The relationship between fatigue impact and walking capacity and perceived ability in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is inconclusive in the existing literature. A better understanding might ...guide new treatment avenues for fatigue and/or walking capacity in patients with MS.
To investigate the relationship between the subjective impact of fatigue and objective walking capacity as well as subjective walking ability in MS patients.
A cross-sectional multicenter study design was applied. Ambulatory MS patients (n = 189, age: 47.6 ± 10.5 years; gender: 115/74 women/men; Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS): 4.1 ± 1.8 range: 0–6.5) were tested at 11 sites. Objective tests of walking capacity included short walking tests (Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 10-Metre Walk Test (10mWT) at usual and fastest speed and the timed up and go (TUG)), and long walking tests (2- and 6-Minute Walk Tests (MWT). Subjective walking ability was tested applying the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12). Fatigue impact was measured by the self-reported modified fatigue impact scale (MFIS) consisting of a total score (MFIStotal) and three subscales (MFISphysical, MFIScognitive and MFISpsychosocial). Uni- and multivariate regression analysis were performed to evaluate the relation between walking and fatigue impact.
MFIStotal was negatively related with long (6MWT, r = −0.14, p = 0.05) and short composite (TUG, r = −0.22, p = 0.003) walking measures. MFISphysical showed a significant albeit weak relationship to walking speed in all walking capacity tests (r = −0.22 to −0.33, p < .0001), which persisted in the multivariate linear regression analysis. Subjective walking ability (MSWS-12) was related to MFIStotal (r = 0.49, p < 0.0001), as well as to all other subscales of MFIS (r = 0.24–0.63, p < 0.001), showing stronger relationships than objective measures of walking.
The physical impact of fatigue is weakly related to objective walking capacity, while general, physical, cognitive and psychosocial fatigue impact are weakly to moderately related to subjective walking ability, when analysed in a large heterogeneous sample of MS patients.
•Despite being equally prevalent symptoms in MS the relation between gait impairments and fatigue is unclear.•General fatigue impact is not related to most walking outcomes in MS.•The physical impact of fatigue is weak to moderately related to both objective and subjective walking capacity in MS.
Background: Many persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) report increased fatigue in the afternoon and evening compared with the morning. It is commonly accepted that physical capacity also decreases ...as time of day progresses, potentially influencing the outcomes of testing.
Objective: The objective of this article was to determine whether self-reported fatigue level and walking capacity are influenced by time of day in PwMS.
Methods: A total of 102 PwMS from 8 centers in 5 countries, with a diverse level of ambulatory dysfunction (Expanded Disability Status Scale EDSS <6.5), participated. Patients performed walking capacity tests and reported fatigue level at three different time points (morning, noon, afternoon) during 1 day. Walking capacity was measured with the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and the 10-m walk test performed at usual and fastest speed. Self-reported fatigue was measured by the Rochester Fatigue Diary (RFD). Subgroups with mild (EDSS 1.5–4.0, n = 53) and moderate (EDSS 4.5–6.5, n = 49) ambulatory dysfunction were formed, as changes during the day were hypothesized to depend on disability status.
Results: Subgroups had different degree of ambulatory dysfunction (p < 0.001) but reported similar fatigue levels. Although RFD scores were affected by time of day with significant differences between morning and noon/afternoon (p < 0.0001), no changes in walking capacity were found in any subgroup. Additional analyses on subgroups distinguished by diurnal change in self-reported fatigue failed to reveal analogous changes in walking capacity.
Conclusions: Testing of walking capacity is unaffected by time of day, despite changes in subjective fatigue.
Despite recent advances in multiple sclerosis treatment, patients experience relapses for which standard treatment remains glucocorticosteroids (GCS). However, there is limited information comparing ...doses or routes of administration for different GCS types or the benefit of GCS compared to natural recovery. Currently, high dose (HD) methylprednisolone (MP) is the preferred therapy. We conducted meta-analyses of published studies assessing MP at different doses and in comparison to other steroid products or no treatment. Relevant studies were identified through predetermined processes and five articles met the inclusion criteria. Three studies compared HD MP to placebo; two studies compared the effect of HD MP and low dose (LD) MP; only one accepted report compared HD MP to another GCS. This report could not be included in a meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of HD MP vsplacebo studies indicated a mean treatment difference of 0.76 in Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS) changes from baseline. The meta-analysis of HD and LD MP demonstrated no difference in EDSS change. Despite these rather obvious findings, these meta-analyses have been valuable in identifying further research questions. We recommend studies to determine optimum benefit related to dosage, timing for starting therapy and the most appropriate GCS type. Given the advances in MS therapeutics, these studies will have to include patients on additional disease modifying therapy. Multiple Sclerosis (2000) 6 267 - 273
To address the need for brief, reliable, valid, and standardized quality of life (QOL) assessment applicable across neurologic conditions.
