Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) provides high rates of local control (LC) and margin-negative (R0) resections for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and borderline resectable ...pancreatic cancer (BRPC), respectively, with minimal toxicity.
A single-institution retrospective review was performed for patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer treated with induction chemotherapy followed by SBRT. SBRT was delivered over 5 consecutive fractions using a dose painting technique including 7-10 Gy/fraction to the region of vessel abutment or encasement and 5-6 Gy/fraction to the remainder of the tumor. Restaging scans were performed at 4 weeks, and resectable patients were considered for resection. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Seventy-three patients were evaluated, with a median follow-up time of 10.5 months. Median doses of 35 Gy and 25 Gy were delivered to the region of vessel involvement and the remainder of the tumor, respectively. Thirty-two BRPC patients (56.1%) underwent surgery, with 31 undergoing an R0 resection (96.9%). The median OS, 1-year OS, median PFS, and 1-year PFS for BRPC versus LAPC patients was 16.4 months versus 15 months, 72.2% versus 68.1%, 9.7 versus 9.8 months, and 42.8% versus 41%, respectively (all P>.10). BRPC patients who underwent R0 resection had improved median OS (19.3 vs 12.3 months; P=.03), 1-year OS (84.2% vs 58.3%; P=.03), and 1-year PFS (56.5% vs 25.0%; P<.0001), respectively, compared with all nonsurgical patients. The 1-year LC in nonsurgical patients was 81%. We did not observe acute grade ≥3 toxicity, and late grade ≥3 toxicity was minimal (5.3%).
SBRT safely facilitates margin-negative resection in patients with BRPC pancreatic cancer while maintaining a high rate of LC in unresectable patients. These data support the expanded implementation of SBRT for pancreatic cancer.
Abstract
Purpose. Limited data are available to guide neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic cancer.
Material and methods. We updated our ...institutional outcomes with a neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) approach. An IRB-approved analysis was performed of all BRPC and LAPC patients treated with our departmental treatment protocol. After staging, medically fit patients underwent chemotherapy for 2-3 months, with regimen at the discretion of the treating medical oncologist. Patients then received SBRT delivered in five consecutive daily fractions with median total radiation doses of 30 Gy to tumor and 40 Gy dose painted to tumor-vessel interfaces. This was followed by restaging imaging for possible resection. Overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS), and locoregional control (LRC) rates were estimated and compared by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods.
Results. We identified 159 patients, 110 BRPC and 49 LAPC, with 14.0 months median overall follow-up. The resection and margin negative (R0) rate for BRPC patients who completed neoadjuvant therapy was 51% and 96%, respectively. Estimated median OS was 19.2 months for BRPC patients and 15.0 months for LAPC patients (p = 0.402). Median OS was 34.2 months for surgically resected patients versus 14.0 months for unresected patients (p < 0.001). Five of 21 (24%) LAPC patients receiving FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy underwent R0 resection. In LAPC, FOLFIRINOX recipients underwent R0 resection more often than other chemotherapy recipients (5 of 21 vs. 0 of 28, p = 0.011). There was a trend for improved survival in those resected LAPC patients (p = 0.09). For those not undergoing resection, one year LRC was 78%. Any grade ≥ 3 potentially radiation-related toxicity rate was 7%.
Conclusions. These data underscore the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of neoadjuvant SBRT and chemotherapy for BRPC and LAPC.
Radiation therapy dose escalation using stereotactic body radiation therapy may significantly improve both local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) for patients with inoperable pancreas cancer. ...However, ablative dose cannot be routinely offered because of the risk of causing severe injury to adjacent normal organs. Stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) represents a novel technique that may achieve safe delivery of ablative dose and improve long-term outcomes.
