Patients with infective endocarditis (IE) form a heterogeneous group, ranging from those who are successfully treated with no adverse events, to those with severe complications and a high mortality. ...In this Review, we highlight pathogen-host interactions and the mechanisms underlying various risk factors for patients with IE. A temporal trend in the pattern of IE has been observed in high-income countries within the past 5 decades, with patients contracting IE at an increasingly old age, and a growing incidence of health-care-associated staphylococcal IE. Consequently, prevention strategies should no longer focus on prophylaxis of streptococcal bacteraemia during dental procedures, but instead encourage a more-general approach to reduce the incidence of health-care-associated IE. Much knowledge has been gained about the mechanisms of vegetation formation, growth, and embolization on damaged or inflamed cardiac valves, and on cardiac devices. Improved understanding of these mechanisms will help to combat the increasing problem of antimicrobial resistance. Two mechanisms of IE should increasingly be the focus of future research: the role of immunosenescence in elderly patients with IE, particularly after transcatheter aortic valve implantation, and the mechanisms that trigger septic shock, a condition that leads to a substantial increase in the risk of death in patients with IE.
In this trial, patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock who were expected to undergo coronary revascularization were randomly assigned to receive or not to receive intraaortic balloon support. ...Balloon support had no effect on 30-day mortality.
The rate of death among patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction is high even when the patients undergo early revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
1
–
4
Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation is the most widely used form of mechanical hemodynamic support in this clinical setting.
5
In U.S. and European guidelines, the use of an intraaortic balloon in the treatment of cardiogenic shock is given a class IB and class IC recommendation, respectively.
6
–
8
However, evidence is based mainly on registry data, and there is a lack of adequately powered randomized trials. A meta-analysis that . . .
Summary Background In current international guidelines the recommendation for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use has been downgraded in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction on ...the basis of registry data. In the largest randomised trial (IABP-SHOCK II), IABP support did not reduce 30 day mortality compared with control. However, previous trials in cardiogenic shock showed a mortality benefit only at extended follow-up. The present analysis therefore reports 6 and 12 month results. Methods The IABP-SHOCK II trial was a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. Patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction who were undergoing early revascularisation and optimum medical therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to IABP versus control via a central web-based system. The primary efficacy endpoint was 30 day all-cause mortality, but 6 and 12 month follow-up was done in addition to quality-of-life assessment for all survivors with the Euroqol-5D questionnaire. A masked central committee adjudicated clinical outcomes. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00491036. Findings Between June 16, 2009, and March 3, 2012, 600 patients were assigned to IABP (n=301) or control (n=299). Of 595 patients completing 12 month follow-up, 155 (52%) of 299 patients in the IABP group and 152 (51%) of 296 patients in the control group had died (relative risk RR 1·01, 95% CI 0·86–1·18, p=0·91). There were no significant differences in reinfarction (RR 2·60, 95% CI 0·95–7·10, p=0·05), recurrent revascularisation (0·91, 0·58–1·41, p=0·77), or stroke (1·50, 0·25–8·84, p=1·00). For survivors, quality-of-life measures including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression did not differ significantly between study groups. Interpretation In patients undergoing early revascularisation for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, IABP did not reduce 12 month all-cause mortality. Funding German Research Foundation; German Heart Research Foundation; German Cardiac Society; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte; University of Leipzig—Heart Centre; Maquet Cardiopulmonary; Teleflex Medical.
Background
Intra‐aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) is currently the most commonly used mechanical assist device for patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction. ...Although there has been only limited evidence from randomised controlled trials, the previous guidelines of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) strongly recommended the use of the IABP in patients with infarction‐related cardiogenic shock on the basis of pathophysiological considerations, non‐randomised trials and registry data. The recent guidelines downgraded the recommendation based on a meta‐analysis which could only include non‐randomised trials showing conflicting results. Up to now, there have been no guideline recommendations and no actual meta‐analysis including the results of the large randomised multicentre IABP‐SHOCK II Trial which showed no survival benefit with IABP support. This systematic review is an update of the review published in 2011.
