Recent reports indicate that statins are associated with an increased risk for new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM) compared with placebo and that this relation is dose dependent. The aim of this study ...was to perform a comprehensive network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the impact of different types and doses of statins on new-onset DM. RCTs comparing different types and doses of statins with placebo were searched for using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. A search of RCTs pertinent to this meta-analysis covering the period from November 1994 to October 2012 was conducted by 2 independent investigators using the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Embase databases as well as abstracts and presentations from major cardiovascular meetings. Seventeen RCTs reporting the incidence of new-onset DM during statin treatment and including a total of 113,394 patients were identified. The RCTs compared either a statin versus placebo or high-dose versus moderate-dose statin therapy. Among different statins, pravastatin 40 mg/day was associated with the lowest risk for new-onset DM compared with placebo (odds ratio 1.07, 95% credible interval 0.86 to 1.30). Conversely, rosuvastatin 20 mg/day was numerically associated with 25% increased risk for DM compared with placebo (odds ratio 1.25, 95% credible interval 0.82 to 1.90). The impact on DM appeared to be intermediate with atorvastatin 80 mg/day compared with placebo (odds ratio 1.15, 95% credible interval 0.90 to 1.50). These findings were replicated at moderate doses. In conclusion, different types and doses of statins show different potential to increase the incidence of DM.
Summary Background Despite recent studies, the optimum duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary drug-eluting stent placement remains uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis with ...several analytical approaches to investigate mortality and other clinical outcomes with different DAPT strategies. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane databases, and proceedings of international meetings on Nov 20, 2014, for randomised controlled trials comparing different DAPT durations after drug-eluting stent implantation. We extracted study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample characteristics, and clinical outcomes. DAPT duration was categorised in each study as shorter versus longer, and as 6 months or shorter versus 1 year versus longer than 1 year. Analyses were done by both frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Findings We identified ten trials published between Dec 16, 2011, and Nov 16, 2014, including 31 666 randomly assigned patients. By frequentist pairwise meta-analysis, shorter DAPT was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality compared with longer DAPT (HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·69–0·98; p=0·02; number needed to treat NNT=325), with no significant heterogeneity apparent across trials. The reduced mortality with shorter compared with longer DAPT was attributable to lower non-cardiac mortality (0·67, 0·51–0·89; p=0·006; NNT=347), with similar cardiac mortality (0·93, 0·73–1·17; p=0.52). Shorter DAPT was also associated with a lower risk of major bleeding, but a higher risk of myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis. We noted similar results in a Bayesian framework with non-informative priors. By network meta-analysis, patients treated with 6-month or shorter DAPT and 1-year DAPT had higher risk of myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis but lower risk of mortality compared with patients treated with DAPT for longer than 1 year. Patients treated with DAPT for 6 months or shorter had similar rates of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis, but lower rates of major bleeding than did patients treated with 1-year DAPT. Interpretation Although treatment with DAPT beyond 1 year after drug-eluting stent implantation reduces myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis, it is associated with increased mortality because of an increased risk of non-cardiovascular mortality not offset by a reduction in cardiac mortality. Funding None.
To provide contemporary data on the implementation of European guideline recommendations for lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) across different settings and populations and how this impacts low-density ...lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement.
An 18 country, cross-sectional, observational study of patients prescribed LLT for primary or secondary prevention in primary or secondary care across Europe. Between June 2017 and November 2018, data were collected at a single visit, including LLT in the preceding 12 months and most recent LDL-C. Primary outcome was the achievement of risk-based 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) LDL-C goal while receiving stabilized LLT; 2019 goal achievement was also assessed. Overall, 5888 patients (3000 primary and 2888 secondary prevention patients) were enrolled; 54% 95% confidence interval (CI) 52-56 achieved their risk-based 2016 goal and 33% (95% CI 32-35) achieved their risk-based 2019 goal. High-intensity statin monotherapy was used in 20% and 38% of very high-risk primary and secondary prevention patients, respectively. Corresponding 2016 goal attainment was 22% and 45% (17% and 22% for 2019 goals) for very high-risk primary and secondary prevention patients, respectively. Use of moderate-high-intensity statins in combination with ezetimibe (9%), or any LLT with PCSK9 inhibitors (1%), was low; corresponding 2016 and 2019 goal attainment was 53% and 20% (ezetimibe combination), and 67% and 58% (PCSK9i combination).
Gaps between clinical guidelines and clinical practice for lipid management across Europe persist, which will be exacerbated by the 2019 guidelines. Even with optimized statins, greater utilization of non-statin LLT is likely needed to reduce these gaps for patients at highest risk.
