Abstract
Background: Over 4300 children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA) are diagnosed with cancer each year in Canada, 1/3 of whom have refractory/metastatic disease or will relapse. A national ...collaborative program, PRecision Oncology For Young peopLE (PROFYLE), was created with the goal to develop and implement a pipeline providing access to tumor molecular profiling to identify novel targeted treatment options in a clinically relevant timeframe for CAYA with hard-to-treat cancers.
Design: PROFYLE unites 21 institutions, building upon 3 pre-existing regional pediatric precision oncology programs (Personalized Oncogenomics (POG), SickKids Cancer Sequencing (KiCS), and Personalized Targeted Therapy in Refractory or Relapsed Cancer in Childhood (TRICEPS)). PROFYLE nodes (genomics/bioinformatics, proteomics, modeling, biomarkers, data/biobanking, therapeutics, bioethics, policy, AYA) are unified by a shared governance structure. PROFYLE includes genomic and transcriptomic sequencing of paired germline/cancer fresh/frozen samples. Inclusion criteria: ≤29y; treatment at a Canadian center; diagnosis of a hard-to-treat cancer. Profiling results are reviewed by multidisciplinary Molecular Tumor Boards. A report including a results/recommendations summary of actionable findings (therapeutic, diagnostic, prognostic, cancer predisposition), potential targeted therapy options including available clinical trials, clarification of diagnosis, and genetic counseling referral is provided to the treating oncologist.
Results: To date, >800 CAYA are enrolled in PROFYLE and POG, KiCS, TRICEPS. Cancer diagnoses: 35% sarcoma, 18% leukemia/lymphoma, 14% CNS tumor, 14% neuroblastoma, 19% other. At study entry, 44% of participants had not relapsed, 39% 1 relapse, 14% 2 relapses, and 3% 3+ relapses. 13% had a cancer-predisposing pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variant, 39% had ≥1 potentially actionable somatic alteration, and 13% had a therapeutically targetable somatic alteration. The most frequent classes of alterations were RAS/MAPK, immune checkpoint, cell cycle, DNA repair, epigenetic, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, RTK. Of clinicians who reported the utility of results, 78% indicated the findings had the potential to inform a medical decision.
Future Directions: We will build on PROFYLE's success by addressing the challenge of real-time availability of target-based therapies through innovative clinical trial strategies incorporating new drugs, off-label use, drug combinations, basket and single patient study designs to enable improved access to therapies for CAYA with actionable molecular targets. We will work on policy-relevant research to facilitate implementation of precision oncology care for CAYA in Canada. We will leverage knowledge developed by PROFYLE thus far by integrating omics, modeling and biomarkers research in the trials being developed.
Citation Format: Stephanie A. Grover, Thierry Alcindor, Jason N. Berman, Jennifer A. Chan, Avram E. Denburg, Rebecca J. Deyell, David D. Eisenstat, Conrad V. Fernandez, Paul E. Grundy, Abha Gupta, Cynthia Hawkins, Meredith S. Irwin, Nada Jabado, Steven J. Jones, Michael F. Moran, Daniel A. Morgenstern, Shahrad R. Rassekh, Adam Shlien, Daniel Sinnett, Poul H. Sorensen, Patrick J. Sullivan, Michael D. Taylor, Anita Villani, James A. Whitlock, David Malkin, on behalf of the Terry Fox PROFYLE Consortium. PROFYLE: The pan-Canadian precision oncology program for children, adolescents and young adults with hard-to-treat cancer abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 636.
Abstract
Introduction: Over 4300 children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA) are diagnosed with cancer each year in Canada, 1/3 of whom will have refractory or metastatic disease or will relapse ...with a very poor prognosis. Most CAYA cancer survivors suffer significant late effects that impose an enormous burden to them, their family and the health care system. To address this urgent medical and socioeconomic need, a pan-Canadian collaborative program, PRecision Oncology For Young peopLE (PROFYLE), was created with the objective to develop and implement the first Canadian precision oncology pipeline providing access to tumour molecular profiling with the aim of identifying novel targeted therapeutic options in a clinically relevant timeframe for CAYA with hard-to-treat cancer.
