The phase III PACIFIC trial compared durvalumab with placebo in patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer and no disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. ...Consolidation durvalumab was associated with significant improvements in the primary end points of overall survival (OS; stratified hazard ratio HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.87;
= .00251) and progression-free survival (PFS blinded independent central review; RECIST v1.1; stratified HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.65;
< .0001), with manageable safety. We report updated, exploratory analyses of survival, approximately 5 years after the last patient was randomly assigned.
Patients with WHO performance status 0 or 1 (any tumor programmed cell death-ligand 1 status) were randomly assigned (2:1) to durvalumab (10 mg/kg intravenously; administered once every 2 weeks for 12 months) or placebo, stratified by age, sex, and smoking history. Time-to-event end point analyses were performed using stratified log-rank tests. Medians and landmark survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Seven hundred and nine of 713 randomly assigned patients received durvalumab (473 of 476) or placebo (236 of 237). As of January 11, 2021 (median follow-up, 34.2 months all patients; 61.6 months censored patients), updated OS (stratified HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; median, 47.5
29.1 months) and PFS (stratified HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.68; median, 16.9
5.6 months) remained consistent with the primary analyses. Estimated 5-year rates (95% CI) for durvalumab and placebo were 42.9% (38.2 to 47.4) versus 33.4% (27.3 to 39.6) for OS and 33.1% (28.0 to 38.2) versus 19.0% (13.6 to 25.2) for PFS.
These updated analyses demonstrate robust and sustained OS and durable PFS benefit with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy. An estimated 42.9% of patients randomly assigned to durvalumab remain alive at 5 years and 33.1% of patients randomly assigned to durvalumab remain alive and free of disease progression, establishing a new benchmark for standard of care in this setting.
Relapse is common in patients with locally advanced unresectable lung cancer after concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. In a randomized study, addition of the anti–PD-L1 antibody durvalumab ...every 2 weeks for 12 months increased relapse-free survival by 47%.
Standard operating procedures for autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) aim to guarantee best possible engraftment. Three procedures are routinely used for transplant infusion: regular bag ...infusion (Procedure 1), injection via syringe (Procedure 2), and combination of regular bag infusion and syringe (Procedure 3). We conducted a retrospective analysis of all autologous stem cell transplants done in the hematology department of the Vivantes Clinic Neukoelln in Berlin, Germany, between January 1, 2016 and March 4, 2017. Of the total of 69 patients, 17 underwent Procedure 1, 32 Procedure 2, and 20 Procedure 3. Although speed of transplant reinfusion differed significantly between procedure types, these differences had no effect on duration of leukopenia. However, duration of leukopenia did correlate with need for blood transfusion and use of antibiotics. Our findings contradict the general perception that very rapid reinfusion is necessary. Nevertheless, considering the limitations of this study (retrospective, single center, small sample size) and that longer duration of aplasia is associated with greater need for intervention, efficient transplant reinfusion is advisable. More research is needed regarding timeliness and type of procedure used.
5-Fluorouracil (FU) is one of the most commonly used cytostatic drugs in the systemic treatment of cancer. Treatment with FU may cause severe or life-threatening side effects and the ...treatment-related mortality rate is 0.2-1.0%.
Among other risk factors associated with increased toxicity, a genetic deficiency in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), an enzyme responsible for the metabolism of FU, is well known. This is due to variants in the DPD gene (DPYD). Up to 9% of European patients carry a DPD gene variant that decreases enzyme activity, and DPD is completely lacking in approximately 0.5% of patients. Here we describe the clinical and genetic background and summarize recommendations for the genetic testing and tailoring of treatment with 5-FU derivatives. The statement was developed as a consensus statement organized by the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology in cooperation with 13 medical associations from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Key Messages: (i) Patients should be tested for the 4 most common genetic DPYD variants before treatment with drugs containing FU. (ii) Testing forms the basis for a differentiated, risk-adapted algorithm with recommendations for treatment with FU-containing drugs. (iii) Testing may optionally be supplemented by therapeutic drug monitoring.
Objective
By implementing a focused must‐have vaccination strategy (Easy Vaccination in Oncology EVO), we aimed to increase rates for high‐impact vaccinations (Streptococcus pneumoniae, influenza, ...herpes zoster and hepatitis B) in the at‐risk population of oncological patients.
Methods
In this German multicentre interventional non‐randomised controlled two‐arm open trial with repeated cross‐sectional data collection, we evaluated the EVO strategy as an easy to implement approach. Vaccination rates were assessed in the outpatient setting and re‐assessed after 3 months. A generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) was used to assess the primary endpoint (Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccination rates according to recommendations), taking clustering within clinics into account.
Results
Vaccination rates substantially increased in the intervention group; Streptococcus pneumoniae +21.5% (+16.7% according to recommendations), influenza +12.2%, herpes zoster +13.3% (+13.6% age group 50+), and hepatitis B +11%. Vaccination rates in the control group tended to decrease or increase only moderately (−5.8% −3.8%, +7.4%, +2.1% 1.4%, and −1.7%, respectively). GLMM showed significant effect of the intervention (OR 7.50, 95% CI 2.18–25.80, p = 0.001).
Conclusion
This easy‐to‐implement and resource‐saving approach has the potential to increase vaccination rates in oncological patients and to have a considerable impact protecting oncological patients from preventable infectious diseases.
Clinical trial registration
The study was registered at the German Resister for Clinical Studies (DRKS) under DRKS00020118.
