Latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) is the major transforming protein of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and is critical for EBV-induced B-cell transformation in vitro. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) ...regulates accessibility of chromatin, alters functions of transcriptional activators and repressors, and has been directly implicated in transcriptional activation. Previously we showed that LMP1 activates PARP1 and increases Poly(ADP-ribos)ylation (PARylation) through PARP1. Therefore, to identify targets of LMP1 that are regulated through PARP1, LMP1 was ectopically expressed in an EBV-negative Burkitt's lymphoma cell line. These LMP1-expressing cells were then treated with the PARP inhibitor olaparib and prepared for RNA sequencing. The LMP1/PARP targets identified through this RNA-seq experiment are largely involved in metabolism and signaling. Interestingly, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of RNA-seq data suggests that hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) is an LMP1 target mediated through PARP1. PARP1 is acting as a coactivator of HIF-1α-dependent gene expression in B cells, and this co-activation is enhanced by LMP1-mediated activation of PARP1. HIF-1α forms a PARylated complex with PARP1 and both HIF-1α and PARP1 are present at promoter regions of HIF-1α downstream targets, leading to accumulation of positive histone marks at these regions. Complex formation, PARylation and binding of PARP1 and HIF-1α at promoter regions of HIF-1α downstream targets can all be attenuated by PARP1 inhibition, subsequently leading to a buildup of repressive histone marks and loss of positive histone marks. In addition, LMP1 switches cells to a glycolytic 'Warburg' metabolism, preferentially using aerobic glycolysis over mitochondrial respiration. Finally, LMP1+ cells are more sensitive to PARP1 inhibition and, therefore, targeting PARP1 activity may be an effective treatment for LMP1+ EBV-associated malignancies.
Abstract
Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) establishes lifelong asymptomatic infection by replication of its chromatinized episomes with the host genome. EBV exhibits different latency-associated ...transcriptional repertoires, each with distinct three-dimensional structures. CTCF, Cohesin and PARP1 are involved in maintaining viral latency and establishing episome architecture. Epstein–Barr virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) represents 1.3–30.9% of all gastric cancers globally. EBV-positive gastric cancers exhibit an intermediate viral transcription profile known as ‘Latency II’, expressing specific viral genes and noncoding RNAs. In this study, we investigated the impact of PARP1 inhibition on CTCF/Cohesin binding in Type II latency. We observed destabilization of the binding of both factors, leading to a disrupted three-dimensional architecture of the episomes and an altered viral gene expression. Despite sharing the same CTCF binding profile, Type I, II and III latencies exhibit different 3D structures that correlate with variations in viral gene expression. Additionally, our analysis of H3K27ac-enriched interactions revealed differences between Type II latency episomes and a link to cellular transformation through docking of the EBV genome at specific sites of the Human genome, thus promoting oncogene expression. Overall, this work provides insights into the role of PARP1 in maintaining active latency and novel mechanisms of EBV-induced cellular transformation.
Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Background and aims
Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric carcinoma (EBVaGC) is the most common EBV-associated cancer and accounts for ~ 10% of all gastric cancers (GC). Epstein–Barr virus ...nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1), which is critical for the replication and maintenance of the EBV latent genome, is consistently expressed in all EBVaGC tumors. We previously developed small molecule inhibitors of EBNA1. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and selectivity of an EBNA1 inhibitor in cell-based and animal xenograft models of EBV-positive and EBV-negative gastric carcinoma.
Methods
We tested the potency of an EBNA1 inhibitor, VK-1727, in vitro and in xenograft studies, using EBV-positive (SNU719 and YCCEL1) and EBV-negative (AGS and MKN74) GC cell lines. After treatment, we analyzed cell viability, proliferation, and RNA expression of EBV genes by RT-qPCR.
Results
Treatment with VK-1727 selectively inhibits cell cycle progression and proliferation in vitro. In animal studies, treatment with an EBNA1 inhibitor resulted in a significant dose-dependent decrease in tumor growth in EBVaGC xenograft models, but not in EBV-negative GC xenograft studies. Gene expression analysis revealed that short term treatment in cell culture tended towards viral gene activation, while long-term treatment in animal xenografts showed a significant decrease in viral gene expression.
Conclusions
EBNA1 inhibitors are potent and selective inhibitors of cell growth in tissue culture and animal models of EBV-positive GC. Long-term treatment with EBNA1 inhibitors may lead to loss of EBV in mouse xenografts. These results suggest that pharmacological targeting of EBNA1 may be an effective strategy to treat patients with EBVaGC.