We performed a single institution retrospective analysis of 35 consecutive pancreatic cancer patients treated with SMART in mid-inspiration breath hold on an MR-linear accelerator. Most had locally advanced disease (80%) and received induction chemotherapy (91.4%) for a median 3.9 months before stereotactic body radiation therapy. All were prescribed 5 fractions delivered in consecutive days to a median total dose of 50 Gy (BED10 100 Gy10), typically with a 120% to 130% hotspot. Elective nodal irradiation was delivered to 20 (57.1%) patients. No patient had fiducial markers placed and all were treated with continuous intrafraction MR visualization and automatic beam triggering.
With median follow-up of 10.3 months from SMART, acute (2.9%) and late (2.9%) grade 3 toxicities were uncommon. One-year LC, distant metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival, cause-specific survival, and OS were 87.8%, 63.1%, 52.4%, 77.6%, and 58.9%, respectively.
To our knowledge, this is the first report of 5-fraction pancreas SMART delivered on an MR-linear accelerator. We observed minimal severe treatment-related toxicity and encouraging early LC. Prospective confirmation of feasibility and long-term clinical outcomes of dose intensified SMART is warranted.
Significant improvements within radioembolization imaging and dosimetry permit the development of an accurate and personalized pretreatment plan using technetium 99m–labeled macroaggregated albumin ...(99mTc-MAA) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) combined with anatomical CT (SPECT/CT). Despite these potential advantages, the clinical transition to pretreatment protocols with SPECT/CT is hindered by their unknown safety constraints. This study aimed to address this issue by establishing novel dose limits for 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT to enable quantitative pretreatment planning.
Stratification criteria to determine images most viable for dosimetry analysis were created from a cohort of 85 patients. SPECT/CT, cone beam CT, and activity calculations derived from the local deposition method were used to create an accurate pretreatment protocol. Planar and SPECT/CT images were compared using linear regression and modified Bland-Altman analyses to convert accepted planar dose limits to SPECT/CT. To validate these new dose limits, activity calculations based on SPECT/CT were compared with those calculated with the body surface area and planar methods for three treatment plans.
A total of 38 of 85 patients were deemed viable for dosimetry analysis. SPECT yielded greater lung shunt fractions (LSFs) than planar imaging when LSFs were <4.89%, whereas SPECT yielded lower LSFs than planar imaging when LSFs were >4.89%. Planar to SPECT/CT dose conversions were 0.76×, 0.70×, and 0.55× for the whole liver, normal liver, and lungs, respectively. Patients with SPECT LSFs ≤4.89% were safely treated with the direct application of planar lung dose limits. Activity calculations with the newly established SPECT/CT dose limits were greater than those of the body surface area method by a median range of 33.1% to 61.9% and were lower than planar-based activity calculations by a median range of 12.5% to 13.7% for the whole liver and by 29.4% to 32.2% for the normal liver.
This study demonstrated a safe method for translating dose limits from 99mTc-MAA planar imaging to SPECT/CT. A robust pretreatment protocol was further developed guided by the current knowledge in the field. Established SPECT/CT dose limits safely treated 97.5% of patients and permitted the application of independent pretreatment planning with 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT.
Abstract Purpose Relative radiation dose exposure to vital organs in the thorax could influence clinical outcomes in esophageal cancer (EC). We assessed whether the type of radiation therapy (RT) ...modality used was associated with postoperative outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). Patients and methods Contemporary data from 580 EC patients treated with nCRT at 3 academic institutions from 2007 to 2013 were reviewed. 3D conformal RT (3D), intensity modulated RT (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT) were used for 214 (37%), 255 (44%), and 111 (19%) patients, respectively. Postoperative outcomes included pulmonary, GI, cardiac, wound healing complications, length of in-hospital stay (LOS), and 90-day postoperative mortality. Cox model fits, and log-rank tests both with and without Inverse Probability of treatment Weighting (IPW) were used to correct for bias due to non-randomization. Results RT modality was significantly associated with the incidence of pulmonary, cardiac and wound complications, which also bore out on multivariate analysis. Mean LOS was also significantly associated with treatment modality (13.2 days for 3D (95%CI 11.7–14.7), 11.6 days for IMRT (95%CI 10.9–12.7), and 9.3 days for PBT (95%CI 8.2–10.3) ( p < 0.0001)). The 90 day postoperative mortality rates were 4.2%, 4.3%, and 0.9%, respectively, for 3D, IMRT and PBT ( p = 0.264). Conclusions Advanced RT technologies (IMRT and PBT) were associated with significantly reduced rate of postoperative complications and LOS compared to 3D, with PBT displaying the greatest benefit in a number of clinical endpoints. Ongoing prospective randomized trial will be needed to validate these results.
