Descriptive complexity provides intrinsic, i.e. machine-independent, characterizations of the main complexity classes. On the other hand, logic can be useful for designing programs in a natural ...declarative way. This is especially important for parallel computation models such as cellular automata, since designing parallel programs is considered a difficult task.
This paper establishes three logical characterizations of the three classical complexity classes modeling minimal time, called real-time, of one-dimensional cellular automata according to their canonical variations: unidirectional or bidirectional communication, input word given in a parallel or sequential way.
Our three logics are natural restrictions of existential second-order Horn logic with built-in successor and predecessor functions. These logics correspond exactly to the three ways of deciding a language on a square grid circuit of side n according to one of the three natural locations of an input word of length n: along a side of the grid, on the diagonal that contains the output cell – placed on the vertex (n,n) of the square grid–, or on the diagonal opposite to the output cell.
The key ingredient to our results is a normalization method that transforms a formula from one of our three logics into an equivalent normalized formula that closely mimics a grid circuit.
Then, we extend our logics by allowing a limited use of negation on hypotheses like in Stratified Datalog. By revisiting in detail a number of representative classical problems - recognition of the set of primes by Fisher's algorithm, Dyck language recognition, Firing Squad Synchronization problem, etc. - we show that this extension makes easier programming and we prove that it does not change the real-time complexity of our logics.
Finally, based on our experience in expressing these representative problems in logic, we argue that our logics are high-level programming languages: they make it possible to express in a natural, complete and synthetic way the algorithms of the literature, based on signals – and even to design new inductive algorithms –, and to translate them automatically into cellular automata of the same complexity.
Descriptive complexity may be useful to design programs in a natural declarative way. This is important for parallel computation models such as cellular automata, because designing parallel programs ...is considered difficult. Our paper establishes logical characterizations of the three classical complexity classes that model minimal time, called real-time, of one-dimensional cellular automata according to their canonical variants. Our logics are natural restrictions of the existential second-order Horn logic. They correspond to the three ways of deciding a language on a square grid circuit of side n according to the three canonical placements of an input word of length n on the grid. Our key tool is a normalization method that transforms a formula into an equivalent formula that faithfully mimics a grid circuit.
Descriptive complexity provides intrinsic, that is,machine-independent, characterizations of the major complexity classes. On the other hand, logic can be useful for designing programs in a natural ...declarative way. This is particularly important for parallel computation models such as cellular automata, because designing parallel programs is considered a difficult task.This paper establishes three logical characterizations of the three classical complexity classes modeling minimal time, called real-time, of one-dimensional cellular automata according to their canonical variants: unidirectional or bidirectional communication, input word given in a parallel or sequential way.Our three logics are natural restrictions of existential second-order Horn logic with built-in successor and predecessor functions. These logics correspond exactly to the three ways of deciding a language on a square grid circuit of side n according to one of the three canonical locations of an input word of length n: along a side of the grid, on the diagonal that contains the output cell, or on the diagonal opposite to the output cell.The key ingredient of our results is a normalization method that transforms a formula from one of our three logics into an equivalent normalized formula that faithfully mimics a grid circuit.Then, we extend our logics by allowing a limited use of negation on hypotheses like in Stratified Datalog. By revisiting in detail a number of representative classical problems - recognition of the set of primes by Fisher’s algorithm, Dyck language recognition, Firing Squad Synchronization problem,etc. - we show that this extension makes easier programming and we prove that it does not change the complexity of our logics in real-time.Finally, starting from our experience in expressing those representative problems in logic, we argue that our logics are high-level programming languages: they allow to express in a natural,precise and synthetic way the algorithms of literature, based on signals, and to translate them automatically into cellular automata of the same complexity.
Descriptive complexity may be useful to design programs in a natural declarative way. This is important for parallel computation models such as cellular automata, because designing parallel programs ...is considered difficult. Our paper establishes logical characterizations of the three classical complexity classes that model minimal time, called real-time, of one-dimensional cellular automata according to their canonical variants. Our logics are natural restrictions of the existential second-order Horn logic. They correspond to the three ways of deciding a language on a square grid circuit of side n according to the three canonical placements of an input word of length n on the grid. Our key tool is a normalization method that transforms a formula into an equivalent formula that literally mimics a grid circuit.
PDF