The clinical outcome, response to treatment, and occurrence of acute complications were retrospectively investigated in 308 primary autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) cases and correlated with ...serological characteristics and severity of anemia at onset. Patients had been followed up for a median of 33 months (range 12-372); 60% were warm AIHA, 27% cold hemagglutinin disease, 8% mixed, and 5% atypical (mostly direct antiglobulin test negative). The latter 2 categories more frequently showed a severe onset (hemoglobin Hb levels ≤6 g/dL) along with reticulocytopenia. The majority of warm AIHA patients received first-line steroid therapy only, whereas patients with mixed and atypical forms were more frequently treated with 2 or more therapy lines, including splenectomy, immunosuppressants, and rituximab. The cumulative incidence of relapse was increased in more severe cases (hazard ratio 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-6.57 for Hb ≤6 g/dL; P < .001). Thrombotic events were associated with Hb levels ≤6 g/dL at onset, intravascular hemolysis, and previous splenectomy. Predictors of a fatal outcome were severe infections, particularly in splenectomized cases, acute renal failure, Evans syndrome, and multitreatment (4 or more lines). The identification of severe and potentially fatal AIHA in a largely heterogeneous disease requires particular experienced attention by clinicians.
•Mixed, atypical, and warm immunoglobulin G plus C AIHA (∼30% of cases) more frequently have a severe onset (Hb ≤6 g/dL) and require multiple therapy lines.•Infections, particularly after splenectomy, acute renal failure, Evans syndrome, and multitreatment, were predictors of fatal outcome.
Digital health tools are increasingly being used in cancer care and may include electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) monitoring systems. We examined physicians' perceptions of usability and ...clinical utility of a digital health tool (GIMEMA-ALLIANCE platform) for ePRO monitoring in the real-life practice of patients with hematologic malignancies. This tool allows for the collection and assessment of ePROs with real-time graphical presentation of results to medical staff. Based on a predefined algorithm, automated alerts are sent to medical staff. Participating hematologists completed an online survey on their experience with the platform. Of the 201 patients invited to participate between December 2020 and June 2021 (cut-off date for current analysis), 180 (90%) agreed to enter the platform and had a median age of 57 years. Twenty-three hematologists with a median age of 42 years and an average of 17 years of experience in clinical practice were surveyed. All hematologists agreed or strongly agreed that the platform was easy to use, and 87%, agreed or strongly agreed that ePROs data were useful to enhance communication with their patients. The majority of physicians (78%) accessed the platform at least once per month to consult the symptom and health status profile of their patients. The frequency of access was independent of physician sex (
=0.393) and years of experience in clinical practice (
=0.404). In conclusion, our preliminary results support the clinical utility, from the perspective of the treating hematologist, of integrating ePROs into the routine cancer care of patients with hematologic malignancies.
Background
Digital health tools are increasingly being used in oncology practice to better monitor patients' health status. They may include electronic-patient-reported outcome (ePRO) monitoring ...systems, with automated alerts triggered to the physician depending on specific conditions (e.g., when patients report clinically relevant problems). Although implementation of these tools in real-life practice may offer valuable benefits, it is important to assess their usability and utility from the users' standpoint.
Objective
The aim of this study was to evaluate the patients' perception of usability and utility of a digital health tool for ePRO monitoring of patients with hematologic malignancies in real-life practice.
Methods
In December 2020, the GIMEMA Group developed a digital health platform for adult patients with hematologic malignancies (GIMEMA-ALLIANCE platform) with the goal of facilitating patient-centered care. The platform was open to enrollment until December 2022 and involved 26 hospitals. After providing written informed consent, patients received a personal password to access the secure patient portal and complete ePRO questionnaires assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptoms (EORTC QLQ-C30 and selected items from the EORTC Item Library). Real-time graphical presentation of PRO results is displayed for both patients and physicians. The platform allows hematologists to receive real-time alerts in the presence of clinically important problems and symptoms. For the purpose of this study, a dedicated section in the patient portal was developed to evaluate the usability and utility of the platform. In this section, patients had the possibility to complete the System Usability Scale (SUS). The SUS is a 10-item widely used questionnaire to evaluate users' perceived system satisfaction. Its score ranges from 0 to 100 and a score ≥70 is considered a threshold for an acceptable usability. Analyses were performed overall and by age group category, based on the median age of the patient population. Patients also completed an ad-hoc survey consisting of 6 items covering aspects on the utility of the platform, for example in favoring shared decision-making or improving the communication with the treating hematologist. Only patients who have completed the ePRO questionnaires at least twice, i.e. those who had the possibility to sufficiently test its functionalities, were considered eligible for completing the survey on usability and utility of the platform.
