Gospodarstvo se v znanstvenem spoznanju pojavlja v obliki abstrakcij, predmet ekonomije pa je sam po sebi relativnosten. To sta dva razloga, zakaj ekonomije ne smemo jemati kot vedo brez vrednosti - ...vedo brez vrednostnih sodb. Vrednost se pojavlja kot cilj gospodaijenja, nujna pa je tudi pri merjenju gospodarskih učinkov. Economy in scientific cognition appears as an abstract image. The subject of economy is in itself relative. These are the reasons why economy - as a science without values or evaluational judgment - cannot be comprehended. Values appear as a purpose or goal and are needed for assesing economic effects.
The subject matter treated is the relationship between the market and natural forms of doing business, viewed through finding relevance between the rules of dialectical development and historical ...movement of market relations. The analysis of dialectical thinking and empirical activities shows that there are no pure forms and substances, which is also valid for the area of relations of market and natural components in the sphere od doing business. The same ground is used also for the conclusion regarding the directions and methods of reform of Yugoslav economy and Yugoslav society.
U raspravama o društveno-ekonomskim problemima i promjenama ekonomskog i političkog sistema prisutna je tzv. eklektička »dijalektika« i pokušaj zamjene ekonomske nauke ekonomskom ideologijom i ...politikom. Suprotno tome u radu se zastupa jedan genetičko-evolucijski vs. teleološko utopijski pristup. Osnovne postavke genetičko-evolucijskog pristupa su da bez svojine kao pravne, ekonomske i socijalne kategorije nema ekonomije, da je razvijenost vlasničke strukture ovisna od razvijenosti i strukture objektivnih i subjektivnih snaga društvene proizvodnje, a da se legitimnost svojine određenog tipa potvrđuje kroz ekonomske i socijalne efekte koje ona reproducira.
U raspravama o društveno-ekonomskim problemima i promjenama ekonomskog i političkog sistema prisutna je tzv. eklektička »dijalektika« i pokušaj zamjene ekonomske nauke ekonomskom ideologijom i ...politikom. Suprotno tome u radu se zastupa jedan genetičko-evolucijski vs. teleološko utopijski pristup. Osnovne postavke genetičko-evolucijskog pristupa su da bez svojine kao pravne, ekonomske i socijalne kategorije nema ekonomije, da je razvijenost vlasničke strukture ovisna od razvijenosti i strukture objektivnih i subjektivnih snaga društvene proizvodnje, a da se legitimnost svojine određenog tipa potvrđuje kroz ekonomske i socijalne efekte koje ona reproducira.
While intellectuals belong to a social class -- the intelligentsia -- their place in society is paradoxical, as they define themselves in opposition to societal norms or consensus (as society's ..."critical conscience") even as they develop along & within it. The contemporary intellectual, living in an age termed postmodern or postindustrial, is nevertheless recognizably a product of bourgeois, industrial-capitalist society. The possible resolution of this paradox is addressed: the role of the intellectual will continue to evolve because it is important that modern society retain a critical conscience. 9 References. Adapted from the source document.
Scientific theories ostensibly seek to give accurate explanations of the objects of their research. In this light, a literature review examines a priori & a posteriori analyses of socioeconomic ...development. Criticisms are offered of the predominant social science paradigm frequently favored by economists: (1) incorrect immigration of the natural sciences; (2) the failure to consider the differentiation of human social sciences & the production of extremely diverse theoretical conclusions; (3) poor utilization of sorely needed dialects, while overrelying on formal logical & primarily quantitative methods; & (4) the use of dialects from Newtonian physics or Darwinian biology in lieu of the more suitable subjective-paradigmatic dialects. Special attention is given to the bifurcation of the social sciences between classical & neoliberal economic theories, on one hand, & historically oriented institution-based theories, on the other. Final remarks concern the projection of alternative institutional system changes. 9 References. Adapted from the source document.
Slovenian state efforts to join the European Union are discussed as part of a global process of the "intellectualization of the nations," which must be qualitatively different from earlier, largely ...colonial-imperial, processes, eg, the "Americanization of America." Two historical paradigms describe the position of Slovenia in Europe: the thesis on the historical discontinuity of Slovenian statehood under the aegis of the Austrian & Yugoslav states & the inferiority complex of the Slovenian people, who, because of their country's small size, have allegedly assimilated the "servant psychology." To analyze the prospects for Slovenian intellectual development, it is necessary to analyze postindependence problems: (1) growing conservatism of the broad social strata, (2) the discrepancy between actual development needs of the Slovene language & incessant reform debates; (3) the weak institutional basis of the educational system; (4) low social status of intellectuals, who have been historically considered parasites by elites & eccentrics by workers & peasants, & have been occasionally co-opted by the bureaucracy; & (5) fragmentation of the geographical-administrative territory, which facilitated the disintegration of the Slovene cultural-ethnic space. A. Devic