Epstein Barr virus (EBV) is a potentially oncogenic gammaherpesvirus that establishes a chronic, latent infection in memory B cells. The EBV genome persists in infected host cells as a chromatinized ...episome and is subject to chromatin-mediated regulation. Binding of the host insulator protein CTCF to the EBV genome has an established role in maintaining viral latency type. CTCF is posttranslationally modified by the host enzyme PARP1. PARP1, or poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1, catalyzes the transfer of a poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) moiety from NAD
onto acceptor proteins, including itself, histone proteins, and CTCF. PARylation of CTCF by PARP1 can affect CTCF's insulator activity, DNA binding capacity, and ability to form chromatin loops. Both PARP1 and CTCF have been implicated in the regulation of EBV latency and lytic reactivation. Thus, we predicted that pharmacological inhibition with PARP1 inhibitors would affect EBV latency type through a chromatin-specific mechanism. Here, we show that PARP1 and CTCF colocalize at specific sites throughout the EBV genome and provide evidence to suggest that PARP1 acts to stabilize CTCF binding and maintain the open chromatin landscape at the active Cp promoter during type III latency. Further, PARP1 activity is important in maintaining latency type-specific viral gene expression. The data presented here provide a rationale for the use of PARP inhibitors in the treatment of EBV-associated cancers exhibiting type III latency and ultimately could contribute to an EBV-specific treatment strategy for AIDS-related or posttransplant lymphomas.
EBV is a human gammaherpesvirus that infects more than 95% of individuals worldwide. Upon infection, EBV circularizes as an episome and establishes a chronic, latent infection in B cells. In doing so, the virus utilizes host cell machinery to regulate and maintain the viral genome. In otherwise healthy individuals, EBV infection is typically nonpathological; however, latent infection is potentially oncogenic and is responsible for 1% of human cancers. During latent infection, EBV expresses specific sets of proteins according to the given latency type, each of which is associated with specific types of cancers. For example, type III latency, in which the virus expresses its full repertoire of latent proteins, is characteristic of AIDS-associated and posttransplant lymphomas associated with EBV infection. Understanding how viral latency type is regulated at the chromatin level may reveal potential targets for EBV-specific pharmacological intervention in EBV-associated cancers.
Nidogen 1 (NID1) is an important basement membrane protein secreted by many cell types. We previously found that human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection rapidly induced chromosome 1 breaks and that ...the basement membrane protein NID1, encoded near the 1q42 break site, was downregulated. We have now determined that the specific breaks in and of themselves did not regulate NID1, rather interactions between several viral proteins and the cellular machinery and DNA regulated NID1. We screened a battery of viral proteins present by 24 hours postinfection (hpi) when regulation was induced, including components of the incoming virion and immediate early (IE) proteins. Adenovirus (Ad) delivery of the tegument proteins pp71 and UL35 and the IE protein IE1 influenced steady-state (ss) NID1 levels. IE1's mechanism of regulation was unclear, while UL35 influenced proteasomal regulation of ss NID1. Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) experiments determined that pp71 downregulated
transcription. Surprisingly, WF28-71, a fibroblast clone that expresses minute quantities of pp71, suppressed
transcription as efficiently as HCMV infection, resulting in the near absence of ss NID1. Sequence analysis of the region surrounding the 1q42 break sites and
promoter revealed CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) binding sites. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments determined that pp71 and CTCF were both bound at these two sites during HCMV infection. Expression of pp71 alone replicated this binding. Binding was observed as early as 1 hpi, and colocalization of pp71 and CTCF occurred as quickly as 15 min postinfection (pi) in infected cell nuclei. In fibroblasts where CTCF was knocked down, Adpp71 infection did not decrease
transcription nor ss NID1 protein levels. Our results emphasize another aspect of pp71 activity during infection and identify this viral protein as a key contributor to HCMV's efforts to eliminate NID1. Further, we show, for the first time, direct interaction between pp71 and the cellular genome.
