Retrospective analysis of patients with medically inoperable non-small cell lung cancer treated with continuous high-dose external beam radiation therapy at the Medical University of South Carolina.
...We identified 35 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated 1998-2002. None were candidates for resection for reasons including: pulmonary function (n = 23), previous cancer (n = 9), other co-morbidities (n = 2), and refusal of surgery (n = 1). Median percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 41.5%. Median age was 71 years. Five patients had more than one primary tumor: three were concurrently treated, two were sequentially treated. Lesion sizes were <3 cm (n = 24); 3-5 cm (n = 12), and >5 cm (n = 5). Nodal stage was as follows: N0 (n = 33) and N1 (n = 2). Radiation therapy was administered once daily: median dose was 80.5 Gy/35 fx/2.3 Gy/fx. The clinical target volume was tumor plus nodes ≥1.0 cm. V20 data were available for 12 patients, with a mean value of 15.7%.
Thirty-four patients completed treatment. Median follow-up was 23.0 months. There were 26 deaths: 19 died from non-small cell lung (73%) and seven died from co-morbid illness (27%). Median survival was 24 months (95% CI, 18.0-31.9 months). Four patients were alive with disease, and five were alive disease-free at 10- and 68-month follow-ups. Of 41 lesions, local failure occurred in 15 lesions (37%) of which 3 local failure patients (9%) failed concomitantly in untreated regional lymph nodes. There were no isolated nodal recurrences. Distant progression: 10 patients (29%) of which 6 distant progression without local failure. Two patients who both had prior lobectomies experienced grade 5 toxicities.
Continuous high-dose external beam radiation therapy 80.5 Gy administered in 35 fractions was tolerated. Treatment-related death was rare (6%) and isolated to patients with prior lobectomies in an extremely high-risk population. Most mortality was lung cancer-related. The dose of 80.5 Gy in 7 weeks is supported for patients with single lesions and no prior lobectomy. Local failure dominates and higher effective doses should be explored.
Locally advanced esophageal cancer Sherman, Carol A; Turrisi, Andrew T; Wallace, Michael B ...
Current treatment options in oncology
3, Številka:
6
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus should undergo computed tomography of the chest and abdomen and positron emission tomography to look for evidence of ...distant metastatic disease. In the absence of systemic metastases, locoregional staging should be performed with endoscopic ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration of accessible periesophageal lymph nodes and any detectable celiac lymph nodes. Patients found to have T3 tumors (transmural extension), T4 tumors (invasion of adjacent structures), or N1-M1a (lymph node-positive) disease do poorly when treated with surgery alone; 5-year survival is less than 20%. These patients should be considered for combined modality therapy. Patients with T4 disease are generally not deemed candidates for surgical resection; they may be considered for definitive chemoradiotherapy. Patients with T3 disease or lymph node-positive disease may be treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy alone. Patients considered for trimodality therapy should be fully restaged before surgery to assess their response to neoadjuvant treatment. This should include repeat endoscopic ultrasound and fine needle aspiration of lymph nodes. Patients whose lymph node metastases do not completely respond to neoadjuvant therapy are unlikely to benefit from the addition of surgery. Patients with persistently positive celiac lymph nodes have a very poor prognosis and should not undergo surgery. Patients with persistent nodal disease who have good performance status may be considered for additional chemotherapy. Patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who have poor performance status are not good candidates for combined modality therapy. These individuals are best managed with palliative intent. Particular attention should be given to alleviating the common problem of dysphagia, which causes significant morbidity.
Purpose: To report the long-term follow-up of Southwest Oncology Group-8269, a phase II North American cooperative group trial of concurrent cisplatin, etoposide, vincristine (PEV), and thoracic ...radiotherapy (TRT) for limited small-cell lung cancer (L-SCLC).
Methods: 114 eligible patients from 47 institutions enrolled between April, 1985 and March 1986. Patients had documented L-SCLC. Induction chemotherapy consisted of three cycles of PEV. TRT was administered at 1.8 Gy/fraction in 25 daily fractions to a total dose of 45 Gy, to begin concomitantly. Consolidative chemotherapy included two cycles of vincristine, methotrexate, etoposide, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was concurrent with the 3rd cycle of chemotherapy. The PCI dose was 30 Gy in 15 fractions of 2 Gy/fraction.
Results: As of May 2000, 5 of 114 remain alive and progression-free with a minimum follow-up interval of 13.2 years, as of May 2000. The median follow-up interval is 14.2 years. Thirty eight patients died of causes other than SCLC and five patients are still alive and progression-free. Of the remaining 71 patients dying of SCLC, local failure (LF) occurred in 24% (17 patients), distant metastasis (DM) occurred in 35% (25 patients), simultaneous LF and DM occurred in 25% (18 patients), and was indeterminate in 16% (11 patients). Thus, LF was a component of failure in 49%. Twenty patients had the CNS as the initial site of failure. Eleven patients (10%) developed fatal second primary cancers, including two with acute myelogenous leukemia, two with squamous cell lung cancer, one each with breast, pancreas, prostate, renal cell, and myelodysplasia. One patient developed both a melanoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Conclusion: There are long-term survivors with concomitant TRT and PEV. LF and DM are common. Pattern of failure suggests needs to improve local and systemic control.
To achieve the ultimate goal of cancer treatment, which is 100% cancer control with negligible toxicity, the therapeutic window must be enlarged, allowing for higher doses of beneficial treatments ...with reduced toxicity. The advent of image- and metabolism-guided therapy offers the best opportunity to date for combining modern radiation targeting and imaging techniques. Indeed, for the first time, it is reasonable to locally target metastatic disease with the goal of sterilization. Combining these focal radiation techniques with novel targeted antiproliferative agents and full-dose classic cytotoxic chemotherapy will become more effective as we learn to use these compounds in a less systemically toxic manner and as radiation fields become more defined. In addition, increasing numbers of biologic modifiers of normal tissue response are becoming available, and they suggest great promise for decreasing the normal tissue toxicity resulting from both radiation and chemotherapy treatments. Thus, radiation metastectomy for gross metastases, used together with systemic control of micrometastatic disease, may yield improved survival rates. This hypothesis is ready for testing in cancers of the breast, prostate, colon, and in sarcomas. Enlarging the therapeutic window is a major goal that would allow for an increasingly favorable therapeutic gain.
PDF