The prognostic relevance of periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still matter of debate, ...particularly regarding the type (cardiac troponin or creatin kinase-MB) and different thresholds of biomarkers elevation, as the importance of associated ancillary criteria of ischemia or concomitant angiographic complications. There are still uncertainties regarding the value of PMI as event which is prognostically equivalent to spontaneous myocardial infarction or if it simply represents a marker of baseline risk, atherosclerotic burden and procedural complexity. In the present review, we will present the mechanisms and predictors of PMI occurring during PCI and potential treatment strategies to reduce its occurrence. We will also overview all commonly adopted definitions of PMI, which carry different prevalence and prognostic implications in daily practice and clinical trials. Finally, we will discuss the impact of different PMI definitions on the interpretation of trials results, emphasizing the importance of adequate endpoints selection in the planning and interpretation of clinical trials.The prognostic relevance of periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still matter of debate, particularly regarding the type (cardiac troponin or creatin kinase-MB) and different thresholds of biomarkers elevation, as the importance of associated ancillary criteria of ischemia or concomitant angiographic complications. There are still uncertainties regarding the value of PMI as event which is prognostically equivalent to spontaneous myocardial infarction or if it simply represents a marker of baseline risk, atherosclerotic burden and procedural complexity. In the present review, we will present the mechanisms and predictors of PMI occurring during PCI and potential treatment strategies to reduce its occurrence. We will also overview all commonly adopted definitions of PMI, which carry different prevalence and prognostic implications in daily practice and clinical trials. Finally, we will discuss the impact of different PMI definitions on the interpretation of trials results, emphasizing the importance of adequate endpoints selection in the planning and interpretation of clinical trials.
Older patients are underrepresented in prospective studies and randomized clinical trials of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Over the last decade, a few specific trials have been conducted in this ...population, allowing more evidence-based management. Older adults are a heterogeneous, complex, and high-risk group whose management requires a multidimensional clinical approach beyond coronary anatomic variables. This review focuses on available data informing evidence-based interventional and pharmacological approaches for older adults with ACS, including guideline-directed management. Overall, an invasive approach appears to demonstrate a better benefit-risk ratio compared to a conservative one across the ACS spectrum, even considering patients' clinical complexity and multiple comorbidities. Conversely, more powerful strategies of antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention have been associated with increased bleeding events and no benefit in terms of mortality reduction. An interdisciplinary evaluation with geriatric assessment should always be considered to achieve a holistic approach and optimize any treatment on the basis of the underlying biological vulnerability.
Objectives This study sought to determine whether coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is associated with an increased risk of stroke compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). ...Background Some, but not all, randomized trials have reported increased rates of stroke with CABG compared with PCI. However, all these studies were powered insufficiently to examine differences in the risk of stroke reliably. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of 19 trials in which 10,944 patients were randomized to CABG versus PCI. The primary end point was the 30-day rate of stroke. We also determined the rate of stroke at the midterm follow-up and investigated whether there was an interaction between revascularization type and the extent of coronary artery disease on the relative risk of stroke. Results The 30-day rate of stroke was 1.20% after CABG compared with 0.34% after PCI (odds ratio: 2.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.69 to 5.09, p < 0.0001). Similar results were observed after a median follow-up of 12.1 months (1.83% vs. 0.99%, odds ratio: 1.67, 95% confidence interval: 1.09 to 2.56, p = 0.02). The extent of coronary artery disease (single vessel vs. multivessel vs. left main) did not affect the relative increase in the risk of stroke observed with CABG compared with PCI at either 30 days (p = 0.57 for interaction) or midterm follow-up (p = 0.08 for interaction). Similar results were observed when the outcomes in 33,980 patients from 27 observational studies were analyzed. Conclusions Coronary revascularization by CABG compared with PCI is associated with an increased risk of stroke at 30 days and at the mid-term follow-up.
PPCI involving coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) is challenging because of difficulties in “wiring” the distal part of the lesion, the presence of extensive thrombus burden, and increased risk of ...distal embolization and no reflow (1). ...CAA is a risk factor for stent thrombosis after stenting for acute coronary syndromes (2). ...PPCI-treated patients with STEMI caused by CAA show unacceptable rates of early stent thrombosis causing recurrent MIs. All event rates are calculated as Kaplan-Meier estimates.BARC = bleeding academic research consortium; CL = culprit lesion; EF = ejection fraction; MI = myocardial infarction; RCA = right coronary artery. Patients With Aneurysm as CL (n = 32) Patients Without Aneurysm as CL (n = 2,280) p Value Age, yrs 65.85 ± 11.61 62.94 ± 12.52 0.17 Male 26 (81.3) 1,773 (77.8) 0.637 Diabetes mellitus 7 (21.9) 374 (16.7) 0.441 Previous MI 8 (25.8) 256 (11.4) 0.013 CL = RCA 16 (50.0) 739 (32.4) 0.035 EF at discharge, % 48.28 ± 6.63 48.56 ± 9.40 0.884 Bleeding BARC 3,5 1 (3.2) 17 (0.8) 0.13 30-day event rates Death/MI 5 (15.6) 169 (7.7) 0.091 Death 1 (3.1) 131 (6.0) 0.515 Cardiac death 1 (3.1) 105 (4.7) 0.682 New MI 4 (12.7) 50 (2.3) <0.001...
PDF