Results
Out of the 362 eligible patients, a total of 161 (44%) completed the survey. No difference in age and sex was found between patients who completed or not the survey. The median age of patients who completed the survey was 59 years (IQR: 51 - 67) and 53 (34%) were women. The most prevalent diagnosis was multiple myeloma (n=40, 25%). At the time of survey completion, 69% of the patients were receiving a treatment for their disease. The mean SUS score of the overall population was 80.8 (SD 15.5) and the majority of patients (n=131, 81%) gave a rating ≥70 (the prespecified threshold for the acceptable usability). The mean SUS score for the younger and the older groups was 80.5 (SD 14.9) and 81.4 (SD 16), respectively. Eighty-eight percent of patients agreed or strongly agreed that the platform was easy to use, 83% felt very confident in using the platform, and 72% found the various functionalities offered by the platform well integrated (Figure 1). Positive feedbacks on the utility of the platform were also collected. For example, 71% of patients considered the ePRO questionnaires useful for their health conditions and 63% would recommend its use to other patients. However, amongst the patients who had visits at the clinic (n=127), only 39% reported that their doctor discussed ePRO results with them, and this may explain the lower agreement for some items (Figure 2). For example, 38% of the patients strongly agreed/agreed that the platform helped them to improve the communication with their doctor, while 44% neither agreed or disagreed and 18% strongly disagreed/disagreed.
Conclusion
This study showed a good usability and utility of the GIMEMA-ALLIANCE platform from the patients' perspective, and this was true for younger and older patients. Future areas of improvement should include actions to facilitate physicians in discussing ePRO results during the clinical encounter with their patients.
Background
Imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) approved in Italy for frontline treatment of chronic‐phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP‐CML). The choice of TKI is ...based on a combined evaluation of the patient’s and the disease characteristics. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of frontline TKI therapy in an unselected cohort of Italian patients with CP‐CML to correlate the choice with the patient’s features.
Methods
A total of 1967 patients with CP‐CML diagnosed between 2012 and 2019 at 36 centers throughout Italy were retrospectively evaluated; 1089 patients (55.4%) received imatinib and 878 patients (44.6%) received a second‐generation (2G) TKI.
Results
Second‐generation TKIs were chosen for most patients aged <45 years (69.2%), whereas imatinib was used in 76.7% of patients aged >65 years (p < .001). There was a predominant use of imatinib in intermediate/high European long–term survival risk patients (60.0%/66.0% vs. 49.7% in low‐risk patients) and a limited use of 2G‐TKIs in patients with comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous neoplasms, ischemic heart disease, or stroke and in those with >3 concomitant drugs. We observed a greater use of imatinib (61.1%) in patients diagnosed in 2018–2019 compared to 2012–2017 (53.2%; p = .002). In multivariable analysis, factors correlated with imatinib use were age > 65 years, spleen size, the presence of comorbidities, and ≥3 concomitant medications.
Conclusions
This observational study of almost 2000 cases of CML shows that imatinib is the frontline drug of choice in 55% of Italian patients with CP‐CML, with 2G‐TKIs prevalently used in younger patients and in those with no concomitant clinical conditions. Introduction of the generic formulation in 2018 seems to have fostered imatinib use.
Among 1967 Italian patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2019 with chronic‐phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP‐CML), 1089 patients (55.4%) received imatinib and 878 patients (44.6%) received a second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor: nilotinib or dasatinib. Factors associated with the predominant use of imatinib were age >65 years, enlarged spleen, the presence of comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous neoplasms, ischemic heart disease, and stroke), and ≥3 concomitant medications at the time of CML diagnosis.
Introduction Median age at diagnosis in patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) is about 60 years: only few data are available in younger subjects at present.
Aim To analyze initial features, ...choice of frontline Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) and early adverse events leading to permanent TKI discontinuation in the first 12 months from TKI start in newly diagnosed subjects aged ≤ 40 years in a large and unselected real-life cohort of CML patients.
Methods We retrospectively evaluated 1963 patients newly diagnosed from 1/2012 to 12/2019 at 38 Hematology Centers in Italy participating at the “Campus CML” project: according to age at diagnosis, 302 were ≤ 40 years Younger Patients (YP), 900 were > 45 < 65 years Intermediate Aged Patients (IAP) and 761 were ≥ 65 years Elderly Patients (EP).