Radiation therapy (RT) plays an essential role in the management of esophageal cancer. Because the esophagus is a centrally located thoracic structure there is a need to balance the delivery of ...appropriately high dose to the target while minimizing dose to nearby critical structures. Radiation dose received by these critical structures, especially the heart and lungs, may lead to clinically significant toxicities, including pneumonitis, pericarditis, and myocardial infarction. Although technological advancements in photon RT delivery like intensity modulated RT have decreased the risk of such toxicities, a growing body of evidence indicates that further risk reductions are achieved with proton beam therapy (PBT). Herein we review the published dosimetric and clinical PBT literature for esophageal cancer, including motion management considerations, the potential for reirradiation, radiation dose escalation, and ongoing esophageal PBT clinical trials. We also consider the potential cost-effectiveness of PBT relative to photon RT.
Persistent immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment is a major limitation to boosting the abscopal effect, whereby radiation therapy at 1 site can lead to regression of tumors at distant ...sites. Here, we investigate the use of radiation and immunogenic biomaterials (IBM) targeting only the gross tumor volume/subvolume for boosting the abscopal effect in immunologically cold tumors.
To evaluate the abscopal effect, 2 syngeneic contralateral tumors were implanted in each mouse, where only 1 tumor was treated. IBM was administered to the treated tumor with 1 fraction of radiation and results were compared, including as a function of different radiation therapy field sizes. The IBM was designed similar to fiducial markers using immunogenic polymer components loaded with anti-CD40 agonist. Tumor volumes of both treated and untreated tumors were measured over time, along with survival and corresponding immune cell responses.
Results showed that radiation with IBM administered to the gross tumor subvolume can effectively boost abscopal responses in both pancreatic and prostate cancers, significantly increasing survival (P < .0001 and P < .001, respectively). Results also showed equal or superior abscopal responses when using field sizes smaller than the gross tumor volume compared with irradiating the whole tumor volume. These results were buttressed by observation of higher infiltration of cytotoxic CD8+ T-lymphocytes in the treated tumors (P < .0001) and untreated tumors (P < .0001) for prostate cancer. Significantly higher infiltration was also observed in treated tumors (P < .0001) and untreated tumors P < .01) for pancreatic cancer. Moreover, the immune responses were accompanied by a positive shift of proinflammatory cytokines in both prostate and pancreatic tumors.
The approach targeting gross tumor subvolumes with radiation and IBM offers opportunity for boosting the abscopal effect while significantly minimizing healthy tissue toxicity. This approach proffers a radioimmunotherapy dose-painting strategy that can be developed for overcoming current barriers of immunosuppression especially for immunologically cold tumors.
MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy Benitez, Cecil M; Chuong, Michael D; Künzel, Luise A ...
Seminars in radiation oncology,
01/2024, Letnik:
34, Številka:
1
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy (MRIgRT) has improved soft tissue contrast over computed tomography (CT) based image-guided RT. Superior visualization of the target and ...surrounding radiosensitive structures has the potential to improve oncological outcomes partly due to safer dose-escalation and adaptive planning. In this review, we highlight the workflow of adaptive MRIgRT planning, which includes simulation imaging, daily MRI, identifying isocenter shifts, contouring, plan optimization, quality control, and delivery. Increased utilization of MRIgRT will depend on addressing technical limitations of this technology, while addressing treatment efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and workflow training.
PDF
