Acute kidney injury (AKI) can evolve quickly and clinical measures of function often fail to detect AKI at a time when interventions are likely to provide benefit. Identifying early markers of kidney ...damage has been difficult due to the complex nature of human AKI, in which multiple etiologies exist. The objective of this study was to identify and validate novel biomarkers of AKI.
We performed two multicenter observational studies in critically ill patients at risk for AKI - discovery and validation. The top two markers from discovery were validated in a second study (Sapphire) and compared to a number of previously described biomarkers. In the discovery phase, we enrolled 522 adults in three distinct cohorts including patients with sepsis, shock, major surgery, and trauma and examined over 300 markers. In the Sapphire validation study, we enrolled 744 adult subjects with critical illness and without evidence of AKI at enrollment; the final analysis cohort was a heterogeneous sample of 728 critically ill patients. The primary endpoint was moderate to severe AKI (KDIGO stage 2 to 3) within 12 hours of sample collection.
Moderate to severe AKI occurred in 14% of Sapphire subjects. The two top biomarkers from discovery were validated. Urine insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2), both inducers of G1 cell cycle arrest, a key mechanism implicated in AKI, together demonstrated an AUC of 0.80 (0.76 and 0.79 alone). Urine TIMP-2·IGFBP7 was significantly superior to all previously described markers of AKI (P <0.002), none of which achieved an AUC >0.72. Furthermore, TIMP-2·IGFBP7 significantly improved risk stratification when added to a nine-variable clinical model when analyzed using Cox proportional hazards model, generalized estimating equation, integrated discrimination improvement or net reclassification improvement. Finally, in sensitivity analyses TIMP-2·IGFBP7 remained significant and superior to all other markers regardless of changes in reference creatinine method.
Two novel markers for AKI have been identified and validated in independent multicenter cohorts. Both markers are superior to existing markers, provide additional information over clinical variables and add mechanistic insight into AKI.
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01209169.
Abstract
Background
Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are at higher risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). No study has evaluated the relationship between VAP and mortality in this ...population, or compared this relationship between SARS-CoV-2 patients and other populations. The main objective of our study was to determine the relationship between VAP and mortality in SARS-CoV-2 patients.
Methods
Planned ancillary analysis of a multicenter retrospective European cohort. VAP was diagnosed using clinical, radiological and quantitative microbiological criteria. Univariable and multivariable marginal Cox’s regression models, with cause-specific hazard for duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, were used to compare outcomes between study groups. Extubation, and ICU discharge alive were considered as events of interest, and mortality as competing event.
Findings
Of 1576 included patients, 568 were SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, 482 influenza pneumonia, and 526 no evidence of viral infection at ICU admission. VAP was associated with significantly higher risk for 28-day mortality in SARS-CoV-2 group (adjusted HR 1.65 (95% CI 1.11–2.46),
p
= 0.013), but not in influenza (1.74 (0.99–3.06),
p
= 0.052), or no viral infection groups (1.13 (0.68–1.86),
p
= 0.63). VAP was associated with significantly longer duration of mechanical ventilation in the SARS-CoV-2 group, but not in the influenza or no viral infection groups. VAP was associated with significantly longer duration of ICU stay in the 3 study groups. No significant difference was found in heterogeneity of outcomes related to VAP between the 3 groups, suggesting that the impact of VAP on mortality was not different between study groups.
Interpretation
VAP was associated with significantly increased 28-day mortality rate in SARS-CoV-2 patients. However, SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, as compared to influenza pneumonia or no viral infection, did not significantly modify the relationship between VAP and 28-day mortality.
Clinical trial registration
The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04359693.
Recent multicenter studies identified COVID-19 as a risk factor for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). However, no large multicenter study has compared the incidence of IPA between COVID-19 and ...influenza patients.
To determine the incidence of putative IPA in critically ill SARS-CoV-2 patients, compared with influenza patients.
This study was a planned ancillary analysis of the coVAPid multicenter retrospective European cohort. Consecutive adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for > 48 h for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia or influenza pneumonia were included. The 28-day cumulative incidence of putative IPA, based on Blot definition, was the primary outcome. IPA incidence was estimated using the Kalbfleisch and Prentice method, considering extubation (dead or alive) within 28 days as competing event.
A total of 1047 patients were included (566 in the SARS-CoV-2 group and 481 in the influenza group). The incidence of putative IPA was lower in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia group (14, 2.5%) than in influenza pneumonia group (29, 6%), adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio (cHR) 3.29 (95% CI 1.53-7.02, p = 0.0006). When putative IPA and Aspergillus respiratory tract colonization were combined, the incidence was also significantly lower in the SARS-CoV-2 group, as compared to influenza group (4.1% vs. 10.2%), adjusted cHR 3.21 (95% CI 1.88-5.46, p < 0.0001). In the whole study population, putative IPA was associated with significant increase in 28-day mortality rate, and length of ICU stay, compared with colonized patients, or those with no IPA or Aspergillus colonization.
Overall, the incidence of putative IPA was low. Its incidence was significantly lower in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia than in those with influenza pneumonia. Clinical trial registration The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04359693 .
Purpose
Characteristics of acute kidney injury (AKI) occurring after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are incompletely described. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of AKI, identifying risk ...factors and assessing the impact of AKI on outcome after OHCA.
Methods
Single-center study between 2007 and 2012 in a cardiac arrest center in Paris, France. All consecutive OHCA patients with at least one weight measurement and one serum creatinine level available and treated by therapeutic hypothermia were included, except those with chronic kidney disease and those dead on arrival. AKI was defined as stage 3 of the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) classification. Main outcome was day-30 mortality. Factors associated with AKI occurrence and day-30 mortality were evaluated by logistic regression.
