradication of the disease in 40-50% of patients ...(pts). The aim of this multicenter phase II prospective study was to evaluate if a minimal residual disease (MRD)-driven immunotherapy consolidation after IFRT can improve the outcome of pts unlikely to be cured by IFRT only, and to assess the therapeutic effect of IFRT and anti-CD20 consolidation by MRD evaluation. Methods. One hundred and ten pts with stage I/II FL were enrolled; 106 were evaluable and treated with 24 Gy IFRT. Peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) samples were centralized to the FIL (Fondazione Italiani Linfomi) MRD Network of EuroMRD-certified laboratories. In pts BCL2::IGH+ at baseline by both nested PCR (NEST) and RQ-PCR (RQ) in the BM and/or (a/o) PB, MRD was analyzed after IFRT and every 6 months over a 3-year period. Pts who were MRD+ by both NEST and RQ in the BM a/o PB after IFRT or who became MRD+ during the follow-up were treated with 8 weekly doses of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ofatumumab (OFA). The primary objective of the study was to define the efficacy of immunotherapy in obtaining a negative MRD. Results. Of the 106 evaluable pts, 50 were males (47%). Median age was 55.5 years (29-83). The FLIPI score was 0 in 60% of pts, 1 in 34%, 2 in 6%; 69% of pts had inguinal site involvement, significantly more frequent in young patients. At baseline, 30.5% of pts had a BCL2::IGH rearrangement (30 MBR, 1 MBR and mcr, 1 mcr) in the BM a/o PB; the concordance between compartments was 87%. BCL2::IGH+ and BCL2::IGH- pts were not significantly different, except for a younger age (p 0.009) and a more frequent FLIPI 0 (p 0.052) among marker negative cases. All but 1 pt achieved a clinical response after IFRT; 1 pt died soon after IFRT of unrelated causes. MRD evaluation after IFRT revealed the persistence of BCL2::IGH+ cells in the PB a/o BM in 60% of pts. MRD+ pts, either after IFRT (n=18) or in case of conversion to MRD+ during the follow-up (n=8), received OFA, obtaining a conversion to MRD- in 23/25 evaluable pts (92%, CI 74-99%), significantly superior to the expected 50%. After a median follow-up of 46.3 months (m) (range 11-66), of the 23 pts who achieved a MRD- with OFA, 5 returned MRD+ (4 underwent OFA re-treatment, achieving a second MRD-, 1 relapsed as a transformation), 4 relapsed being MRD-, 14 remain in complete remission and MRD-, with a duration of molecular response at the last molecular assessment of 30 months (range 6-36). Overall, a clinical relapse was observed in 29 pts submitted to IFRT and 1 patient progressed soon after IFRT. A confirmed histologic transformation to DLBCL was observed in 5 of these patients. Among the 73 “marker negative” patients, 20 relapsed (27.4%) over time, whilst among the 32 BCL2::IGH+ at baseline 9 (28.1%) were resistant or relapsed (p=0.939). The administration of OFA was associated to a significantly reduced risk of POD24 (p= 0.035). Overall, the 24-m and 36-m overall survival (OS) were 100% and 98.9%, respectively; the 24-m and 36-m PFS were 83.7% and 77.4%, respectively. PFS was not different according to the presence or absence of BCL2::IGH at enrollment (p=0.820). PFS was significantly different according to the FLIPI score (p=0.041), but not different according to gender (p=0.696), stage I-II (p=0.122), histological grade (p=0.212), inguinal nodal site vs others (p=0.492). The Kaplan Meier landmark analysis, stratified by MRD, at m+6 (p=0.228), m+12 (p=0.003), m+18 (p=0.0002), m+24 (p=0.004) showed that PFS significantly improved from m+12 onwards when a negative MRD was present (Figure 1). Conclusions. IFRT alone is often insufficient to eradicate FL, inducing a MRD- status only in 40% of pts, long-lasting only in a third of them. An immunotherapy consolidation with OFA after IFRT in MRD+ pts was capable of increasing the molecular responses to 92%, allowing to achieve the primary objective of the study, though this effect was not always persistent. The achievement of a molecular remission correlated significantly with a reduction in the incidence of relapse over time, although this strategy was applicable only to 30% BCL2::IGH+ PET/CT staged FL pts. A consolidation strategy with more effective agent should be advisable. With these limits, a clinical advantage of the MRD-driven treatment strategy is suggested, although not largely applicable.
To evaluate the benefits and safety of the empiric antibiotic treatment (EAT) active against KPC-
in febrile neutropenic patients with acute leukaemia (AL) who are colonised by KPC-
A 7-year ...(2013-2019) retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at the Haematology, Sapienza Rome University (Italy) on 94 febrile neutropenia episodes (FNE) in AL patients KPC-
carriers treated with active EAT.
