The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin reduces the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with chronic heart failure, but whether empagliflozin ...also improves clinical outcomes when initiated in patients who are hospitalized for acute heart failure is unknown. In this double-blind trial (EMPULSE; NCT04157751 ), 530 patients with a primary diagnosis of acute de novo or decompensated chronic heart failure regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction were randomly assigned to receive empagliflozin 10 mg once daily or placebo. Patients were randomized in-hospital when clinically stable (median time from hospital admission to randomization, 3 days) and were treated for up to 90 days. The primary outcome of the trial was clinical benefit, defined as a hierarchical composite of death from any cause, number of heart failure events and time to first heart failure event, or a 5 point or greater difference in change from baseline in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score at 90 days, as assessed using a win ratio. More patients treated with empagliflozin had clinical benefit compared with placebo (stratified win ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.68; P = 0.0054), meeting the primary endpoint. Clinical benefit was observed for both acute de novo and decompensated chronic heart failure and was observed regardless of ejection fraction or the presence or absence of diabetes. Empagliflozin was well tolerated; serious adverse events were reported in 32.3% and 43.6% of the empagliflozin- and placebo-treated patients, respectively. These findings indicate that initiation of empagliflozin in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure is well tolerated and results in significant clinical benefit in the 90 days after starting treatment.
Heart failure is a global public health problem, affecting a large number of individuals from low-income and middle-income countries. REPORT-HF is, to our knowledge, the first prospective global ...registry collecting information on patient characteristics, management, and prognosis of acute heart failure using a single protocol. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in 1-year post-discharge mortality according to region, country income, and income inequality.
Patients were enrolled during hospitalisation for acute heart failure from 358 centres in 44 countries on six continents. We stratified countries according to a modified WHO regional classification (Latin America, North America, western Europe, eastern Europe, eastern Mediterranean and Africa, southeast Asia, and western Pacific), country income (low, middle, high) and income inequality (according to tertiles of Gini index). Risk factors were identified on the basis of expert opinion and knowledge of the literature.
Of 18 102 patients discharged, 3461 (20%) died within 1 year. Important predictors of 1-year mortality were old age, anaemia, chronic kidney disease, presence of valvular heart disease, left ventricular ejection fraction phenotype (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction HFrEF vs preserved ejection fraction HFpEF), and being on guideline-directed medical treatment (GDMT) at discharge (p<0·0001 for all). Patients from eastern Europe had the lowest 1-year mortality (16%) and patients from eastern Mediterranean and Africa (22%) and Latin America (22%) the highest. Patients from lower-income countries (ie, ≤US$3955 per capita; hazard ratio 1·58, 95% CI 1·41–1·77), or with greater income inequality (ie, from the highest Gini tertile; 1·25, 1·13–1·38) had a higher 1-year mortality compared with patients from regions with higher income (ie, >$12 235 per capita) or lower income inequality (ie, from the lowest Gini tertile). Compared with patients with HFrEF, patients with HFpEF had a lower 1-year mortality with little variation by income level (pinteraction for HFrEF vs HFpEF <0·0001).
Acute heart failure is associated with a high post-discharge mortality, particularly in patients with HFrEF from low-income regions with high income inequality. Regional differences exist in the proportion of eligible patients discharged on GDMT, which was strongly associated with mortality and might reflect lack of access to post-discharge care and prescribing of GDMT.
Novartis Pharma.
Aims
Inflammation is a central process in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF), but trials targeting tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α were largely unsuccessful. Interleukin (IL)‐6 is an important ...inflammatory mediator and might constitute a potential pharmacologic target in HF. However, little is known regarding the association between IL‐6 and clinical characteristics, outcomes and other inflammatory biomarkers in HF. We thus aimed to identify and characterize these associations.