We studied the influence of comorbidities on remission rate and overall survival (OS) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Participants of the CML Study IV, a randomized 5-arm trial ...designed to optimize imatinib therapy, were analyzed for comorbidities at diagnosis using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI); 511 indexed comorbidities were reported in 1519 CML patients. Age was an additional risk factor in 863 patients. Resulting CCI scores were as follows: CCI 2, n = 589; CCI 3 or 4, n = 599; CCI 5 or 6, n = 229; and CCI ≥ 7, n = 102. No differences in cumulative incidences of accelerated phase, blast crisis, or remission rates were observed between patients in the different CCI groups. Higher CCI was significantly associated with lower OS probabilities. The 8-year OS probabilities were 93.6%, 89.4%, 77.6%, and 46.4% for patients with CCI 2, 3 to 4, 5 to 6, and ≥7, respectively. In multivariate analysis, CCI was the most powerful predictor of OS, which was still valid after removal of its age-related components. Comorbidities have no impact on treatment success but do have a negative effect on OS, indicating that survival of patients with CML is determined more by comorbidities than by CML itself. OS may therefore be inappropriate as an outcome measure for specific CML treatments. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00055874.
•There is a strong negative association between comorbidities at diagnosis and overall survival.•There is no negative effect of comorbidities on remission rates and progression to advanced phases in CML.
Purpose
The PELICAN trial evaluates for the first time efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) versus capecitabine as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
...Methods
This randomized, phase III, open-label, multicenter trial enrolled first-line MBC patients who were ineligible for endocrine or trastuzumab therapy. Cumulative adjuvant anthracyclines of 360 mg/m
2
doxorubicin or equivalent were allowed. Left ventricular ejection fraction of >50 % was required. Patients received PLD 50 mg/m
2
every 28 days or capecitabine 1250 mg/m
2
twice daily for 14 days every 21 days. The primary endpoint was time-to-disease progression (TTP).
Results
210 patients were randomized (
n
= 105, PLD and
n
= 105, capecitabine). Adjuvant anthracyclines were given to 37 % (PLD) and 36 % (capecitabine) of patients. No significant difference was observed in TTP HR = 1.21 (95 % confidence interval, 0.838–1.750). Median TTP was 6.0 months for both PLD and capecitabine. Comparing patients with or without prior anthracyclines, no significant difference in TTP was observed in the PLD arm (log-rank
P
= 0.64). For PLD versus capecitabine, respectively, overall survival (median, 23.3 months vs. 26.8 months) and time-to-treatment failure (median, 4.6 months vs. 3.7 months) were not statistically significantly different. Compared to PLD, patients on capecitabine experienced more serious adverse events (
P
= 0.015) and more cardiac events among patients who had prior anthracycline exposure (18 vs. 8 %;
P
= 0.31).
Conclusion
Both PLD and capecitabine are effective first-line agents for MBC.
In Germany, bladder carcinoma accounts for 3-4 % of all malignant tumors. New study findings in the fields of endoscopy, surgery, and systemic therapy have led to multimodal treatment approaches for ...bladder cancer that can prolong overall survival and improve the affected patients' quality of life.
This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, with special attention to the German Clinical Practice Guideline on the Early Detection, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Continuing Care of Bladder Carcinoma, along with data available on the websites of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The bladder carcinoma guideline of the Onkopedia guidelines program was used as well.
75% of all urothelial carcinomas are diagnosed in the non-muscle-invasive stage. These carcinomas should be resected via the endoscopic transurethral approach whenever possible. Next, depending on the patient's risk profile, intravesical therapy may be needed. Patients with carcinoma in the muscle-invasive stage should be given multimodal treatment, including radical cystectomy with urinary diversion and perioperative systemic therapy; alternatively, bladder-preserving chemoradiotherapy can be offered in selected cases. For patients with metastatic bladder carcinoma, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has become well established for first- and second-line therapy alongside classic cytostatic treatment and has been shown to prolong patients' lives significantly. The administration of checkpoint inhibitors can prolong the overall survival of patients with metastases to 15-17 months.
The treatment of bladder carcinoma in all stages calls for interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure the provision of effective, individual multimodal treatment.
Objectives: We developed the first German evidence- and consensus-based clinical guideline on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of germ cell tumours (GCT) of the testes in adult patients. We ...present the guideline content in 2 separate publications. The present second part summarizes therecommendations for the treatment of advanced disease stages and for the management of follow-up and late effects. Materials and Methods: An interdisciplinary panel of 42 experts including 1 patient representative developed the guideline content. Clinical recommendations and statements were based on scientific evidence and expert consensus. For this purpose, evidence tables for several review questions, which were based on systematic literature searches (last search in March 2018), were provided. Thirty-one experts, who were entitled to vote, rated the final clinical recommendations and statements. Results: Here we present the treatment recommendations separately for patients with metastatic seminoma and non-seminomatous GCT (stages IIA/B and IIC/III), for restaging and treatment of residual masses, and for relapsed and refractory disease stages. The recommendations also cover extragonadal and sex cord/stromal tumours, the management of follow-up and toxicity, quality-of-life aspects, palliative care, and supportive therapy. Conclusion: Physicians and other medical service providers who are involved in the diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up of GCT (all stages, outpatient and inpatient care as well as rehabilitation) are the users of the present guideline. The guideline also comprises quality indicators for measuring the implementation of the guideline recommendations in routine clinical care; these data will be presented in a future publication.
PDF
