The ADAURA trial confirmed adjuvant Osimertinib's efficacy in EGFR-mutated Non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet the limited mature overall survival (OS) data at approval poses a challenge. This ...study explores patient preferences in the absence of complete OS information, hypothesizing that disease-free survival (DFS) benefit alone may influence adjuvant Osimertinib pursuit.
At Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (Jan-Dec 2021), patients assessed for adjuvant therapy received a survey probing OS and DFS preferences. Scenarios were (a) minimum OS justifying Osimertinib, (b) minimum DFS improvement justifying 3-years of adjuvant Osimertinib, (c) minimum 5-year DFS percent change, and (d) minimum OS justifying copay changes. Results were analyzed.
Of 524 NSCLC patients, 51 participated. Scenario 1 saw 56% requiring a 12-month OS benefit for Osimertinib justification. In scenario 2, 72% deemed a 12-month DFS benefit sufficient. Scenario 3 revealed 31% opting out despite a 10% OS increase. Scenario 4 showed varied willingness to pay, with 33% unwilling to any shoulder copayment even with a 10-year OS benefit.
This study explores patient preferences without complete OS data, revealing diverse thresholds. Factors include employment, education, and willingness to pay. Findings underscore shared decision-making importance. Limitations include sample size, potential biases, and regional focus; larger cohorts are needed for validation.
This study investigates patient preferences for adjuvant Osimertinib in EGFR-mutated NSCLC without complete OS data. This prospective survey assessed thresholds for DFS benefits and OS justifications. Findings reveal diverse patient preferences and highlight the importance of shared decision-making. Factors like employment, education, and willingness to pay significantly influenced decisions.
Pembrolizumab, a widely used immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), has revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Identifying unique tumor characteristics in patients likely to ...respond to pembrolizumab could help the clinical adjudication and development of a personalized therapeutic strategy. In this retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical data and pathological features of 84 NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab. We examined the correlation between the clinical and demographic characteristics and the tumor histopathologic features obtained before immunotherapy. The response to pembrolizumab therapy was evaluated via the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The clinical data and cancer tissue characteristics were assessed and compared among three groups according to the following RECIST: the responsive group (RG), the stable disease group (SD), and the progressive disease group (PD), where the RG comprised patients with either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR). The overall survival rate of the RG group was significantly higher than the SD and PD groups. In addition, the percentage of pre-treatment viable tumor cell content in the RG and SD groups was significantly higher. At the same time, the extracellular stroma proportion was significantly lower than that of the PD group. The number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the RG group was significantly higher than in the PD group. There were no significant differences in tumor necrosis, the stroma composition, PD-L1 expression level (TPS 1-49% vs. ≥50%), and treatment response. In conclusion, our population of NSCLC patients who experienced positive treatment responses to pembrolizumab therapy had a better prognosis compared to patients with either SD or PD. Moreover, the relative proportions of viable tumor cells to tumor-associated lymphocytes were associated with responsiveness to treatment. It is expected that larger prospective clinical studies will further validate these findings.
Metformin, a common medication used in the treatment of diabetes mellitus is known to have anticancer effects. We hypothesized that the salutary effect of metformin on the survival of patients with ...stage I NSCLC is influenced by body mass index (BMI).
Patients undergoing lobectomy for stage I NSCLC without neoadjuvant therapy were included. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses to examine the association between metformin use and overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival were performed, stratified by BMI (>25 kg/m2 and ≤25 kg/m2). Expression of immune checkpoints in patients on metformin and not was performed in a separate cohort of 205 patients with advanced disease.
Four hundred thirty-four stage I patients (including 74 metformin users) were deemed eligible for analysis. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed an association between metformin use and OS (hazard ratio HR = 0.52; p = 0.04) as well as DSS (HR = 0.21; p = 0.04) but not recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.67; p = 0.33) in high-BMI patients only. In a separate cohort of 205 patients with tumors of all stages (including 35 metformin users), downregulation of immune checkpoint gene expression (programmed cell death 1, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4, B and T lymphocyte associated, CD27 molecule, lymphocyte activating 3, and inducible T cell costimulator) in metformin users was seen only in high-BMI patients, with upregulation of these genes seen in low-BMI patients with metformin use.
Metformin use may be associated with better OS and DSS only in high-BMI patients. This hypothesis is supported by gene expression data of immune checkpoint genes in metformin users using a separate cohort of advanced-stage tumors. Further studies examining the interaction of BMI with metformin in NSCLC are worthwhile.
Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is overexpressed in many types of tumours, including lung cancer. Y15, a small molecule which inhibits Y397 FAK autophosphorylation, decreases growth of human ...neuroblastoma, breast and pancreatic cancers. In this study, we investigated the in vitro and in vivo effects of Y15, and the underlying mechanism on non-small cell lung cancer cells.
The cytotoxic effects of Y15 targeting FAK signalling were evaluated. Gene-knockdown experiments were performed to determine the anti-cancer mechanism. Xenografts with RAS or EGFR mutations were selected for in vivo Y15 treatment.
Y15 blocked autophosphorylation of FAK in a time- and dose-dependent manner. It caused dose-dependent decrease of lung cancer cell viability and clonogenicity. Y15 inhibited tumour growth of RAS-mutant (A549 with KRAS mutation and H1299 with NRAS mutation), as well as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant (H1650 and H1975) lung cancer xenografts. JNK activation is a mechanism underlying Y15-induced Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 downregulation. Moreover, knockdown of Bcl-2 or Bcl-xL potentiated the effects of Y15. The combination of various inhibitors of the Bcl-2 family of proteins with FAK inhibitors demonstrated synergy in multiple lung cancer cell lines in vitro.