Eighty-two (87%) FNE were empirically treated with antibiotic combinations 38 colistin-based and 44 ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZAVI)-based, 12 with CAZAVI monotherapy. Successful outcomes were observed in 88/94 (94%) FNE, 46/49 (94%) microbiologically documented infections, and 24/27 (89%) gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI). Mortality due to infective causes was 4.2% (2.1% within 1 week). KPC
infections caused 28/94 FNE (30%) and KPC
BSI was documented in 22 FNE (23.4%) (85% of GNB-BSI), in all cases patients received active EAT, and 21 survived. KPC
BSI mortality rate was 4.5%. CAZAVI-based EAT showed better results than colistin-based EAT (55/56 vs 33/38, p = 0.037), overall and without EAT modification (41/56 vs 20/38, p = 0.02). Empirical combinations including CAZAVI were successful in 98% of cases (43/44 vs 33/38 for colistin-based EAT, p = 0.01), without modifications in 82% (36/44 vs 20/28, p = 0.02). All deaths occurred in patients treated with colistin-based EAT (4/38 vs 0/56, p = 0.02). CAZAVI-containing EAT was the only independent factor for an overall successful response (HR 0.058, CI 0.013-1.072, p = 0.058). Nephrotoxicity occurred in 3(8%) patients undergoing colistin-based EAT (none in those undergoing CAZAVI-based EAT, p = 0.02).
KPC-
infections are frequent in colonised AL patients with FNE. EAT with active antibiotics, mainly CAZAVI-based combinations, was effective, safe, and associated with low overall and KPC
BSI-related mortality.
Abstract
Objectives
During the lockdown that started in Italy on 10 March 2020 to address the COVID-19 pandemic, aggressive procedures were implemented to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission in ...SARS-CoV-2-negative patients with haematological malignancies. These efforts progressively reduced Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP) spread among these patients. Here we evaluated the potential effects of measures against COVID-19 that reduced KPC-KP transmission.
Patients and methods
We analysed KPC-KP spread among 123 patients with haematological malignancies, hospitalized between March and August 2020, who were managed using measures against COVID-19. Their outcomes were compared with those of 80 patients hospitalized during the preceding 4 months (November 2019–February 2020).
Results
During March–August 2020, 15.5% of hospitalized patients were KPC-KP positive, compared with 52.5% in November 2019–February 2020 (P < 0.0001); 8% and 27.5% of patients in these two groups were newly KPC-KP positive, respectively (P = 0.0003). There were eight new KPC-KP-positive patients during January 2020 and none during June 2020. The weekly rate of hospitalized KPC-KP-positive patients decreased from 50% during March 2020 to 17% during August 2020. Four KPC-KP bloodstream infections (BSIs) were experienced by 123 patients (3%) in March–August 2020, and seven BSIs (one fatal) by 80 patients (8%) in November 2019–February 2020 (P = 0.02). Consumption and expense of ceftazidime/avibactam administered to KPC-KP-positive patients significantly decreased in March–August 2020.
Conclusions
Aggressive strategies to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission were applied to all hospitalized patients, characterized by high levels of KPC-KP endemicity and nosocomial transmission. Such measures prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection acquisition and KPC-KP horizontal transmission. Reduced KPC-KP spread, fewer associated clinical complications and decreased ceftazidime/avibactam consumption represented unexpected ‘collateral benefits’ of strategies to prevent COVID-19.
Abstract only
11040
Background: The majority of GIST patients with advanced disease initially achieves disease control from imatinib treatment. Approximately 10% of patients progresses within 6 ...months of starting therapy (primary resistance) and also 50-60% of the responding patients develops progression disease within two years (secondary resistance). Progression disease (PD) can be numerical, dimensional or mixed. The known prognostic factors of risk stratification in local disease are tumor size, mitotic activity and anatomic site. In this retrospective analysis we explore several clinical factors affecting survival in metastatic setting. Methods: The population included in this large database of 128 patients with metastatic GIST was obtained examining data collected from four Oncologic Centres with expertise for the GIST management. The clinical factors analyzed were sex, tumor size, mitotic activity, anatomic site, KIT and PDGFRa mutational status, site of metastasis, FDG-PET status at progressing disease and pattern of tumor progression to I line imatinib 400, II line Imatinib 800 or Sunitinib, evaluated with CT scan or MRI: PD with dimensional growth (dimensional, dPD), with new lesions appearance (numerical, nPD) and with both numerical and dimensional growth (Mixed, mPD). Every factor has been correlated with Overall Survival (OS) measured in months. Survival analyses were performed by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were executed to search for association with the outcome. Results: Univariate analysis showed significant value for primary tumor site (p < 0.0001), mitotic activity (p = 0.02), tumor size (p = 0.05) and PD pattern (p = 0.008): OS nPD group was 102.7 months, in dPD group 87 and in mPD group 70. The multivariate analysis confirm significant prognostic factors for OS tumor site (p = 0.0004) and PD pattern (p = 0.02). Conclusions: with the limitations of a retrospective analisys, this study shows for the first time the impact of pattern of progression on OS: patients with dPD have a worse prognosis than those with nPD or mPD, suggesting type of PD as an independent prognostic factor for OS in advanced GISTs.