Design: Prior to PROFYLE, 3 programs (Personalized Oncogenomics Project (POG), SickKids Cancer Sequencing Program (KiCS), and Personalized Targeted Therapy in Refractory or Relapsed Cancer in Childhood (TRICEPS)) constituted the bulk of childhood precision oncology efforts in Canada. PROFYLE was designed to unite and build upon them, and consists of interconnected nodes including: genomics/bioinformatics, proteomics, cancer modeling, biomarkers, biobanking/data repositories, therapeutics/clinical trial design and biomedical ethics; unified by a shared governance structure. There are 16+ institutions in the PROFYLE consortium. The PROFYLE profiling strategy consists of initial reporting from a >800 cancer gene panel, followed by whole genome (paired germline/cancer samples) and whole transcriptome analyses. Eligibility criteria: ≤29y; treatment at a Canadian oncology center; diagnosis with a hard-to-treat cancer. Profiling results are reviewed by multidisciplinary Molecular Tumour Boards. A patient-specific molecular research report including summary of results and recommendations (actionable finding, potential targeted therapies, any open clinical trials which the patient may be eligible for, change of diagnosis, and/or referral for genetic counselling) is provided to the treating oncologist.
Results: To date, 644 patients have taken part in PROFYLE (n=338) and POG, KiCS, TRICEPS. For the first 100 participants, cancer diagnoses include 43 sarcomas, 23 CNS tumors, 10 leukemia and lymphomas, 10 neuroblastoma and 14 other rare cancers. At study entry, 48% had not yet relapsed, 40% 1 relapse, 10% 2 relapses, and 2% 3+ relapses. 13 had a cancer-predisposing germline mutation and 82 had at least one potentially actionable somatic alteration. The most commonly mutated genes/pathways included TP53, CDNK2A/B, FGFR, MYC, and FLT1/3/4. 82% had results/recommendations from the MTB that informed a medical decision to alter diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment of their disease. In 71%, management recommendations were provided. Analyses of the complete dataset will be presented at the meeting.
Conclusion: The goal of developing a national precision oncology pipeline has been realized through the establishment of the PROFYLE initiative. PROFYLE continues to grow through increased recruitment, additional institutions, contribution of new knowledge to the field of precision oncology, improving access to clinical trials for CAYA patients, and advocacy and partnerships on local, national and international scales.
Citation Format: Stephanie A. Grover, Jason N. Berman, Jennifer A. Chan, Rebecca J. Deyell, David D. Eisenstat, Conrad V. Fernandez, Paul E. Grundy, Cynthia Hawkins, Meredith S. Irwin, Nada Jabado, Steven J. Jones, Michael Moran, Shahrad R. Rassekh, Adam Shlien, Daniel Sinnett, Poul H. Sorensen, Patrick J. Sullivan, Michael D. Taylor, Anita Villani, James A. Whitlock, David Malkin, on behalf of the Terry Fox PROFYLE Consortium. Terry Fox PRecision Oncology For Young peopLE (PROFYLE): A Canadian precision medicine program for children, adolescents and young adults with hard-to-treat cancer abstract. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5413.
Abstract
Background: Over 4,300 children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA) are diagnosed with cancer each year in Canada, 1/3 of whom have refractory/metastatic disease or will relapse. The ...PRecision Oncology For Young peopLE (PROFYLE) national, collaborative program, was created to provide equitable access to molecular profiling to identify novel targeted treatment options in a clinically relevant timeframe for all CAYA with hard-to-cure cancers in Canada.
Design: Building upon 3 pre-existing regional precision oncology programs, PROFYLE now includes >20 institutions and has united an interdisciplinary team of experts, leaders, research teams, end-users and advocates from across Canada. The program has 14 domain specific nodes that are unified by a shared governance structure, and has harmonized biobanking, genomics, bioinformatics and reporting procedures. PROFYLE includes genomic and transcriptomic sequencing of paired germline and cancer fresh/frozen samples, proteomic analysis, and cancer modelling. Inclusion criteria: ≤29y; treatment at a Canadian center; diagnosis of a hard-to-cure cancer. Profiling results are reviewed by multidisciplinary Molecular Tumor Boards. A report including a results/recommendations summary of actionable findings (therapeutic, diagnostic, prognostic, cancer predisposition), potential targeted therapy options including available clinical trials, clarification of diagnosis, and genetic counseling recommendations is provided to the treating oncologist.
Results: >1,000 CAYA are included from all of the provinces. Cancer diagnoses: 34% sarcoma, 16% leukemia/lymphoma, 16% CNS tumor, 11% neuroblastoma, 23% other. 17% of participants had a cancer-predisposing pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variant, 45% had ≥1 potentially actionable somatic alteration, 22.6% had a therapeutically targetable somatic alteration. The most frequent classes of therapeutic alterations were RAS/MAPK (15%), cell cycle (14%), epigenetic (13%), RTK (12%), PI3K/AKT/mTOR (11%), DNA repair (9%), immune checkpoint (8%). Of clinicians who reported the utility of results, 55% indicated the findings were useful for clinical management.