Results
580 patients (71.3 % male, median age 59.3 years, initial shockable rhythm in 56.9 % of cases) were included in the analysis. AKI stage 3 occurred in 280 (48.3 %) patients. Age, male gender, resuscitation duration, post-resuscitation shock, public setting, and initial rhythm were associated with AKI stage 3. AKI stage 3 was associated with a significantly higher day-30 mortality rate OR 1.60; 95 % CI (1.05, 2.43);
p
= 0.03. No independent association between AKI and neurologic outcome was observed. At day 30, 67 patients had a normal kidney function (eGFR >75 mL/min/1.73 m
2
), and five remained dialysis-dependent. Patients with eGFR higher than 75 mL/min/1.73 m
2
at day 30 were younger and more frequently male.
Conclusion
AKI stage 3 was frequent after OHCA and was associated with poorer outcome. Improvement strategies in post-resuscitation care should consider AKI as a potential target of treatment.
Intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are the two main RRT modalities in patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI). Meta-analyses conducted more than ...10 years ago did not show survival difference between these two modalities. As the quality of RRT delivery has improved since then, we aimed to reassess whether the choice of IHD or CRRT as first modality affects survival of patients with severe AKI.
This is a secondary analysis of two multicenter randomized controlled trials (AKIKI and IDEAL-ICU) that compared an early RRT initiation strategy with a delayed one. We included patients allocated to the early strategy in order to emulate a trial where patients would have been randomized to receive either IHD or CRRT within twelve hours after the documentation of severe AKI. We determined each patient's modality group as the first RRT modality they received. The primary outcome was 60-day overall survival. We used two propensity score methods to balance the differences in baseline characteristics between groups and the primary analysis relied on inverse probability of treatment weighting.
A total of 543 patients were included. Continuous RRT was the first modality in 269 patients and IHD in 274. Patients receiving CRRT had higher cardiovascular and total-SOFA scores. Inverse probability weighting allowed to adequately balance groups on all predefined confounders. The weighted Kaplan-Meier death rate at day 60 was 54·4% in the CRRT group and 46·5% in the IHD group (weighted HR 1·26, 95% CI 1·01-1·60). In a complementary analysis of less severely ill patients (SOFA score: 3-10), receiving IHD was associated with better day 60 survival compared to CRRT (weighted HR 1.82, 95% CI 1·01-3·28; p < 0.01). We found no evidence of a survival difference between the two RRT modalities in more severe patients.
Compared to IHD, CRRT as first modality seemed to convey no benefit in terms of survival or of kidney recovery and might even have been associated with less favorable outcome in patients with lesser severity of disease. A prospective randomized non-inferiority trial should be implemented to solve the persistent conundrum of the optimal RRT technique.
Background
Prone position (PP) is highly recommended in moderate-to-severe ARDS. However, the optimal duration of PP sessions remains unclear. We searched to evaluate the time required to obtain the ...maximum physiological effect, and to search for parameters related to patient survival in PP.
Methods and results
It was a prospective, monocentric, physiological study. We included in the study all prone-positioned patients in our ICU between June 2016 and January 2018. Pulmonary mechanics, data from volumetric capnography and arterial blood gas were recorded before prone positioning, 2 h after proning, before return to a supine position (SP) and 2 h after return to SP. Dynamic parameters were recorded before proning and every 30 min during the session until 24 h. 103 patients (ARDS 95%) were included performing 231 PP sessions with a mean length of 21.5 ± 5 h per session. They presented a significant increase in pH, static compliance and P
a
O
2
/F
i
O
2
with a significant decrease in P
a
CO
2
, P
plat
, phase 3 slope of the volumetric capnography, P
et
CO
2
,
V
D
/
V
T-phy
and Δ
P
. The beneficial physiological effects continued after 16 h of PP and at least up to 24 h in some patients. The evolution of the respiratory parameters during the first session and also during the pooled sessions did not find any predictor of response to PP, whether before, during or 2 h after the return in SP.
Conclusions
PP sessions should be prolonged at least 24 h and be extended in the event that the P
a
O
2
/F
i
O
2
ratio at 24 h remains below 150, especially since no criteria can predict which patient will benefit or not from it.
Trial registration
The trial has been registered on 28 June 2016 in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 02816190) (
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02816190?term=propocap&rank=1
).
The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs are significantly altered in the burn patient, and the burn patient population shows wide inter- and intraindividual variation in drug handling. ...Burn injury evolves in two phases. The first phase corresponds to the burn shock, which occurs during the first 48 hours after thermal injury. In this phase, hypovolaemia, oedema, hypoalbuminaemia and a low glomerular filtration rate are observed, which result in a slower rate of drug distribution and lower renal clearance. The second phase (beyond 48 hours after injury) is a hyperdynamic state with high blood flow in the kidneys and liver, an increased alpha1-acid-glycoprotein level and loss of the drug with exudate leakage. As a result, protein binding, drug distribution and clearance may be altered. Because of the alteration in these variables, wide intraindividual variation of pharmacokinetic parameters occurs depending upon the time since thermal injury and fluid resuscitation. Interindividual variations may be correlated with the percentage of the body surface area that is burnt, creatinine clearance, albuminaemia or the alpha1-acid-glycoprotein level. A number of important variations in pharmacodynamic parameters have been described, but their mechanisms are poorly understood. From a practical point of view, for the subpopulation of burn patients who eliminate drugs extremely rapidly, higher doses and/or shorter dosing intervals are required to avoid treatment inefficacy. Drug concentration measurements help to take into account interindividual variability. However, adaptation of doses based on Bayesian methods is frequently not possible because the distribution of pharmacokinetic parameters is poorly characterized in this population. Methods based only on individual data or on a surrogate marker for efficacy may be used to optimize the dosing regimen in this population.
PDF
