Purpose Abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy and in combination with fulvestrant in women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human ...epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy. Methods MONARCH 3 is a double-blind, randomized phase III study of abemaciclib or placebo plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in 493 postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. Patients received abemaciclib or placebo (150 mg twice daily continuous schedule) plus either 1 mg anastrozole or 2.5 mg letrozole, daily. The primary objective was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary objectives included response evaluation and safety. A planned interim analysis occurred after 189 events. Results Median progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in the abemaciclib arm (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.72; P = .000021; median: not reached in the abemaciclib arm, 14.7 months in the placebo arm). In patients with measurable disease, the objective response rate was 59% in the abemaciclib arm and 44% in the placebo arm ( P = .004). In the abemaciclib arm, diarrhea was the most frequent adverse effect (81.3%) but was mainly grade 1 (44.6%). Comparing abemaciclib and placebo, the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (21.1% v 1.2%), diarrhea (9.5% v 1.2%), and leukopenia (7.6% v 0.6%). Conclusion Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor was effective as initial therapy, significantly improving progression-free survival and objective response rate and demonstrating a tolerable safety profile in women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
HER2-positive breast cancers usually contain large amounts of T-cell infiltrate. We hypothesised that trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer could be mediated by immune mechanisms. We ...assessed the safety and anti-tumour activity of pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, added to trastuzumab in trastuzumab-resistant, advanced HER2-positive breast cancer.
We did this single-arm, multicentre, phase 1b–2 trial in 11 centres based in five countries. Eligible participants were women aged 18 years or older, who had advanced, histologically confirmed, HER2-positive breast cancer; documented progression during previous trastuzumab-based therapy; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; and a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded metastatic tumour biopsy for central assessment of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. In phase 1b, we enrolled patients with PD-L1-positive tumours in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation of intravenous pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, every 3 weeks) plus 6 mg/kg of intravenous trastuzumab. The primary endpoint of the phase 1b study was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity and recommended phase 2 dose; however, a protocol amendment on Aug 28, 2015, stipulated a flat dose of pembrolizumab of 200 mg every 3 weeks in all Merck-sponsored trials. In phase 2, patients with PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumours were enrolled in parallel cohorts and received the flat dose of pembrolizumab plus standard trastuzumab. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 study was the proportion of PD-L1-positive patients achieving an objective response. This trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02129556, and with EudraCT, number 2013-004770-10, and is closed.
Between Feb 2, 2015, and April 5, 2017, six patients were enrolled in phase 1b (n=3 received 2 mg/kg pembrolizumab, n=3 received 10 mg/kg pembrolizumab) and 52 patients in phase 2 (n=40 had PD-L1-positive tumours, n=12 had PD-L1-negative tumours). The data cutoff for this analysis was Aug 7, 2017. During phase 1b, there were no dose-limiting toxicities in the dose cohorts tested. Median follow-up for the phase 2 cohort was 13·6 months (IQR 11·6–18·4) for patients with PD-L1-positive tumours, and 12·2 months (7·9–12·2) for patients with PD-L1-negative tumours. Six (15%, 90% CI 7–29) of 40 PD-L1-positive patients achieved an objective response. There were no objective responders among the PD-L1-negative patients. The most common treatment-related adverse event of any grade was fatigue (12 21% of 58 patients). Grade 3–5 adverse events occurred in 29 (50%) of patients, treatment-related grade 3–5 adverse events occurred in 17 (29%), and serious adverse events occurred in 29 (50%) patients. The most commonly occurring serious adverse events were dyspnoea (n=3 5%), pneumonitis (n=3 5%), pericardial effusion (n=2 3%), and upper respiratory infection (n=2 3%). There was one treatment-related death due to Lambert-Eaton syndrome in a PD-L1-negative patient during phase 2.
Pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab was safe and showed activity and durable clinical benefit in patients with PD-L1-positive, trastuzumab-resistant, advanced, HER2-positive breast cancer. Further studies in this breast cancer subtype should focus on a PD-L1-positive population and be done in less heavily pretreated patients.
Merck, International Breast Cancer Study Group.