Future Directions: Collaborations with other national and international initiatives and data from this interdisciplinary, multi-institutional research program will inform the development of a framework to innovatively link research, clinical and system considerations with Canadian values relevant to multi-omic profiling and drug access for CAYA. In addition, we believe that with a comprehensive molecular view of cancer, PROFYLE will transform our understanding of underlying disease mechanisms, facilitate and improve diagnostic and prognostic indicators, and identify new therapeutic strategies and targets for CAYA patients with cancer.
Citation Format: Stephanie A. Grover, Lesleigh Abbott, Jason N. Berman, Guillaume Bourque, Jennifer A. Chan, Avram E. Denburg, Rebecca J. Deyell, Conrad V. Fernandez, Cynthia Hawkins, Jan-Willem Henning, Meredith S. Irwin, Nada Jabado, Steven J. Jones, Philipp F. Lange, Paul Moorehead, Michael F. Moran, Daniel A. Morgenstern, Sapna Oberoi, Antonia Palmer, Shahrad R. Rassekh, Donna L. Senger, Adam Shlien, Daniel Sinnett, Caron Strahlendorf, Patrick J. Sullivan, Michael D. Taylor, Suzanne Vercauteren, Anita Villani, Stephanie Villeneuve, James A. Whitlock, David Malkin, on behalf of the PROFYLE Consortium. A pan-Canadian precision oncology program for children, adolescents and young adults with hard-to-cure cancer: The PRecision Oncology For Young peopLE (PROFYLE) Program. abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4509.
Abstract
Background: Over 4,300 children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA) are diagnosed with cancer each year in Canada, 1/3 of whom have refractory/metastatic disease or will relapse. A ...national collaborative program, PRecision Oncology For Young peopLE (PROFYLE), was created with the goal to develop and implement a pipeline providing access to tumor molecular profiling to identify novel targeted treatment options in a clinically relevant timeframe for CAYA with hard-to-cure cancers.
Design: PROFYLE includes more than 20 institutions, building upon 3 pre-existing regional precision oncology programs (Personalized Oncogenomics (POG), SickKids Cancer Sequencing (KiCS), and Personalized Targeted Therapy in Refractory or Relapsed Cancer in Childhood (TRICEPS)). PROFYLE has united an interdisciplinary team of experts, leaders, research team, end-users and advocates from across Canada to form 14 domain specific nodes unified by a shared governance structure. PROFYLE includes genomic and transcriptomic sequencing of paired germline/cancer fresh/frozen samples. Inclusion criteria: ≤29y; treatment at a Canadian center; diagnosis of a hard-to-cure cancer. Profiling results are reviewed by multidisciplinary Molecular Tumor Boards. A report including a results/recommendations summary of actionable findings (therapeutic, diagnostic, prognostic, cancer predisposition), potential targeted therapy options including available clinical trials, clarification of diagnosis, and genetic counseling recommendations is provided to the treating oncologist.
Results: To date, >900 CAYA are enrolled. Cancer diagnoses: 36% sarcoma, 16% leukemia/lymphoma, 16% CNS tumor, 13% neuroblastoma, 19% other. At study entry, 44% of participants had not relapsed, 40% had 1 relapse, 9% 2 relapses, 4% 3+ relapses. 17% had a cancer-predisposing pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variant, 40% had ≥1 potentially actionable somatic alteration, 9.7% had a therapeutically targetable somatic alteration. The most frequent classes of therapeutic alterations were cell cycle (15%), RAS/MAPK (14%), epigenetic (13%), RTK (12%), PI3K/AKT/mTOR (10%), DNA repair (9%), immune checkpoint (8%). Of clinicians who reported the utility of results, 56% indicated the findings were useful for clinical management.
Future Directions: With a comprehensive molecular view of cancer, PROFYLE will transform our understanding of underlying disease mechanisms, facilitate and improve diagnostic and prognostic indicators, and identify new therapeutic strategies and targets. Data from this interdisciplinary, multi-institutional research program will inform the development of a framework to innovatively link research, clinical and system considerations with Canadian values relevant to genomic profiling and drug access for CAYA in Canada.
Citation Format: Stephanie A. Grover, Lesleigh Abbott, Jason N. Berman, Jennifer A. Chan, Avram E. Denburg, Rebecca J. Deyell, Conrad V. Fernandez, Cynthia Hawkins, Jan-Willem Henning, Meredith S. Irwin, Nada Jabado, Steven J. Jones, Philipp F. Lange, Michael F. Moran, Daniel A. Morgenstern, Antonia Palmer, Shahrad R. Rassekh, Donna L. Senger, Adam Shlien, Daniel Sinnett, Caron Strahlendorf, Patrick J. Sullivan, Michael D. Taylor, Suzanne Vercauteren, Anita Villani, James A. Whitlock, David Malkin, on behalf of the Terry Fox PROFYLE Consortium. The PRecision Oncology For Young peopLE (PROFYLE) Program: A national precision oncology program for children, adolescents and young adults with hard-to-cure cancer in Canada abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5224.
