Objectives
To analyze the effect of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on the outcome of interstitial lung disease secondary to rheumatoid arthritis (RA-ILD).
Patients and methods
We ...performed a multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients with RA-ILD receiving DMARDs between 2015 and 2017. The patients were assessed using high-resolution computed tomography and pulmonary function tests at baseline and at 24 months. The radiological assessment was centralized. The main outcome measure at 24 months was changed in lung function (improvement, stabilization, worsening, or death). We recorded the 28-joint Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and adverse events. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with worsening of ILD.
Results
After 24 months, lung disease was stabilized in 40 patients (57.1%), improved in 8 (11.4%), and worse in 21 (30.0%). One patient (1.4%) died. The factors associated with worsening of ILD in the multivariate analysis were treatment with abatacept, tocilizumab, or rituximab (OR, 0.102 95%CI, 0.015–0.686), DAS28 (OR, 1.969 95%CI, 1.005–3.857), and smoking (OR, 6.937 95%CI, 1.378–4.900). During follow-up, 30 patients (42.9%) experienced an adverse event, which was severe in 12 cases (17.1%).
Conclusions
Lung function is stable and inflammatory activity well controlled in most patients with RA-ILD receiving treatment with DMARDs. Non-anti-TNF DMARDs reduce the risk of worsening of lung disease in 90% of patients. The inflammatory activity of RA and smoking, on the other hand, are associated with worsening.
Key Points
• We have performed prospectively evaluated lung and joint function in patients with RA-ILD receiving treatment with various DMARDs.
• In our study, the lung function is stable and inflammatory activity well controlled in most patients with RA-ILD receiving treatment with DMARDs.
• Neither csDMARDs nor anti-TNF agents were associated with a significant risk of worsening of lung disease, whereas non-anti-TNF bDMARDs could reduce the risk of worsening of lung disease.
• Smoking and poor control of joint involvement were the main factors associated with worsening of lung disease.
Objectives
To analyze the diagnostic utility of lung ultrasound (US) to detect interstitial lung disease (ILD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients comparing with high-resolution computed tomography ...(HRCT)
Patients and methods
We performed a cross-sectional, observational study in patients with RA-ILD (cases) controlled with a group of RA patients without ILD (controls) paired by sex, age, and time of disease evolution. Patients were assessed using HRCT, PFT, and US. The main variables were B-line number, evaluation of the lung-US score already described, pleural irregularities, and A pattern US lost.
ROC curve analysis
was performed to establish the cut-off point of the US B-lines number for detecting the presence of significant RA–ILD in relation to HRCT, and logistic
regression analysis
was performed to identify the intercostal spaces.
Results
Seventy-one patients were included, 35 (49.2%) with ILD-RA and 36 (50.8%) RA controls. Regarding US score, we found that the detection of 5.5 lines in a reduced score of 8 intercostal spaces had a sensitivity = 62.2%, specificity = 91.3%, PPV = 88.4%, and NPV = 69.5%. In multivariate analysis, the intercostal spaces which showed independent association with ILD were 3rd right anterior axillary space (OR IC 95% 19.0 1.3–27.5), 8th right posterior axillary space (OR IC 95% 0.04 0.0–0.6), 8th right subscapular space (OR IC 95% 16.5 1.8–45.5), 9th right paravertebral space (OR IC 95% 7.11 1.0–37.1), and 2nd left clavicular middle space (OR IC 95% 21.9 1.26–37.8).
Conclusions
Lung ultrasound could be a useful tool for ILD diagnosis associated with rheumatoid arthritis. A 8-space reduced score showed a similar total predictive capacity than 72-space score.
Key Points
•
Lung ultrasound could be a useful tool for ILD diagnosis associated with rheumatoid arthritis.
•
The 72-space evaluation is highly sensitive, whereas a simplified score enables a more specific and faster diagnosis.
•
The number of B lines is correlated with DLCO, ACPA, inflammatory activity, and physical function.
A human motion capture system using an RGB-D camera could be a good option to understand the trunk limitations in spondyloarthritis. The aim of this study is to validate a human motion capture system ...using an RGB-D camera to analyse trunk movement limitations in spondyloarthritis patients. Cross-sectional study was performed where spondyloarthritis patients were diagnosed with a rheumatologist. The RGB-D camera analysed the kinematics of each participant during seven functional tasks based on rheumatologic assessment. The OpenNI2 library collected the depth data, the NiTE2 middleware detected a virtual skeleton and the MRPT library recorded the trunk positions. The gold standard was registered using an inertial measurement unit. The outcome variables were angular displacement, angular velocity and lineal acceleration of the trunk. Criterion validity and the reliability were calculated. Seventeen subjects (54.35 (11.75) years) were measured. The Bending task obtained moderate results in validity (r = 0.55–0.62) and successful results in reliability (ICC = 0.80–0.88) and validity and reliability of angular kinematic results in Chair task were moderate and (r = 0.60–0.74, ICC = 0.61–0.72). The kinematic results in Timed Up and Go test were less consistent. The RGB-D camera was documented to be a reliable tool to assess the movement limitations in spondyloarthritis depending on the functional tasks: Bending task. Chair task needs further research and the TUG analysis was not validated.
