What is known and objective
Opioid use in the United States has reached unprecedented—some would even say crisis—levels. Although many individuals use opioid drugs as part of legitimate pain ...management plans, a significant number misuse prescription or illicit opioids. With regular opioid use, individuals develop tolerance and physical dependence; both are predictable, physiologic responses to repeated opioid exposure. However, a substantial number of individuals who misuse opioids will develop opioid use disorder (OUD), a complex, primary, chronic, neurobiological disease rooted in genetic, environmental and psychosocial factors. This article discusses OUD, opioid receptor physiology, and opioid withdrawal symptomatology and pathophysiology, as well as current treatment options available to reduce opioid withdrawal symptoms in individuals with physical dependence and/or OUD.
Methods
The research articles regarding OUD and its management have been reviewed thoroughly based on a PubMed literature search using keywords related to opioid dependence, its pathophysiology and current treatment strategies.
Results and discussion
Tolerance/physical dependence and the behavioural characteristics associated with OUD reflect complex neurobiologic adaptations in several major systems of the brain, including the locus ceruleus and mesolimbic systems. Physical dependence is responsible for the distressing withdrawal symptoms individuals experience upon abrupt cessation or rapid dose reduction of exogenous opioids. Opioid withdrawal symptoms are a key driver behind continued opioid use, and a barrier to opioid discontinuation. Several opioid‐based medications are available to treat patients with OUD; these treatments can diminish opioid withdrawal symptoms and cravings as well as block opioid effects in the event of relapse. Additionally, non‐opioid drugs may be used during acute detoxification to help alleviate opioid withdrawal symptoms.
What is new and conclusion
The opioid crisis has produced many challenges for physicians, one being the need to determine which patients would benefit most from maintenance therapy and which may be candidates for opioid discontinuation. In addition to summarizing current understanding of OUD, we provide a new algorithm for determining the need for continued opioid use as well as examples of situations where management of opioid withdrawal symptoms is indicated.
Opioid abuse has reached epidemic levels and includes many chronic pain patients. This review discusses opioid receptor physiology and opioid withdrawal symptomatology and pathophysiology, as well as current treatment options available to assist in the withdrawal process in individuals with physical dependence and/or opioid use disorder.
Peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) constitute a class of drugs which reverse opioid-induced constipation (OIC) with similar opioid analgesic effects. OIC differs from other ...forms of constipation in that it is an iatrogenic condition that occurs when an opioid acts on the dense network of μ-opioid receptors in the enteric system, which affect a variety of functions including gastrointestinal motility, secretion, and other factors that can cause bowel dysfunction. Unfortunately, laxative products, bowel regimens, dietary changes, and lifestyle modifications have limited effectiveness in preventing OIC, Opioid-associated adverse effect which occurs in 40% to 80% of opioid patients and may led to cessation of the treatment. PAMORAs are μ-receptor opioid antagonists specifically developed so that they have very limited ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and thus they are able to antagonize peripheral but not central μ-opioid receptors. PAMORAs are designed to have no effect on the analgesic benefits of opioid pain relievers but to relieve but antagonizing the effects of the opioid in the gastrointestinal system. The three main PAMORAS are methyltrexone (oral or parenteral), naldemedine (oral only), and naloxegol (oral only). Clinical studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of these agents for alleviating constipation without diminishing the analgesic effect of opioid therapy. The aim of this narrative review to update the current status of PAMORAs for treating OIC in terms of safety and efficacy.
Chronic pain is associated with decreased quality of life and is one of the most common reasons adults seek medical care, making treatment imperative for many aspects of patient well-being. Chronic ...pain management typically involves the use of Schedule II full μ-opioid receptor agonists for pain relief; however, the increasing prevalence of opioid addiction is a national crisis that is impacting public health and social and economic welfare. Buprenorphine is a Schedule III partial μ-opioid receptor agonist that is an equally effective but potentially safer treatment option for chronic pain than full μ-opioid receptor agonists. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the clinical efficacy and safety of the transdermal and buccal formulations of buprenorphine, which are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for chronic pain, compared with that of extended-release full μ-opioid receptor agonists.
Controlled or randomized controlled clinical trial information was retrieved from EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed using the search terms "buprenorphine" AND "chronic" AND "pain."
A total of 33 clinical studies were ultimately used in this review, including 29 (88%) on transdermal buprenorphine and 4 (12%) on buprenorphine buccal film. Although the measure of pain intensity varied among studies, each of these 33 trials demonstrated efficacy for buprenorphine in pain relief. A total of 28 studies also assessed safety, with each concluding that buprenorphine was generally well tolerated.
Comparison of current clinical data along with results of responder and safety analyses support the use of buprenorphine over full μ-opioid receptor agonists for effective preferential treatment of chronic pain; however, head-to-head clinical studies are warranted.
