Hip Disarticulation Tanner, Richard M.; Joels, Charles S.; Fisher, Daniel F. ...
The American surgeon,
11/2021, Letnik:
87, Številka:
11
Journal Article
Background It is generally accepted that failed infrainguinal bypass with prosthetic material significantly compromises arterial run off, which may limit future revascularization. It is well known ...that the negative consequences of early vein graft thrombosis are limited, but the effect of failed peripheral angioplasty on the distal vasculature is poorly studied. The purpose of this study was to determine whether early failure after superficial femoral artery intervention influences subsequent revascularization options. Methods Between July 1, 1998, and June 30, 2006, 276 patients underwent endovascular intervention of the superficial femoral artery. A prospective analysis of angiograms done before the intervention and after early failure (≤200 days) was performed in a blinded fashion by three attending vascular surgeons to determine the optimal distal bypass site if an operation were to be performed. Inter-rater reliability of the angiogram scores was assessed using the Fleiss generalized κ for multiple raters. Potential distal anastomotic sites were classified as above knee popliteal, below knee popliteal, tibial, or no adequate site. A consensus classification was determined for each patient (2 of 3 raters). Results Of the 276 patients who underwent endovascular intervention of the superficial femoral artery, early failure was noted in 24 limbs in 23 patients. Angiographic records were available for 21 limbs in 20 patients (60% men; mean age, 65.3 ± 11.3 years), of which 60% had critical limb ischemia, 40% had claudication, and 65% had diabetes. The distal bypass site was altered in six limbs (28.6%); four from popliteal to tibial and two from above knee to below knee popliteal. Inter-rater reliability was 0.54 (moderate/good). The procedures performed on these early failures were percutaneous transluminal angioplasty ± stent (n = 14), infrainguinal bypass (n = 5), and no treatment (n = 1). Only 0.4% (1 of 276) of patients required major limb amputation due to early failure of a superficial femoral artery intervention. Conclusions Early failure after isolated endovascular intervention of the superficial femoral artery is infrequent and alters the distal target in 30% of early-failure patients if open bypass is planned. Salvage with repeat angioplasty, if necessary, can be accomplished in most patients, and the need for limb amputation is exceedingly rare. The early failure results in this study support a more liberal application of endovascular intervention to the superficial femoral artery in patients with lower extremity ischemia, especially claudication. The repercussions of late endovascular failure as well as the effects of disease progression need further study.
Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters offer a safe and effective means of preventing pulmonary embolus and have reduced complications when compared to earlier techniques of caval interruption. However, ...despite continued improvement in filters and insertion methods, complications still occur. Pneumothorax, hemorrhage, and vessel injury may result while obtaining vascular access. Filter misplacement, excessive tilt, and vascular injury have been reported with insertion, but preinsertion cavography is helpful in preventing these insertion-related complications. Attention to detail, proper use of guidewires, and preinsertion imaging are vital in preventing insertion-related complications as well. Long-term complications occur in a minority of patients and include recurrent pulmonary embolus, caval occlusion, and filter migration. Overall, the benefits of preventing pulmonary embolism far exceed the risks related to filter placement in properly selected patients.
Objective It has long been evident that lifetime follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is necessary to identify late complications. The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis ...that late follow-up rates for EVAR in routine practice are inferior to those reported from protocol-driven clinical trials, consequently contributing to avoidable events associated with poor long-term outcome. Methods From February 1999 to December 2005, 302 EVARs were performed and eligible for follow-up. Of these, 47 were performed as part of an industry-sponsored clinical trial (study patients). Responsibility for follow-up was assigned to a research nurse for study patients and to office clerical staff for nonstudy patients. Follow-up compliance was classified as either frequent (<1 missed scheduled appointment) or incomplete (>2 missed scheduled appointments). Overall survival and complication rates were analyzed. Results Of the 302 patients, 203 (67.2%) had frequent follow-up and 99 (32.8%) had incomplete follow-up. The mean follow-up was significantly better in the frequent follow-up group (34.7 ± 22 months) vs the incomplete follow-up group (18.8 ± 18.6 months, P < .001). The 5-year survival (63.9% frequent vs 64.0% incomplete), the 5-year reintervention rate (22.3% frequent vs 10.8% incomplete), and incidence of known endoleak (14.8% frequent vs 9.1% incomplete) were statistically similar in the two groups. The incidence of major adverse events, defined as events requiring urgent surgical intervention, was significantly increased in the incomplete follow-up group (6.1% vs 0.5%; P = .006), with nearly half of these patients dying perioperatively. There was no difference in measured outcomes for study patients compared with nonstudy patients. However, mean follow-up was significantly longer for study patients vs nonstudy patients (44.8 ± 23.7 months vs 26.8 ± 20.9 months; P < .001). Conclusions Follow-up surveillance after EVAR is less intense in practice environments outside of clinical trials. Patients with incomplete follow-up have higher fatal complication rates than patients with frequent follow-up. These data expose a potential under-appreciated limitation of EVAR, questioning whether the findings in clinical trials defining the efficacy of EVAR can be routinely extrapolated to ordinary practice.
