Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has become the standard of care for medically inoperable patients with peripherally located, early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and for those ...refusing surgical resection. Despite the availability of national and international guidelines, there exists substantial variability in many aspects of SBRT practice.
The ESTRO ACROP guideline is based on a questionnaire covering all aspects of SBRT implementation and practice (n=114 items). The questionnaire was answered by the 11 faculty members of the ESTRO course “Clinical practice and implementation of image-guided SBRT” and their 8 institutions.
Agreement by >50% of the institutions was achieved in 72% of all items. Only 8/57 technologies and techniques were identified as mandatory for SBRT while 32/57 were considered as optional. In contrast, quality-assurance related elements were considered as mandatory in 12/24 items. A consensus of risk-adapted SBRT fractionation was achieved with 3×15Gy for peripherally located lesions and 4×12Gy (PTV D95-D99; Dmax <125% to <150%) for lesions with broad chest wall contact. For patients free from severe comorbidities and with favourable long-term OS expectancy, use of the maximum tolerated dose of 3×18Gy should be considered.
This ACROP guideline achieved detailed recommendations in all aspects of SBRT implementation and practice, which will contribute to further standardization of SBRT for peripherally located early stage NSCLC.
Setup, range, and anatomical uncertainties influence the dose delivered with intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), but clinical quantification of these errors for oropharyngeal cancer is ...lacking. We quantified these factors and investigated treatment fidelity, that is, robustness, as influenced by adaptive planning and by applying more beam directions.
We used an in-house treatment planning system with multicriteria optimization of pencil beam energies, directions, and weights to create treatment plans for 3-, 5-, and 7-beam directions for 10 oropharyngeal cancer patients. The dose prescription was a simultaneously integrated boost scheme, prescribing 66 Gy to primary tumor and positive neck levels (clinical target volume-66 Gy; CTV-66 Gy) and 54 Gy to elective neck levels (CTV-54 Gy). Doses were recalculated in 3700 simulations of setup, range, and anatomical uncertainties. Repeat computed tomography (CT) scans were used to evaluate an adaptive planning strategy using nonrigid registration for dose accumulation.
For the recalculated 3-beam plans including all treatment uncertainty sources, only 69% (CTV-66 Gy) and 88% (CTV-54 Gy) of the simulations had a dose received by 98% of the target volume (D98%) >95% of the prescription dose. Doses to organs at risk (OARs) showed considerable spread around planned values. Causes for major deviations were mixed. Adaptive planning based on repeat imaging positively affected dose delivery accuracy: in the presence of the other errors, percentages of treatments with D98% >95% increased to 96% (CTV-66 Gy) and 100% (CTV-54 Gy). Plans with more beam directions were not more robust.
For oropharyngeal cancer patients, treatment uncertainties can result in significant differences between planned and delivered IMPT doses. Given the mixed causes for major deviations, we advise repeat diagnostic CT scans during treatment, recalculation of the dose, and if required, adaptive planning to improve adequate IMPT dose delivery.
To evaluate the clinical implementation of an online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for nonrigid target motion management in locally advanced cervical cancer intensity modulated radiation therapy ...(IMRT).
Each of the 64 patients had four markers implanted in the vaginal fornix to verify the position of the cervix during treatment. Full and empty bladder computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired prior to treatment to build a bladder volume-dependent cervix-uterus motion model for establishment of the plan library. In the first phase of clinical implementation, the library consisted of one IMRT plan based on a single model-predicted internal target volume (mpITV), covering the target for the whole pretreatment observed bladder volume range, and a 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) motion-robust backup plan based on the same mpITV. The planning target volume (PTV) combined the ITV and nodal clinical target volume (CTV), expanded with a 1-cm margin. In the second phase, for patients showing >2.5-cm bladder-induced cervix-uterus motion during planning, two IMRT plans were constructed, based on mpITVs for empty-to-half-full and half-full-to-full bladder. In both phases, a daily cone beam CT (CBCT) scan was acquired to first position the patient based on bony anatomy and nodal targets and then select the appropriate plan. Daily post-treatment CBCT was used to verify plan selection.