Introduction
Limited stage follicular lymphoma (FL) is usually managed with involved field radiotherapy (IFRT), although different approaches are currently carried out, ranging from watch and wait to ...combined treatment. RT on involved lymph nodes allows eradication of the disease only in 40-50% of patients. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (MoAb), widely used in advanced stage FL, are likely to be effective in reducing the relapse risk, although no scientific evidence of their role has been provided. The aim of this multicenter phase II prospective study was to evaluate the role of MRD in identifying patients unlikely to be cured by RT, for whom an immunotherapy-based consolidation could improve outcome.
Methods
110 patients with stage I/II FL were enrolled. IFRT was administered to all patients at a dose of 24 Gy. Peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) samples were centralized to the Italian FIL (Federazione Italiani Linfomi) MRD Network of EuroMRD-certified laboratories: the presence of a BCL2/IGH rearrangement was investigated at baseline in all patients by nested PCR (NEST) and RQ-PCR (RQ), the latter according to the EuroMRD guidelines. In patients BCL2/IGH+ at baseline by both NEST and RQ in BM and/or PB, MRD was analyzed in both tissues after IFRT and every 6 months over a three-year follow-up period. Patients with positive MRD by both NEST and RQ in BM and/or PB after IFRT or who became positive during the follow-up were treated with 8 weekly doses of the anti-CD20 MoAb ofatumumab. The primary objective of the study was to define the efficacy of immunotherapy in obtaining the disappearance of BCL2/IGH rearranged cells.
Results
Preliminary data are available for 107 patients, 57 males, 50 females. Median age was 55 years (29-83). 17% had G1 FL, 32% G2, 40% G3A, 11% NOS. The FLIPI score was 0 in 59% of patients, 1 in 35%, 2 in 6%. 69% of patients had inguinal site involvement. Despite a negative BM biopsy, at baseline 30% of patients (n=32) had a BCL2/IGH rearrangement (30 MBR, 1 MBR and mcr, 1 mcr) in the BM and/or PB; the concordance between compartments was 90%, with 10% of negative PB showing a positive BM. No significant differences were observed in relapse probability between patients with or without a molecular marker. All patients were submitted to IFRT and all obtained a clinical response, which was complete in 79 of the 101 evaluated patients (78%) and partial in 22 (22%). MRD evaluation after treatment revealed the persistence of BCL2/IGH rearranged cells in the PB and/or BM in 60% of patients. According to the design of the protocol, MRD-positive patients, either after IFRT (n=18) or in case of conversion to a positive signal during the follow-up (n=7), received 8 weekly administration of ofatumumab. A conversion to MRD negativity, evaluated in 23 treated patients, was obtained in 20 (87% - CI 65.1-97.1). This result was significantly superior to the expected 50%. One death occurred after IFRT, due to ischemic stroke. Adverse events likely correlated to ofatumumab occurred in 7/25 treated patients, consisting of infusion reactions in 5, leading to a permanent interruption of immunotherapy in 3.
After a median follow-up of 18 months, all patients who achieved a MRD negativity with ofatumumab underwent a regular molecular follow-up and are still MRD-negative. Overall, clinical relapse or progression were observed in 17 patients: 13 (18%) among the 73 “no marker” patients; 2 relapses (16%) were observed among the 12 MRD-negative patients after IFRT and 2 relapses were observed among the 23 patients treated with the anti-CD20 MoAb (8.7%), 1 having achieved a MRD negativity and 1 not. No significant differences in event-free survival have so far been observed between the three groups.
Conclusions
The MRD data of this phase II trial for early stage FL indicate that RT alone is often insufficient to eradicate the disease, being capable of inducing a negative MRD only in 40% of evaluable cases, with a long-lasting effect only in half of them. The primary objective of this study - MRD negativity after immunotherapy - was achieved, obtaining the disappearance of BCL2/IGH rearranged cells in the majority of patients treated with ofatumumab. The strategy of an immunotherapy consolidation after IFRT in MRD-positive patients allowed to increase molecular responses. A longer follow-up and further studies on larger patient populations will allow to conclusively define the impact of this MRD-driven strategy also on clinical outcome.
Pulsoni:Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Merk: Consultancy; Bristol Meyer Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Ferrero:Servier: Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Luminari:ROCHE: Other: Role as Advisor ; CELGENE: Other: Role as Advisor & Travel Grant; TAKEDA: Other: Travel Grant; GILEAD: Other: Lecturer . Liberati:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Clinical trial support; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Clinical trial support; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Clinical trial support; Roche: Other: Clinical trial support; Novartis: Other: Clinical trial support. Ferreri:Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy. Nassi:Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Corradini:Roche: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; kite: Honoraria; KiowaKirin: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Mannina:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Arcaini:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Bayer, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Roche, Sandoz, Janssen-Cilag, VERASTEM: Consultancy; Celgene, Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead: Other: Travel expenses. Galimberti:Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Ladetto:AbbVie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; J&J: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Foà:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.
The anti-CD20 MoAb Ofatumomab is employed to eradicate Minimal Residual Disease in early stage Follicular Lymphoma(FL). The drug is registered for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, not for FL.
PDF
