Objective To study the roles of self-reported symptoms and/or prior diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and other potential risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to ...clarify whether the screening of GDM in early pregnancy is beneficial for all women with PCOS. Design The FinnGeDi multicentre case-control study including 1146 women with singleton pregnancies diagnosed with GDM and 1066 non-diabetic pregnant women. There were 174 women with PCOS (symptoms and/or diagnosis self-reported by a questionnaire) and 1767 women without PCOS (data missing for 271). Methods The study population (N = 1941) was divided into four subgroups: GDM + PCOS (N = 105), GDM + non-PCOS (N = 909), non-GDM + PCOS (N = 69), and controls (N = 858). The participants’ characteristics and their parents’ medical histories were compared. Results The prevalence of PCOS was 10.4% among GDM women and 7.4% among non-diabetics (odds ratios (OR) 1.44, 95% CI: 1.05–1.97), but PCOS was not an independent risk for GDM after adjustments for participants’ age and pre-pregnancy BMI (OR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.74–1.54). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the most significant parameters associated with GDM were overweight, obesity, age ≥35 years, participant’s mother’s history of GDM, either parent’s history of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and participant’s own preterm birth. Conclusions The increased risk of GDM in women with PCOS was related to obesity and increased maternal age rather than to PCOS itself, suggesting that routine early screening of GDM in PCOS women without other risk factors should be reconsidered. Instead, family history of GDM/T2D and own preterm birth were independent risk factors for GDM.
IntroductionGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common disorder of pregnancy and contributes to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Metformin is often used for the prevention and management of GDM; ...however, its use in pregnancy continues to be debated. The Metformin in Pregnancy Study aims to use individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to clarify the efficacy and safety of metformin use in pregnancy and to identify relevant knowledge gaps.Methods and analysisMEDLINE, EMBASE and all Evidence-Based Medicine will be systematically searched for randomised controlled trials (RCT) testing the efficacy of metformin compared with placebo, usual care or other interventions in pregnant women. Two independent reviewers will assess eligibility using prespecified criteria and will conduct data extraction and quality appraisal of eligible studies. Authors of included trials will be contacted and asked to contribute IPD. Primary outcomes include maternal glycaemic parameters and GDM, as well as neonatal hypoglycaemia, anthropometry and gestational age at delivery. Other adverse maternal, birth and neonatal outcomes will be assessed as secondary outcomes. IPD from these RCTs will be harmonised and a two-step meta-analytic approach will be used to determine the efficacy and safety of metformin in pregnancy, with a priori adjustment for covariates and subgroups to examine effect moderators of treatment outcomes. Sensitivity analyses will assess heterogeneity, risk of bias and the impact of trials which have not provided IPD.Ethics and disseminationAll IPD will be deidentified and studies contributing IPD will have ethical approval from their respective local ethics committees. This study will provide robust evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of metformin use in pregnancy, and may identify subgroups of patients who may benefit most from this treatment modality. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at scientific meetings, providing much needed evidence to inform clinical and public health actions in this area.
Gestational diabetes (GDM) is often accompanied by maternal overweight. Our aim was to evaluate the separate and concomitant effects of GDM and maternal overweight/obesity on perinatal outcomes.
We ...used the Finnish Medical Birth Register to identify all 24,577 women with a singleton pregnancy who delivered in 2009 in Finland and underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Women were divided into groups according to the result of OGTT (GDM/no GDM) and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI): normal weight (≤24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥30.0 kg/m2). Primary outcomes included macrosomia, caesarean delivery, and treatment at neonatal ward. Normal weight women without GDM constituted the reference group.
Compared to reference group, overweight or obese women without GDM had an increased risk of macrosomia odds ratio adjusted for age, parity, smoking and socio-economic status (aOR)1.18 (95% CI 1.09-1.28) and 1.50 (95% CI 1.19-1.88), and caesarean delivery aORs 1.17 (95% CI 1.07-1.28) and 1.52 (95% CI 1.37-1.69), respectively. In normal weight GDM women the risk of macrosomia aOR 1.17 (95% CI 0.85-1.62) and caesarean delivery aOR 1.10 (95% CI 0.96-1.27) was not significantly increased as compared to normal weight women without GDM. GDM increased the risk of treatment at neonatal ward in all BMI categories and maternal obesity without GDM was also a risk factor for treatment at neonatal ward. Interaction p values between BMI and GDM on these outcomes were <0.001.