Twenty-four and 40 patients were included in the first and second phase, respectively. In the second phase, 11 patients had two IMRT plans. Overall, an IMRT plan was used in 82.4% of fractions. The main reasons for selecting the motion-robust backup plan were uterus outside the PTV (27.5%) and markers outside their margin (21.3%). In patients with two IMRT plans, the half-full-to-full bladder plan was selected on average in 45% of the first 12 fractions, which was reduced to 35% in the last treatment fractions.
The implemented online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for locally advanced cervical cancer enables (almost) daily tissue-sparing IMRT.
To validate and clinically evaluate autocontouring using atlas-based autosegmentation (ABAS) of computed tomography images.
The data from 10 head-and-neck patients were selected as input for ABAS, ...and neck levels I-V and 20 organs at risk were manually contoured according to published guidelines. The total contouring times were recorded. Two different ABAS strategies, multiple and single subject, were evaluated, and the similarity of the autocontours with the atlas contours was assessed using Dice coefficients and the mean distances, using the leave-one-out method. For 12 clinically treated patients, 5 experienced observers edited the autosegmented contours. The editing times were recorded. The Dice coefficients and mean distances were calculated among the clinically used contours, autocontours, and edited autocontours. Finally, an expert panel scored all autocontours and the edited autocontours regarding their adequacy relative to the published atlas.
The time to autosegment all the structures using ABAS was 7 min/patient. No significant differences were observed in the autosegmentation accuracy for stage N0 and N+ patients. The multisubject atlas performed best, with a Dice coefficient and mean distance of 0.74 and 2 mm, 0.67 and 3 mm, 0.71 and 2 mm, 0.50 and 2 mm, and 0.78 and 2 mm for the salivary glands, neck levels, chewing muscles, swallowing muscles, and spinal cord-brainstem, respectively. The mean Dice coefficient and mean distance of the autocontours vs. the clinical contours was 0.8 and 2.4 mm for the neck levels and salivary glands, respectively. For the autocontours vs. the edited autocontours, the mean Dice coefficient and mean distance was 0.9 and 1.6 mm, respectively. The expert panel scored 100% of the autocontours as a "minor deviation, editable" or better. The expert panel scored 88% of the edited contours as good compared with 83% of the clinical contours. The total editing time was 66 min.
Multiple-subject ABAS of computed tomography images proved to be a useful novel tool in the rapid delineation of target and normal tissues. Although editing of the autocontours is inevitable, a substantial time reduction was achieved using editing, instead of manual contouring (180 vs. 66 min).
To quantify intrafraction patient motion and its time dependence in immobilized intracranial and extracranial patients. The data can be used to optimize the intrafraction imaging frequency and ...consequent patient setup correction with an image guidance and tracking system, and to establish the required safety margins in the absence of such a system.
The intrafraction motion of 32 intracranial patients, immobilized with a thermoplastic mask, and 11 supine- and 14 prone-treated extracranial spine patients, immobilized with a vacuum bag, were analyzed. The motion was recorded by an X-ray, stereoscopic, image-guidance system. For each group, we calculated separately the systematic (overall mean and SD) and the random displacement as a function of elapsed intrafraction time.
The SD of the systematic intrafraction displacements increased linearly over time for all three patient groups. For intracranial-, supine-, and prone-treated patients, the SD increased to 0.8, 1.2, and 2.2 mm, respectively, in a period of 15 min. The random displacements for the prone-treated patients were significantly higher than for the other groups, namely 1.6 mm (1 SD), probably caused by respiratory motion.
Despite the applied immobilization devices, patients drift away from their initial position during a treatment fraction. These drifts are in general small if compared with conventional treatment margins, but will significantly contribute to the margin for high-precision radiation treatments with treatment times of 15 min or longer.
To develop and validate fully automated generation of VMAT plan-libraries for plan-of-the-day adaptive radiotherapy in locally-advanced cervical cancer.