Graphical abstract
Comparation of both systems, required software for camera analysis, outcomes and final results of validity and reliability of each test.
Objective
To describe the incidence and fatality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and identify risk factors to fatality in patients with inflammatory articular diseases (IAD).
Methods
This is a ...cross‐sectional observational study of IAD patients and COVID‐19 with controls matched for age, sex, and RT‐PCR. A control group was used to compare the cumulative incidence (CI) and case fatality rate (CFR). The main outcomes of the study were CI and CFR. Other variables included comorbidities, treatments, and characteristics of the COVID‐19. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate risk factors for fatality in patients with IAD.
Results
Of the 1537 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 23/1537 (1.49%) had IAD 13 (0.8%) had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 5 psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (0.3%) and 5 axial spondyloarthritis (0.3%). There were no significant differences in CI of COVID‐19 and CFR in patients with IAD compared with COVID‐19 patients without IAD. In RT‐PCR positive patients, the CI of COVID‐19 in PsA and AS was higher. Of the 23 IAD patients, 2 RA patients (8.6%) died. The patients did no show characteristics of the COVID‐19 disease different from the population. In multivariate analysis, the factor associated with fatality in patients with IAD was older age (OR 95% CI, 1.1 1.0‐1.2).
Conclusion
COVID‐19 CI, fatality rate and other features do not seem to be increased in IAD patients. Older age was associated with fatality in patients with IAD.
To describe a prospective cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated with interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) and identify risk factors associated with disease progression and mortality ...in this cohort.
We performed a multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients with RA-ILD receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) between 2015 and 2020. The patients were assessed using high-resolution computed tomography and pulmonary function tests at baseline and at 60 months. The main endpoint was "Progression to ILD at the end of follow-up" in terms of the following outcomes: (1) improvement (i.e., improvement in forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥10% or diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≥15% and absence of radiological progression); (2) nonprogression (stabilization or improvement in FVC ≤10% or diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) <15% and absence of radiological progression); (3) progression (worsening of FVC >10% or DLCO >15% and radiological progression); or (4) death. We recorded demographic and clinical characteristics, lung function, and the incidence of adverse events. A Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the worsening of ILD.
After 60 months, lung disease had stabilized in 66 patients (56.9%), improved in 9 (7.8%), and worsened in 23 (19.8%). Eighteen patients (15.5%) died, with a mean survival of 71.8 (1.9) months after diagnosis of ILD. The Cox multivariate analysis revealed the independent predictors of worsening of RA-ILD to be usual interstitial pneumonia (hazard ratio (HR), 2.6 (95%CI, 1.0-6.7)), FVC <80% (HR, 3.8 (95%CI, 1.5-6.7)), anticitrullinated protein antibody titers (HR, 2.8 (95%CI, 1.1-6.8)), smoking (HR, 2.5 (95%CI, 1.1-6.2)), and treatment with abatacept, tocilizumab, or rituximab (HR, 0.4 (95%CI, 0.2-0.8)). During follow-up, 79 patients (68%) experienced an adverse event, mostly infection (61%). Infection was fatal in 10/18 patients (55.5%) during follow-up.
Lung function is stable in most patients with RA-ILD receiving treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), although one-third worsened or died. Identifying factors associated with worsening in RA-ILD is important for clinical management.
OBJECTIVETo describe the frequency of polyautoimmunity and multiple autoimmune syndrome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
PATIENTS AND ...METHODSThis was a cross-sectional observational study of patients with RA, SLE, and controls without autoimmune rheumatic disease. Cases were those with RA according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria and SLE according to the 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria, consecutively recruited in a rheumatology clinic. Controls were subjects with no rheumatic autoimmune disease (AIDs) recruited in the same area. Patients filled out a questionnaire on polyautoimmunity. Variables of interest were polyautoimmunity (RA or SLE with other AIDs), whereas secondary variables were rheumatic, skin, endocrine, digestive, and neurological AIDs. Multiple autoimmune syndrome is defined as the presence of 3 or more AIDs and a family history of AIDs. Statistical analyses performed were descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate (dependent variablepolyautoimmunity).
RESULTSThe study population comprised 109 patients with RA, 105 patients with SLE, and 88 controls. Polyautoimmunity was recorded in 15 patients with RA (13.8%), 43 with SLE (41%), and 2 controls (2.2%). The most frequent AID in RA was Sjögren syndrome (53.3%), followed by Hashimoto thyroiditis and psoriasis; the most frequent AIDs in SLE were Sjögren syndrome (55.8%) and antiphospholipid syndrome (30.2%), followed by Hashimoto thyroiditis. Obesity was associated with polyautoimmunity in RA (odds ratio OR, 3.362; p = 0.034). In SLE, joint damage (OR, 2.282; p = 0.038) and anti-RNP antibodies (OR, 5.095; p = 0.028) were risk factors for polyautoimmunity, and hydroxychloroquine was a protective factor (OR, 0.190; p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONSPolyautoimmunity is frequent in RA and even more frequent in SLE. It was associated with obesity in RA and with joint damage and anti-RNP in SLE. Hydroxychloroquine was a protector.