We have found that human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) utilizes multiple viral proteins in multiple pathways to regulate a ubiquitous cellular basement membrane protein, nidogen-1 (NID1). The extent of the resources and the redundant methods that the virus has evolved to affect this control strongly suggest that its removal provides a life cycle advantage to HCMV. Our discoveries that one of the proteins that HCMV uses to control NID1, pp71, binds directly to the cellular DNA and can exert control when present in vanishingly small quantities may have broad implications in a wide range of infection scenarios. Dysregulation of NID1 in an immunocompetent host is not known to manifest complications during infection; however, in the naive immune system of a developing fetus, disruption of this developmentally critical protein could initiate catastrophic HCMV-induced birth defects.
Abstract The Epstein Barr virus (EBV) genome persists in infected host cells as a chromatinized episome and is subject to chromatin-mediated regulation. Binding of the host insulator protein CTCF to ...the EBV genome has an established role in maintaining viral latency type, and in other herpesviruses, loss of CTCF binding at specific regions correlates with viral reactivation. Here, we demonstrate that binding of PARP1, an important cofactor of CTCF, at the BZLF1 lytic switch promoter restricts EBV reactivation. Knockdown of PARP1 in the Akata-EBV cell line significantly increases viral copy number and lytic protein expression. Interestingly, CTCF knockdown has no effect on viral reactivation, and CTCF binding across the EBV genome is largely unchanged following reactivation. Moreover, EBV reactivation attenuates PARP activity, and Zta expression alone is sufficient to decrease PARP activity. Here we demonstrate a restrictive function of PARP1 in EBV lytic reactivation.
The enzyme Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) plays a very important role in the DNA damage response, but its role in numerous aspects is not fully understood. We recently showed that in the ...absence of DNA damage, PARP1 regulates the expression of the chromatin-modifying enzyme EZH2. Work from other groups has shown that EZH2 participates in the DNA damage response. These combined data suggest that EZH2 could be a target of PARP1 in both untreated and genotoxic agent-treated conditions. In this work we tested the hypothesis that, in response to DNA damage, PARP1 regulates EZH2 activity. Here we report that PARP1 regulates EZH2 activity after DNA damage. In particular, we find that EZH2 is a direct target of PARP1 upon induction of alkylating and UV-induced DNA damage in cells and
. PARylation of EZH2 inhibits EZH2 histone methyltransferase (H3K27me) enzymatic activity. We observed in cells that the induction of PARP1 activity by DNA alkylating agents decreases the association of EZH2 with chromatin, and PARylation of histone H3 reduces EZH2 affinity for its target histone H3. Our findings establish that PARP1 and PARylation are important regulators of EZH2 function and link EZH2-mediated heterochromatin formation, DNA damage and PARylation. These findings may also have clinical implications, as they suggest that inhibitors of EZH2 can improve anti-tumor effects of PARP1 inhibitors in BRCA1/2-deficient cancers.
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has overwhelmed healthcare resources even in wealthy nations, necessitating rationing of limited resources without previously established crisis standards of ...care protocols. In Massachusetts, triage guidelines were designed based on acute illness and chronic life-limiting conditions. In this study, we sought to retrospectively validate this protocol to cohorts of critically ill patients from our hospital.
We applied our hospital-adopted guidelines, which defined severe and major chronic conditions as those associated with a greater than 50% likelihood of 1- and 5-year mortality, respectively, to a critically ill patient population. We investigated mortality for the same intervals.
An urban safety-net hospital ICU.
All adults hospitalized during April of 2015 and April 2019 identified through a clinical database search.
None.
Of 365 admitted patients, 15.89% had one or more defined chronic life-limiting conditions. These patients had higher 1-year (46.55% vs 13.68%; p < 0.01) and 5-year (50.00% vs 17.22%; p < 0.01) mortality rates than those without underlying conditions. Irrespective of classification of disease severity, patients with metastatic cancer, congestive heart failure, end-stage renal disease, and neurodegenerative disease had greater than 50% 1-year mortality, whereas patients with chronic lung disease and cirrhosis had less than 50% 1-year mortality. Observed 1- and 5-year mortality for cirrhosis, heart failure, and metastatic cancer were more variable when subdivided into severe and major categories.
Patients with major and severe chronic medical conditions overall had 46.55% and 50.00% mortality at 1 and 5 years, respectively. However, mortality varied between conditions. Our findings appear to support a crisis standards protocol which focuses on acute illness severity and only considers underlying conditions carrying a greater than 50% predicted likelihood of 1-year mortality. Modifications to the chronic lung disease, congestive heart failure, and cirrhosis criteria should be refined if they are to be included in future models.
PDF