This is the first report of a NACC2-NTRK2 fusion in a histological glioblastoma. Oncogenomic analysis revealed this actionable fusion oncogene in a pediatric cerebellar glioblastoma, which would not ...have been identified through routine diagnostics, demonstrating the value of clinical genome profiling in cancer care.
Background
Few studies describe acute kidney injury (AKI) burden during paediatric cisplatin therapy and post-cisplatin kidney outcomes. We determined risk factors for and rate of (1) AKI during ...cisplatin therapy, (2) chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hypertension 2–6 months post-cisplatin, and (3) whether AKI is associated with 2–6-month outcomes.
Methods
This prospective cohort study enrolled children (aged < 18 years at cancer diagnosis) treated with cisplatin from twelve Canadian hospitals. AKI during cisplatin therapy (primary exposure) was defined based on Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) serum creatinine criteria (≥ stage one). Severe electrolyte abnormalities (secondary exposure) included ≥ grade three hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia, or hypomagnesemia (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0). CKD was albuminuria
or
decreased kidney function for age (KDIGO guidelines). Hypertension was defined based on the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines.
Results
Of 159 children (median interquartile range IQR age: 6 2–12 years), 73/159 (46%) participants developed AKI and 55/159 (35%) experienced severe electrolyte abnormalities during cisplatin therapy. At median IQR 90 76–110 days post-cisplatin, 53/119 (45%) had CKD and 18/128 (14%) developed hypertension. In multivariable analyses, AKI was not associated with 2–6-month CKD or hypertension. Severe electrolyte abnormalities during cisplatin were associated with having 2–6-month CKD
or
hypertension (adjusted odds ratio (AdjOR) 95% CI: 2.65 1.04–6.74). Having both AKI
and
severe electrolyte abnormalities was associated with 2–6-month hypertension (AdjOR 95% CI: 3.64 1.05–12.62).
Conclusions
Severe electrolyte abnormalities were associated with kidney outcomes. Cisplatin dose optimization to reduce toxicity and clear post-cisplatin kidney follow-up guidelines are needed.
Graphical abstract
A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as
Supplementary information
IMPORTANCE: Few multicenter pediatric studies have comprehensively described the epidemiologic characteristics of cisplatin-associated acute kidney injury using standardized definitions. OBJECTIVE: ...To examine the rate of and risk factors associated with acute kidney injury among children receiving cisplatin infusions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study examined children (aged <18 years) recruited from May 23, 2013, to March 31, 2017, at 12 Canadian pediatric academic health centers who were receiving 1 or more cisplatin infusion. Children whose estimated or measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or who had received a kidney transplant were excluded. Data analysis was performed from January 3, 2018, to September 20, 2019. EXPOSURES: Cisplatin infusions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was acute kidney injury during cisplatin infusion, defined using a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes serum creatinine criteria–based definition (stage 1 or higher). The secondary outcome was acute kidney injury defined by electrolyte criteria from the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (grade 1 or higher). Assessments occurred at early (first or second cycle) and late (last or second to last cycle) cisplatin infusions. RESULTS: A total of 159 children (mean SD age at early cisplatin infusion, 7.2 5.3 years; 80 50% male) participated. The most common diagnoses were central nervous system tumors (58 36%), neuroblastoma (43 27%), and osteosarcoma (33 21%). Acute kidney injury (by serum creatinine level increase) occurred in 48 of 159 patients (30%) at early cisplatin infusions and 23 of 143 patients (16%) at late cisplatin infusions. Acute kidney injury (by electrolyte abnormalities) occurred in 106 of 159 patients (67%) at early cisplatin infusion and 100 of 143 patients (70%) at late cisplatin infusions. Neuroblastoma diagnosis and higher precisplatin GFR were independently associated with acute kidney injury (serum creatinine level increase) at early cisplatin infusions (adjusted odds ratio aOR for neuroblastoma vs other, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.18-8.95; aOR for GFR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03) and late cisplatin infusions (aOR for neuroblastoma vs other, 6.85; 95% CI, 1.23-38.0; aOR for GFR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03). Higher cisplatin infusion dose was also independently associated with acute kidney injury (serum creatinine level increase) at later cisplatin infusions (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings suggest that acute kidney injury is common among children receiving cisplatin infusions and that rate and risk factors differ at earlier vs later infusions. These results may help with risk stratification with a goal of risk reduction.