Maternal overweight and obesity without GDM increased the risk of macrosomia and caesarean delivery when compared to the reference group. These risks were amplified when overweight/obesity was accompanied by GDM. Obesity without GDM was a risk factor for treatment at neonatal ward; GDM increased this risk in all BMI categories. Our results suggest that especially maternal obesity should be considered as a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes and GDM further amplifies this risk.
Introduction
Antidiabetic drugs (OADs) are increasingly prescribed to treat hyperglycaemia during pregnancy in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), even ...though long-term effects on offspring are unknown. This systematic review summarises the evidence of follow-up studies of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on long-term effects of prenatal exposure to OADs on offspring.
Methods
The MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to April 2018 for the concepts antidiabetic agents and prenatal exposure (or pregnancy and offspring/child) in combination with an RCT search filter. RCTs evaluating post-neonatal health effects in offspring and comparing maternal treatment with an OAD with no treatment, placebo, an alternative OAD or insulin during pregnancy were eligible for inclusion. Two independent researchers selected, extracted and assessed the data. Meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model and the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool was used for quality assessment.
Results
Ten studies were included, with a maximal follow-up duration of 9 years, comprising 778 children of mothers with GDM or PCOS who were randomised to either metformin or insulin/placebo during pregnancy. Meta-analysis showed that children prenatally exposed to metformin were heavier compared to controls (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.26 95% CI 0.11–0.41), but not taller (SMD 0.10 95% CI −0.14–0.33). Additionally, offspring body mass index (BMI)
z
scores did not differ according to metformin exposure (mean difference 0.30 95% CI −0.01–0.61). Individual small studies reported that prenatal exposure to metformin was associated with greater mid-upper arm, head and waist circumferences, biceps skinfolds, waist-to-height ratio, more arm fat, higher fasting glucose, ferritin and lower LDL cholesterol in offspring.
Conclusion
Prenatal exposure to metformin is associated with increased offspring weight, but not with height or BMI. Larger follow-up studies are needed to confirm and look into the implications of these findings.
Plain Language Summary
Plain language summary available for this article.
Objective. To study interobserver agreement in the assessment of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiogram ST interval analysis (STAN). Design. Observational study. Setting. Labor ward in ...tertiary level university hospital. Sample. Two hundred (140 reassuring and 60 non-reassuring) STAN recordings on non-selected women with singleton, vertex, term pregnancies were selected from our archive. Samples of 60-min were analysed from the end of each recording, excluding the last 30 min before delivery. Methods. Three consultants, who had undergone STAN training and had clinical experience in using STAN, reviewed the recordings using cardiotocography (CTG) and ST information with no clinical data. The reviewers were asked to follow STAN guidelines and 1 to classify the CTG as normal, intermediary, abnormal, or preterminal, and 2 to make a clinical decision on labor management. Main outcome measures. Interobserver agreement evaluated by weighted kappa ( w) values and the proportion of agreement. Results. In CTG classification, the interobserver agreement between three observers was moderate ( w, 0.47-0.48). The proportion of agreement was 56-59%. In clinical decision-making, w values varied from 0.47 to 0.60, and the proportion of agreement was 80-86%. Conclusions. In non-selected term pregnancies, the interobserver agreement among experienced obstetricians in the classification of CTG and clinical decision-making according to STAN guidelines is moderate at best.
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as disturbed glucose metabolism first recognized during pregnancy. Untreated GDM increases the risk of obstetric and neonatal complications, ...such as fetal overgrowth (macrosomia). The first-line treatment of GDM includes diet therapy and the self-monitoring of blood glucose concentrations and, if needed, pharmacotherapy, which is most commonly accomplished with insulin. Oral anti-diabetic agents such as metformin have recently been under investigation. GDM increases the risk of developing overt diabetes, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of metformin vs. insulin therapy on pregnancy and neonatal outcome as well as on later growth and development of the infant and to investigate the independent and concomitant effects of GDM and maternal overweight/obesity on pregnancy outcome and maternal long-term risks.
In a randomized study of 100 women, metformin therapy was not associated with an increased risk of pregnancy or neonatal complications when compared with insulin treatment. However, 32% of the women treated with metformin needed additional insulin in the achievement of normoglycaemia. The need of additional insulin was associated with maternal obesity, an earlier need of pharmacotherapy and fasting hyperglycaemia in OGTT. Infants exposed to metformin were taller and heavier at the age of 18 months compared with infants exposed to insulin. There was no difference in the motor, social or linguistic development between these children when assessed at the age of 18 months.