Methods and results
Interleukin‐6 was measured in 2329 patients 89.4% with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% of the BIOSTAT‐CHF cohort. The primary outcome was all‐cause mortality and HF hospitalization during 2 years, with all‐cause, cardiovascular (CV), and non‐CV death as secondary outcomes. Approximately half (56%) of all included patients had plasma IL‐6 values greater than the previously determined 95th percentile of normal values at baseline. Elevated N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide, procalcitonin and hepcidin, younger age, TNF‐α/IL‐1‐related biomarkers, or having iron deficiency, atrial fibrillation and LVEF > 40% independently predicted elevated IL‐6 levels. IL‐6 independently predicted the primary outcome HR (95% confidence interval) per doubling: 1.16 (1.11–1.21), P < 0.001, all‐cause mortality 1.22 (1.16–1.29), P < 0.001 and CV as well as non‐CV mortality 1.16 (1.09–1.24), P < 0.001; 1.31 (1.18–1.45), P < 0.001, but did not improve discrimination in previously published risk models.
Conclusions
In a large, heterogeneous cohort of HF patients, elevated IL‐6 levels were found in more than 50% of patients and were associated with iron deficiency, reduced LVEF, atrial fibrillation and poorer clinical outcomes. These findings warrant further investigation of IL‐6 as a potential therapeutic target in specific HF subpopulations.
Hypertension is a leading cause of heart failure and other cardiovascular diseases. Its role in the pathogenesis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) differs from that in heart ...failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Moreover, rigorous blood pressure control may reduce the incidence of heart failure. However, once heart failure develops, prognosis is affected by blood pressure, which may differ between patients with and without heart failure. Therefore, the association between guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure and its uptitration must be considered for blood pressure management and should not be overlooked. Heart failure medications affect the blood pressure and efficacy per baseline blood pressure value. This review discusses the potential mechanisms by which hypertension leads to HFrEF or HFpEF, the impact of hypertension on incident heart failure, and the recommended approaches for blood pressure management in patients with heart failure. Comparison between patients with and without heart failure regarding blood pressure The association between CV events and SBP is linear in patients without heart failure; however, it becomes J-shaped or inverse linear in those with heart failure. The management of BP, including optimal BP or pharmacotherapy, differs between the two populations. ACEi angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, ARB angiotensin II receptor blockers; ARNi angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, BB beta-blockers, BP blood pressure, CV cardiovascular, DASH Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension, GDMT guideline-directed medical therapy, HF heart failure, HFrEF heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, MRA mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, SBP systolic blood pressure, SGLT2i sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), β blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are of proven benefit and are recommended by ...guidelines for management of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to examine the first prospective multinational data from Asia on prescribing patterns of guideline-directed medical therapies and analyse its effect on outcomes.
In the prospective multinational ASIAN-HF registry (with enrolment from 46 centres in 11 countries in Asia), we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older, with symptomatic heart failure (stage C, with at least one episode of decompensated heart failure in the past 6 months that resulted in admission to hospital or was treated in an outpatient clinic) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤40% on baseline echocardiography, consistent with 2016 European Society of Cardiology guidelines). We excluded patients with heart failure caused by severe valvular heart disease, life-threatening comorbidity with a life expectancy of less than 1 year, who were unable or unwilling to give consent, or who had concurrent participation in a clinical trial. Patients were followed up for 3 years for the outcomes of death and cause-specific admittance to hospital. Primary outcomes were uptake of guideline-directed medical therapies (as proportions) by therapeutic class, achieved doses as proportions of guideline-recommended doses, and their association with 1-year composite outcome of all-cause death or admittance to hospital because of heart failure. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01633398.