Transdermal buprenorphine is indicated for chronic pain management, but as its role in the clinical management of acute pain is less clear, this narrative review examines studies of the patch for ...acute pain, mainly in the postoperative setting. Although perhaps better known for its role in opioid rehabilitation programs, buprenorphine is also an effective analgesic that is a Schedule III controlled substance. Although buprenorphine is a partial agonist at the μ-opioid receptor, it is erroneous to think of the agent as a partial analgesic; it has full analgesic efficacy and unique attributes among opioids, such as a ceiling for respiratory depression and low "drug likeability" among those who take opioids for recreational purposes. Transdermal buprenorphine has been most thoroughly studied for acute pain control in postoperative patients. Postoperative pain follows a distinct and predictable trajectory depending on the type of surgery and patient characteristics. Overall, when the patch is applied prior to surgery and left in place for the prescribed seven days, it was associated with reduced postoperative pain, lower consumption of other analgesics, and patient satisfaction. Transdermal buprenorphine has been evaluated in clinical studies of patients undergoing gynecological surgery, hip fracture surgery, knee or hip arthroscopy/arthroplasty, shoulder surgery, and spinal surgery. Transdermal buprenorphine may also be appropriate pain medication for controlling pain during postsurgical orthopedic rehabilitation programs. Transdermal buprenorphine may result in typical opioid-associated side effects but with less frequency than other opioids. Despite clinical reservations about transdermal buprenorphine and its potential role in acute pain management in the clinical setting, clinical acceptance may be hampered by the fact that it is off-label and buprenorphine is better known as an opioid maintenance agent rather than an analgesic.
Introduction
Neurodegeneration is the term describing the death of neurons both in the central nervous system and periphery. When affecting the central nervous system, it is responsible for diseases ...like Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disorders, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and other less frequent pathologies. There are several common pathophysiological elements that are shared in the neurodegenerative diseases. The common denominators are oxidative stress (OS) and inflammatory responses. Unluckily, these conditions are difficult to treat. Because of the burden caused by the progression of these diseases and the simultaneous lack of efficacious treatment, therapeutic approaches that could target the interception of development of the neurodegeneration are being widely investigated. This review aims to highlight the most recent proposed novelties, as most of the previous approaches have failed. Therefore, older approaches may currently be used by healthcare professionals and are not being presented.
Methods
This review was based on an electronic search of existing literature, using PubMed as primary source for important review articles, and important randomized clinical trials, published in the last 5 years. Reference lists from the most recent reviews, as well as additional sources of primary literature and references cited by relevant articles, were used.
Results
Eighteen natural pharmaceutical substances and 24 extracted or recombinant products, and artificial agents that can be used against OS, inflammation, and neurodegeneration were identified. After presenting the most common neurodegenerative diseases and mentioning some of the basic mechanisms that lead to neuronal loss, this paper presents up to date information that could encourage the development of better therapeutic strategies.
Conclusions
This review shares the new potential pharmaceutical and not pharmaceutical options that have been recently introduced regarding OS and inflammatory responses in neurodegenerative diseases.
History of Respiratory Stimulants Peppin, John F; Pergolizzi, Jr, Joseph V; Fudin, Jeffrey ...
Journal of pain research,
01/2021, Letnik:
14
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
The interest in substances that stimulate respiration has waxed and waned throughout the years, intensifying following the introduction of a new class of drugs that causes respiratory depression, and ...diminishing when antidotes or better drug alternatives are found. Examples include the opioids--deaths increasing during overprescribing, diminishing with wider availability of the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone, increasing again during COVID-19; the barbiturates--until largely supplanted by the benzodiazepines; propofol; and other central nervous system depressants. Unfortunately, two new troubling phenomena force a reconsideration of the status-quo: (1) overdoses due to highly potent opioids such as fentanyl, and even more-potent licit and illicit fentanyl analogs, and (2) overdose due to polysubstance use (the combination of an opioid plus one or more non-opioid drug, such as a benzodiazepine, sedating antidepressant, skeletal muscle relaxant, or various other agents). Since these now represent the majority of cases, new solutions are again needed. An interest in respiratory stimulants has been revived. This interest can be informed by a short review of the history of this interesting class of medications. We present a short history of the trajectory of advances toward more selective and safer respiratory stimulants.