Summary Background Prediction of response to anthracycline-based therapy for breast cancer is challenging. We aimed to assess the value of HER2 and TOP2A as predictive markers of response to ...anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy in patients with early breast cancer. Methods We did a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised adjuvant trials that compared anthracycline-based regimens with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) regimens. We assessed the status of HER2 and TOP2A genes with fluorescent in-situ hybridisation. Tumour samples were submitted to an external laboratory for validation. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) to compare event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival in patients receiving anthracycline-based treatment with those receiving CMF in two HER2 cohorts ( HER2 amplified and non-amplified tumours) and in three TOP2A cohorts (normal, amplified, and deleted tumours). Findings We analysed data for 3452 patients for HER2 and 3102 patients for TOP2A . For EFS, HRs were 0·89 (95% CI 0·79–1·01) for HER2 non-amplified patients and 0·71 (0·58–0·86) for HER2 -amplified patients (pinteraction =0·0485); for overall survival, HRs were 0·91 (95% CI 0·79–1·05) for HER2 non-amplified patients and 0·73 (0·59–0·89) for HER2 -amplified patients (pinteraction =0·0718). In analysis of TOP2A status, HRs for EFS were 0·88 (0·78–1·00) for normal, 0·63 (0·46–0·87) for deleted, and 0·62 (0·43–0·90) for amplified (pinteraction =0·0513); HRs for overall survival were 0·89 (0·78–1·03) for normal, 0·68 (0·49–0·95) for deleted, and 0·67 (0·46–0·98) for amplified (pinteraction =0·1608). When patients with TOP2A -deleted and TOP2A -amplified tumours were grouped together (altered cohort) and compared with data from patients with normal TOP2A tumours, HRs for EFS were 0·64 (0·50–0·81) for altered and 0·88 (0·78–1·00) for normal (pinteraction =0·0183); HRs for overall survival were 0·67 (0·52–0·86) for altered and 0·89 (0·78–1·03) for normal (pinteraction =0·0455). Interpretation Although HER2 amplification and combined TOP2A amplification and deletion may have some value in the prediction of responsiveness to anthracycline-based chemotherapy, our findings do not support the use of anthracyclines only in patients with HER2 -amplified or TOP2A -aberrated tumours. Funding Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro, Academy of Finland, Belgian Federation Against Cancer, Cancer Research UK, Les Amis de l'Institut Bordet, Scottish Breast Cancer Trials Group, NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, Danish Council for Strategic Research, Pharmacia-Upjohn (now Pfizer), and Abbott Laboratories.
Detecting signals of micrometastatic disease in patients with early breast cancer (EBC) could improve risk stratification and allow better tailoring of adjuvant therapies. We previously showed that ...postoperative serum metabolomic profiles were predictive of relapse in a single-center cohort of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative EBC patients. Here, we investigated this further using preoperative serum samples from ER-positive, premenopausal women with EBC who were enrolled in an international phase III trial.
Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy of 590 EBC samples (319 with relapse or ≥6 years clinical follow-up) and 109 metastatic breast cancer (MBC) samples was performed. A Random Forest (RF) classification model was built using a training set of 85 EBC and all MBC samples. The model was then applied to a test set of 234 EBC samples, and a risk of recurrence score was generated on the basis of the likelihood of the sample being misclassified as metastatic.
In the training set, the RF model separated EBC from MBC with a discrimination accuracy of 84.9%. In the test set, the RF recurrence risk score correlated with relapse, with an AUC of 0.747 in ROC analysis. Accuracy was maximized at 71.3% (sensitivity, 70.8%; specificity, 71.4%). The model performed independently of age, tumor size, grade, HER2 status and nodal status, and also of Adjuvant! Online risk of relapse score.
In a multicenter group of EBC patients, we developed a model based on preoperative serum metabolomic profiles that was prognostic for disease recurrence, independent of traditional clinicopathologic risk factors.
.
At 8 years of follow-up, premenopausal women with breast cancer had higher rates of disease-free and overall survival with the addition of ovarian suppression to antiestrogen therapy and a higher ...rate of hormonal side effects than with tamoxifen alone.
Mutations in the hotspot ligand-binding domain of the estrogen receptor (ER) gene
have recently been recognized as mechanisms of endocrine resistance in endocrine receptor-positive metastatic breast ...cancer (MBC). Accumulating data suggest these mutations develop under the selective pressure of endocrine treatments, and are infrequent in untreated ER-positive breast cancers. In vitro studies show that these mutations confer ligand-independent activity, resistance to estrogen deprivation, and relative resistance to tamoxifen and fulvestrant. Post-hoc retrospective and prospective analyses of
mutations in patients with MBC have consistently found that these mutations are markers of poor prognosis and predict resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs). These results warrant further investigation and prospective validation in dedicated studies. Moreover, studies are ongoing to clarify the activity of novel drugs in the context of metastatic endocrine resistant luminal breast cancer harboring
mutations. In this review, we summarize the pre-clinical and clinical findings defining the characteristics of
mutant breast cancer, and highlight the potential clinical developments in this field.