Between Oct 1, 2012, and Dec 31, 2015, we enrolled 5276 patients with HFrEF (mean age 59·6 years SD 13·2, 77% men, body-mass index 24·9 kg/m2 5·1, 33% New York Heart Association class III or IV). Follow-up data were available for 4544 (90%) of 5061 eligible patients taking medication for heart failure, with median follow-up of 417 days (IQR 214–735). ACE inhibitors or ARBs were prescribed to 3868 (77%) of 5005 patients, β blockers to 3975 (79%) of 5061, and MRAs to 2998 (58%) of 5205, with substantial regional variation. Guideline-recommended dose was achieved in only 17% of cases for ACE inhibitors or ARB, 13% for β blockers, and 29% for MRAs. Country (all three drug classes), increasing body-mass index (ACE inhibitors or ARBs and MRAs), and in-patient recruitment (ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers) were associated with attainment of guideline-recommended dose (all p<0·05). When adjusted for indication bias, increasing drug doses, from low dose (1–<25% of guideline-recommended dose) upwards were associated with lower hazards of a 1-year composite outcome for ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers compared with non-users. The lowest adjusted hazards were in the group that attained guideline-recommended doses above 50% (hazard ratio HR 0·54, 95% CI 0·50–0·58 for ACE inhibitors or ARBs 50–99·9%; HR 0·47, 0·46–0·50 for β blockers, and HR 0·77, 0·72–0·81 for MRAs ≥100%).
Guideline-directed medical therapies at recommended doses are underutilised in patients with HFrEF. Improved uptake and uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapies are needed for better patient outcomes.
National Medical Research Council (Singapore), A*STAR Biomedical Research Council ATTRaCT program, Boston Scientific Investigator Sponsored Research program, and Bayer.
This study compares a deep learning interpretation of 23 echocardiographic parameters-including cardiac volumes, ejection fraction, and Doppler measurements-with three repeated measurements by core ...lab sonographers. The primary outcome metric, the individual equivalence coefficient (IEC), compares the disagreement between deep learning and human readers relative to the disagreement among human readers. The pre-determined non-inferiority criterion is 0.25 for the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval. Among 602 anonymised echocardiographic studies from 600 people (421 with heart failure, 179 controls, 69% women), the point estimates of IEC are all <0 and the upper bound of the 95% confidence intervals below 0.25, indicating that the disagreement between the deep learning and human measures is lower than the disagreement among three core lab readers. These results highlight the potential of deep learning algorithms to improve efficiency and reduce the costs of echocardiography.
Heart failure around the world Tromp, Jasper; Ferreira, João Pedro; Janwanishstaporn, Satit ...
European journal of heart failure,
October 2019, Letnik:
21, Številka:
10
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
With increasingly large sample sizes required to demonstrate event reduction, heart failure outcome trials are no longer being performed in a small group of selected patients and countries, but at a ...global scale with worldwide contribution of patients from countries with considerable differences in background therapy, socioeconomic status and healthcare practices. Recent studies have highlighted how socioeconomic determinants rather than geographical factors may underlie the heterogeneity of patient populations across the globe. Therefore, in this review, we evaluated (i) regional differences in patient characteristics and outcomes in recent epidemiologic studies; (ii) regional differences in worldwide representativeness of clinical trial populations; and (iii) the role of socioeconomic determinants in driving country differences in heart failure trial enrolment and clinical outcomes.
Selenium and outcome in heart failure Bomer, Nils; Grote Beverborg, Niels; Hoes, Martijn F. ...
European journal of heart failure,
August 2020, Letnik:
22, Številka:
8
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
Aims
Severe deficiency of the essential trace element selenium can cause myocardial dysfunction although the mechanism at cellular level is uncertain. Whether, in clinical practice, moderate selenium ...deficiency is associated with worse symptoms and outcome in patients with heart failure is unknown.
Methods and results
BIOSTAT‐CHF is a multinational, prospective, observational cohort study that enrolled patients with worsening heart failure. Serum concentrations of selenium were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Primary endpoint was a composite of all‐cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure; secondary endpoint was all‐cause mortality. To investigate potential mechanisms by which selenium deficiency might affect prognosis, human cardiomyocytes were cultured in absence of selenium, and mitochondrial function and oxidative stress were assessed. Serum selenium concentration (deficiency) was <70 μg/L in 485 (20.4%) patients, who were older, more often women, had worse New York Heart Association class, more severe signs and symptoms of heart failure and poorer exercise capacity (6‐min walking test) and quality of life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire). Selenium deficiency was associated with higher rates of the primary endpoint hazard ratio (HR) 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–1.42 and all‐cause mortality (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.26–1.86). In cultured human cardiomyocytes, selenium deprivation impaired mitochondrial function and oxidative phosphorylation, and increased intracellular reactive oxygen species levels.