e22003
Background: Urine kidney injury biomarkers measured during cisplatin therapy may help identify patients at risk for adverse long-term kidney outcomes. In children treated for cancer, we ...examined associations of urine tubular injury biomarkers collected during two cisplatin cycles, with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hypertension at 3 and 12 months post-cisplatin. Methods: We analyzed data from the Applying Biomarkers to Minimize Long-Term Effects of Childhood/Adolescent Cancer Treatment (ABLE) Nephrotoxicity Study: a twelve-center prospective cohort of 159 children receiving cisplatin. Urine tubular injury biomarkers (by ELISA: neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin NGAL; kidney injury molecule-1 KIM-1; tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 TIMP-2; insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7 IGFBP-7) were measured at three timepoints (pre-infusion; 12-24 hours post-infusion; discharge after cisplatin cycle) during an early cisplatin cycle (EarlyCisP: first or second cycle of therapy) and a later cycle (LateCisP: last or second-to-last cycle). Area under the curve (AUC) for biomarkers to predict CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate below normal or urine albumin/creatinine above normal for age, per international definition) and hypertension (3 blood pressures; per American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines) at 3 and 12 months post-cisplatin was calculated. AUC change from adding biomarkers to a published clinical prediction model for 3-month outcomes was evaluated (DeLong method). Results: 156 patients were available for analysis (mainly solid tumors). 3-month (median 90 days) outcomes were 52/118 (44%) CKD; 17/125 (14%) hypertension. 12-month (median 335 days) outcomes were 47/118 (40%) CKD; 15/125 (12%) hypertension. AUCs for all biomarkers to predict 3 and 12-month CKD and hypertension were poor to modest (best AUC = 0.70, 95% CI 0.60-0.80 for pre-infusion EarlyCisP TIMP-2*IGFBP-7 to predict 3-month hypertension). Biomarkers did not improve the clinical prediction model for 3-month CKD (AUC change not statistically significant with vs. without biomarkers). Adding pre-infusion EarlyCisP NGAL and TIMP-2*IGFBP-7 to the clinical prediction model for 3-month hypertension led to AUC change from 0.81 (0.72-0.91) to 0.89 (0.83-0.95) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Tubular injury biomarkers we studied were individually not strong predictors of 3 or 12-month post-cisplatin kidney outcomes. Adding biomarkers to existing clinical prediction models may help predict post-therapy hypertension development or identify higher kidney-risk patients.
Few studies have described associations between the AKI biomarkers urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) with AKI in cisplatin-treated ...children. We aimed to describe excretion patterns of urine NGAL and KIM-1 and associations with AKI in children receiving cisplatin.
Participants (
=159) were enrolled between 2013 and 2017 in a prospective cohort study conducted in 12 Canadian pediatric hospitals. Participants were evaluated at early cisplatin infusions (at first or second cisplatin cycle) and late cisplatin infusions (last or second-to-last cycle). Urine NGAL and KIM-1 were measured (
) pre-cisplatin infusion, (
) post-infusion (morning after), and (
) at hospital discharge at early and late cisplatin infusions. Primary outcome: AKI defined by serum creatinine rise within 10 days post-cisplatin, on the basis of Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines criteria (stage 1 or higher).
Of 159 children, 156 (median interquartile range (IQR) age: 5.8 2.4-12.0 years; 78 50% female) had biomarker data available at early cisplatin infusions and 127 had data at late infusions. Forty six of the 156 (29%) and 22 of the 127 (17%) children developed AKI within 10 days of cisplatin administration after early and late infusions, respectively. Urine NGAL and KIM-1 concentrations were significantly higher in patients with versus without AKI (near hospital discharge of late cisplatin infusion, median IQR NGAL levels were 76.1 10.0-232.7 versus 14.9 5.4-29.7 ng/mg creatinine; KIM-1 levels were 4415 2083-9077 versus 1049 358-3326 pg/mg creatinine;
<0.01). These markers modestly discriminated for AKI (area under receiver operating characteristic curve AUC-ROC range: NGAL, 0.56-0.72; KIM-1, 0.48-0.75). Biomarker concentrations were higher and better discriminated for AKI at late cisplatin infusions (AUC-ROC range, 0.54-0.75) versus early infusions (AUC-ROC range, 0.48-0.65).
Urine NGAL and KIM-1 were modest at discriminating for cisplatin-associated AKI. Further research is needed to determine clinical utility and applicability of these markers and associations with late kidney outcomes.
PDF