Results Clinical features, frontline TKI and causes of early TKI discontinuation according to age at diagnosis are reported in the Table 1. As to baseline clinical features, YP had significantly higher WBC count, lower Hb levels and higher rate of spleen enlargement: moreover, as expected, low-risk Sokal score was more common and rate of concomitant diseases/number of concomitant drugs lower in YP. As to frontline TKI, 96 YP (31.1%) received imatinib (IM) and 206 (68.9%) a 2G-TKI dasatinib (DAS) n=60, 19.9%; nilotinib (NIL) n=144, 47.6%: choice of 2G-TKI as frontline treatment was significantly more common in YP compared to both IAP and EP (p < 0.001). Causes of permanent frontline TKI discontinuation during the first 12 months of treatment according to age at diagnosis are reported in the Table 1: among YP, 45 (14.9%) discontinued frontline TKI treatment due to hematologic toxicity (5 cases, 1.6%), extra-hematologic toxicity (11 cases, 3.7%), primary resistance (24 cases, 8.0%), secondary resistance (2 cases, 0.6%) or evolution in blastic phase (BP) (3 cases, 1.0%). Cumulative incidence of permanent discontinuation at 12 months was 14.6% (95%CI 10.7 - 18.5) in YP compared to 16.9% (95%CI 14.3 - 19.2) in IAP (p=0.388) and 24.0% (95%CI 20.9 - 27.1) in EP (p < 0.001) (Figure 1): considering only permanent TKI discontinuation due to treatment resistance (primary resistance + secondary resistance + evolution in BP), no difference was observed according to age at diagnosis 9.6% (95%CI 6.3 - 12.9) in YP versus 10.2% (95%CI 8.2 - 12.2) in IAP versus 11.8% (95%CI 9.6 - 14.0) in EP, p=0.589.
Conclusions Our data highlight the following peculiar clinical features at baseline and during the first year of treatment in YP with CML compared with IAP and EP: a delayed diagnosis, outlined by higher WBC count and rate of spleen enlargement; an expected choice of 2G-TKI as frontline treatment in the real-life, even if about one third of them was still treated with IM; a lower incidence of early frontline TKI permanent discontinuation compared to EP but not IAP, mainly due to toxic causes and not related to resistance. Data on early molecular response and further evaluations at 24 and 36 months are warranted to complete present analysis.
Introduction Three TKIs, imatinib (IM), dasatinib (DAS) and nilotinib (NIL), are approved for frontline therapy in Italy. Choice of frontline TKI is based mainly on evaluation of patient's ...characteristics and clinical expectations. To avoid long term adverse events or potential drug interactions, elderly patients may start CML treatment with a frontline reduced dose of TKI (RD-TKI).
Aim To analyse outcome of CP-CML patients aged over 65 years in a large and unselected cohort treated with RD-TKI.
Methods We retrospectively evaluated 747 patients from 1/2012 to 12/2019 at 36 Hematology Centres participating at the “Campus CML” project.
Results Clinical features for the whole cohort according to frontline TKI initial dose are reported in Table 1. Among all patients, 605 (81%) were treated with standard dose (SD) while the remaining 142 (19%) with reduced dose (RD). As to frontline TKI, 579 patients (77%) received IM and 158 (23%) a 2G-TKI (DAS n=78, 49%; NIL n=80, 51%). Of the 142 RD-TKI, 122 (85.9%) started with IM, 14 (9.9%) with DAS and 6 (4.2%) with NIL. Median RD was 100 mg for IM (range 100-300), 20 mg for DAS (range 20-50) and 250 mg for NIL (range 150-300).
RD-TKI was mainly reported in IM treated patients (p=0.018), in elderly (p<0.001) and in patients with comorbidities, in particular diabetes (p=0.005) and ischemic heart disease (p=0.039). Number of concomitant drugs was also significantly associated with RD-TKI (p<0.001) probably to avoid drug interactions and subsequent toxicity. In detail, among RD-TKI, 41.1% of patients was treated with more than five concomitant drugs. Sokal score did not impact on TKI starting dose. No differences emerged between SD-TKI and RD-TKI in terms of haematological or extra-haematological toxicity. TKI frontline dose was not associated with difference in resistance, nor primary neither secondary resistance. Progression to blastic phase was reported in 1.2% of the whole population, none of which in RD-TKI. At 12 months no differences were noted in terms of achievement of major molecular response (MMR), obtained in 22.4% of SD-TKI treated patients and in 19% of RD-TKI treated patients. RD-TKI had inferior probability of deep molecular response (DMR) achievement (p=0.003), reported in 12.6% of patients. No differences were reported in 12-months cumulative rate of permanent discontinuation for any cause and for primary resistance between SD-TKI and RD-TKI as reported in Figure 1.