FAK inhibition demonstrated efficacy both in vitro and in vivo in lung cancers with either oncogenic RAS or EGFR mutations. In addition, FAK inhibition in combination with inhibitors of Bcl-2 family of anti-apoptotic proteins has synergistic activity in these MAPK-activated non-small cell lung cancer cell line models.
AZD6244 (ARRY 142886) is a potent and selective mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinase (MEK) inhibitor currently in early clinical trials. We ...examined the activity of AZD6244 in a panel of non-small cell lung cancer and a panel of cell lines representing many cancer types using in vitro growth assays. AZD6244 induced G(0)-G(1) cell cycle arrest in sensitive cell lines that primarily included cells containing the BRAF V600E mutation. In these cells, G(0)-G(1) arrest is accompanied by the up-regulation of the cell cycle inhibitors p21(WAF1) and p27(Kip1) and down-regulation of cyclin D1. In the majority of cell lines tested, including those with K-ras or non-V600E BRAF mutations, AZD6244 induced the accumulation of phospho-MEK, an effect not observed in the most sensitive BRAF V600E-containing cells. Accumulation of phospho-MEK in non-V600E-containing cell lines is due to abrogation of negative feedback pathways. BRAF V600E disrupts negative feedback signaling, which results in enhanced baseline phospho-MEK expression. Exogenous expression of BRAF V600E disrupts feedback inhibition but does not sensitize cells to AZD6244. Specific suppression of endogenous BRAF V600E does not confer resistance to AZD6244 but enhances sensitivity to AZD6244. Thus, our findings show that BRAF V600E marks cells with an in vitro requirement for MAPK signaling to support proliferation. These cells are exquisitely sensitive to AZD6244 (IC(50), <100 nmol/L), have high baseline levels of phospho-MEK, and lack feedback inhibition between ERK and Raf. These data suggest an approach to identifying cells that may be sensitive to AZD6244 and other MEK inhibitors.
Sotorasib 960 mg once daily is approved to treat KRAS G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sotorasib exhibits non-dose proportional pharmacokinetics and ...clinical responses at lower doses; therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of sotorasib 960 mg and 240 mg.
In this phase 2, randomized, open-label study, adults with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC received sotorasib 960 mg or 240 mg once daily. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and pharmacokinetics. The study was not powered for formal statistical hypothesis testing.
In the 960 mg group (n = 104), ORR was 32.7 % and DCR was 86.5 %. In the 240 mg group (n = 105), ORR was 24.8 % and DCR was 81.9 %. Median PFS was 5.4 months (960 mg) and 5.6 months (240 mg). At a median follow-up of 17.5 months, median OS was 13.0 months (960 mg) and 11.7 months (240 mg). AUC0–24 h and Cmax were 1.3-fold numerically higher with the 960 mg dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs, ≥10 %) for 960 mg and 240 mg doses, respectively, were diarrhea (39.4 %; 31.7 %), nausea (23.1 %; 19.2 %), increased alanine aminotransaminase (14.4 %; 17.3 %), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (13.5 %; 13.5 %).
Patients treated with sotorasib 960 mg once daily had numerically higher ORR and DCR, and longer DOR and OS, than patients treated with 240 mg in this descriptive analysis. TEAEs were manageable with label-directed dose modifications.
NCT03600883
•Sotorasib 960 mg orally, daily is approved in pretreated KRAS G12C advanced NSCLC.•Sotorasib 960 mg once daily had a more favorable benefit-risk profile than 240 mg.•ORR and OS favored 960 mg including across patient subgroups with poor prognosis.•The safety profile is manageable with label-directed dose modifications.•Sotorasib 960 mg daily is the FDA-recommended dose for patients with advanced NSCLC.
Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase implicated in carcinogenesis through its pleitropic effects on cell proliferation, survival and metastasis. This article provides a ...summary of the existing data implicating FAK in lung cancer.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
Neoadjuvant therapy has emerged as a favoured treatment paradigm for patients with clinical N2 disease undergoing surgical resection for non-small-cell lung cancer. It is unclear ...whether such a treatment paradigm affects perioperative outcomes. We sought to examine the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to assess the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on perioperative outcomes and long-term survival in these patients.
METHODS:
All patients with a history of non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing anatomical resection between 2004 and 2014 were included. Thirty-day and 90-day mortality of all patients having neoadjuvant therapy versus those who did not were compared. In addition, the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the overall survival of patients with clinical N2 disease was examined.
RESULTS:
Of the 134 428 selected patients, 9896 (7.4%) patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy had a higher 30-day (3% vs 2.6%; P < 0.01) and 90-day mortality (6.5% vs 4.9%; P < 0.01). This association remained after adjusting for covariates. Among patients with clinical N2 disease (n = 10 139), 42.3%, 35.3% and 22.4% of patients had neoadjuvant, adjuvant and no chemotherapy, respectively. Univariable, multivariable and propensity score-weighted analyses indicated no difference in survival between patients receiving neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS:
Neoadjuvant therapy may adversely affect perioperative outcomes without providing a survival advantage compared with adjuvant therapy in clinical N2 stage patients. Randomized controlled trials need to be conducted to examine this issue further.
PDF
