Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) are an aggressive, genetically complex and difficult to treat group of cancers. In lieu of truly effective targeted therapies, surgery and radiotherapy ...represent the primary treatment options for most patients. But these treatments are associated with significant morbidity and a reduction in quality of life. Resistance to both radiotherapy and the only available targeted therapy, and subsequent relapse are common. Research has therefore focussed on identifying biomarkers to stratify patients into clinically meaningful groups and to develop more effective targeted therapies. However, as we are now discovering, the poor response to therapy and aggressive nature of HNSCCs is not only affected by the complex alterations in intracellular signalling pathways but is also heavily influenced by the behaviour of the extracellular microenvironment. The HNSCC tumour landscape is an environment permissive of these tumours' aggressive nature, fostered by the actions of the immune system, the response to tumour hypoxia and the influence of the microbiome. Solving these challenges now rests on expanding our knowledge of these areas, in parallel with a greater understanding of the molecular biology of HNSCC subtypes. This update aims to build on our earlier 2014 review by bringing up to date our understanding of the molecular biology of HNSCCs and provide insights into areas of ongoing research and perspectives for the future.
Radiotherapy is a major treatment modality for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Up to 50% of patients with locally advanced disease relapse after radical treatment and there is ...therefore a need to develop predictive bomarkers for clinical use that allow the selection of patients who are likely to respond. MicroRNA (miRNA) expression profiling of a panel of HNSCC tumours with and without recurrent disease after surgery and radiotherapy detected miR‐196a as one of the highest upregulated miRNAs in the poor prognostic group. To further study the role of miR‐196a, its expression was determined in eight head and neck cancer cell lines. Overexpression of miR‐196a in HNSCC cells, with low endogenous miR‐196a expression, significantly increased cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Conversely, miR‐196a knockdown in cells with high endogenous expression levels significantly reduced oncogenic behaviour. Importantly, overexpression of miR‐196a increased radioresistance of cells as measured by gamma H2AX staining and MTT survival assay. Annexin A1 (ANXA1), a known target of miR‐196a, was found to be directly modulated by miR‐196a as measured by luciferase assay and confirmed by Western blot analysis. ANXA1 knockdown in HNSCC exhibited similar phenotypic effects to miR‐196a overexpression, suggesting the oncogenic effect of miR‐196a may at least be partly regulated through suppression of ANXA1. In conclusion, this study identifies miR‐196a as a potential important biomarker of prognosis and response of HNSCC to radiotherapy. Furthermore, our data suggest that miR‐196a and/or its target gene ANXA1 could represent important therapeutic targets in HNSCC.
What's new?
There is accumulating evidence that miR‐196a plays an important role in the pathogenesis of a number of cancers. Through functional studies, here the authors demonstrate that miR‐196a confers an oncogenic phenotype in head and neck cancer cells, through the targeting of ANXA1. The results also show that MiR‐196a modulation is associated with response to radiation. MiR‐196a may therefore represent both a prognostic and a predictive biomarker in head and neck cancer. Furthermore, the data suggest that miR‐196a and/or its target gene ANXA1 could represent important therapeutic targets in head and neck cancer.
Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are associated with poor morbidity and mortality. Current treatment strategies are highly toxic and do not benefit over 50% of patients. There is ...therefore a crucial need for predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers to allow treatment stratification for individual patients. One class of biomarkers that has recently gained importance are microRNA (miRNA). MiRNA are small, noncoding molecules which regulate gene expression post‐transcriptionally. We performed miRNA expression profiling of a cohort of head and neck tumours with known clinical outcomes. The results showed miR‐9 to be significantly downregulated in patients with poor treatment outcome, indicating its role as a potential biomarker in HNSCC. Overexpression of miR‐9 in HNSCC cell lines significantly decreased cellular proliferation and inhibited colony formation in soft agar. Conversely, miR‐9 knockdown significantly increased both these features. Importantly, endogenous CXCR4 expression levels, a known target of miR‐9, inversely correlated with miR‐9 expression in a panel of HNSCC cell lines tested. Induced overexpression of CXCR4 in low expressing cells increased proliferation, colony formation and cell cycle progression. Moreover, CXCR4‐specific ligand, CXCL12, enhanced cellular proliferation, migration, colony formation and invasion in CXCR4‐overexpressing and similarly in miR‐9 knockdown cells. CXCR4‐specific inhibitor plerixafor abrogated the oncogenic phenotype of CXCR4 overexpression as well as miR‐9 knockdown. Our data demonstrate a clear role for miR‐9 as a tumour suppressor microRNA in HNSCC, and its role seems to be mediated through CXCR4 suppression. MiR‐9 knockdown, similar to CXCR4 overexpression, significantly promoted aggressive HNSCC tumour cell characteristics. Our results suggest CXCR4‐specific inhibitor plerixafor as a potential therapeutic agent, and miR‐9 as a possible predictive biomarker of treatment response in HNSCC.
MicroRNA‐9 is frequently downregulated in head and neck cancer. MiR‐9 directly targets and downregulates CXCR4 in HNSCC. CXCR4 activation by its ligand CXCL12 induces growth and invasion. Loss of miR‐9 induces CXCR4 overexpression and oncogenic activation. Plerixafor specifically inhibits CXCR4 activity, abrogating the invasive cancer phenotype, and therefore, miR‐9 may be a potential predictive biomarker of response to plerixafor treatment.
BackgroundMTL-CEBPA is a novel immunotherapy targeting the myeloid cell lineage which has shown promising clinical activity as monotherapy and combination therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in ...hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Immunosuppressive myeloid cells are associated with worse outcomes to checkpoint inhibitors. Pre-clinical data have shown that MTL-CEBPA potentiates the oncological effect of PD-1 inhibitors.MethodsThis phase 1A/B, first-in-human, open-label, multicenter study evaluates the safety, tolerability, PK, and efficacy of MTL-CEBPA in combination with a pembrolizumab in adult patients with advanced solid tumours across 3 dose cohorts (70mg/98mg/130mg/m2 MTL-CEBPA once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks with final week break per cycle, with 200mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint is safety and ORR; key secondary endpoints include PK, CR rate & DCR. Key inclusion criteria: Patients with advanced solid tumours who have progressed on standard of care therapy or for whom no standard therapy is available, measurable disease, ECOG PS <2, life expectancy >3 months. A dose exploration will determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D).Results10 pts (3 men, 7 women; median age 50.5yrs), all with different tumor types (1 each of triple negative breast, methothelioma, squamous thymic, cholangiocarcinoma, eccrine, fibrolamellar hepatocellular, colorectal, pancreatic and 2 platinum resistant high-grade serous ovarian). 4 pts had ≥4 prior lines of treatment. All pts reported treatment-related AEs, 7 pts reported AEs considered related to MTL-CEBPA only and all were grade 1 or 2. The most common was nausea (n=3) followed by anaemia, headache, insomnia, neutropenia, pyrexia, transaminase increase and ventricular extrasystole (all n=1). Five pts reported AEs considered related to pembrolizumab only, 2AEs in 1 pt only were grade 3 (ALT and AST increases) There were no DLTs, SAEs or AEs leading to discontinuation or to death in the study. Tumor response was evaluated in 9 pts. 2 pts had a PR (epithelioid mesothelioma at 2 months with 83% tumour reduction, pt ongoing at 9 months & serous ovarian cancer at 2 months with 69% reduction in tumour, pt progressed at 6 months). Three pts had SD, 4 pts had PD as BOR, and 4 pts are continuing to receive treatment.ConclusionsMTL-CEBPA in combination with pembrolizumab demonstrated manageable toxicity at the dose levels tested and has shown antitumor activity. MTD was not reached and RP2D was determined at 130mg/m2 on day 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Enrolment into the dose expansion is ongoing.Trial RegistrationThis study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04105335.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by the North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee, approval number 19/NE/0312.
