V članku primerjamo Trubarjevi izdaji Pisma Rimljanom iz 1560 in 1582. Z izdajo 1560 je nadaljeval prevajanje prvega dela Novega testamenta, medtem ko je izdaja 1582 integrirana v celotni Novi ...testament. V izdaji iz 1582 je glede na izdajo iz 1560 več kot 400 jezikovnih sprememb. Spremembe so klasificirane glede na tiskovne napake, morfološke popravke, skladenjsko navezavo, vstavke in izpuščanja, pravopisne spremembe (velika in majhna začetnica, fonetizacija, postavljanje ločil), spremembo pravopisne in fonetične norme (jat, s/s, z/i, polglasnik idr.), semantiko, morfologijo in tvorbo besed ter leksiko.
Prehod slovenskega jezika iz kulturnega v knjižni je mogoče utemeljiti neposredno s pojavom zavestnega jezikovnega funkcionalizma v teološkem in pragmatičnem smislu, posredno pa z zavestjo ontološke ...vrednosti jezika in iz tega izvirajočega temeljnega, tedaj še implicitnega spoznanja o neupravičenosti vrednostne hierarhizacije jezikov. - Analiza Uvoda v Bohoričevo slovnico izloča tako funkcionalistični kot ontološki vidik razumevanja jezika, Dalmatinov prevod Biblije pa udejanja jezikovno kompetenčnost tedanjega časa na takšni ravni, da lahko govorimo o 16. stoletju kot narodotvornem času slovenstva.
Poleg - zlasti besediloslovnega - raziskovanja sodobnega stanja more biti zanimivo, kako je členke v prvem tiskanem slovenskem besedilu uporabljal Trubar, se pravi, kakšen je položaj členkov v ...izhodiščni točki, ko je jezik "spremenil agregatno stanje". Da je v katekizmu slaba četrtina različnih členkov glede na današnje število, je razumljivo tako z vidika razvoja kakor besedilnovrstne omejenosti katekizemskega besedila (v pridigi npr. je pogostnost različnih členkov nekaj večja). Najpogostejši (mestoma blizu prirednovezniški vlogi) je členek tudi, drugi najpogostejši je navezovalni pa (pag), sorazmerno visoko je uvrščen vsaj (z nekaj nejasnimi primeri), redek, a zanimiv je ja (ia; v celotnem Katekizmu trikrat) ipd. - Prispevek si przadeva podpreti misel, da so členki nasploh, kakor tudi že v prvem tiskanem besedilu, kazalnik intelektualizacije jezika na sporočanjski ravni.
Prispevek opisuje možne neposredne in posredne vire prve slovnice slovensekga jezika, ki jo je leta 1584 napisal Adam Bohorič. natančneje določi neposredne vire (Melanchthon, Donat) in opiše možne ...posredne vire, pri čemer se omeji na latinske humanistične slovnice (Valla, Perotti, Perger, Sulpicij, Nebrija, Manutius, Despauterius, Linacre, Alvarus, Scaliger, Ramus).
The monograph (‘The Slavic image of word : the forces of depiction in a Slavic language of the sixteenth century’) sets the groundwork for the elucidation of some historical development in the middle ...of the evolution of Slavic languages that also influenced the establishment of literary language both in Slovenia and Russia in the mid-sixteenth century (the beginning of Slavic literary and liturgy, the intertwining of Greek and Latin Christian linguistic patterns, connection to the East-West Schism in 1054).
This dictionary provides comprehensive information on the vocabulary used in the Slovenian literary language during the period of the Reformation. It was written based on complete concordance from ...all editions of Slovenian texts from the period 1550-1603. The word entries are accompanied by grammatical information, such as the part of speech used and other grammatical data. The extent of their use is shown by the attributed sources. The features of the linguistic system of that period are also shown by numerous notices regarding written, phonological and morphological variations.
The paper discusses the interactive relationship between verbal categories (aspect as point of departure, & time, voice, & mood) in the 16th-century Slovenian literary language. The findings are ...based on the analysis of examples of aspect-time, aspect-voice, & aspect-mood agreement or disagreement, established by comparing sample texts (particularly Trubar's (1557) & Dalmatin's (1584) translations of the Gospels). In addition, the comparison with Luther's translation of the Bible (1545) as Dalmatin's primary translation source, helped to illuminate the causes of this situation & phenomena. The author also points out several characteristic differences between the practices of Trubar's & Dalmatin's literary language, limited primarily to the verbal derivation & morphology. References. Adapted from the source document
The book (‘The Cyclorama of the Slavic Word (A Test of Renaissance Humanism through a Cross-Section of the Complete Works of Primož Trubar and Maximus the Greek)’) presents a detailed cultural and ...historical analysis of the problems associated with the attempts to link Western and Eastern Christianity since the first century of Christianization onward, with special attention being paid to the importance of the Slavic presence in European history, including questions regarding the role of individual contributions (biographical and historical overviews) to the spiritual history of the Christian East and West. This book uses juxtaposition to present the work, creativity and views of two key figures in Slovenia and Russia, Primož Trubar and Maximus the Greek (St. Maxim the Greek). The said Slavic authors, who also wrote in Latin, German and Greek, but consciously chose Slavic for very specific reasons (Primož Trubar used it as his mother language and Maximus the Greek as a language of salvation), are studied on the basis of primary archival sources, with special regard to manuscripts (of Maximus the Greek) and to early printing (of Primož Trubar) in the sixteenth century. In addition, Neža Zajc also critically analyzes the Renaissance period and presents the option of viewing it from a different perspective: the hypotheses to date that were based on secondary literature have proven to be insufficiently explanatory or proved unsatisfactory.
PDF
