Underutilization of therapies to reduce ischemic risk in peripheral artery disease (PAD) persists.
The purpose was to conduct an implementation trial of lipid management in vascular disease.
The ...OPTIMIZE PAD-1 (Implementation of Vascular Care Team to Improve Medical Management of PAD Patients) trial randomized patients with peripheral artery disease with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥70 mg/dL to management via a vascular care team including a clinical pharmacist and an algorithm of intensive lipid management to achieve goal LDL-C in 1 step vs usual care plus provider education. Medications were obtained using commercial insurance. The primary endpoint was percent change in LDL-C at 12 months.
Of 166 enrolled patients, 74.2% did not have an LDL-C level at goal. Among 114 randomized patients (mean age 66 years, 36.0% women, and 15.8% Black), 50.9% received high-intensity statin, and 7.9% received ezetimibe at baseline. The mean 12-month LDL-C change was −49.1% (95% CI: −58.7% to −39.5%) with vascular care team management and −5.4% (95% CI: −15.3% to 4.6%) with usual care; the between-group least-squares mean difference was −43.7% (95% CI: −57.6% to −29.9%; P < 0.0001). Mean LDL-C was reduced in vascular care team patients from 100.6 mg/dL at baseline to 54.8 and 50.1 mg/dL by week 4 and month 12, respectively. At 12 months, vascular care team patients were >3 times as likely to achieve LDL-C <70 mg/dL and 8 times as likely to achieve LDL-C <55 mg/dL (P < 0.0001) than usual care.
OPTIMIZE PAD-1 showed that an interprofessional, algorithm-based program can achieve rapid LDL-C lowering in vascular patients using available insurance and therapies, and LDL-C targets can be met in most patients if enabled by optimized systems of care.
Display omitted
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a severe manifestation of atherosclerosis. Patients with PAD are at heightened risk for atherothrombotic complications, including myocardial infarction and stroke ...(MACE); however, there is also an equal or greater risk of major adverse limb events (MALE), such as acute limb ischemia (ALI) and major amputation. Therefore, there is a need for effective medical therapies to reduce the risk of both MACE and MALE. Recent trials have demonstrated the role of thrombin inhibition in reducing the risk of MACE and MALE in PAD patients. One such medical therapy, vorapaxar, is a potent inhibitor of protease activated receptor-1 which mediates the cellular effects of thrombin. Vorapaxar, used in addition to aspirin, has demonstrated robust reductions in MACE and MALE in PAD patients. In this article, we provide a contemporary review of the current state of PAD and the role of antithrombotic medications in the treatment of PAD, as well as the current clinical data on vorapaxar and strategies to integrate vorapaxar into contemporary medical management of peripheral artery disease.
Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at risk for severe morbidity and mortality, including ischaemic-related events. Furthermore, there is heterogeneity within the PAD population, where ...the drivers of risk for cardiovascular and limb-specific ischaemic events differ. Patients with PAD with concomitant coronary artery disease are at increased risk for cardiovascular ischaemic events, whereas patients with PAD with a prior history of lower-extremity revascularization are at increased risk for limb-specific ischaemic events. The current therapeutic challenge is identifying these risk factors to tailor therapy optimally for each patient. Additionally, the majority of our current medical therapeutics in patients with PAD have been shown to reduce atherothrombotic events, such as myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death, with a paucity of medical therapeutics specifically targeting a reduction in limb-specific ischaemic events. Over the past several years, there have been several contemporary clinical trials evaluating antithrombotic agents and their efficacy in reducing limb-specific ischaemic events. Specifically, rivaroxaban, with the addition of aspirin, has emerged as an efficacious therapeutic. In this article, we provide a review of the current clinical burden of PAD, the rationale behind current PAD medical therapeutics and the contemporary trials that have described the benefit of a novel therapeutic in PAD, rivaroxaban.