Objectives
To evaluate, in terms of efficacy and safety, the effect of IABP versus non‐IABP or other assist devices guideline compliant standard therapy on mortality and morbidity in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Search methods
Searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid) and EMBASE (Ovid), LILACS, IndMed and KoreaMed, registers of ongoing trials and proceedings of conferences were updated in October 2013. Reference lists were scanned and experts in the field contacted to obtain further information. No language restrictions were applied.
Selection criteria
Randomised controlled trials on patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Data collection and analysis
Data collection and analysis were performed according to the published protocol. Individual patient data were provided for six trials and merged with aggregate data. Summary statistics for the primary endpoints were hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Main results
Seven eligible studies were identified from a total of 2314 references. One new study with 600 patients was added to the original review. Four trials compared IABP to standard treatment and three to other percutaneous left assist devices (LVAD). Data from a total of 790 patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock were included in the updated meta‐analysis: 406 patients were treated with IABP and 384 patients served as controls; 339 patients were treated without assisting devices and 45 patients with other LVAD. The HR for all‐cause 30‐day mortality of 0.95 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.19) provided no evidence for a survival benefit. Different non‐fatal cardiovascular events were reported in five trials. During hospitalisation, 11 and 4 out of 364 patients from the intervention groups suffered from reinfarction or stroke, respectively. Altogether 5 out of 363 patients from the control group suffered from reinfarction or stroke. Reocclusion was treated with subsequent re‐revascularization in 6 out of 352 patients from the intervention group and 13 out of 353 patients of the control group. The high incidence of complications such as moderate and severe bleeding or infection in the control groups has to be attributed to interventions with other LVAD. Possible reasons for bias were more frequent in small studies with high cross‐over rates, early stopping and the inclusion of patients with IABP at randomisation.
Authors' conclusions
Available evidence suggests that IABP may have a beneficial effect on some haemodynamic parameters. However, this did not result in survival benefits so there is no convincing randomised data to support the use of IABP in infarct‐related cardiogenic shock.
Different devices for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) have been developed for the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock. However, all of them are associated with direct blood contact, the ...need for anticoagulation and bleeding complications. To overcome these limitations the pericardial sac got into the focus as a promising implantation site for MCS. For this purpose, further knowledge about the mechanical properties of human pericardium is required. In this prospective, monocentric, experimental pilot study 56 samples of human pericardium were extracted postmortem from 13 critically ill patients. After preparation of test specimens uniaxial tensile tests were performed. The primary end points were load at fracture per sample width and strain at fracture. Acute inflammation was assessed by blood levels of C-reactive protein, white blood count and procalcitonin measured at several times during hospital stay. Inflammatory load was estimated by area under the inflammatory curves. Correlation and regression analysis were used to assess the relationship of primary end points to inflammation, comorbidities and postmortem time to preparation. Human pericardium showed a load at fracture per sample width of 1.95 1.38-2.94 N/mm (median inter quartile range) and a strain at fracture of 89.29 73.84-135.23 %. Markers of acute inflammation and cardiac hypertrophy did not correlate to load or strain at fracture. However, strain at fracture increased with higher body mass index and an increasing number of postmortem days. In contrast, higher patient age was associated with a lower strain at fracture. Inflammation and cardiac hypertrophy did not influence mechanical properties of human pericardium.
Inflammatory pathways are involved in the development of atherosclerosis. Interaction of vessel wall cells and invading monocytes by cytokines may trigger local inflammatory processes. ...3‐Hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are standard medications used in cardiovascular diseases. They are thought to have anti‐inflammatory capacities, in addition to their lipid‐lowering effects. We investigated the anti‐inflammatory effect of statins in the cytokine‐mediated‐interaction‐model of human vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC) and human mononuclear cells (MNC). In this atherosclerosis‐related inflammatory model LPS (lipopolysaccharide, endotoxin), as well as high mobility group box 1 stimulation resulted in synergistic (i.e. over‐additive) IL‐6 (interleukin‐6) production as measured in ELISA. Recombinant IL‐1, tumour necrosis factor‐α and IL‐6 mediated the synergistic IL‐6 production. The standard anti‐inflammatory drugs aspirin and indomethacin (Indo) reduced the synergistic IL‐6 production by 60%. Simvastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin or pravastatin reduced the IL‐6 production by 53%, 50%, 64% and 60%, respectively. The inhibition by the statins was dose dependent. Combination of statins with aspirin and/or Indo resulted in complete inhibition of the synergistic IL‐6 production. The same inhibitors blocked STAT3 phosphorylation, providing evidence for an autocrine role of IL‐6 in the synergism. MNC from volunteers after 5 day aspirin or simvastatin administration showed no decreased IL‐6 production, probably due to drug removal during MNC isolation. Taken together, the data show that anti‐inflammatory functions (here shown for statins) can be sensitively and reproducibly determined in this novel SMC/MNC coculture model. These data implicate that statins have the capacity to affect atherosclerosis by regulating cytokine‐mediated innate inflammatory pathways in the vessel wall.