In an epidemiological study of 24,565 pregnancies, normal-weight women with GDM did not have an increased risk of macrosomia or Caesarean delivery when compared with normal-weight women without GDM. GDM was an independent risk factor of neonatal morbidity, especially hypoglycaemia. Maternal overweight and obesity were independent risk factors of macrosomia and obesity was also an independent risk factor of Caesarean delivery and neonatal morbidity.
In a follow-up study (n = 116), women with a history of insulin-treated GDM had an increased risk of metabolic syndrome when compared with women without GDM 19 years after index pregnancy. However, maternal pre-pregnancy overweight as such was a stronger risk factor as regards the development of metabolic syndrome than previous GDM.
Tiivistelmä
Raskausdiabetes on ensimmäisen kerran raskauden aikana ilmaantuva glukoosiaineenvaihdunnan häiriö. Hoitamattomana raskausdiabetes lisää raskaana olevan ja vastasyntyneen komplikaatioriskiä, erityisesti sikiön liiallista kasvua (makrosomiaa). Raskausdiabetestä hoidetaan ruokavaliolla, veren glukoosipitoisuuksien omaseurannalla sekä tarvittaessa lääkehoidolla, joka on useimmiten insuliinihoitoa. Muita diabeteslääkkeitä, kuten metformiinia, on tutkittu viime vuosina paljon. Raskausdiabetes lisää myöhemmällä iällä riskiä sairastua diabetekseen, metaboliseen oireyhtymään sekä sydän- ja verisuonisairauksiin.
Tämän tutkimuksen tarkoituksena oli selvittää metformiinihoidon tehoa ja turvallisuutta verrattuna insuliiniin raskausdiabeteksen hoidossa. Lisäksi selvitettiin raskausdiabeteksen ja ylipainon itsenäistä vaikutusta raskauskomplikaatioiden esiintyvyyteen sekä naisen myöhempään sairastuvuuteen.
Satunnaistetussa tutkimuksessa (n = 100) metformiini ei lisännyt vastasyntyneen makrosomian eikä vastasyntyneen tai raskauskomplikaatioiden riskiä verrattuna insuliiniin. Metformiinilla hoidetuista naisista 32% tarvitsi lisäksi insuliinia normaalin glukoositasapainon saavuttamiseksi. Lisäinsuliinin tarvetta ennustivat äidin lihavuus, varhainen lääkehoidon tarve sekä kohollaan olevat glukoosin paastoarvot sokerirasituksessa. Metformiinille altistuneet lapset olivat sekä pidempiä että painavampia 18 kuukauden iässä kuin insuliinille altistuneet lapset, mutta heidän motorisessa, sosiaalisessa tai kielellisessä kehityksessään ei ollut eroja.
Epidemiologisessa tutkimuksessa (n = 24,565) normaalipainoisen naisen raskausdiabetes ei lisännyt keisarileikkauksen tai sikiön makrosomian riskiä verrattuna normaalipainoisiin naisiin, joiden sokeriaineenvaihdunta oli normaali. Raskausdiabetes lisäsi itsenäisesti vastasyntyneen sairastavuuden ja hypoglykemian riskiä. Äidin ylipaino ja lihavuus lisäsivät itsenäisesti makrosomian riskiä ja lihavuus myös keisarileikkauksen ja vastasyntyneen sairastuvuuden riskiä.
Seurantatutkimuksessa (n = 116) insuliinihoidettujen raskausdiabeetikoiden riski sairastua 19 vuotta raskauden jälkeen myöhempään metaboliseen oireyhtymään oli lisääntynyt verrattuna terveisiin verrokkeihin. Raskautta edeltävä ylipaino oli vahvempi riskitekijä metabolisen oireyhtymän kehittymiselle kuin aiempi raskausdiabetes.
Specific PCR detection and electron microscopy of Flavobacterium columnare revealed the risk of false-negative results in molecular detection of this fish pathogen. Freezing and thawing destroyed the ...cells so that DNA was for the most part undetectable by PCR. The detection of bacteria was also weakened after prolonged enrichment cultivation of samples from infected fish.