Our framework for fully automated treatment ...plan generation (Erasmus-iCycle) was adapted to create dual-arc VMAT treatment plan libraries for cervical cancer patients. For each of 34 patients, automatically generated VMAT plans (autoVMAT) were compared to manually generated, clinically delivered 9-beam IMRT plans (CLINICAL), and to dual-arc VMAT plans generated manually by an expert planner (manVMAT). Furthermore, all plans were benchmarked against 20-beam equi-angular IMRT plans (autoIMRT). For all plans, a PTV coverage of 99.5% by at least 95% of the prescribed dose (46 Gy) had the highest planning priority, followed by minimization of V45Gy for small bowel (SB). Other OARs considered were bladder, rectum, and sigmoid.
All plans had a highly similar PTV coverage, within the clinical constraints (above). After plan normalizations for exactly equal median PTV doses in corresponding plans, all evaluated OAR parameters in autoVMAT plans were on average lower than in the CLINICAL plans with an average reduction in SB V45Gy of 34.6% (p<0.001). For 41/44 autoVMAT plans, SB V45Gy was lower than for manVMAT (p<0.001, average reduction 30.3%), while SB V15Gy increased by 2.3% (p = 0.011). AutoIMRT reduced SB V45Gy by another 2.7% compared to autoVMAT, while also resulting in a 9.0% reduction in SB V15Gy (p<0.001), but with a prolonged delivery time. Differences between manVMAT and autoVMAT in bladder, rectal and sigmoid doses were ≤ 1%. Improvements in SB dose delivery with autoVMAT instead of manVMAT were higher for empty bladder PTVs compared to full bladder PTVs, due to differences in concavity of the PTVs.
Quality of automatically generated VMAT plans was superior to manually generated plans. Automatic VMAT plan generation for cervical cancer has been implemented in our clinical routine. Due to the achieved workload reduction, extension of plan libraries has become feasible.
FLASH dose rates >40 Gy/s are readily available in proton therapy (PT) with cyclotron-accelerated beams and pencil-beam scanning (PBS). The PBS delivery pattern will affect the local dose rate, as ...quantified by the PBS dose rate (PBS-DR), and therefore needs to be accounted for in FLASH-PT with PBS, but it is not yet clear how. Our aim was to optimize patient-specific scan patterns for stereotactic FLASH-PT of early-stage lung cancer and lung metastases, maximizing the volume irradiated with PBS-DR >40 Gy/s of the organs at risk voxels irradiated to >8 Gy (FLASH coverage).
Plans to 54 Gy/3 fractions with 3 equiangular coplanar 244 MeV proton shoot-through transmission beams for 20 patients were optimized with in-house developed software. Planning target volume-based planning with a 5 mm margin was used. Planning target volume ranged from 4.4 to 84 cc. Scan-pattern optimization was performed with a Genetic Algorithm, run in parallel for 20 independent populations (islands). Mapped crossover, inversion, swap, and shift operators were applied to achieve (local) optimality on each island, with migration between them for global optimality. The cost function was chosen to maximize the FLASH coverage per beam at >8 Gy, >40 Gy/s, and 40 nA beam current. The optimized patterns were evaluated on FLASH coverage, PBS-DR distribution, and population PBS-DR-volume histograms, compared with standard line-by-line scanning. Robustness against beam current variation was investigated.
The optimized patterns have a snowflake-like structure, combined with outward swirling for larger targets. A population median FLASH coverage of 29.0% was obtained for optimized patterns compared with 6.9% for standard patterns, illustrating a significant increase in FLASH coverage for optimized patterns. For beam current variations of 5 nA, FLASH coverage varied between –6.1%-point and 2.2%-point for optimized patterns.
Significant improvements on the PBS-DR and, hence, on FLASH coverage and potential healthy-tissue sparing are obtained by sequential scan-pattern optimization. The optimizer is flexible and may be further fine-tuned, based on the exact conditions for FLASH.