Background Vascular surgical education for general surgery residents is concerning as endovascular interventions increase and vascular surgery expands. The purpose of this study was to examine the ...effects these factors have on vascular surgery case numbers for general surgery residents and statewide surgeons and to report on former general surgery residents' perceptions of vascular surgery in training and practice. Study Design Case numbers for all general surgery residents graduating from the Greenville Hospital System from 1991 to 2007 and for the vascular surgery fellows graduating from 2003 to 2007 were obtained. A database identified case numbers and physician specialty for vascular procedures from 1997 through 2006. A survey gained perspectives of graduated general surgery residents on the vascular experience during residency and practice and on postresidency vascular caseload. Results There was significant decline in resident participation in open abdominal aortic aneurysm (22.4 versus 7.7), carotid endarterectomy (37.2 versus 31.1), aortobifemoral bypass (18.6 versus 5.5), and lower extremity bypass (42.8 versus 19.1). Numbers for dialysis access creation (49.0 versus 57.1) were maintained. Statewide, comparing 1997 with 2006, the percentages of procedures performed by vascular surgeons were: abdominal aortic aneurysm (29.3% versus 49%; p < 0.001), carotid endarterectomy (28.9% versus 45.5%; p < 0.001), and dialysis access (4.6% versus 12.3%; p = 0.020). The survey of general surgery graduates revealed lower extremity bypass, carotid endarterectomy, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and dialysis access are important in training. Dialysis access was the most common operation performed by the general surgery graduates. Conclusions There is a trend toward vascular surgeons and vascular residents performing most open vascular cases. Currently practicing surgeons believe there is value to vascular exposure for general surgeons in training, and vascular surgery should remain in general surgery training.
Background In patients with chronic mesenteric insufficiency (CMI), traditional bypass surgery carries a high operative mortality. Endovascular therapy for reconstruction of the mesenteric vascular ...system has high technical success but poor long-term patency. Secondary procedures are often mandatory for recurrent disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an endovascular-first treatment strategy for CMI, reserving open reconstruction for complex disease patterns without an endovascular option. Study Design Data for consecutive adult patients (N = 107) initially treated with endovascular techniques for CMI were reviewed. The management algorithm consisted of postoperative and biannual ultrasound and clinical follow-up. Results A total of 107 patients with CMI were treated from April 2004 through June 2010. Technical success for endovascular reconstruction was 100%. Long-term follow-up data were available on 90% of patients. After the index procedure, 57% of patients (n = 55) had complete resolution of the preoperative symptoms. During the management phase, 83% of patients had elevated velocities on duplex evaluation. During this interval, 53% of patients required no further intervention after the index procedure, and the remaining patients required an additional 78 procedures. Five patients required open revascularization for recurrent disease, and only 2 patients died from complications of mesenteric insufficiency. Conclusions Endovascular management for CMI has a high technical success rate with low morbidity and mortality. Regular follow-up is essential to optimize patient outcomes. Ultrasound findings alone are a poor predictor of recurrent disease. Long-term success requires adaptation of a management program to elicit recurrent symptoms and offer prompt treatment.
Other less common complications include the erosion of viscera, bleeding from abdominal wall vessels, loss of fluids and electrolytes, prolonged ileus, difficult removal from kinking or knotting of ...the drain, and, more rarely, incisional hernia, which may in turn result in intestinal obstruction and small bowel incarceration.1, 2 Drains are usually removed when the drainage is minimal, which is typically 24 to 48 hours after surgery if it is being used to cover perioperative bleeding and hematoma formation. ...drains that have been leftin place for prolonged periods of time may develop granulation tissue around the drain.3 This may make drain removal more traumatic and increase the incidence of erosion into adjacent structures.2, 3 Drains are often placed percutaneously through CT or ultrasound guidance while attempting to avoid injury to adjacent structures.
The development of new energy sources for hemostasis has facilitated advanced laparoscopic procedures. Few studies, however, have documented the strength of the vessels sealed or the extent of ...surrounding lateral thermal injury, two important factors in maintaining hemostasis while preventing injury to surrounding structures. This study compared the burst pressure and extent of thermal injury of vessels sealed with the 5-mm laparoscopic PlasmaKinetics trade mark sealer (PK) (Gyrus Medical, Maple Grove, Minnesota) and the 5-mm laparoscopic LigaSure trade mark sealing device (LS) (Valleylab, Boulder, Colorado).
Arteries in three sizes (2-3 mm, 4-5 mm, and 6-7 mm) were harvested from domestic pigs. Eight to 17 specimens from each size were randomly sealed with the PK, and the same number with the LS. Burst pressures were measured in mm Hg. The extent of thermal injury, determined by coagulation necrosis, was measured microscopically in millimeters after staining the transected vessels with hematoxylin and eosin. Descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations, are reported. Student's t-test and ANOVA were performed to determine significance (P <.05).
The mean bursting pressures of the PK and the LS were equal in the 2-3 mm vessels (397 vs. 326 mm Hg, P =.49). The PK bursting pressures were significantly less than the LS in the 4-5 mm (389 vs. 573 mm Hg, P =.02) and the 6-7 mm groups (317 vs. 585 mm Hg, P =.0004). As vessel size increased, the PK was associated with significantly lower burst pressures, while the LS was associated with progressively higher burst pressures (P =.035). Thermal spread was not significantly different between the PK and the LS in the 2-3 mm (1.5 vs. 1.2 mm, P =.27), the 4-5 mm (2.4 vs. 2.4 mm, P =.79), or the 6-7 mm vessel size groups (3.2 vs. 2.5 mm, P =.32). Increasing vessel size, regardless of instrument used, was associated with increased thermal injury (P <.0001).
The LS produces supraphysiologic seals with significantly higher bursting pressures than the PK in vessels ranging from 4 to 7 mm. The PK seals become progressively weaker while the LS seals increase in strength as the vessel size increases. Although thermal spread increases with vessel size, the degree of lateral thermal injury is no different between the two instruments.
PDF