Conclusions
Selenium deficiency in heart failure patients is independently associated with impaired exercise tolerance and a 50% higher mortality rate, and impaired mitochondrial function in vitro, in human cardiomyocytes. Clinical trials are needed to investigate the effect of selenium supplements in patients with heart failure, especially if they have low plasma concentrations of selenium.
Comorbidities are common in patients with heart failure (HF) and complicate treatment and outcomes. We identified patterns of multimorbidity in Asian patients with HF and their association with ...patients' quality of life (QoL) and health outcomes.
We used data on 6,480 patients with chronic HF (1,204 with preserved ejection fraction) enrolled between 1 October 2012 and 6 October 2016 in the Asian Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure (ASIAN-HF) registry. The ASIAN-HF registry is a prospective cohort study, with patients prospectively enrolled from in- and outpatient clinics from 11 Asian regions (Hong Kong, Taiwan, China, Japan, Korea, India, Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, and Philippines). Latent class analysis was used to identify patterns of multimorbidity. The primary outcome was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization within 1 year. To assess differences in QoL, we used the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. We identified 5 distinct multimorbidity groups: elderly/atrial fibrillation (AF) (N = 1,048; oldest, more AF), metabolic (N = 1,129; obesity, diabetes, hypertension), young (N = 1,759; youngest, low comorbidity rates, non-ischemic etiology), ischemic (N = 1,261; ischemic etiology), and lean diabetic (N = 1,283; diabetic, hypertensive, low prevalence of obesity, high prevalence of chronic kidney disease). Patients in the lean diabetic group had the worst QoL, more severe signs and symptoms of HF, and the highest rate of the primary combined outcome within 1 year (29% versus 11% in the young group) (p for all <0.001). Adjusting for confounders (demographics, New York Heart Association class, and medication) the lean diabetic (hazard ratio HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.46-2.22), elderly/AF (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.26-1.96), ischemic (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.22-1.88), and metabolic (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02-1.60) groups had higher rates of the primary combined outcome compared to the young group. Potential limitations include site selection and participation bias.
Among Asian patients with HF, comorbidities naturally clustered in 5 distinct patterns, each differentially impacting patients' QoL and health outcomes. These data underscore the importance of studying multimorbidity in HF and the need for more comprehensive approaches in phenotyping patients with HF and multimorbidity.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01633398.
Biomarkers may help us to unravel differences in the underlying pathophysiology between heart failure (HF) patients with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). ...Therefore, we compared biomarker profiles to characterize pathophysiological differences between patients with HFrEF and HFpEF.
We retrospectively analyzed 33 biomarkers from different pathophysiological domains (inflammation, oxidative stress, remodeling, cardiac stretch, angiogenesis, arteriosclerosis, and renal function) in 460 HF patients (21% HFpEF, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%) measured at discharge after hospitalization for acute HF. The association between these markers and the occurrence of all-cause mortality and/or HF-related rehospitalizations at 18 months was compared between patients with HFrEF and HFpEF. Patients were 70.6±11.4 years old and 37.4% were female. Patients with HFpEF were older, more often female, and had a higher systolic blood pressure. Levels of high-sensitive C-reactive protein were significantly higher in HFpEF, while levels of pro-atrial-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide were higher in HFrEF. Linear regression followed by network analyses revealed prominent inflammation and angiogenesis-associated interactions in HFpEF and mainly cardiac stretch-associated interactions in HFrEF. The angiogenesis-specific marker, neuropilin and the remodeling-specific marker, osteopontin were predictive for all-cause mortality and/or HF-related rehospitalizations at 18 months in HFpEF, but not in HFrEF (
for interaction <0.05).
In HFpEF, inflammation and angiogenesis-mediated interactions are predominantly observed, while stretch-mediated interactions are found in HFrEF. The remodeling marker osteopontin and the angiogenesis marker neuropilin predicted outcome in HFpEF, but not in HFrEF.
PDF