Drawing from larger calibrated item banks, we developed ...short measures (8-9 items each) of 13 different QOL domains across physical, mental, and social health and evaluated their validity and reliability. Three samples were utilized during short form development: general population (Internet-based, n = 2,113); clinical panel (Internet-based, n = 553); and clinical outpatient (clinic-based, n = 581). All short forms are expressed as T scores with a mean of 50 and SD of 10.
Internal consistency (Cronbach α) of the 13 short forms ranged from 0.85 to 0.97. Correlations between short form and full-length item bank scores ranged from 0.88 to 0.99 (0.82-0.96 after removing common items from banks). Online respondents were asked whether they had any of 19 different chronic health conditions, and whether or not those reported conditions interfered with ability to function normally. All short forms, across physical, mental, and social health, were able to separate people who reported no health condition from those who reported 1-2 or 3 or more. In addition, scores on all 13 domains were worse for people who acknowledged being limited by the health conditions they reported, compared to those who reported conditions but were not limited by them.
These 13 brief measures of self-reported QOL are reliable and show preliminary evidence of concurrent validity inasmuch as they differentiate people based upon number of reported health conditions and whether those reported conditions impede normal function.
Abstract Objective To study and compare the sensitivities to change of the French versions of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) and the Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ). Method A ...retrospective study of the medical records of 30 chronic low back pain (LBP) outpatients undergoing a 4-week functional training program in a physical medicine and rehabilitation unit. Physical data (a visual analogue pain scale, the Schöber index, Sorensen and Shirado tests and the finger-to-floor distance) and functional status (QBPDS and DPQ scores) were measured at D0 and D25. Sensitivity to change was assessed in terms of the standardized response mean (SRM) and the effect size (ES). Results With the exception of the DPQ's “social interest” domain, all QBPDS and DPQ scores improved significantly over the course of the rehabilitation programme. Sensitivity to change was high for the QBPDS (SRM = 0.80; ES = 0.62) but only moderate for the DPQ (SRM = 0.59; ES = 0.61). Discussion-Conclusion Our results show that the QBPDS was more sensitive to clinical change than the DPQ in a sample of chronic LBP sufferers. It would be interesting to assess this sensitivity in a population of acute LBP patients and to evaluate the long-term effects of a functional rehabilitation program on the DPQ's “social interest” domain.
To evaluate the influence of time on the quality of life of hemiplegic stroke patients living at home, we analyzed a sample of 45 outpatients. The sample was divided into two groups, according to the ...delay between the discharge time from hospital and the assessment (Group 1, fewer than 6 mo; Group 2, more than 6 mo after discharge). We hypothesized that patients in Group 2 would have a lower level of quality of life than patients in Group 1. Disability was assessed with the Functional Independence Measure, and the quality of life was assessed with the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Both groups were comparable with regard to demographic and stroke characteristics. There was no statistically significant difference in Functional Independence Measure scores (global and subscales). Reintegration to Normal Living Index-perception of self subscale scores were significantly lower in Group 2. At the item level, quality of life scores were also significantly lower in Group 2 for indoor mobility (Mann-Whitney U test; P = 0.001), self-care needs (P = 0.005), personal relationships (P = 0.02), and the handling of life events (P = 0.05). These results confirm our hypothesis and suggest that quality of life may deteriorate in some domains over time, even when the disability level is unchanged, but these results need to be replicated in prospective studies with larger samples of stroke survivors.
Background and purpose
The purpose was to determine the test–retest reliability, practice effects, convergent validity and sensitivity to multiple sclerosis (MS) disability of neuroperformance ...subtests from the patient self‐administered Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT) designed to assess low contrast vision (Contrast Sensitivity Test, CST), upper extremity motor function (Manual Dexterity Test, MDT) and lower extremity motor function (Walking Speed Test, WST) and to introduce the concept of regression‐based norms to aid clinical interpretation of performance scores using the MSPT cognition test (Processing Speed Test, PST) as an example.
Methods
Substudy 1 assessed test–retest reliability, practice effects and convergent validity of the CST, MDT and WST in 30 MS patients and 30 healthy controls. Substudy 2 examined sensitivity to MS disability in over 600 MS patients as part of their routine clinic assessment. Substudy 3 compared performance on the PST in research volunteers and clinical samples.
Results
The CST, MDT and WST were shown to be reliable, valid and sensitive to MS outcomes. Performance was comparable to technician‐administered testing. PST performance was poorer in the clinical sample compared with the research volunteer sample.
Conclusions
The self‐administered MSPT neuroperformance modules produce reliable, objective metrics that can be used in clinical practice and support outcomes research. Published studies which require patient voluntary consent may underestimate the rate of cognitive dysfunction observed in a clinical setting.
Oral and intrathecal baclofen (ITB) have been associated with epileptic seizures. The authors observed a higher incidence of epileptic seizures in 99 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated ...with ITB vs a matched control group (7% vs 1%, p < 0.05). Three patients with MS on ITB developed status epilepticus. Seizures were often associated with additional triggering factors.