Liquid biopsy based on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) enables non-invasive dynamic assessment of disease status in patients with cancer, both in the early and advanced settings. The analysis of ...DNA-methylation (DNAm) from cfDNA samples holds great promise due to the intrinsic characteristics of DNAm being more prevalent, pervasive, and cell- and tumor-type specific than genomics, for which established cfDNA assays already exist. Herein, we report on recent advances on experimental strategies for the analysis of DNAm in cfDNA samples. We describe the main steps of DNAm-based analysis workflows, including pre-analytics of cfDNA samples, DNA treatment, assays for DNAm evaluation, and methods for data analysis. We report on protocols, biomolecular techniques, and computational strategies enabling DNAm evaluation in the context of cfDNA analysis, along with practical considerations on input sample requirements and costs. We provide an overview on existing studies exploiting cell-free DNAm biomarkers for the detection and monitoring of cancer in early and advanced settings, for the evaluation of drug resistance, and for the identification of the cell-of-origin of tumors. Finally, we report on DNAm-based tests approved for clinical use and summarize their performance in the context of liquid biopsy.
New single-cell isolation technologies are facilitating studies on the transcriptomics of individual cells. Bio-Rad ddSEQ is a droplet-based microfluidic system that, when coupled with downstream ...Illumina library preparation and sequencing, enables the monitoring of thousands of genes per cell. Sequenced reads show unique features that do not permit the use of freely available tools to perform single cell demultiplexing.
We present ddSeeker, a tool to perform initial processing and quality metrics of reads generated through Bio-Rad ddSEQ/Illumina experiments. Its application to the Illumina test dataset demonstrates that ddSeeker performs better than Illumina BaseSpace software, enabling a higher recovery of valid reads. We also show its utility in the analysis of an in-house dataset including two read sets characterized by low and high sequencing quality. ddSeeker and its source code are available at https://github.com/cgplab/ddSeeker .
ddSeeker is a freely available tool to perform initial processing and quality metrics of reads generated through Bio-Rad ddSEQ/Illumina single cell transcriptomic experiments.
Activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway occurs frequently in breast cancer that is resistant to endocrine therapy. Approved mTOR inhibitors effectively inhibit cell growth and proliferation but ...elicit AKT phosphorylation via a feedback activation pathway, potentially leading to resistance to mTOR inhibitors. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of buparlisib plus fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer who were pretreated with endocrine therapy and mTOR inhibitors.
BELLE-3 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Postmenopausal women aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, who had relapsed on or after endocrine therapy and mTOR inhibitors, were recruited from 200 trial centres in 22 countries. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) via interactive response technology (block size of six) to receive oral buparlisib (100 mg per day) or matching placebo starting on day 1 of cycle 1, plus intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg) on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. Randomisation was stratified by visceral disease status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by local investigator assessment as per the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 in the full analysis population (all randomised patients, by intention-to-treat). Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of treatment and at least one post-baseline safety assessment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01633060, and is ongoing but no longer enrolling patients.
Between Jan 15, 2013, and March 31, 2016, 432 patients were randomly assigned to the buparlisib (n=289) or placebo (n=143) groups. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the buparlisib versus placebo group (3·9 months 95% CI 2·8–4·2 vs 1·8 months 1·5–2·8; hazard ratio HR 0·67, 95% CI 0·53–0·84, one-sided p=0·00030). The most frequent grade 3–4 adverse events in the buparlisib versus placebo group were elevated alanine aminotransferase (63 22% of 288 patients vs four 3% of 140), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (51 18% vs four 3%), hyperglycaemia (35 12% vs none), hypertension (16 6% vs six 4%), and fatigue (ten 3% vs two 1%). Serious adverse events were reported in 64 (22%) of 288 patients in the buparlisib group versus 23 (16%) of 140 in the placebo group; the most frequent serious adverse events (affecting ≥2% of patients) were elevated aspartate aminotransferase (six 2% vs none), dyspnoea (six 2% vs one 1%), and pleural effusion (six 2% vs none). On-treatment deaths occurred in ten (3%) of 288 patients in the buparlisib group and in six (4%) of 140 in the placebo group; most deaths were due to metastatic breast cancer, and two were considered treatment-related (cardiac failure n=1 in the buparlisib group and unknown reason n=1 in the placebo group).
The safety profile of buparlisib plus fulvestrant does not support its further development in this setting. Nonetheless, the efficacy of buparlisib supports the rationale for the use of PI3K inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in patients with PIK3CA mutations.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
PDF