The CARLA study (Cardiovascular Disease, Living and Ageing in Halle) is a longitudinal population-based cohort study of the general population of the city of Halle (Saale), Germany. The primary aim ...of the cohort was to investigate risk factors for cardiovascular diseases based on comprehensive cardiological phenotyping of study participants and was extended to study factors associated with healthy ageing. In total, 1779 probands (812 women and 967 men, aged 45–83 years) were examined at baseline (2002–2005), with a first and second follow-up performed 4 and 8 years later. The response proportion at baseline was 64.1% and the reparticipation proportion for the first and second follow-up was 86% and 77% respectively. Sixty-four percent of the study participants were in retirement while 25% were full- or partially-employed and 11% were unemployed at the time of the baseline examination. The currently running third follow-up focuses on the assessment of physical and mental health, with an intensive 4 h examination program, including measurement of cardiovascular, neurocognitive, balance and gait parameters. The data collected in the CARLA Study resulted in answering various research questions in over 80 publications, of which two thirds were pooled analyses with other similar population-based studies. Due to the extensiveness of information on risk factors, subclinical conditions and evident diseases, the biobanking concept for the biosamples, the cohort representativeness of an elderly population, and the high level of quality assurance, the CARLA cohort offers a unique platform for further research on important indicators for healthy ageing.
Monocytes and macrophages contribute to pathogenesis of various inflammatory diseases, including auto-inflammatory diseases, cancer, sepsis, or atherosclerosis. They do so by production of cytokines, ...the central regulators of inflammation. Isoprenylation of small G-proteins is involved in regulation of production of some cytokines. Statins possibly affect isoprenylation-dependent cytokine production of monocytes and macrophages differentially. Thus, we compared statin-dependent cytokine production of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated freshly isolated human monocytes and macrophages derived from monocytes by overnight differentiation. Stimulated monocytes readily produced tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1β. Statins did not alter cytokine production of LPS-stimulated monocytes. In contrast, monocyte-derived macrophages prepared in the absence of statin lost the capacity to produce cytokines, whereas macrophages prepared in the presence of statin still produced cytokines. The cells expressed indistinguishable nuclear factor-kB activity, suggesting involvement of separate, statin-dependent regulation pathways. The presence of statin was necessary during the differentiation phase of the macrophages, indicating that retainment-of-function rather than costimulation was involved. Reconstitution with mevalonic acid, farnesyl pyrophosphate, or geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate blocked the retainment effect, whereas reconstitution of cholesterol synthesis by squalene did not. Inhibition of geranylgeranylation by GGTI-298, but not inhibition of farnesylation or cholesterol synthesis, mimicked the retainment effect of the statin. Inhibition of Rac1 activation by the Rac1/TIAM1-inhibitor NSC23766 or by Rac1-siRNA (small interfering RNA) blocked the retainment effect. Consistent with this finding, macrophages differentiated in the presence of statin expressed enhanced Rac1-GTP-levels. In line with the above hypothesis that monocytes and macrophages are differentially regulated by statins, the CD14/CD16-, merTK-, CX
CR1-, or CD163-expression (M2-macrophage-related) correlated inversely to the cytokine production. Thus, monocytes and macrophages display differential Rac1-geranylgeranylation-dependent functional capacities, that is, statins sway monocytes and macrophages differentially.
PDF