Abstract Background and purpose In a published study on cervical cancer, 5-beam IMRT was inferior to single arc VMAT. Here we compare 9, 12, and 20 beam IMRT with single and dual arc VMAT. Material ...and methods For each of 10 patients, automated plan generation with the in-house Erasmus-iCycle optimizer was used to assist an expert planner in generating the five plans with the clinical TPS. Results For each patient, all plans were clinically acceptable with a high and similar PTV coverage. OAR sparing increased when going from 9 to 12 to 20 IMRT beams, and from single to dual arc VMAT. For all patients, 12 and 20 beam IMRT were superior to single and dual arc VMAT, with substantial variations in gain among the study patients. As expected, delivery of VMAT plans was significantly faster than delivery of IMRT plans. Conclusions Often reported increased plan quality for VMAT compared to IMRT has not been observed for cervical cancer. Twenty and 12 beam IMRT plans had a higher quality than single and dual arc VMAT. For individual patients, the optimal delivery technique depends on a complex trade-off between plan quality and treatment time that may change with introduction of faster delivery systems.
•Dosimetric comparison of single-isocenter and multiple-isocenters in lung SBRT.•Largest differences between the two planning techniques observed in low-dose region.•Mean lung dose increased on ...average by 0.4 Gy compared to multiple isocenters.•Estimated risk of radiation pneumonitis increased on average by 1.0%
A potential challenge in single-isocenter multi-lesion lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is that patient positioning is not based on each lesion individually, but on the average position of all lesions. This may lead to larger margins compared to treating with one isocenter per lesion, but increases workflow efficiency. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a single-isocenter technique leads to increased normal lung dose compared to a conventional multiple-isocenters technique.
A cohort of 15 NSCLC patients with two or three lesions previously treated with SBRT was subjected to treatment planning with a multiple-isocenter technique and a single-isocenter technique. For the latter, two margin approaches were evaluated: (1) identical margins for each internal target volume (ITV), assuming an average registration for all lesions in cone-beam CT (CBCT) positioning verification and (2) a smaller margin for the largest lesion, assuming an optimal registration for that lesion. For all 45 treatment plans, mean lung dose (MLD) and lungs-V20Gy were evaluated. The study was performed following RATING guidelines.
The MLD was 4.9 ± 1.9 Gy (mean ± SD) for multiple-isocenters and 5.4 ± 2.1 Gy and 5.3 ± 2.2 Gy for single-isocenter approach 1 and 2, respectively. V20Gy was 5.5 ± 3.7%, 5.5 ± 3.2% and 5.4 ± 3.3%. A median range increase in MLD of 11.6% −14.9 – 26.8 was observed when comparing single-isocenter treatment plans to those with multiple isocenters. V20Gy increased by 0.2 −3.4 – 1.3 percentage points.
A single-isocenter SBRT technique for lung patients with multiple targets results in clinically acceptable increases in normal lung dose.
•Relative OAR motion to pancreatic tumors influences delivered doses to OAR in SBRT.•Modeling geometrical variations aids to understand dosimetric uncertainties in OAR.•Common motion patterns exist ...in the gastrointestinal organs.•Motion is larger in anterior regions, being limited in abdominal cavity closer to tumor.•The model is able to simulate real anatomies, since clinical DVHs were reproduced.
To characterize daily geometrical variations of gastrointestinal organs with respect to pancreatic tumors, through a population-based statistical model.
The study included 131 CT scans from 35 pancreatic cancer patients treated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT). For each patient, day-to-day anatomical variations of the stomach, the duodenum and the bowel were assessed from the deformation vector fields (DVF) obtained by non-rigidly registering the contours of the fractions to the planning CT scans. For the whole population, day-to-day motion-deformation patterns were abstracted using principal component analysis (PCA) on the set of DVFs mapped on a reference patient. Based on these geometrical variations, anatomies were generated to create population-based dose-volume histograms (DVH) per patient, which were also compared to clinical values.
Through PCA, the most dominant directions of daily deformations were localized in the abdominal organs. Common patterns were found, such as stomach contraction–expansion in the anterior–posterior direction ranging from 5 to 13 mm, and superior-inferior deformations on the bowel from 7 to 14 mm. The duodenum resulted to move laterally, but in a lesser extent (4–8 mm). The population-based DVHs derived from the model mostly included the daily DVHs observed in the clinic (in >90% of the cases).
Anatomical variations influence the delivered doses to healthy organs during SBRT. A motion model was successfully built and explored to extract the larger directions of movement of the gastrointestinal organs. Day-to-day motion modeling can potentially be used to account for geometrical uncertainties in future plan optimization and in online adaptive strategies.
PDF