The aims of this study were to evaluate adherence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), identify potential risk factors, and analyze the ...discriminative ability of the Morisky–Green test (MGT) to detect bDMARD nonadherence. One hundred and seventy-eight adult RA patients treated with bDMARDs were included. Adherence was measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR) of the previous 6 months. An MPR >80% was considered good adherence. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and MGT scores were assessed through a standardized clinical interview at the cross-sectional date. One-hundred and twelve patients (63%) were taking subcutaneous bDMARDs, while 66 (37%) were taking intravenous drugs. One-hundred fifty-eight (88.8%) showed good adherence to bDMARDs, while 79 (61.2%) also correctly took concomitant conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). In logistic regression models, nonadherence to bDMARDs was associated with higher disease activity odds ratio (OR) 1.45; 95% CI, 1.03–2.03;
p
= 0.032 and subcutaneous route (OR 3.70; 95% CI 1.02–13.48;
p
= 0.040). MGT accurately identified an MPR >80% of bDMARDs in 76.9% of the patients. A sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 70%, positive predictive value of 95.3%, negative predictive value of 28.5%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 2.6, and negative LR of 0.3% were obtained. Adherence may be good for bDMARDs but is low for csDMARDs. Low adherence for bDMARDs is associated with poorer disease control during the past 6 months and use of subcutaneous route. These findings should alert doctors to consider possible low adherence before declaring treatment failure.
To evaluate sleep disorders and associated factors in patients with rheumatoid-arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).
We performed an observational study of 35 patients with RA-ILD ...(cases) and 35 age- and sex-matched RA patients without ILD (controls). We evaluated sleep disorders (Oviedo Sleep Questionnaire), positive psychological factors (resilience using the Wagnild and Young Resilience Scale, emotional intelligence using the 24-item Trait Meta-Mood Scale), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), quality of life (36-item short-form survey), and fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Questionnaire). Other variables studied included the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and RA activity according to the DAS28-ESR.
Compared to the controls, the cases were characterized by poorer sleep quality with a higher prevalence of insomnia (42% vs. 20%;
= 0.039), greater severity of insomnia (
= 0.001), and lower sleep satisfaction (
= 0.033). They also had poorer resilience and emotional recovery and more severe anxiety and depression. A diagnosis of ILD was the only factor independently associated with the three dimensions of sleep quality. The predictors of poorer sleep satisfaction in patients with RA-ILD were age (β = -0.379), DAS28-ESR (β = -0.331), and usual interstitial pneumonia pattern (β = -0.438). The predictors of insomnia were DAS28-ESR (β = 0.294), resilience (β = -0.352), and CCI (β = 0.377).
RA-ILD is associated with significant sleep disorders. RA-ILD seems to be an independent risk factor for sleep alterations, with a greater impact on insomnia. Age, disease activity, and comorbidity also play a role in sleep disorders in patients with RA-ILD.
To describe disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) patterns in routine clinical practice in adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to ascertain the reasons for methotrexate (MTX) ...discontinuation.
A cross-sectional observational study was conducted from March to October 2014 at the Rheumatology Units of seven hospitals in Spain. In a single visit, the treating rheumatologist completed an online case report form. This report contained sociodemographic and RA variables. This study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and local and national research legislations.
A total of 301 patients (71% women) with a mean age of 56.7±14.0 years and disease duration of 3.6±1.5 years were examined. The patients had RA with moderate disease activity, at least one poor prognostic factor, and comorbidities. The mean time between RA diagnosis and prescription of the first conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) was 2.4±6.0 months. A total of 295 patients (98%) started the first csDMARD on monotherapy. MTX was the most-prescribed first-line drug (n=233, 79%). The mean treatment time of the first-line csDMARD was 27.0±19.4 months. Of these patients, 98% progressed to a second-line csDMARD; 118 patients were changed to another DMARD, mainly due to inefficacy (51, 37%), adverse events (AEs, 37, 27%), or intolerance (18, 13%). The use of MTX as second-line therapy reduced from 79% to 51%. At the time of the study, 200 patients (66%) received a csDMARD as monotherapy and 45 (15%) a combination of ≥2 csDMARDs. Fifty-five (18%) patients were being treated with a biological drug in monotherapy (16, 29%) or in a combination with a csDMARD (39, 71%), mainly MTX, 147 patients (57%) received steroids. Biological DMARD were prescribed as the second line for 42% of patients and 51% of patients received the third-line therapy or beyond. The rate of AEs that motivated a change in the csDMARD was 34%.
MTX was the most-used csDMARD as first and second-line therapy together with corticosteroids. The combination of two or more csDMARDs as first-line treatment was very infrequent. MTX toxicity and intolerance were higher and more significant than inefficacy but progressively decreased with use.
PDF