Background Physicians have expressed significant mistrust with public reporting of interventional cardiology outcomes. Similar data are not available on alternative reporting structures, including ...nonpublic quality improvement programs with internally distributed measures of interventional quality. We thus sought to evaluate the perceptions of public and nonpublic reporting of interventional cardiology outcomes and its impact on clinical practice. Methods and Results A standardized survey was distributed to 218 interventional cardiologists in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, with responses received from 62 (28%). The majority of respondents (90%) expressed some or a great deal of trust in the analytic methods used to generate reports in a nonpublic quality improvement system within Veterans Affairs, while a minority (35%) expressed similar trust in the analytic methods in a public reporting system that operates outside Veterans Affairs (
<0.001). Similarly, a minority of respondents (44%) felt that in-hospital and 30-day mortality accurately reflected interventional quality in a nonpublic quality improvement system, though a smaller proportion of survey participants (15%) felt that the same outcome reflected procedural quality in public reporting systems (
<0.001). Despite these sentiments, the majority of operators did not feel pressured to avoid (82% and 75%;
=0.383) or perform (72% and 63%;
=0.096) high-risk procedures within or outside Veterans Affairs. Conclusions Interventional cardiologists express greater trust in analytic methods and clinical outcomes reported in a nonpublic quality improvement program than external public reporting environments. The majority of physicians did not feel pressured to avoid or perform high-risk procedures, which may improve access to interventional care among high-risk patients.
•TBI-related BBB leakage is detectable with DCE-MRI in the early postinjury period.•Subtle BBB permeability elevations are present outside of focal lesions.•BBB disruption is not strongly related to ...early postinjury symptoms and cognition.•BBB measures exhibit variable changes by 6-month follow-up.
Dysfunction of the blood–brain-barrier (BBB) is a recognized pathological consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) which may play an important role in chronic TBI pathophysiology. We hypothesized that BBB disruption can be detected with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI not only in association with focal traumatic lesions but also in normal-appearing brain tissue of TBI patients, reflecting microscopic microvascular injury. We further hypothesized that BBB integrity would improve but not completely normalize months after TBI.
DCE MRI was performed in 40 adult patients a median of 23 days after hospitalized TBI and in 21 healthy controls. DCE data was analyzed using Patlak and linear models, and derived metrics of BBB leakage including the volume transfer constant (Ktrans) and the normalized permeability index (NPI) were compared between groups. BBB metrics were compared with focal lesion distribution as well as with contemporaneous measures of symptomatology and cognitive function in TBI patients. Finally, BBB metrics were examined longitudinally among 18 TBI patients who returned for a second MRI a median of 204 days postinjury.
TBI patients exhibited higher mean Ktrans (p = 0.0028) and proportion of suprathreshold NPI voxels (p = 0.001) relative to controls. Tissue-based analysis confirmed greatest TBI-related BBB disruption in association with focal lesions, however elevated Ktrans was also observed in perilesional (p = 0.011) and nonlesional (p = 0.044) regions. BBB disruption showed inverse correlation with quality of life (rho = −0.51, corrected p = 0.016). Among the subset of TBI patients who underwent a second MRI several months after the initial evaluation, metrics of BBB disruption did not differ significantly at the group level, though variable longitudinal changes were observed at the individual subject level.
This pilot investigation suggests that TBI-related BBB disruption is detectable in the early post-injury period in association with focal and diffuse brain injury.
Background Arterial closure devices reduce the length of bedrest after invasive cardiac procedures via the femoral approach, but there are conflicting data on their association with major bleeding ...and vascular complications. We thus sought to evaluate the contemporary use of femoral arterial closure devices and their association with major bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results We identified patients undergoing percutaneous intervention via the femoral approach within the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System from December 2004 through September 2018. The association between arterial closure device use and major bleeding was evaluated using both propensity matching and instrumental variable analyses, incorporating contrast-induced nephropathy as a falsification end point. We identified 132 373 percutaneous coronary interventions performed by 681 operators, with closure device use increasing 1.2% each year (linear trend
<0.001). In a propensity-matched cohort, closure devices were associated with a 1.1% reduction in periprocedural bleeding (95% CI, -1.5% to -0.6%). Closure devices were also associated with a numerical decrease in contrast-inducted nephropathy that did not reach statistical significance (-0.6%; 95% CI, -1.3% to 0.1%). In an instrumental variable analysis of closure device use, there was no difference in the bleeding rate between those who received a closure device and those who did not (0.2%; 95% CI, -0.9% to 1.2%). Conclusions Arterial closure devices are associated with a reduction in major bleeding within a propensity-matched cohort. This association dissipates in an instrumental variable analysis, highlighting some of the methodologic limitations of comparative effectiveness research in observational analyses.
PDF