To evaluate the mechanisms of how therapeutic upregulation of the transcription factor, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPα), prevents tumor progression in patients with advanced ...hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and in different mouse tumor models.
We conducted a phase I trial in 36 patients with HCC (NCT02716012) who received sorafenib as part of their standard care, and were given therapeutic C/EBPα small activating RNA (saRNA; MTL-CEBPA) as either neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. In the preclinical setting, the effects of MTL-CEBPA were assessed in several mouse models, including BNL-1ME liver cancer, Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC), and colon adenocarcinoma (MC38).
MTL-CEBPA treatment caused radiologic regression of tumors in 26.7% of HCC patients with an underlying viral etiology with 3 complete responders. MTL-CEBPA treatment in those patients caused a marked decrease in peripheral blood monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell (M-MDSC) numbers and an overall reduction in the numbers of protumoral M2 tumor-associated macrophages (TAM). Gene and protein analysis of patient leukocytes following treatment showed CEBPA activation affected regulation of factors involved in immune-suppressive activity. To corroborate this observation, treatment of all the mouse tumor models with MTL-CEBPA led to a reversal in the suppressive activity of M-MDSCs and TAMs, but not polymorphonuclear MDSCs (PMN-MDSC). The antitumor effects of MTL-CEBPA in these tumor models showed dependency on T cells. This was accentuated when MTL-CEBPA was combined with checkpoint inhibitors or with PMN-MDSC-targeted immunotherapy.
This report demonstrates that therapeutic upregulation of the transcription factor C/EBPα causes inactivation of immune-suppressive myeloid cells with potent antitumor responses across different tumor models and in cancer patients. MTL-CEBPA is currently being investigated in combination with pembrolizumab in a phase I/Ib multicenter clinical study (NCT04105335).
Abstract
Tumor associated macrophages (TAM) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are widely implicated in the suppression of immune responses in cancer and are associated with negative ...clinical outcomes. We report that in mouse tumor models, therapeutic up-regulation of the transcriptional factor C/EBPα with small activating RNA (MTL-CEBPA) blocks the suppressive activity of monocytic (M) MDSC and TAM without affecting polymorphonuclear (PMN) MDSC. MTL-CEBPA treatment demonstrated antitumor activity that was dependent on T cells. Combination of MTL-CEBPA and anti-PD1 antibody or with PMN-MDSC targeted therapy resulted in marked antitumor effect. A phase I trial was conducted in 36 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Marked decrease in M-MDSC and the expression of genes and proteins involved in immune suppressive activity of these cells were observed. Combined treatment with MTL-CEBPA and sorafenib resulted in a 27% objective radiological response and three complete responses in patients with virally associated HCC. Tissue biopsies from these patients demonstrated decrease in M2 polarized macrophages within the tumors. Thus, therapeutic up-regulation of C/EBPα inhibited suppressive myeloid cells that resulted in potent antitumor effect in mice and with encouraging clinical response in cancer patients. We are currently recruiting to a multi-centre study of MTL-CEBPA in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab) in adult patients with advanced solid tumors (TIMEPOINT - ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04105335).
Citation Format: Ayumi Hashimoto, Debashis Sarker, Vikash Reebye, Sheba Jarvis, Mikael H. Sodergren, Andrew Kossenkov, Nina Raulf, Jenni Vasara, Pinelopi Andrikakou, Tim Meyer, Kai-Wen Huang, Ruth Plummer, Cheng Ean Chee, Duncan Spalding, Madhava Pai, David J. Pinato, Rohini Sharma, Bristi Basu, Daniel Palmer, Yuk-Ting Ma, Robert Habib, Anna Martirosyan, Naouel Elasri, Adeline Reynaud, John Rossi, Mark Cobbold, Nagy Habib, Dmitry Gabrilovich. Up-regulation of C/EBPα inhibits suppressive activity of myeloid cells and potentiates antitumor response in mice and cancer patients abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1730.
Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (
HNSCC
) are associated with poor morbidity and mortality. Current treatment strategies are highly toxic and do not benefit over 50% of patients. There is ...therefore a crucial need for predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers to allow treatment stratification for individual patients. One class of biomarkers that has recently gained importance are micro
RNA
(mi
RNA
). Mi
RNA
are small, noncoding molecules which regulate gene expression post‐transcriptionally. We performed mi
RNA
expression profiling of a cohort of head and neck tumours with known clinical outcomes. The results showed miR‐9 to be significantly downregulated in patients with poor treatment outcome, indicating its role as a potential biomarker in
HNSCC
. Overexpression of miR‐9 in
HNSCC
cell lines significantly decreased cellular proliferation and inhibited colony formation in soft agar. Conversely, miR‐9 knockdown significantly increased both these features. Importantly, endogenous
CXCR
4 expression levels, a known target of miR‐9, inversely correlated with miR‐9 expression in a panel of
HNSCC
cell lines tested. Induced overexpression of
CXCR
4 in low expressing cells increased proliferation, colony formation and cell cycle progression. Moreover,
CXCR
4‐specific ligand,
CXCL
12, enhanced cellular proliferation, migration, colony formation and invasion in
CXCR
4‐overexpressing and similarly in miR‐9 knockdown cells.
CXCR
4‐specific inhibitor plerixafor abrogated the oncogenic phenotype of
CXCR
4 overexpression as well as miR‐9 knockdown. Our data demonstrate a clear role for miR‐9 as a tumour suppressor micro
RNA
in
HNSCC
, and its role seems to be mediated through
CXCR
4 suppression. MiR‐9 knockdown, similar to
CXCR
4 overexpression, significantly promoted aggressive
HNSCC
tumour cell characteristics. Our results suggest
CXCR
4‐specific inhibitor plerixafor as a potential therapeutic agent, and miR‐9 as a possible predictive biomarker of treatment response in
HNSCC
.
Abstract only
4601
Background: MTL-CEBPA is the first small activating RNA to enter clinical trials and upregulates C/EBPα, a master regulator of myeloid cell differentiation. We previously reported ...a favourable safety profile of MTL-CEBPA as a single agent in HCC (Sarker D et al, ASCO 2018). After discontinuation of MTL-CEBPA, 3 out of 5 patients (pts) treated with sorafenib off study had a complete response (CR) of 7-18 months duration; 2 pts of which demonstrated resolution of lung metastases for > 1 year. Here we provide new data on pts prospectively treated with MTL-CEBPA + sorafenib. Methods: Primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability of MTL-CEBPA 90-130mg/m
2
QW or BIW in combination with sorafenib 400mg BD administered to HCC patients either concomitantly or sequentially, in cohorts either tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) naive or resistant. Secondary objectives included preliminary assessment of activity by response rate (RECIST v1.1) and immune landscape analysis. Results: As at the cut off date of 1 Feb 2020, 12 pts have been treated with MTL-CEBPA co-administered with sorafenib and 14 pts with MTL-CEBPA followed by sorafenib (23M/3F, median age 65.5years, range 44-83, ECOG PS 0/1: 18/8). The most common treatment-related AEs (all grades/grade 3-4) in these groups include facial flushing (4/0), raised AST (4/2) raised ALT (2/1), fatigue (5/0), raised ALP (2/0), and anaemia (2/2), diarrhoea (3/0), rash (2/0) and anorexia (1/0). Of 14 evaluable pts in the TKI naive cohorts, 2 pts had CR, 3 pts had partial response and 7 had stable disease. 9/10 pts in the TKI resistant cohorts evaluable for efficacy had stable disease. Flow cytometry demonstrated statistically significant decreases in frequency of immature CD66
+
CD10
−
neutrophils and myeloid derived suppressor cells. IHC demonstrated significant reduction in M2 macrophages in tumour biopsies. Conclusions: MTL-CEBPA + sorafenib is well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. This study has confirmed signals of objective response to the combination treatment in TKI naïve HCC patients with viral aetiology, warranting expanded development in these patients. Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02716012. Table: see text
PDF