Conclusions RD-TKI was a frontline treatment strategy used mainly in frail elderly patients, with more comorbidities and concomitant therapies. RD-TKI did not impact on primary resistance leading to TKI switch. While no differences were reported in the rate of MMR, the rate of 12-months DMR achievement was inferior in RD-TKI, but this result need to be confirmed with longer follow-up.
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a greatly heterogeneous condition both in terms of clinical presentation and response to treatment, usually classified as warm (WAIHA), cold (CAD), mixed, and ...atypical forms. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of outcome and response to therapy considering in particular the serological characteristics and the severity of anemia at onset. We evaluatedretrospectively 307 patients (112 M and 195 F, median age at diagnosis 63, range 1-97), diagnosed between 1978 and 2013 and followed-up for a median of 33 months (range 12-372); 60% of cases were WAIHA, 27% CAD, 8% mixed, and 5% atypical (14 DAT- and 1 DAT+ for IgA only). Hemoglobin values were lower in mixed (median 5.8, range 2-10.7 g/dL) atypical (6.2, 3-9), and in IgG+C3 DAT+ WAIHA (6.9, 2.9-11.5). Twenty-one subjects were diagnosed with Evans’ syndrome, the majority of them WAIHA, with a severe onset. Considering anemia at onset, 27% of cases had Hb levels <6, 36% Hb 6.1-8, 24% Hb 8.1-10, and 13% Hb>10 g/dL; the most severe cases were mainly mixed and atypical forms (P=0.0001).
Regarding therapy, 47% of cases were treated with one therapy line only, 26% with two, 13% with three, and 4% with four or more lines. Sixty % of WAIHA received first line steroid therapy only, 20 CAD required no treatment, and patients with IgG+C DAT+ WAIHA, mixed, and atypical forms were more frequently treated with 2 or more therapy lines (P<0.0001); the gender- and age-adjusted cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly increased in more severe cases by Fine and Gray model (Figure). Response to steroids was observed in ~75% of cases, with lower rates in CAD and generally observed at high steroid dosages. Splenectomy (32 cases, mostly WAIHA or severe forms) had a response rate of 75%, but was ineffective in 2/3 CAD; the relapse rate was 8/24 (33%) after a median of 41 months. Regarding immunosuppressants (31 cases azathioprine, 40 cyclophosphamide, and 12 cyclosporine) the OR was 50-70% (PR 20-40), irrespective of serological type and severity of anemia, although the simultaneous administration of steroid in most cases may weaken these results; the relapse rate was 8/60 (13%) after a median of 11 months. Rituximab (55 cases at conventional, and in 19 at low doses (LD) of 100 mg /weekly x 4) had an 80% OR (35% PR). Predictors of response to LD were WAIHA, younger age, and shorter interval between diagnosis and rituximab therapy; at variance, OR to conventional doses occurred irrespectively of age, serological type, clinical severity at onset, and disease duration. The relapse rate was 5% (2/42, of whom 1 CAD) for standard and 38% (6/16, of whom 5 CAD) for LD, and relapses occurred mostly within the first year after treatment.
As regards complications, infections occurred in 26 cases (10 grade 3, 11 grade 4, and 5 grade 5), irrespective of serological AIHA type and severity at onset, and of the number of therapy lines; on the contrary, they were observed more frequently in splenectomized cases. Acute renal failure was recorded in 6 cases and was not associated with AIHA clinical or serological characteristics. A thrombotic event was recorded in 11% and was associated with severe onset, higher median LDH levels, and previous splenectomy.
At the time of the analysis 63 cases (21%) have died, of whom 11 because of AIHA (3.6%); death was not associated with the severity of anemia at onset, nor with the serological type of AIHA; at variance, it was associated with infections (HR 11.47, 95% CI 3.43-38.4, p=0.0004), acute renal failure (HR 17.99, 95% CI 4.73-68.40, p=0.001), Evans’ syndrome (HR 6.8, 95% CI 1.99-23.63, P=0.0074), previous splenectomy (HR 3.21, 95% CI 0.92-11.25), and multi-treatment (4 or more lines of therapy; HR 9.1, 95% CI 2.41-34.36, p=0.0076). Death was not associated with thrombotic events, nor with the type of treatment, in particular immunosuppressants or rituximab.
In conclusion, we showed that AIHA cases with a severe onset, mostly mixed and atypical forms, are frequently refractory to different therapies. Although obtained retrospectively, our results suggest to put forward rituximab among second line options, given its efficacy and safety. In addition, standard rituximab doses should be preferred in CAD, whereas lower doses may be equally effective in WAIHA and mixed forms. Finally, we suggest to defer splenectomy after rituximab, given the increased risk of thromboembolism, infections and fatal outcome in splenectomized patients.
Display omitted
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
PDF