Ibuprofen first came to market about 50 years ago and rapidly moved to over-the-counter (OTC) sales. In April 2019, the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) of ...France issued a warning for NSAID uses by patients with infectious diseases based on an analysis of 20 years of real-world safety data on ibuprofen and ketoprofen. Nevertheless, ibuprofen remains a mainstay in the analgesic armamentarium and with numerous randomized clinical trials, head-to-head studies, and decades of clinical experience. The authors offer a review of the safety of ibuprofen and how it may differ from other NSAIDs. Ibuprofen is associated with certain well-known gastrointestinal adverse effects that are related to dose and patient population. Among nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), ibuprofen has a comparatively low risk of cardiovascular adverse effects. It has been associated with renal and hepatic adverse effects, which appear to depend on dose, concomitant medications, and patient population. The association of ibuprofen with infections is more complex in that it confers risk in some situations but benefits in others, the latter in cystic fibrosis. Emerging interest in the literature is providing evidence of the role of ibuprofen as a possible endocrine disrupter as well as its potential antiproliferative effects for cancer cells. Taken altogether, ibuprofen has a favorable safety profile and is an effective analgesic for many acute and chronic pain conditions, although it—like other NSAIDs—is not without risk. After 50 years, evidence is still emerging about ibuprofen and its unique safety profile among NSAIDs.
Funding
The Rapid Service Fee was funded by Abbott Established Pharmaceuticals Division (EPD).
Introduction
There is an urgent unmet medical need for a safe, effective, nonopioid analgesic agent for postoperative pain control.
Methods
This first-in-man study was designed to explore a ...data-informed, model-based candidate dosage regimen and safety of a novel formulation of ketorolac tromethamine (NTM-001) delivered as a 12.5-mg intravenous (IV) bolus followed immediately by 3.5 mg/h continuous infusion over 24 h compared versus IV bolus dosing of 30 mg generic ketorolac every 6 h. The study evaluated pharmacokinetic parameters and safety profiles based on a targeted product profile. A graphical overlay method and model-based comparisons were used to assess the concentration–time curve.
Results
Healthy adults (
n
= 28, 50% men) received NTM-001 and bolus dosing in an open-label crossover design. Observed plasma concentrations were tightly aligned with predicted values with no outliers. Graphical overlay comparisons showed low between-subject variability and agreed with forecasted concentration–time targets. The pharmacokinetic (PK) base models fit with preliminary PK data from both the NTM-001 and bolus groups with model fit median profiles within 95% prediction limits and no updating of the models. Consistent with serum concentration–time profiles, pain relief scores fell within predicted limits, with initial pain relief scores of NTM-001 slightly above the target profile, likely because the initial serum ketorolac concentrations were somewhat higher than predicted. The 24-h pain relief predicted for NTM-001 based on the area under the median ketorolac pain relief versus time curve was about 6% below that of the pain relief target. Both treatments were well tolerated and no subject withdrew because of adverse events.
Conclusions
The PK parameters for NTM-001 and comparator bolus were similar to the modeling targets with no updating of the base model. There were no outliers and little intersubject variability. NTM-001 delivered as a bolus of 12.5 mg IV followed immediately by continuous infusion of 3.5 mg/h using a standard hospital infusion pump may offer an alternative to opioids for acute postoperative pain control.
Plain Language Summary
Opioids are effective analgesics but the risk for opioid use disorder (OUD) and opioid-associated side effects limit their use even for postoperative pain. Ketorolac is an established nonopioid pain reliever that may be as efficacious as morphine in this setting. This study evaluated a new ketorolac product (NTM-001) compared to generic ketorolac. Both were delivered using a standard hospital intravenous (IV) drug pump. The new ketorolac product was administered first with a loading dose of 12.5 mg followed immediately by a continuous IV infusion of 3.5 mg/h. This was compared to IV generic ketorolac administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg every 6 h. The study enrolled 28 healthy adult volunteers. As a crossover study, subjects underwent both treatments: once with the continuous infusion (NTM-001) and once with the IV injection every 6 h (bolus group) with a “washout” period in between. Blood was collected from the volunteers at several time-determined points during the 48-h study to chart ketorolac concentrations in the blood, which can be correlated to predicted levels of pain control. In this study, blood concentrations of ketorolac were reliably predictable and side effects were generally mild with no unexpected adverse events. The continuous infusion group achieved analgesic benefit at a lower total dose than did the every-6-h group over 24 h.
Evidence from diverse sources suggests that persons who have a substance use disorder (SUD) often have problems with one or more additional substances, a situation broadly, if imprecisely, termed ...polysubstance use or more preferably multiple substance use disorder (mSUD). Because of the heavy toll of maladaptive neuronal dysregulation, morbidity, and mortality of SUDs, and increasingly of mSUD, on the individual, their families, the healthcare system, insurers, regulators, and society at large, it seems of value to have an estimate of the prevalence of mSUD. This turns out to be surprisingly difficult, due to nebulous or disparate definitions and to weaknesses in data acquisition methodology. We here attempt a pragmatic way of bracketing an estimate of mSUD prevalence in the US. We conclude that a reasonable estimated range of mSUD in the US is about 8 to 14 million persons. This approach provides a quick estimate for stakeholders involved in efforts to understand or deal with the immediate crisis of mSUD, as more refined estimations are pursued.
PDF
